Whole genome bisulfite sequencing of Down syndrome brain reveals regional DNA hypermethylation and novel disorder insights

References

• Parker SE, Mai CT, Canfield MA, et al. Updated national birth prevalence estimates for selected birth defects in the United States, 2004–2006. Birth Defects Res Part A Clin Mol Teratol. 2010;88:1008–1016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mai CT, Kucik JE, Isenburg J, et al. Selected birth defects data from population-based birth defects surveillance programs in the United States, 2006 to 2010: featuring trisomy conditions. Birth Defects Res Part A Clin Mol Teratol. 2013;97:709–725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin M, Besser LM, Kucik JE, et al. Congenital anomaly multistate prevalence and survival collaborative prevalence of Down syndrome among children and adolescents in 10 regions of the United States. Pediatrics. 2009;124:1565–1571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Presson AP, Partyka G, Jensen KM, et al. Current estimate of Down syndrome population prevalence in the United States. J Pediatr. 2013;163:1163–1168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korenberg JR, Chen XN, Schipper R, et al. Down syndrome phenotypes: the consequences of chromosomal imbalance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:4997–5001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Q, Rasmussen SA, Friedman JM. Mortality associated with Down’s syndrome in the USA from 1983 to 1997: a population-based study. Lancet. 2002;359:1019–1025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonarakis SE. Down syndrome and the complexity of genome dosage imbalance. Nat Rev Genet. 2016;18:147–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Do C, Xing Z, Yu YE, et al. Trans-acting epigenetic effects of chromosomal aneuploidies: lessons from Down syndrome and mouse models. Epigenomics. 2017;9:189–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao R, Zielke CL, Zielke HR, et al. Global up-regulation of chromosome 21 gene expression in the developing Down syndrome brain. Genomics. 2003;81:457–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonarakis SE, Lyle R, Dermitzakis ET, et al. 21 and Down syndrome: from genomics to pathophysiology. Nat Rev Genet. 2004;5:725–738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olmos-Serrano JL, Kang HJ, Tyler WA, et al. Down syndrome developmental brain transcriptome reveals defective oligodendrocyte differentiation and myelination. Neuron. 2016;89:1208–1222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Letourneau A, Santoni FA, Bonilla X, et al. Domains of genome-wide gene expression dysregulation in Down’s syndrome. Nature. 2014;508:345–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sailani MR, Santoni FA, Letourneau A, et al. DNA-methylation patterns in trisomy 21 using cells from monozygotic twins. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0135555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerkel K, Schupf N, Hatta K, et al. Altered DNA methylation in leukocytes with trisomy 21. PLoS Genet. 2010;6:e1001212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacalini MG, Gentilini D, Boattini A, et al. Identification of a DNA methylation signature in blood cells from persons with Down syndrome. Aging (Albany NY). 2014;7:82–96.
   Google Scholar
• Malinge S, Chlon T, Dore LC, et al. Development of acute megakaryoblastic leukemia in Down syndrome is associated with sequential epigenetic changes. Blood. 2013;122:e33–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones MJ, Farré P, McEwen LM, et al. Distinct DNA methylation patterns of cognitive impairment and trisomy 21 in Down syndrome. BMC Med Genomics. 2013;6:58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith AK, Kilaru V, Klengel T, et al. DNA extracted from saliva for methylation studies of psychiatric traits: evidence tissue specificity and relatedness to brain. Am J Med Genet Part B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2015;168:36–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin S, Lee YK, Lim YC, et al. Global DNA hypermethylation in down syndrome placenta. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendioroz M, Do C, Jiang X, et al. Trans effects of chromosome aneuploidies on DNA methylation patterns in human Down syndrome and mouse models. Genome Biol. 2015;16:263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Hajj N, Dittrich M, Böck J, et al. Epigenetic dysregulation in the developing Down syndrome cortex. Epigenetics. 2016;11:563–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu J, Mccarter M, Lian G, et al. Global hypermethylation in fetal cortex of Down syndrome due to DNMT3L overexpression. Hum Mol Genet. 2016;25:1714–1727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunaway KW, Islam MS, Coulson RL, et al. Cumulative impact of polychlorinated biphenyl and large chromosomal duplications on DNA methylation, chromatin, and expression of autism candidate genes. Cell Rep. 2016;17:3035–3048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst J, Kellis M. ChromHMM: automating chromatin-state discovery and characterization. Nat Methods. 2012;9:215–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consortium RE, Kundaje A, Meuleman W, et al. Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes. Nature. 2015;518:317–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson R, Gebhard C, Miguel-Escalada I, et al. An atlas of active enhancers across human cell types and tissues. Nature. 2014;507:455–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosnan ME, Brosnan JT. Formate: the neglected member of one-carbon metabolism. Annu Rev Nutr. 2016;36:369–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonelli R, De Filippo R, Middei S, et al. Pin1 modulates the synaptic content of NMDA receptors via prolyl-isomerization of PSD-95. J Neurosci. 