Combining Structural and Non-structural Risk-reduction Measures to Improve Evacuation Safety in Historical Built Environments

References

• Aguado, J. L. P., T. M. Ferreira, and P. B. Lourenço. 2018. The use of a large-scale seismic vulnerability assessment approach for masonry façade walls as an effective tool for evaluating, managing and mitigating seismic risk in historical centers. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 12 (7–8):1259–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2018.1503366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguado, J. L. P. 2017. Vulnerability assessment as a tool to mitigate and manage seismic risk in old urban areas, University of Minho.
   Google Scholar
• Benedetti, D., and V. Petrini. 1984. On seismic vulnerability of masonry buildings: Proposal of an evaluation procedure. L’industria Delle Construzioni 18:66–78.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardini, G., M. D’Orazio, and E. Quagliarini. 2016. Towards a ‘Behavioural Design’ approach for seismic risk reduction strategies of buildings and their environment. Safety Science 86 (July):273–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.03.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardini, G., M. Lucesoli, and E. Quagliarini. 2020. Sustainable planning of seismic emergency in historic centres through semeiotic tools: Comparison of different existing methods through real case studies. Sustainable Cities and Society 52 (January):101834. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101834.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardini, G., R. Lovreglio, and E. Quagliarini. 2019. Proposing behavior-oriented strategies for earthquake emergency evacuation: A behavioral data analysis from New Zealand, Italy and Japan. Safety Science 116 (July):295–309. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.03.023.
   Google Scholar
• Caliendo, C., P. Ciambelli, R. Del Regno, M. G. Meo, and P. Russo. 2020. Modelling and numerical simulation of pedestrian flow evacuation from a multi-storey historical building in the event of fire applying safety engineering tools. Journal of Cultural Heritage 41 (January):188–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2019.06.010.
   Google Scholar
• D’Orazio, M., E. Quagliarini, G. Bernardini, and L. Spalazzi. 2014. EPES – Earthquake pedestrians׳ evacuation simulator: A tool for predicting earthquake pedestrians׳ evacuation in urban outdoor scenarios. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 10 (PA). Elsevier:153–77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.08.002.
   Google Scholar
• D’Orazio, M., S. Longhi, P. Olivetti, and G. Bernardini. 2015. Design and experimental evaluation of an interactive system for pre-movement time reduction in case of fire. Automation in Construction 52 (April). Elsevier B.V.:16–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.02.015.
   Google Scholar
• De Matteis, G., V. Corlito, M. Guadagnuolo, and A. Tafuro. 2020. Seismic vulnerability assessment and retrofitting strategies of Italian masonry churches of the Alife-Caiazzo diocese in caserta. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 14 (8):1180–95. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2019.1594450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Der Sarkissian, R., C. Abdallah, J. M. Zaninetti, and S. Najem. 2020. Modelling intra-dependencies to assess road network resilience to natural hazards. Natural Hazards 103 (1). Springer Science and Business Media B.V.:121–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-03962-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durak, S., Y. Erbil, and N. Akıncıtürk. 2011. Sustainability of an architectural heritage site in Turkey: Fire risk assessment in Misi village. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 5 (3):334–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15583051003642721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• English, E. C., M. Chen, R. Zarins, P. Patange, and J. C. Wiser. 2019. Building resilience through flood risk reduction: The benefits of amphibious foundation retrofits to heritage structures. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, December:1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2019.1695154.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, T. M., N. Mendes, and R. Silva. 2019. Reducing the seismic vulnerability of existing buildings: Assessment and retrofit. Buildings 9 (6):148. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings9060148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, T. M., R. Maio, and R. Vicente. 2017. Analysis of the impact of large scale seismic retrofitting strategies through the application of a vulnerability-based approach on traditional masonry buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 16 (2):329–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-017-0385-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, T. M., R. Vicentea, and H. Varum. 2014. Seismic vulnerability assessment of masonry facade walls: Development, application and validation of a new scoring method. Structural Engineering and Mechanics 50 (4):541–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2014.50.4.541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, T. M., X. Romão, P. B. Lourenço, E. Paupério, and N. Martins. 2020. Risk and resilience in practice: Cultural heritage buildings. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, May:1–3. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2020.1759007.
