Numerical and Experimental Response of Free-Standing Art Objects Subjected to Ground Motion

References

• Aicardi, I., F. Chiabrando, N. Grasso, A. M. Lingua, F. Noardo, and A. T. Spanò. 2016. UAV photogrammetry with oblique images: First analysis on data acquisition and processing. International Archives of the Photogrammetry XLI:835–42.
   Google Scholar
• Bachmann, J. A., M. F. Vassiliou, and B. Stojadinovic. 2019. Rolling and rocking of rigid uplifting structures. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 48 (14):1556–74. doi:10.1002/eqe.3213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolognesi, M., A. Furini, V. Russo, A. Pellegrinelli, and P. Russo. 2014. Accuracy of cultural heritage 3D models by RPAS and terrestrial photogrammetry. International Archives of the Photogrammetry XL-5:113–19.
   Google Scholar
• Borri, A., and A. Grazini. 2006. Diagnostic analysis of the lesions and stability of Michelangelo’s David. Journal of Cultural Heritage 7:273–85. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2006.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, D., and C. Wolfgang. 2011. Simulating what you see: Combining computer modeling with video analysis. MPTL 16 – HSCI 2011, Ljubljana. September 15–17.
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, E. 1914. On physically similar systems; Illustrations of the use of dimensional equations. Physical Review 4 (4):345–76. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.4.345.
   Google Scholar
• Caliò, I., and M. Marletta. 2003. Passive control of the seismic rocking response of art objects. Engineering Structures 25:1009–18. doi:10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00045-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caliò, I., and M. Marletta. 2004. On the mitigation of the seismic risk of art objects: Case-studies. 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada, August 1–6, Paper No. 2828.
   Google Scholar
• Carnevali, L., E. Ippoliti, F. Lanfranchi, S. Menconero, M. Russo, and V. Russo. 2018. Close-range mini-UAVs photogrammetry for architecture survey. International Archives of the Photogrammetry XLII-2:217–24.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, E. C. 1998. Seismic Testing of Structures. Paper presented at 11th European Conference on Earthquake, Paris, France, Balkema, Rotterdam, 53–64. ISBN: 9054109823.
   Google Scholar
• Cerri, G., G. Pirazzoli, M. Tanganelli, G. Verdiani, T. Rotunno, B. Pintucchi, and S. Viti. 2018. Seismic assessment of artefacts: The case of Juno’s fountain of the National Museum of Bargello. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 364:012057. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/364/1/012057.
   Google Scholar
• Cocuzza Avellino, G. 2020. Rigid body seismic vulnerability and protection by means of low-cost rolling ball system isolator: numerical and experimental analyses, thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Sds Architettura in Siracusa, Università degli studi di Catania.
   Google Scholar
• Cocuzza Avellino, G., I. Caliò, F. Cannizzaro, S. Caddemi, and N. Impollonia. 2019. Response spectra of rigid blocks with uncertain behaviour. Paper presented at COMPDYN 7th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Crete, Greece, June 24–26.
   Google Scholar
• De Canio, G. 2012. Marble devices for the base isolation of the two Bronzes of Riace: A proposal for the David of Michelangelo. Paper presented at 15 WCEE,15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisboa, Portugal, September 24–28.
   Google Scholar
• Di Egidio, A., and A. Contento. 2009. Base isolation of slide-rocking non-symmetric rigid block under impulsive and seismic excitations. Engineering Structures 31:2723–34. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.06.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Egidio, A., and A. Contento. 2010. Seismic response of a non-symmetric rigid block on a constrained oscillating base. Engineering Structures 32:3028–39. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.05.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty, K., M. C. Griffith, N. Lam, and J. Wilson. 2002. Displacement-based seismic analysis for out-of-plane bending of unreinforced masonry walls. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 31:833–50. doi:10.1002/eqe.126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ElGawady, M. A., Q. Ma, J. Butterworth, and J. M. Ingham. 2006. Probabilistic analysis of rocking blocks. Technical Conference, NZ Society for Earthquake Engineering, Napier, New Zealand, 10 Mar 2006 - 12 Mar 2006. Editors: Brabhaharan P. Remembering Napier 1931, Building on 75 years of Earthquake Engineering in New Zealand. 1-8. 2006. Paper Number 17.
   Google Scholar
• Giannini, R., A. Giuffre, and R. Masiani. 1986. La dinamica delle strutture composte di blocchi sovrapposti: Studi in corso sulla colonna Antoniana. Paper presented at VIII Congresso nazionale dell’Associazione Italiana di meccanica Teorica ed Applicata, Turin, Italy, September 29 – October 3, 1:299–304.
   Google Scholar
• Housner, G. W. 1963. The behavior of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 53:404–17.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, M. Y., H. Lee, J. H. Kim, and I. Y. Yang. 2003. Chaotic behavior on rocking vibration of rigid body block structure under two-dimensional sinusoidal excitation (in the case of no sliding). KSME International Journal 17 (9):1249–60. doi:10.1007/BF02982466.
   Google Scholar
• Kalliontzis, D., Sritharan, S., & Schultz, A. (2016). Improved Coefficient of Restitution Estimation for Free Rocking Members. Journal of Structural Engineering (United States), 142(12): 06016002 0601600206016002.
   Google Scholar
• Kounadis, A. N. 2010. On the overturning instability of a rectangular rigid block under ground excitation. The Open Mechanics Journal 4:43–57. doi:10.2174/1874158401004010043.
   Google Scholar
• Linee guida per la valutazione e la riduzione del rischio sismico del patrimonio culturale con riferimento alle Norme tecniche per le costruzioni di cui al decreto del Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei trasporti del 14 gennaio 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Lowry, M., B. J. Farrar, D. Armendariz, and J. Podany. 2007. Protecting Collections in the J. Paul Getty Museum from Earthquake Damage. WAAC Newsletter29(3):16-23. September.
   Google Scholar
• Ministero delle infrastrutture e dei trasporti. Decreto 17 gennaio 2018. Aggiornamento delle “Norme tecniche per le costruzioni” – NTC18.
   Google Scholar
• Podany, J. 2015. An overview of seismic damage mitigation for Museums. Paper presented at International Symposium on Advances of Protection Devices for Museum Exhibits, Beijing and Shanghai, China, April 13–17.
   Google Scholar
• Remondino, F., L. Barazzetti, F. Nex, M. Scaioni, and D. Sarazzi. 2011. UAV photogrammetry for mapping and 3d modeling -current status and future perspectives. International Archives of the Photogrammetry XXXVIII-1:25–31.
   Google Scholar
• Seismosoft. 2020. SeismoArtif - A computer program for generation of artificial accelerograms”. www.seismosoft.com.
   Google Scholar
• Shenton III, H. W., and N. P. Jones. 1991. Base excitation of rigid bodies. I: Formulation. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 117 (10):2286–306. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1991)117:10(2286).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonda, D., A. Cigada, G. Ciccaldo, A. Goppion, A. V. Pollini, and D. Aisaf 2017. Seismic and vibration protection of the statue “Pietà Rondanini” by Michelangelo. Paper presented at XVII Conference Anidis, Pistoia, Italy, September 17–21.
   Google Scholar
• Spanos, P. D., A. Di Matteo, A. Pirrotta, and M. Di Paola. 2017. Nonlinear rocking of rigid blocks on flexible foundation: Analysis and experiments. Procedia Engineering 199:284–89. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.032.
   Google Scholar
• Tocci, C. 1996. Dinamica delle strutture a blocchi sovrapposti. Le colonne isolate. Phd thesis, Facoltà di architettura Università di Roma “La Sapienza”, Rome.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, C. S. 2012. Advanced Base Isolation Systems for Light Weight Equipments. in: Earthquake-Resistant Structures - Design, Assessment and Rehabilitation, ed. A. Moustafa, In-Tech: Guandong, China; 79-130.
   Google Scholar
• Valenti, R., and E. Paternò. 2017. The Itineraries of Drawing: From museum works to art places. In: Di Luggo A., Giordano P., Florio R., Papa L.M., Rossi A., Zerlenga O., Bara S., Campi M., Cirafici A. (eds), Territories and frontiers of representation. Proceedings of the 39th International Conference of Teachers of the disciplines of the Representation, pp. 1307–1314, Roma: Gangemi Editore. ISBN: 978–88–492–3507–4
   Google Scholar
• Valenti R., Paternò E. (2021) Imagined Spaces in Church Architectural Furnishings: Solomon’s Temple in Small-Scale Architectural Language. In: Gambardella C., Cennamo C., Germanà M.L., Shahidan M.F., Bougdah H. (eds) Advances in Utopian Studies and Sacred Architecture. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation (IEREK Interdisciplinary Series for Sustainable Development), pp. 203-213, Springer, Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Wittich, C. E., and T. C. Hutchinson. 2015. Shake table tests of stiff, unattached, asymmetric structures. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 44:2425–43. doi:10.1002/eqe.2589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yim, C. S., A. K. Chopra, and J. Penzien. 1980. Rocking response of rigid blocks to earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 8:565–87. doi:10.1002/eqe.4290080606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar