References
- Borri, A., G. Castori, and A. Grazini. 2009. Retrofitting of masonry building with reinforced masonry ring-beam. Construction and Building Materials 23:1892–901. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.09.012.
- Borri, A., G. Castori, M. Corradi, and R. Sisti. 2014. Masonry wall panels with GFRP and steel-cord strengthening subjected to cyclic shear: An experimental study. Construction and Building Materials 56:63–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.056.
- Braga, F., M. Dolce, and D. Liberatore. 1982. A statistical study on damaged buildings and ensuing review of MSK-76 scale. 7th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering (7ECEE), Athens, Greece.
- Brando, G., A. Pagliaroli, G. Cocco, and F. Di Buccio. 2020. Site effects and damage scenarios: The case study of two historic centers following the 2016 Central Italy earthquake. Engineering Geology 272:105647. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105647.
- Brando, G., E. Criber, and G. De Matteis. 2015. The effects of L’aquila earthquake on the St. Gemma church in Goriano Sicoli: Part II—fem analysis. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13:3733–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9793-3.
- Brandonisio, G., G. Lucibello, E. Mele, and A. De Luca. 2013. Damage and performance evaluation of masonry churches in the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. Engineering Failure Analysis 34:693–714. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.01.021.
- Camassi, R., S. Del Mese, and C. Piccareda. 2003. Rilievo macrosismico degli effetti prodotti dal terremoto della Valle Scrivia dell’11 Aprile 2003. INGV. ( in Italian).
- Canuti, C., S. Carbonari, A. Dall’Asta, L. Dezi, F. Gara, G. Leoni, M. Morici, E. Petrucci, A. Prota, and A. Zona. 2019. Post-earthquake damage and vulnerability assessment of Churches in the Marche Region Struck by the 2016 Central Italy Seismic sequence. International Journal of Architectural Heritage:1–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2019.1653403.
- Casolo, S. 2017. A numerical study on the cumulative out-of-plane damage to church masonry façades due to a sequence of strong ground motions. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 46:2717–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2927.
- Casolo, S., and G. Uva. 2013. Nonlinear analysis of out‐of‐plane masonry façades: Full dynamic versus pushover methods by rigid body and spring model. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 42 (4):499–521. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2224.
- Casolo, S., S. Neumair, M. A. Parisi, and V. Petrini. 2000. Analysis of seismic damage patterns in old masonry church facades. Earthquake Spectra 16 (4):757–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586138.
- Ceroni, F., and A. Prota. 2009. Case study: Seismic upgrade of a masonry bell tower using GFRP ties. ASCE Journal of Composites for Construction 13 (3):188–97.
- Cescatti, E., P. Salzano, C. Casapulla, F. Ceroni, F. da Porto, and A. Prota. 2020. Damages to masonry churches after 2016–2017 Central Italy seismic sequence and definition of fragility curves. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 18 (1):297–329. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00729-7.
- Choudhury, T., G. Milani, and H. B. Kaushika. 2015. Comprehensive numerical approaches for the design and safety assessment of masonry buildings retrofitted with steel bands in developing countries: The case of India. Construction and Building Materials 85:227–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.02.082.
- Corradi, M., A. Di Schino, A. Borri, and R. Rufini. 2018. A review of the use of stainless steel for masonry repair and reinforcement. Construction and Building Materials 181:335–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.034.
- Cosenza, E., and I. Iervolino. 2007. Case study: Seismic retrofitting of a medieval bell tower with FRP. Journal of Composites for Construction 11:319–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:3(319).
- Criber, E., G. Brando, and G. De Matteis. 2015. The effects of L’Aquila earthquake on the St. Gemma church in Goriano Sicoli: Part I—damage survey and kinematic analysis. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13:3713–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9792-4.
- Curti, E., A. Galasco, S. Lagomarsino, S. Parodi, S. Podestà, and A. Lazzari. 2004. Il terremoto del 11 Aprile 2003 in Piemonte: Un nuovo modello per la stima dei costi per la riparazione e il miglioramento sismico delle chiese. XI Congresso Nazionale “L’ingegneria Sismica in Italia”, Genova, gennaio 25–29. ( in Italian).
- D’Ayala, D., and E. Speranza. 2003. Definition of collapse mechanisms and seismic vulnerability of historic masonry buildings. Journal of Earthquake Spectra 19 (3):479–509. doi:https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1599896.
- da Porto, F., F. Silva, C. Costa, and C. Modena. 2012. Macroscale analysis of damage to churches after earthquake in Abruzzo (Italy) on April 6, 2009. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 16:739–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2012.685207.
- De Matteis, G., E. Criber, and G. Brando. 2016. Damage probability matrices for three-nave masonry churches in Abruzzi after the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 10 (2–3):120–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2015.1113340.
- De Matteis, G., G. Brando, and V. Corlito. 2019a. Predictive model for seismic vulnerability assessment of churches based on the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 17:4909–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00656-7.
- De Matteis, G., and M. Zizi. 2019. Seismic damage prediction of masonry churches by a PGA-based approach. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 13 (7):1165–79. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2019.1597215.
- De Matteis, G., V. Corlito, M. Guadagnuolo, and A. Tafuro. 2019b. Seismic Vulnerability assessment and retrofitting strategies of Italian masonry churches of the Alife-Caiazzo Diocese in Caserta. International Journal of Architectural Heritage. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2019.1594450.
- Decanini, L., C. Gavarini, and F. Mollaioli. 1995. Proposta di definizione delle relazioni tra intensità macrosismica e parametri del moto del suolo. Proceedings of 7th national conference on “L’Ingegneria Sismica in Italia” (ANIDIS 1995), Siena, Italy, 63–72. ( in Italian).
- Doglioni, F. 2000. Codice di Pratica (Linee guida), Bollettino Ufficiale n. 15. Regione Marche, September 29. ( in Italian).
- Doglioni, F., A. Moretti, V. Petrini, and P. Angeletti. 1994. Le chiese e il terremoto. Dalla vulnerabilità constatata nel terremoto del Friuli al miglioramento antisismico nel restauro. Verso una politica di prevenzione. Lint Editoriale Associati, Trieste, Italy. ( in Italian).
- Faenza, L., and A. Michelini. 2010. Regression analysis of MCS intensity and ground motion parameters in Italy and its application in ShakeMap. Geophysical Journal International 180 (3):1138–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04467.x.
- Formisano, A. 2016. Theoretical and numerical seismic analysis of masonry building aggregates: Case studies in San Pio Delle Camere (L’Aquila, Italy). Journal of Earthquake Engineering21(2), 227–245.
- Formisano, A., G. Florio, R. Landolfo, and F. Mazzolani. 2015. Numerical calibration of an easy method for seismic behaviour assessment on large scale of masonry building aggregates. Advances in Engineering Software 80:116–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.09.013.
- Formisano, A., G. Vaiano, F. Fabbrocino, and G. Milani. 2018. Seismic vulnerability of Italian masonry churches: The case of the Nativity of Blessed Virgin Mary in Stellata of Bondeno. Journal of Building Engineering 20:179–200. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.07.017.
- Giaretton, M., M. R. Valluzzi, B. Mazzon, and C. Modena. 2017. Out-of-plane shake-table tests of strengthened multi-leaf stone masonry walls. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 15 (10):4299–317. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0125-7.
- GNDT-INGV. 2010. II level form for the evaluation of vulnerability in masonry buildings. Department of Civil Protection, Rome, Italy. ( in italian).
- Lagomarsino, S. 2012. Damage assessment of churches after L’Aquila earthquake (2009). Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 10 (1):73–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-011-9307-x.
- Lagomarsino, S., and S. Giovinazzi. 2006. Macroseismic and mechanical models for the vulnerability and damage assessment of current buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 4:415–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-006-9024-z.
- Lagomarsino, S., and S. Podestà. 2004a. Seismic vulnerability of ancient churches: I. Damage assessment and emergency planning. Earthquake Spectra 20 (2):377–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1737735.
- Lagomarsino, S., and S. Podestà. 2004b. Seismic vulnerability of ancient churches: II. Statistical analysis of surveyed data and methods for risk analysis. Earthquake Spectra 20 (2):395–412.
- Lagomarsino, S., and S. Podestà. 2004c. Damage and vulnerability assessment of churches after the 2002 Molise, Italy, earthquake. Earthquake Spectra 20 (S1):S271–S283. doi:https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1767161.
- Lourenço, P. B., D. V. Oliveira, J. C. Leite, J. M. Ingham, C. Modena, and F. Da Porto. 2013. Simplified indexes for the seismic assessment of masonry buildings: International database and validation. Engineering Failure Analysis 34:585–605. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.02.014.
- Lourenço, P. B., and J. A. Roque. 2006. Simplified indexes for the seismic vulnerability of ancient masonry buildings. Construction and Building Materials 20 (4):200–08. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.08.027.
- Margottini, C., D. Molin, and L. Serva. 1992. Intensity versus ground motion: A new approach using Italian data. Engineering Geology 33 (1):45–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(92)90034-V.
- MiBACT. 2015. Direttiva 23 aprile 2015: Aggiornamento della direttiva 12 dicembre 2013, relativa alle “Procedure per la gestione delle attività di messa in sicurezza e salvaguardia del patrimonio culturale in caso di emergenze derivanti da calamità naturali”. G.U. no. 169, July 23. ( in Italian).
- Milani, G., R. Shehu, and M. Valente. 2017. Possibilities and limitations of innovative retrofitting for masonry churches: Advanced computations on three case studies. Construction and Building Materials 147:239–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.075.
- Ministero per i Beni e le Attività Culturali. 2011. Linee Guida per la valutazione e riduzione del rischio sismico del patrimonio culturale allineate alle nuove Norme tecniche per le costruzioni (Guidelines for the assessment and mitigation of Seismic Risk of the cultural heritage coherent with the Italian Seismic Code). ( in Italian).
- National Office for Ecclesiastical Cultural Heritage and Religious Buildings of the CEI. 1996. https://www.beweb.chiesacattolica.it/inventories/.
- Penna, A., C. Calderini, L. Sorrentino, C. Carocci, E. Cescatti, R. Sisti, A. Borri, C. Modena, and A. Prota. 2019. Damage to churches in the 2016 central Italy earthquakes. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 17 (10):5763–90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00594-4.
- Preti, M., S. Loda, V. Bolis, S. Cominelli, A. Marini, and E. Giuriani. 2019. Dissipative roof diaphragm for the seismic retrofit of listed masonry churches. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 23 (8):1241–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2017.1360223.
- Ramos, L. F., and P. B. Lourenço. 2004. Modeling and vulnerability of historical city centers in seismic areas: A case study in Lisbon. Engineering Structures 26 (9):1295–310. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.04.008.
- Rosati, G. 2019. La valutazione della riduzione del rischio sismico nel patrimonio Ecclesiastico. Il caso delle chiese del Piemonte sud-orientale a quindici anni dal sisma del 2003. Politecnico di Torino. ( in Italian).
- Ruggieri, S., D. Perrone, M. Leone, G. Uva, and M. A. Aiello. 2020. A prioritization RVS methodology for the seismic risk assessment of RC school buildings. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 51:101807. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101807.
- Salzano, P., C. Casapulla, F. Ceroni, and A. Prota. 2020. Seismic vulnerability and simplified safety assessments of masonry churches in the Ischia Island (Italy) after the 2017 earthquake. International Journal of Architectural Heritage:1–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2020.1759732.
- Sieberg, A. 1930. Scala MCS (Mercalli-Cancani-Sieberg). Geologie der Erdbeben, Handbuch der Geophysik 2:552–55.
- Taffarel, S., M. Giaretton, F. da Porto, and C. Modena. 2016. Damage and vulnerability assessment of URM buildings after the 2012 Northern Italy earthquakes. Proceedings of 16th Brick and Block masonry conference (IBMAC2016), Padua, Italy, 2455–62.
- Tosto, C. 2019. Studi preliminari per la schedatura e la valutazione della vulnerabilità sismica degli edifici religiosi. Il caso delle chiese danneggiate dal terremoto del 2003 nel tortonese. Politecnico di Torino. ( in Italian).
- Uva, G., C. A. Sanjust, S. Casolo, and M. Mezzina. 2016. ANTAEUS project for the regional vulnerability assessment of the current building stock in historical centers. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 10 (1):20–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2014.935983.
- Uva, G., V. Sangiorgio, S. Ruggieri, and F. Fatiguso. 2019. Structural vulnerability assessment of masonry churches supported by user-reported data and modern Internet of Things (IoT). Measurement 131:183–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.08.014.
- Valluzzi, M. R., F. da Porto, and C. Modena. 2004. Behavior and modeling of strengthened three-leaf stone masonry walls. Materials and Structures 37 (3):184–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02481618.
- Valluzzi, M. R., L. Binda, and C. Modena. 2005. Mechanical behaviour of historic masonry structures strengthened by bed joints structural repointing. Construction and Building Materials 19 (1):63–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.04.036.