2016;36:5437–5447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe FS, Boubriak I, Sale MJ, et al. Lysine acetylation controls local protein conformation by influencing proline isomerization. Mol Cell. 2014;55:733–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson CJ, Santos-Rosa H, Kouzarides T. Proline isomerization of histone H3 regulates lysine methylation and gene expression. Cell. 2006;126:905–916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurendeau I, Ferrer M, Garrido D, et al. Gene expression profiling of the hedgehog signaling pathway in human meningiomas. Mol Med. 2010;16:262–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inoue K, Shiga T, Ito Y. Runx transcription factors in neuronal development. Neural Dev. 2008;3:20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wayman GA, Yang D, Bose DD, et al. PCB-95 promotes dendritic growth via ryanodine receptor-dependent mechanisms. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120:997–1002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söllner C, Wright GJ. A cell surface interaction network of neural leucine-rich repeat receptors. Genome Biol. 2009;10:R99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilsohn E, Volk T. Fine tuning cellular recognition: the function of the leucine rich repeat (LRR) trans-membrane protein, LRT, in muscle targeting to tendon cells. Cell Adh Migr. 2010;4:368–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tissir F, Bar I, Jossin Y, et al. Protocadherin Celsr3 is crucial in axonal tract development. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:451–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonnefont J, Nikolaev SI, Perrier AL, et al. Evolutionary forces shape the human RFPL1,2,3 genes toward a role in neocortex development. Am J Hum Genet. 2008;83:208–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W V C, Maniatis T. Clustered protocadherins. Development. 2013;140:3297–3302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi S, Takeichi M. Emerging roles of protocadherins: from self-avoidance to enhancement of motility. J Cell Sci. 2015;128:1455–1464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powers RK, Sullivan KD, Culp-Hill R, et al. Trisomy 21 drives production of neurotoxic tryptophan catabolites via the interferon-inducible kynurenine pathway. bioRxiv. 2018:403642.
   Google Scholar
• Aziz NM, Guedj F, Pennings JLA, et al. Lifespan analysis of brain development, gene expression and behavioral phenotypes in the Ts1Cje, Ts65Dn and Dp(16)1/Yey mouse models of Down syndrome. Dis Model Mech. 2018;11:dmm031013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan KD, Lewis HC, Hill AA, et al. Trisomy 21 consistently activates the interferon response. Elife. 2016:5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filiano AJ, Xu Y, Tustison NJ, et al. Unexpected role of interferon-γ in regulating neuronal connectivity and social behaviour. Nature. 2016;535:425–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim IS, Lee M, Park KC, et al. Roles of Mis18α in epigenetic regulation of centromeric chromatin and CENP-A loading. Mol Cell. 2012;46:260–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chedin F, Lieber MR, Hsieh C-L. The DNA methyltransferase-like protein DNMT3L stimulates de novo methylation by Dnmt3a. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2002;99:16916–16921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z-X, Mann JR, Hsieh C-L, et al. Physical and functional interactions between the human DNMT3L protein and members of the de novo methyltransferase family. J Cell Biochem. 2005;95:902–917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeltsch A, Jurkowska RZ. Allosteric control of mammalian DNA methyltransferases – a new regulatory paradigm. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:8556–8575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ooi SKT, Qiu C, Bernstein E, et al. DNMT3L connects unmethylated lysine 4 of histone H3 to de novo methylation of DNA. Nature. 2007;448:714–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otani J, Nankumo T, Arita K, et al. Structural basis for recognition of H3K4 methylation status by the DNA methyltransferase 3A ATRX-DNMT3-DNMT3L domain. EMBO Rep. 2009;10:1235–1241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratnu VS, Emami MR, Bredy TW. Genetic and epigenetic factors underlying sex differences in the regulation of gene expression in the brain. J Neurosci Res. 2017;95:301–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger F, Andrews SR. Bismark: a flexible aligner and methylation caller for Bisulfite-Seq applications. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:1571–1572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingett SW, FastQ Screen: AS. A tool for multi-genome mapping and quality control. F1000Res. 2018;7:1338.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ewels P, Magnusson M, Lundin S, et al. MultiQC: summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:3047–3048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korthauer K, Chakraborty S, Benjamini Y, et al. Detection and accurate false discovery rate control of differentially methylated regions from whole genome bisulfite sequencing. Biostatistics. 2018.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hansen KD, Langmead B, Irizarry RA. BSmooth: from whole genome bisulfite sequencing reads to differentially methylated regions. Genome Biol. 2012;13:R83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavalcante RG, Sartor MA. annotatr: genomic regions in context. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:2381–2383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu G, Wang L-G, He Q-Y. ChIPseeker: an R/Bioconductor package for ChIP peak annotation, comparison and visualization. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:2382–2383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean CY, Bristor D, Hiller M, et al. GREAT improves functional interpretation of cis-regulatory regions. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28:495–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supek F, Bošnjak M, Škunca N, et al. REVIGO summarizes and visualizes long lists of gene ontology terms. PLoS One. 2011;6:e21800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heger A, Webber C, Goodson M, et al. GAT: a simulation framework for testing the association of genomic intervals. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:2046–2048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinz S, Benner C, Spann N, et al. Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol Cell. 2010;38:576–589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar