Evaluation of Retrofitting Techniques for Historical Adobe Constructions Using a multi-criteria Decision Analysis: The Case Study of Chile

References

• AA.VV. 2012. Manual básico de restauración y conservación de construcciones patrimoniales de tierra y piedra de Arica y Parinacota. Arica: Fundación Altiplano Monseñor Salas Valdés
   Google Scholar
• AA.VV. 2016. Towards resilient non-engineered construction guide for risk-informed policy making. UNESCO. T. Narafu (ed.). Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). http://www.unesco.org/open-access/terms-use-ccbysa-en.
   Google Scholar
• Bana Costa, C. A.1994. MACBETH - An interactive path towards the construction of cardinal value functions. International Transactions in Operational Research 1 (4):489–500. doi:10.1016/0969-6016(94)90010-8.
   Google Scholar
• Bana Costa C. A., and J.-C. Vansnick. 1999. The MACBETH approach: Basic ideas, software, and an application. Advances in Decision Analysis. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-0647-6_9.
   Google Scholar
• Bana Costa C. A. and R. C. Oliveira. 2002. Assigning priorities for maintenance, repair and refurbishment in managing a municipal housing stock. European Journal of Operational Research 138 (2):380–91. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00253-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bana Costa, C. A., J.-M. De Corte, and J.-C. Vansnick. 2003. Overview of MACBETH multicriteria decision analysis approach. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making 11 (2):359–87. http://m-macbeth.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Baquedano, P., R. R. Eudave, F. N. Miranda, S. Graus, and T. M. Ferreira. 2021. Traditional earth construction in Latin America: A review on the construction systems and reinforcement strategies. In Masonry construction in active seismic regions, edited byR. Rupakhety, and D. Gautam, 99–121. Amsterdam: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-821087-1.00011-9.
   Google Scholar
• Barrow, J. M., D. Porter, S. Farneth, and E. L. Tolles (2009). Evolving methodology in seismic retrofit: Stabilizing the Las Flores Adobe. Proceedings of the Getty Seismic Adobe Project 2006 Colloquium, edited by M. Hardy, C. Cancino, O., Gail, April 11-13, Los Angeles, CA, 165–73. Los Angeles, CA: Getty Conservation Institute. http://hdl.handle.net/10020/gci_pubs/gsap
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, S., S. Nayak, and S. C. Dutta. 2014. A critical review of retrofitting methods for unreinforced masonry structures. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 7 ():51–67. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2013.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blondet, M., J. Vargas, N. Tarque, and C. Iwaki. 2011. Construcción sismorresistente en tierra: La gran experiencia contemporánea de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Informes de La Construccion 63 (523):41–50. doi:10.3989/ic.10.017.
   Google Scholar
• Brzev, S., C. Scawthorn, A. W. Charleson, L. Allen, M. Greene, K. Jaiswal, and V. Silva (2013). GEM building taxonomy version 2.0. GEM Technical Report 2013-02 V1.0.0.
   Google Scholar
• Calvi, G. M., R. Pinho, G. Magenes, J. Bommer, L. F. Restrepo-Vélez, and H. Crowley. 2006. Development of seismic vulnerability assessment methodologies over the past 30 years. ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology 43 (3):75–104.
   Google Scholar
• Cancino, C., S. Lardinois, T. Michiels, and B. Balakrishnan. 2014 . . The Getty Conservation Institute (:) .
   Google Scholar
• Caterino, N., I. Iervolino, G. Manfredi, and E. Cosenza. 2008. Multi-criteria decision making for seismic retrofitting of RC structures. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 12 (4):555–83. doi:10.1080/13632460701572872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CMN. (2010). Nuestro patrimonio hoy - Monumentos dañados 2010. Consejo de Monumentos Nacionales. https://www.monumentos.gob.cl/sites/default/files/articles-11163_doc_pdf.pdf
   Google Scholar
• CMN. (2012). Reunión Técnica Iglesias del Altiplano: Intervenciones Arquitectónicas y Arqueológicas en los Monumentos Nacionales. Lineamientos de Intervención para Proyectos Bicomponente: Arquitectura y Arqueología. https://www.monumentos.gob.cl/sites/default/files/lineamientos_recomendandos_en_espacion_publicos.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• CNCA. 2013. Reconstrucción Patrimonial en Chile 2010 - 2012. Santiago de Chile: Consejo Nacional de la Cultura y las Artes.
   Google Scholar
• Comerio, M. 2003. Earthquake Protection, 2nd Edition. Earthquake Spectra 19 (3):731–32. doi:10.1193/1.1597879.
   Google Scholar
• Cortez, D. 2014. Sistemas constructivos tradicionales como sistemas de conocimiento local: Quincha con Brea en Totoral, Atacama, Chile. Santiago: Universidad de Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, A., A. Arêde, and H. Varum. 2018. Strengthening and retrofitting of existing structures. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, C., Â. Cerqueira, F. Rocha, and A. Velosa. 2019. The sustainability of adobe construction: Past to future. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 13 (5):639–47. doi:10.1080/15583058.2018.1459954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Ayala, D., and G. Benzoni. 2012. Historic and traditional structures during the 2010 Chile earthquake: Observations, Codes, and Conservation Strategies. Earthquake Spectra 28 (S1):425–51. doi:10.1193/1.4000030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DA-MOP. 2000. Inventario del Patrimonio Cultural Inmueble de Chile.
   Google Scholar
• de Felice, G. 2011. Out-of-plane seismic capacity of masonry depending on wall section morphology. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 5 (4–5):466–82. doi:10.1080/15583058.2010.530339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentile, R., and C. Galasso. 2021. Simplified seismic loss assessment for optimal structural retrofit of RC buildings. Earthquake Spectra 37 (1):346–65. doi:10.1177/8755293020952441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greco, F., and P. B. Lourenço. 2021. Seismic assessment of large historic vernacular adobe buildings in the Andean region of Peru. Learning from casa arones in cusco. Journal of Building Engineering 40 (March 2020):102341. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102341.
   Google Scholar
• ICOMOS/ISCARSAH. 2003. Recommendations for the Analysis, Conservation and Structural Restoration of Architectural Heritage. 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Ishizaka, A., and P. Nemery. 2013. Multi-criteria decision analysis: Methods and software. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez, B. 2014. Los Entramados Tradicionales de Madera en los Cerros Alegre y Concepción. Caracterización histórica y técnica de las viviendas de fnales del siglo XIX y comienzos del XX. Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez, B., L. Pelà, and M. Hurtado. 2018. Building survey forms for heterogeneous urban areas in seismically hazardous zones. Application to the historical center of Valparaíso, Chile. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 12 (7–8):1076–111. doi:10.1080/15583058.2018.1503370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorquera, N. 2012. Culture costruttive in terra e rischio sismico. Conoscenza delle architetture tradizionali cilene e valutazione della loro vulnerabilità al sisma. Università degli Studi di Firenze.
   Google Scholar
• Karmelic, L. 2015. Terremoto Chile 2010. Reconstrucción/restauración patrimonial: proceso de validación de la tierra como material vigente. Balance de las intervenciones en la VI región. http://hdl.handle.net/11441/39292
   Google Scholar
• Law N° 17.288. (1970). Sobre Monumentos Nacionales. Consejo de Monumentos Nacionales. https://www.monumentos.gob.cl/sites/default/files/ley_2019_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lourenço, P. B., M. P. Ciocci, F. Greco, G. Karanikoloudis, C. Cancino, D. Torrealva, and K. Wong. 2019. Traditional techniques for the rehabilitation and protection of historic earthen structures: The seismic retrofitting project. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 13 (1):15–32. doi:10.1080/15583058.2018.1497232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maitland, I., and J. Woodside. 2017. The role of heritage structural engineering and why it is important for future generations. Australian Journal of Structural Engineering 18 (4):262–69. doi:10.1080/13287982.2017.1402420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marttunen, M., J. Mustajoki, M. Dufva, and T. Karjalainen. 2015. How to design and realize participation of stakeholders in MCDA processes? A framework for selecting an appropriate approach. EURO Journal on Decision Processes 3 (1–2):187–214. doi:10.1007/s40070-013-0016-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michiels, T. 2015. Seismic retrofitting techniques for historic adobe buildings. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 9 (8):1059–68. doi:10.1080/15583058.2014.924604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minke, G. 2012. Building with Earth: Design and Technology of a Sustainable Architecture 4th ed. Basel: Birkhäuser.
   Google Scholar
• MINVU. 2010. Plan de Reconstrucción MINVU Ministerio de Vivienda y Urbanismo. Chile: Ministerio de Vivienda y Urbanismo.
   Google Scholar
• Misseri, G., C. Palazzi, and L. Rovero. 2020. Seismic vulnerability of timber-reinforced earthen structures through standard and non–standard limit analysis. Engineering Structures 215 ():110663. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustajoki, J., and M. Marttunen. Finnish Environmenmt Institute. 2013. Comparison of multi-criteria decision analytical software searching for ideas for developing a new EIA-specific multi-criteria software. https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/49477
   Google Scholar
• NCh 3332. Estructuras - Intervención de construcciones patrimoniales de tierra cruda - Requisitos del proyecto estructural (Structural design - Retrofitting of historic earth buildings - Requirements for the structural design planning), Instituto Nacional De Normalización (2013).
   Google Scholar
• NCh 433. Of 72 - Cálculo antisísmico de edificios (Earthquake resistant design of buildings). (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Ord. CMN N° 2774. (2014). Aprueba solicitud de intervención en el inmueble ubicado en Calle O’Higgins N° 678, ZT Pueblo de Nirivilo, Comuna de San Javier, Región del Maule.
   Google Scholar
• Ord. CMN N° 1319. (2011). Aprueba proyecto de reconstrucción y restauración al Monumento Histórico Iglesia de Guacarhue, Comuna Quinta de Tilcoco, y remite planimetría y EETT con Timbre aprobado.
   Google Scholar
• Ortega, J., G. Vasconcelos, H. Rodrigues, M. Correia, and P. B. Lourenço. 2017. Traditional earthquake resistant techniques for vernacular architecture and local seismic cultures: A literature review. Journal of Cultural Heritage 27:181–96. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2017.02.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortega, J., G. Vasconcelos, H. Rodrigues, and M. Correia. 2018. Assessment of the efficiency of traditional earthquake resistant techniques for vernacular architecture. Engineering Structures 173 (June):1–27. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.101.
   Google Scholar
• Papanikolaou, A., and F. Taucer. 2004. Review of non-engineered houses in Latin America with reference to building practices and self-construction projects. EUR21190 EN. Ispra (VA), Italy. Review of non-engineered.
   Google Scholar
• Peña Mondragón, F., and P. B. Lourenço. 2012. Criterios Para El Refuerzo Antisísmico De Estructuras. Revista de Ingeniería Sísmica 66 (87):47–66. doi:10.18867/ris.87.45.
   Google Scholar
• Reyes, J. C., J. P. Smith-Pardo, L. E. Yamin, F. A. Galvis, C. C. Angel, J. D. Sandoval, and C. D. Gonzalez. 2019. Seismic experimental assessment of steel and synthetic meshes for retrofitting heritage earthen structures. Engineering Structures 198 ():109477. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, B. 2005. Paradigms and challenges. In Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys, ed. J. R. F. S. Greco, and M. Ehrgott, 3–24. Boston: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz, D. M., J. C. Reyes, C. Bran, M. Restrepo, Y. A. Alvarado, N. Barrera, C. Laverde, and D. Suesca. 2022. Flexural behavior of rammed earth components reinforced with steel plates based on experimental, numerical, and analytical modeling. Construction and Building Materials 320 ():126231. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L., and D. Ergu. 2015. When is a decision-making method trustworthy? criteria for evaluating multi-criteria decision-making methods. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 14 (6):1171–87. doi:10.1142/S021962201550025X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stellacci, S. 2018. Anti-seismic heritage of the late 18th century in Lisbon and in the South of Italy (Calabria): balancing cultural values and current requirements in its rehabilitation. http://hdl.handle.net/10071/18389
   Google Scholar
• Stellacci, S., V. Rato, E. Poletti, G. Vasconcelos, and G. Borsoi. 2018. Multi-criteria analysis of rehabilitation techniques for traditional timber frame walls in Pombalino buildings (Lisbon). Journal of Building Engineering 16 (July 2017):184–98. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2018.01.001.
   Google Scholar
• Stellacci, S., V. Rato, and R. D. Laureano. 2020. The MACBETH approach to evaluate strategies for the conservation of architectural heritage. In MCDM methods for business and management, ed. J. A. Filipe, and T. Genç, 125–35. Canada: Clausius Scientific Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tarque, N., M. Blondet, J. Vargas-Neumann, and R. Yallico-Luque. 2022. Rope mesh as a seismic reinforcement for two-storey adobe buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 20 3863–3888. doi:10.1007/s10518-022-01346-7.
   Google Scholar
• Tolles, E. L., E. E. Kimbro, and W. S. Ginell. 2002. Planning and engineering guidelines for the seismic retrofitting of historic adobe structures retrofitting of historic adobe structures. Los Angeles, CA: Getty Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Torkzaban, S. 2017 Iran’s Earthen Architectural Heritage as Reflected in the Terra Congress Proceedings and Iran Journal. University of Pennsylvania. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/634?utm_source=repository.upenn.edu%2Fhp_theses%2F634&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages
   Google Scholar
• Torrealva, D., J. Vargas Neumann, and M. Blondet (2006). Earthquake resistant design criteria and testing of adobe buildings at Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Proceedings of the Getty Seismic Adobe Project 2006 Colloquium, 2006, April 11–13, Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar
• Torres Gilles, C., and N. Jorquera Silva. 2018. Técnicas de refuerzo sísmico para la recuperación estructural del patrimonio arquitectónico chileno construido en adobe 70(550)e252.
   Google Scholar
• Vincke, F. 1992. Multicriteria decision-aid. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Wątróbski, J., J. Jankowski, P. Ziemba, A. Karczmarczyk, and M. Zioło. 2019. Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection. Omega 86:107–24. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2018.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, L., and M. A. Thomas (2014). A Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) software selection framework. 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2014, Jan 6-9, Waikoloa, HI, USA, 1084–94. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2014.141.
   Google Scholar