Arch Stone Bridges: Procedures for Evaluation of Structural Integrity

References

• https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us7000df40/executive?fbclid=IwAR1bFLQl4_2j0R26b_FodKSCK_LMhvhGj_VHbb8ooV3M14rvLwKfgeJAz4o
   Google Scholar
• Accornero, F., G. Lacidogna, and A. Carpinteri. 2018. Medieval arch bridges in the Lanzo Valleys, Italy: Cases studies on incremental structural analysis and fracturing benefit. Journal of Bridge Engineering 23 (7):7. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• agisoft metashape 1.7 (Licensed user) 2020 . www.agisoft.com
   Google Scholar
• ASCE/SEI 41. 2017. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). Reston, VA: USA.
   Google Scholar
• Carpinteri, A., G. Lacidogna, and N. Pugno. 2007. Structural damage diagnosis and life-time assessment by acoustic emission monitoring. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 74 (1–2):273–89. doi:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.01.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charter of Venice. 1964. www.icomos.org
   Google Scholar
• CSA S6. 2019. Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code. csagroup.org
   Google Scholar
• D’Altri, A. M., V. Sarhosis, G. Milani, J. Rots, S. Cattari, S. Lagomarsino, E. Sacco, A. Tralli, G. Castellazzi, S. de Miranda . 2020. Modeling strategies for the computational analysis of unreinforced masonry structures: Review and classification. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 27:1153–85. doi:10.1007/s11831-019-09351-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EN 1991-2. 2003. Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 2: Traffic loads on bridges. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization (CEN.
   Google Scholar
• EN 1996- 1-1. 2005. Eurocode 6: Design of masonry structures – Part 1-1: General rules for reinforced and unreinforced masonry structures. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization (CEN.
   Google Scholar
• EN 1998-1. 2004. Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance – Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization (CEN.
   Google Scholar
• EN 1998-3. 2005. Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance - Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization (CEN.
   Google Scholar
• EN 1998-3 NEN SC8 PT3. 2021. Eurocode 8–design of structures for earthquake resistance - Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings and bridges. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization (CEN.
   Google Scholar
• EN12620. 2013. Aggregates for concrete. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization (CEN.
   Google Scholar
• EN1998-3. 2021. Annex E.2. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization (CEN.
   Google Scholar
• HEC-RAS 6.2 software. 2022. https://www.hec.usace.army.mil/software/hec-ras/
   Google Scholar
• Hoek, E., and E. T. Brown. 1980. Empirical strength criterion for rock masses. J. Geotech. Engng Div., ASCE 106 (GT9), 1013–35.
   Google Scholar
• ISCARSAH Principles. 2003. ICOMOC chapter – Principles for the analysis, conservation and structural restoration of architectural heritage. Int. Scientific Committee on the Analysis and Restoration of Structures of Architectural Heritage.
   Google Scholar
• ITSAK Technical Report on Thessaly Earthquakes of March. 2021. Institute of Engineering Seismology and Earthquake Engineering. http://www.itsak.gr/uploads/news/earthquake_reports/EQ_Thessaly_20210303.pdf
   Google Scholar
• KADET. 2021. Hellenic code for seismic assessment of load bearing masonry structures, 296. Athens: Earthquake Planning and Protection.
   Google Scholar
• Kržan, M., S. Gostič, S. Cattari, and V. Bosiljkov. 2015. Acquiring reference parameters of masonry for the structural performance analysis of historical buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13 (1):203–36. doi:10.1007/s10518-014-9686-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lourenço, P. B. 2002. Computation on historic masonry structures. Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials 4 (3):301–09. doi:10.1002/pse.120.
   Google Scholar
• Lourenço, P. B. 2015. Masonry structures: Overview. Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering 1–10. h ttps://d oi.org/https://doi.org/1 0.1007/978-3-642-35344-4
   Google Scholar
• MIDAS Gen 2021 software (Licensed user). https://www.midasstructure.com/en/product/overview/gen
   Google Scholar
• NIST GCR 17-917-45. 2017. Recommended modeling parameters and acceptance criteria for nonlinear analysis in support of seismic evaluation, retrofit and design. National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce, Applied Technology Council, 597 pp. doi 10.6028/NIST.GCR.17-917-45.
   Google Scholar
• Pande, G. N, J. X, Liang, J. Middleton. 1989. Equivalent elastic moduli for brick masonry. Comput Geotech 8:243–265. h ttps://d oi.org/1 0.1016/0266-352X(89)
   Google Scholar
• Pantazopoulou, S. J. 2013. State of the Art Report for the Analysis Methods for Unreinforced Masonry Heritage Structures and Monuments. ecpfe.oasp.gr/en/node/89
   Google Scholar
• QGIS opensource software 2022 . https://download.qgis.org/en/site/
   Google Scholar
• Tomaževic, M. 1999. Earthquake – Resistant design of masonry buildings. In . Series on innovation in structures and construction, eds. A.S. Elhashai and P.J. Dowling, Vol. 1, 280. London, UK: Imperial College Press. https://doi.org/10.1142/p055
   Google Scholar
• Vanin, F., D. Zaganelli, A. Penna, and A. Beyer. 2017. Estimates for the stiffness, strength and drift capacity of stone masonry walls based on 123 quasi-static cyclic tests reported in the literature. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 15 (12):5435–79. doi:10.1007/s10518-017-0188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlachakis, G., E, Vlachaki, P. B. Lourenço. 2020. Learning from failure: Damage and failure of masonry after the 2017 Lesvos earthquake (Greece). Engineering Failure Analysis 117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104803.
   Google Scholar
• WUFI PRO 6.5software 2020 . https://www.wufi.de
   Google Scholar