Appropriate Strengthening Technologies for the Mitigation of Seismic Vulnerability of Bhutanese Vernacular Stone Masonry Architecture

References

• Aris, M., and M. Hutt. 1994. Bhutan: Aspects of culture and development. Kiscadale Asia research series, nVol. 5. Gartmore, Scotland, UK:Kiscadale
   Google Scholar
• Arya, A. S., T. Boen, and Y. Ishiyama. 2014. Guidelines for earthquake resistant non-engineered construction. Paris, France: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, S., S. Nayak, and S. C. Dutta. 2014. A critical review of retrofitting methods for unreinforced masonry structures. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 7:51–67. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2013.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bothara, J., and S. Brzev. 2011. A tutorial: Improving the seismic performance of stone masonry buildings. Oakland, California: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Bothara, J. K., I. Giongo, J. Ingham, and D. Dizhur. 2018. Numerical study on partially-reinforced semi-dressed stone masonry for build-back-better in Nepal. Proceedings of 10thIMC - 10thInternational Masonry Conference, G. Milani, A. Taliercio, and S. Garrity (ed.). July 9-11-2018. Milano, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Chettri, N., G. Dhaurali, T. Neopaney, T. Cheki, and D. Gautam. 2022. Wind vulnerability and strengthening of Bhutanese vernacular roofs. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk 13 (1):1511–34. doi:10.1080/19475705.2022.2086830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chettri, N., D. Gautam, and R. Rupakhety. 2021a. From Tship Chim to Pa Chim: Seismic vulnerability and strengthening of Bhutanese vernacular buildings. Masonry Const Active Seismic Regions 1:253–88. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-821087-1.00009-0.
   Google Scholar
• Chettri, N., D. Gautam, and R. Rupakhety. 2021b. Seismic vulnerability of vernacular residential buildings in Bhutan. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 26 (10):5221–36. Taylor & Francis. doi:10.1080/13632469.2020.1868362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chettri, N., J. Thinley, and G. S. Koirala. 2020. The comparative study on vernacular dwellings in Bhutan. United International Journal for Research & Technology (UIJRT) 1 (4):30–35.
   Google Scholar
• Chimi, T. C. 2016. Seismic vulnerability and mitigation on non-engineered traditional buildings of Bhutan. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications 6 (4):61–66. Part - 5.
   Google Scholar
• Chuki, S., R. Sarkar, and R. Kurar. 2017. A review on traditional architecture houses in Buddhist culture. American Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture 5 (3):113–23. doi:10.12691/ajcea-5-3-6.
   Google Scholar
• Corradi, M., A. Borri, G. Castori, and R. Sisti. 2016. The reticulatus method for shear strengthening of fair-faced masonry. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 14 (12):3547–71. Springer. doi:10.1007/s10518-016-0006-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DDM – Department of Disaster Management, MoHCA – Ministry of Home and Cultural Affairs, RGB – Royal Government of Bhutan. 2009. National recovery and reconstruction plan, “building back Better”. (September 21, 2009. Erthquake. Bhutan, DDM &:MoHCA
   Google Scholar
• DDM – Department of Disaster Management, MoHCA – Ministry of Home and Cultural Affairs, RGoB – Royal Government of Bhutan. 2013. Disaster risk management strategy: “Safe, resilient and happy Bhutan”. Bhutan: Dipartment of Disaster Management, Royal Government of Bhutan.
   Google Scholar
• DDM – Department of Disaster Management, MoHCA – Ministry of Home and Cultural Affairs, RGoB – Royal Government of Bhutan. n.d. Bhutan: Disaster risk management status review. Bhutan: Department of Disaster Management, Royal Government of Bhutan.
   Google Scholar
• De Filippi, F., R. Pennacchio, S. Torres, and L. Restuccia. 2021. Anti-seismic retrofitting techniques for vernacular adobe buildings in Colombia: A proposed framework for developing and assessing sustainable and appropriate interventions. International Journal of Architectural Heritage Conservation, Analysis, and Restoration, 16 (6):1–18. Taylor & Francis. doi:10.1080/15583058.2021.1992538.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Forests and Park Services. 2018. Forestry Facts and Figures 2017. Thimphu, Bhutan: Ministry of Agriculture and Forests.
   Google Scholar
• Diz, S., A. Costa, and A. A. Costa. 2015. Efficiency of strengthening techniques assessed for existing masonry buildings. Engineering Structures 101:205–15. Elsevier. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.07.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dujardin, M. 2000. From living to propelling monument: The Monastery-Fortress (dzong) as vehicle of cultural transfer in contemporary Bhutan. Journal of Bhutan Studies 2 (2):151–81.
   Google Scholar
• EARRD - Engineering Adaptation & Risk Reduction Division. 2017. Retrofitting manual for load bearing structures. 1st ed. Thimphu, Bhutan: Department of Engineering Services, Ministry of Works and Human Settlement, Royal Government of Bhutan.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, T. M., A. A. Costa, and A. Costa. 2015. Analysis of the out-of-plane seismic behavior of unreinforced masonry: A literature review. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 9 (8):949–72. Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. doi:10.1080/15583058.2014.885996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, T. M., R. Maio, and R. Vicente. 2017. Analysis of the impact of large scale seismic retrofitting strategies through the application of a vulnerability-based approach on traditional masonry buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 16 (2):329–48. Springer. doi:10.1007/s11803-017-0385-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forest Resource Management Division. 2014. Forest resources potential assessment of Bhutan 2013. Thimphu, Bhutan: Ministry of Agriculture and Forests.
   Google Scholar
• Gautam, D., N. Chettri, K. Tempa, H. Rodrigues, and R. Rupakhety. 2022. Seismic vulnerability of Bhutanese vernacular stone masonry buildings: From damage observation to fragility analysis. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 160:107351. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giaretton, M., D. Dizhur, F. da Porto, and J. M. Ingham. 2016. Seismic assessment and improvement of unreinforced stone masonry buildings: Literature review and application to New Zealand. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering 49 (2): 148–74.NZSEE. n.10.5459/bnzsee.49.2.148-174
   Google Scholar
• Guardiola-Villora, A., and L. Basset-Salom. 2014. Seismic risk mitigation of Lorca historic centre masonry residential buildings, in Spain. In Vernacular heritage and earthen architecture: Contributions for sustainable development, ed. Correia, Carlos, and Rocha, 689–94. London: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Guerrini, G., I. Senaldi, F. Graziotti, G. Magenes, K. Beyer, and A. Penna. 2019. Shake-table test of a strengthened stone masonry building aggregate with flexible diaphragms. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 13 (7):1078–97. n. Taylor & Francis, London. doi:10.1080/15583058.2019.1635661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IDRG Consultancy Services. 2009. Detailed feasibility report on construction materials, part1.
   Google Scholar
• Jentsch, M. F., C. Kulle, T. Bode, T. Pauer, A. Osburg, J. Euthra, K. Namgyel, K. Tenzin, K. Dukjey, and K. Tenzin. 2017. Field study of the building physics properties of common building types in the Inner Himalayan valleys of Bhutan. Energy for Sustainable Development 38:48–66. doi:10.1016/j.esd.2017.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, D. H., Y. Singh, and K. Namgyel 2013. Building classification scheme for Bhutan. EQRisk Report no. 13-006. Norsar. Kjeller (Norway), Roorkee (India), Thimphu (Bhutan).
   Google Scholar
• Maio, R., J. M. C. Estevao, T. M. Ferreira, and R. Vicente. 2017. The seismic performance of stone masonry buildings in Faial island and the relevance of implementing effective seismic strengthening policies. Engineering Structures 141:41–58. Elsevier. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MoWHS - Ministry of Works and Human Settlement, RGoB – Royal Government of Bhutan. 2014. Earthquake resistant construction training manual (stone masonry). Bhutan: Ministry of Works and Human Settlement, Royal Government of Bhutan.
   Google Scholar
• MoWHS - Ministry of Works and Human Settlement, RGoB - Royal Government of Bhutan. 2014. Bhutanese architecture guidelines. Bhutan: Ministry of Works and Human Settlement, Royal Government of Bhutan.
   Google Scholar
• MoWHS and RGoB. 2016. Windstorm resilient roofing system (Guideline). Bhutan: Ministry of Works and Human Settlement, Royal Government of Bhutan.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Bhutan. 2013. Socio-economic and environmental impact assessment of mining and quarrying activities in Bhutan. Thimphu, Bhutan.
   Google Scholar
• Ortega, J., G. Vasconcelos, H. Rodrigues, and M. Correia. 2018a. Assessment of the efficiency of traditional earthquake resistant techniques for vernacular architecture. Engineering Structures 173:1–27. Elsevier. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortega, J., G. Vasconcelos, H. Rodrigues, and M. Correia. 2018b. Assessment of the influence of horizontal diaphragms on the seismic performance of vernacular buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 16 (9):3871–904. Springer. doi:10.1007/s10518-018-0318-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortega, J., G. Vasconcelos, H. Rodrigues, and M. Correia. 2018c. Seismic vulnerability assessment method for vernacular architecture. 16th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 18-21 june 2018, Thessaloniki.
   Google Scholar
• Ortega, J., G. Vasconcelos, H. Rodrigues, and M. Correia. 2019. A vulnerability index formulation for the seismic vulnerability assessment of vernacular architecture. Engineering Structures 197:109381. 2019 Elsevier. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortega, J., G. VAsconcelos, H. Rodrigues, M. Correia, T. M. Ferreira, and R. Vicente. 2019. Use of post-earthquake damage data to calibrate, validate and compare two seismic vulnerability assessment methods for vernacular architecture. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 39101242. Elsevier. 2019. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortega, J., G. Vasconcelos, H. Rodrigues, M. Correia, and P. B. Lourenco. 2017. Traditional earthquake resistant techniques for vernacular architecture and local seismic cultures: A literature review. Journal of Cultural Heritage 27:181–96. Elsevier.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pema. (n.d). Seismic evaluation and retrofitting of traditional Bhutanese stone masonry residential house. Tatehara, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan: IISEE – International Institute of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Pennacchio, R., F. De Filippi, M. Bosetti, T. Aoki, and P. Wangmo. 2020. Influence of traditional building practices in seismic vulnerability of Bhutanese vernacular rammed earth architecture. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 16 (3):374–93. doi:10.1080/15583058.2020.1785044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PoliMi. 2010.Critical review of retrofitting and reinforcement techniques related to possible failure. Niker - New Integrated Knowledge based approaches to the protection of cultural heritage from earthquake-induced risk - Deliverable 3.2. FP7-ENVIRONMENT - Specific Programme “Cooperation”: Environment (including Climate Change).
   Google Scholar
• Reitsma, M. 2020. The secular House. A manual for preservation and seismic improvement of vernacular stone dwellings in Bhutan. Master degree thesis in Architecture for Sustainable Design. Supervisors: F. De Filippi, R. Pennacchio, T. Aoki. Politecnico di Torino, Torino.
   Google Scholar
• RGoB– Royal Government of Bhutan, World Bank, United Nations. 2009. Bhutan earthquake September 21, 2009, Joint Rapid Assessment for Recovery, Reconstruction and Risk Reduction.
   Google Scholar
• Saboo, N. S. 2016. Guiding the change in transforming townscapes of Bhutan. The International Journal of Environmental Studies 73 (4):541–62. doi:10.1080/00207233.2016.1185334.
   Google Scholar
• Sathiparan, N. 2020. State of art review on PP-band retrofitting for masonry structures. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions 5 (2):62. Springer. doi:10.1007/s41062-020-00316-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senaldi, I., G. Magenes, A. Penna, A. Galasco, and M. Rota. 2014. The effect of stiffened floor and roof diaphragms on the experimental seismic response of a full-scale unreinforced stone masonry building. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 18 (3):407–43. Taylor & Francis, London. doi:10.1080/13632469.2013.876946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ueda, A. 2003. Culture and modernisation: From the perspectives of young people in Bhutan. Thimphu, Bhutan: The Centre for Bhutan Studies. ISBN: .
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C., V. Sarhosis, and N. Nikitas. 2018. Strengthening/Retrofitting techniques on unreinforced masonry structure/element subjected to seismic loads: A literature review. The Open Construction and Building Technology Journal 12:251–68. Bentham Open. doi:10.2174/1874836801812010251.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, E. L., and L. Dorji. 2004. The evolution of forest-related institutions in Bhutan. Bangkok, Thailand: AIT - Asian Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• The World Bank. 2019. Bhutan forest note: Pathways for sustainable forest management and socio-equitable economic development. Washington DC, U.S.A: World Bank Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Yeshey, L. 2015. Country report: Bhutan disaster management. ADRC - Asian Disaster Reduction Center, Kobe, Japan.
   Google Scholar