   Google Scholar
• French, E. L., S. J. Birchall, K. Landman, and R. D. Brown. 2019. Designing public open space to support seismic resilience: A systematic review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 34 (March). Elsevier:1–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.11.001.
   Google Scholar
• Gavarini, C. 2001. Seismic risk in historical centers. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 21 (5):459–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(01)00027-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuliani, F., A. De Falco, and V. Cutini. 2020. The role of urban configuration during disasters. A scenario-based methodology for the post-earthquake emergency management of Italian historic centres. Safety Science 127 (February). Elsevier:104700. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104700.
   Google Scholar
• Goretti, A., and V. Sarli. 2006. Road network and damaged buildings in urban areas: Short and long-term interaction. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 4 (2):159–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-006-9004-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granda, S., and T. M. Ferreira. 2019. Large-scale vulnerability and fire risk assessment of the historic centre of Quito, Ecuador. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, September:1–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2019.1665142.
   Google Scholar
• Grünthal, G. 1998. European macroseismic scale 1998 (EMS-98), Vol. 15. Luxembourg: Cahiers Du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie 15. Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, Z.-H., J.-B. Sheu, and L. Xiao. 2014. Post-disaster evacuation and temporary resettlement considering panic and panic spread. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 69. Elsevier Ltd:112–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2014.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Italian technical commission for seismic micro-zoning. 2014. Handbook of analysis of emergency conditions in urban scenarios (Manuale per l’analisi della condizione limite dell’emergenza dell’insediamento urbano (CLE); in Italian), Edited by F. Bramerini, and S. Castenetto. 1st ed. Rome, Italy: BetMultimedia 978-88-97457-00-8 .
   Google Scholar
• Kaveh, A., S. M. Javadi, and R. M. Moghanni. 2020. Emergency management systems after disastrous earthquakes using optimization methods: A comprehensive review. Advances in Engineering Software 149 (July). Elsevier:102885. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2020.102885.
   Google Scholar
• Kimms, A., and M. Maiwald. 2018. Bi-objective safe and resilient urban evacuation planning. European Journal of Operational Research 269 (3):1122–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.02.050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klüpfel, T., and H. Meyer-König. 2014. PedGo guardian: An assistant for evacuation decision making. In Pedestrian and evacuation dynamics 2012, ed. U. Weidmann, U. Kirsch, and M. Schreckenberg, 445–54 978-3-319-02446-2 . Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-02447-9.
   Google Scholar
• Lagomarsino, S. 2006. On the vulnerability assessment of monumental buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 4 (4):445–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-006-9025-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoba, T. I., D. J. Kaup, and N. M. Finkelstein. 2005. Modifications of the Helbing-Molnar-Farkas-Vicsek social force model for pedestrian evolution. Simulation 81 (5):339–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0037549705052772.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, X., Z. Yang, G. P. Cimellaro, and Z. Xu. 2019. Pedestrian evacuation simulation under the scenario with earthquake-induced falling debris. Safety Science 114 (April). Elsevier:61–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.12.028.
   Google Scholar
• Lumbroso, D., and M. Davison. 2018. Use of an agent-based model and Monte Carlo analysis to estimate the effectiveness of emergency management interventions to reduce loss of life during extreme floods. Journal of Flood Risk Management 11 (January):S419–S433. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12230.
   Google Scholar
• Marrion, C. E. 2016. More effectively addressing fire/Disaster challenges to protect our cultural heritage. Journal of Cultural Heritage 20 (July). Elsevier Masson SAS:746–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2016.03.013.
   Google Scholar
• Martino, A., F. Fatiguso, G. De Tommasi, and J. Casal. 2016. Accidental impacts on historical and architectural heritage in port areas: The case of brindisi. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, June. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2016.1204486.
   Google Scholar
• Martins, A. N., A. A. Pereira, C. Forbes, J. L. M. P. de Lima, and D. Matos. 2020. Risk to cultural heritage in baixa pombalina (Lisbon downtown) - A transdisciplinary approach to exposure and drivers of vulnerability. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, April:1–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2020.1745322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrovčič, S., and V. Kilar. 2020. Design considerations for retrofitting of historic masonry structures with externally bonded FRP systems. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, December:1–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2020.1853278.
   Google Scholar
• PreventionWeb - UNDRR. 2020. Accessed January 10. https://www.preventionweb.net/terminology#D.
   Google Scholar
• Raikes, J., T. F. Smith, C. Jacobson, and C. Baldwin. 2019. Pre-disaster planning and preparedness for floods and droughts: A systematic review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 38 (May). Elsevier Ltd:101207. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101207.
   Google Scholar
• Romão, X., and E. Paupério. 2021. An indicator for post-disaster economic loss valuation of impacts on cultural heritage. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 15 (5):678–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2019.1643948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronchi, E., E. D. Kuligowski, P. A. Reneke, R. D. Peacock, and D. Nilsson. 2013. The process of verification and validation of building fire evacuation models, NIST Technical Note 1822.
   Google Scholar
• Rus, K., V. Kilar, and D. Koren. 2018. Resilience assessment of complex urban systems to natural disasters: A new literature review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 31 (January). Elsevier Ltd:311–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.015.
   Google Scholar
• Russo, M., M. Angelosanti, G. Bernardini, E. Cantatore, A. D’Amico, E. Currà, F. Fatiguso, G. Mochi, and E. Quagliarini. 2020. Morphological systems of open spaces in built environment prone to sudden-onset disasters. International Conference on Sustainability in Energy and Buildings SEB 2020, Split, Croatia, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Russo, M., M. Angelosanti, G. Bernardini, E. Cantatore, A. D’Amico, E. Currà, F. Fatiguso, G. Mochi, and E. Quagliarini. 2021. Morphological systems of open spaces in built environment prone to sudden-onset disasters. In Sustainability in energy and buildings 2020 (Part of the smart innovation, systems and technologies book series - SIST, Volume 203 – 2190-3018), ed. J. Littlewood, R. J. Howlett, and L. C. Jain, 321–31. Singapore: Springer. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8783-2_27.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. 1980. The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. In Priority setting. Resource allocation. London: MacGraw-Hill, New York International Book Company 978-0070543713 .
   Google Scholar
• Santarelli, S., G. Bernardini, and E. Quagliarini. 2018. Earthquake building debris estimation in historic city centres: From real world data to experimental-based criteria. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 31 (October):281–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.017.
   Google Scholar
• Santarelli, S., G. Bernardini, E. Quagliarini, and M. D’Orazio. 2018. New indices for the existing city-centers streets network reliability and availability assessment in earthquake emergency. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 12 (2):153–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2017.1328543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiwakoti, N., M. Sarvi, and G. Rose. 2008. Modelling pedestrian behaviour under emergency conditions – State-of-the-art and future directions. 31st Australasian Transport Research Forum (ATRF) October 2-3 Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia, 457–73.
   Google Scholar
• Shrestha, S. R., R. Sliuzas, and M. Kuffer. 2018. Open spaces and risk perception in post-earthquake Kathmandu city. Applied Geography 93 (April). Pergamon:81–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APGEOG.2018.02.016.
   Google Scholar
• Veeraswamy, A., E. R. Galea, L. Filippidis, P. J. Lawrence, S. Haasanen, R. J. Gazzard, and T. E. L. Smith. 2018. The simulation of urban-scale evacuation scenarios with application to the swinley forest fire. Safety Science 102 (February):178–93. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.07.015.
   Google Scholar
• Vicente, R., T. M. Ferreira, and J. A. R. M. Da Silva. 2015. Supporting urban regeneration and building refurbishment. Strategies for building appraisal and inspection of old building stock in city centres. Journal of Cultural Heritage 16 (1):1–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2014.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, Y., Y. Zhang, T. Yao, K. Wong, J. Y. Tsou, and Y. Zhang. 2021. A GIS-based system for spatial-temporal availability evaluation of the open spaces used as emergency shelters: The case of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 10 (2):63. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10020063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasufuku, K., Y. Akizuki, A. Hokugo, Y. Takeuchi, A. Takashima, T. Matsui, H. Suzuki, and A. T. K. Pinheiro. 2017. Noticeability of illuminated route signs for tsunami evacuation. Fire Safety Journal 91 (May). Elsevier Ltd:926–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2017.04.038.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, L., H. Li, Y. Sun, R. Huang, Q. Hu, J. Wang, and F. Gao. 2017. Planning emergency shelters for urban disaster resilience: An integrated location-allocation modeling approach. Sustainability (Switzerland) 9 (11):1–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su9112098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar