Automatic Procedures for the Safety Assessment of Stand-alone Masonry Arches

References

• Aita, D., R. Barsotti, S. Bennati, and F. Foce. 2004. The statics of pointed masonry arches between ‘limit’ and ‘elastic’ analysis. In Arch bridges IV. Advances in assessment, structural design and construction, ed. P. Roca, and C. Molins. Barcelona, Spain: CIMNE, pp. 354-362.
   Google Scholar
• Alberti, L. B. 1546. Dieci Libri De L’Architettvra Di Leon Battista De Gli Alberti Fiorentino […]. Venice: Ed. Vincenzo Vaugris.
   Google Scholar
• Alexakis, H., and N. Makris. 2015. Limit equilibrium analysis of masonry arches. Archive of Applied Mechanics 85 (9–10):1363–81. doi:10.1007/s00419-014-0963-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandonisio, G., V. Angelillo, and A. De Luca. 2020. Seismic capacity of buttressed masonry arches. Engineering Structures 215:110661. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandonisio, G., G. Lucibello, E. Mele, and A. De Luca. 2013. Damage and performance evaluation of masonry churches in the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. Engineering Failure Analysis 34:693–714. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.01.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandonisio, G., E. Mele, and A. De Luca. 2017. Limit analysis of masonry circular buttressed arches under horizontal loads. Meccanica 52 (11–12):2547–65. doi:10.1007/s11012-016-0609-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacace, D., J. Rouhi, M. Zizi, and G. De Matteis. 2019. Vulnerabilità sismica di archi in muratura: Uno studio parametrico con approccio cinematico. In: Proceedings of XVIII Convegno ANIDIS - L’Ingegneria Sismica in Italia, Ascoli Piceno, Italy, September 15–19.
   Google Scholar
• Calderini, C., and S. Lagomarsino. 2014. Seismic response of masonry arches reinforced by tie-rods: Static tests on a scale model. Journal of Structural Engineering 141 (5). doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cascini, L., R. Gagliardo, and F. Portioli. 2020. LiABlock_3D: A software tool for collapse mechanism analysis of historic masonry structures. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 14 (1):75–94. doi:10.1080/15583058.2018.1509155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavalagli, N., V. Gusella, and L. Severini. 2016. -Lateral loads carrying capacity and minimum thickness of circular and pointed masonry arches. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 115–116:645–56. doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.07.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coccia, S., and M. Como. 2015. Minimum thrust of rounded cross vaults. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 9 (4):468–84. doi:10.1080/15583058.2013.804965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Como, M. 2013. Statics of historic masonry constructions. Berlin: Ed. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Da Porto, F., G. Tecchio, P. Zampieri, C. Modena, and A. Prota. 2015. Simplified seismic assessment of railway masonry arch bridges by limit analysis. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 12 (5):567–91. doi:10.1080/15732479.2015.1031141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danyzy, A. 1732. Méthode générale pour dèterminer la résistance qu’il faut opposer à la poussée des voûtes. Histoire de la Société des Sciences établie à Montpellier 2:40–56.
   Google Scholar
• De Luca, A., A. Giordano, and E. Mele. 2004. A simplified procedure for assessing the seismic capacity of masonry arches. Engineering Structures 26:1915–29. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Matteis, G., G. Brando, and V. Corlito. 2019. Predictive model for seismic vulnerability assessment of churches based on the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 17 (9):4909–36. doi:10.1007/s10518-019-00656-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Matteis, G., D. Cacace, M. Zizi, and J. Rohui. 2019. Seismic behaviour of Gothic transversal arcades: A preliminary parametric investigation. In: Advances in Engineering Materials, Structures and Systems: Innovations, Mechanics and Applications - Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Structural Engineering, Mechanics and Computation, Cape Town, South Africa, September 2-4.
   Google Scholar
• De Matteis, G., and F. M. Mazzolani. 2010. The Fossanova Church: Seismic vulnerability assessment by numeric and physical testing. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 4 (3):222–45. doi:10.1080/15583050903078903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Matteis, G., and M. Zizi. 2019. Seismic damage prediction of masonry churches by a PGA-based approach. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 13 (7):1165–79. doi:10.1080/15583058.2019.1597215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitri, R., and F. Tornabene. 2015. A parametric investigation of the seismic capacity for masonry arches and portals of different shapes. Engineering Failure Analysis 52:1–34. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.02.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.U. no. 35. 2019 January 21. (suppl. ord. no. 5). Circular no. 7, Instructions for application of the “Update of the «Technical Codes for the design of constructions»” issued by D.M. 17/ 01/2018(in Italian). Rome, Italy: Ministry of Infrastructures and Transports.
   Google Scholar
• G.U. no. 47. 2011 February 26. (suppl. ord. no. 54). Directive of the Prime Minister dated on 9/02/2011, Assessment and mitigation of seismic risk of cultural heritage with reference to the Technical Code for the design of constructions, issued by D.M. 14/1/2008 (in Italian). Rome, Italy: Ministry of Public Building and Works.
   Google Scholar
• G.U. no. 8. 2018 February 20. (suppl. ord. no. 42). Ministerial Decree dated on 17/01/2018, Update of the “Technical Codes for the design of constructions” (in Italian). Rome, Italy: Ministry of Infrastructures and Transports.
   Google Scholar
• Gaetani, A., P. B. Lourenço, G. Monti, and G. Milani. 2017. A parametric investigation on the seismic capacity of masonry cross vaults. Engineering Structure 148:686–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyman, J. 1982. The masonry arch. Chichester: Ellis Horwood Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Heyman, J. 1995. The stone skeleton: Structural engineering of masonry architecture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hofer, L., P. Zampieri, M. A. Zanini, F. Faleschin, and C. Pellegrino. 2018. Seismic damage survey and empirical fragility curves for churches after the August 24, 2016 Central Italy earthquake. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 111:98–109. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.02.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horne, M. R. 1979. Plastic theory of structures. 2nd ed. Oxford: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Kooharian, A. 1952. Limit analysis of voussoir (segmental) and concrete arches. Journal of the American Concrete Institute 24 (4):317–28.
   Google Scholar
• Lagomarsino, S. 2011. Damage assessment of churches after L’Aquila earthquake (2009). Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 10 (1):73–92. doi:10.1007/s10518-011-9307-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marotta, A., L. Sorrentino, M. Liberatore, and J. M. Ingham. 2017. Vulnerability assessment of unreinforced masonry churches following the 2010–2011 canterbury earthquake sequence. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 21 (6):912–34. doi:10.1080/13632469.2016.1206761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mèry, E. 1840. Sur l’equilibre des voutes en berceu. Paris, France: Annales de Ponts et Chaussess.
   Google Scholar
• Milani, G. 2015. Upper bound sequential linear programming mesh adaptation scheme for collapse analysis of masonry vaults. Advances in Engineering Software 79:91–110. doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misseri, G., and L. Rovero. 2017. Parametric investigation on the dynamic behaviour of masonry pointed arches. Archive of Applied Mechanics 87 (3):385–404. doi:10.1007/s00419-016-1199-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monti, G., M. Vailati, A. Gaetani, and A. Paolone. 2014. Analytical models for seismic assessment and strengthening of masonry arches. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Masonry Conference, Guimarães, Portugal, July 7-9.
   Google Scholar
• Palazzi, N. C., L. Rovero, J. C. De La Llera, and C. Sandoval. 2020. Preliminary assessment on seismic vulnerability of masonry churches in Central Chile. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 14 (6):829–48. doi:10.1080/15583058.2019.1570388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulatsu, B., E. M. Bretas, and P. B. Lourenço. 2016. Discrete element modeling of masonry structures: Validation and application. Earthquake and Structures 11 (4):563–82. doi:10.12989/eas.2016.11.4.563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romano, A., and J. A. Ochsendorf. 2010. The mechanics of gothic masonry arches. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 4 (1):59–82. doi:10.1080/15583050902914660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockdale, G., and G. Milani. 2019. Diagram based assessment strategy for first-order analysis of masonry arches. Journal of Building Engineering 22:122–29. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2018.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockdale, G., S. Tiberti, D. Camilletti, G. Sferrazza Papa, A. Basshofi Habieb, E. Bertolesi, G. Milani, S. Casolo, et al. 2018. Kinematic collapse load calculator: Circular arches. SoftwareX 7:175–79. doi:10.1016/j.softx.2018.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tempesta, G., and S. Galassi. 2019. Safety evaluation of masonry arches. A numerical procedure based on the thrust line closest to the geometrical axis. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 155:206–21. doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.02.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zampieri, P., N. Simoncello, and C. Pellegrino. 2018. Seismic capacity of masonry arches with irregular abutments and arch thickness. Construction and Building Materials 201:786–806. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zampieri, P., G. Tecchio, F. Da Porto, and C. Modena. 2015. Limit analysis of transverse seismic capacity of multi-span masonry arch bridges. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13 (5):1557–79. doi:10.1007/s10518-014-9664-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar