Contrasting DNA methylation responses of inbred fish lines to different rearing environments

References

• Bossdorf O, Arcuri D, Richards CL, et al. Experimental alteration of DNA methylation affects the phenotypic plasticity of ecologically relevant traits in Arabidopsis thaliana. Evol Ecol. 2010;24:541–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoeven KJF, Preite V. Epigenetic variation in asexually reproducing organisms. Evolution. 2013;68:644–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoeven KJF, vonHoldt BM, Sork VL. Epigenetics in ecology and evolution: what we know and what we need to know. Mol Ecol. 2016;25:1631–1638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman JJ, Sultan SE. DNA methylation mediates genetic variation for adaptive transgenerational plasticity. Proc R Soc B. 2016;283:20160988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergeer P, Wagemaker N, Ouborg NJ. Evidence for an epigenetic role in inbreeding depression. Biol Lett. 2012;8:798–801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sultan SE. Organism and environment: ecological development, niche construction, and adaptation. USA: Oxford University Press; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Richards CL, Alonso C, Becker C, et al. Ecological plant epigenetics: evidence from model and non‐model species, and the way forward. Ecol Lett. 2017;20:1576–1590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan EJ, Gluckman PD, Dearden PK. Epigenetics, plasticity, and evolution: how do we link epigenetic change to phenotype? J Exp Zool Part B. 2014;322:208–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards EJ. Inherited epigenetic variation – revisiting soft inheritance. Nat Rev Genet. 2006;7:395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitz RJ, He Y, Valdés-López O, et al. Epigenome-wide inheritance of cytosine methylation variants in a recombinant inbred population. Genome Res. 2013;23:1663–1674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch IJ, Clark MM, Thompson MJ, et al. The concerted impact of domestication and transposon insertions on methylation patterns between dogs and grey wolves. Mol Ecol. 2016;25:1838–1855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore LD, Le T, Fan G. DNA methylation and its basic function. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013;38:23–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baerwald MR, Meek MH, Stephens MR, et al. Migration‐related phenotypic divergence is associated with epigenetic modifications in rainbow trout. Mol Ecol. 2016;25:1785–1800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeremias G, Barbosa J, Marques SM, et al. Synthesizing the role of epigenetics in the response and adaptation of species to climate change in freshwater ecosystems. Mol Ecol. 2018;27:2790–2806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teh AL, Pan H, Chen L, et al. The effect of genotype and in utero environment on interindividual variation in neonate DNA methylomes. Genome Res. 2014;24:1064–1074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubin MJ, Zhang P, Meng D, et al. DNA methylation in Arabidopsis has a genetic basis and shows evidence of local adaptation. eLife. 2015;4:e05255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoeven KJF, Vonholdt BM, Sork VL. Epigenetics in ecology and evolution: what we know and what we need to know. Mol Ecol. 2016;25:1631–1638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best C, Ikert H, Kostyniuk DJ, et al. Epigenetics in teleost fish: from molecular mechanisms to physiological phenotypes. Comp Biochem Physiol Part B Biochem Mol Biol. 2018;224:210–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatarenkov A, Lima SMQ, Earley RL, et al. Deep and concordant subdivisions in the self-fertilizing mangrove killifishes (Kryptolebias) revealed by nuclear and mtDNA markers. Biol J Linn Soc. 2017;122:558–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison A, Rodríguez-López CM, Moran P, et al. Epigenetic regulation of sex ratios may explain natural variation in self-fertilization rates. Proc Biol Sci. 2015;282:20151900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison A, Wright P, Taylor DS, et al. Environmental diel variation, parasite loads, and local population structuring of a mixed-mating mangrove fish. Ecol Evol. 2012;2:1682–1695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor DS. Twenty-four years in the mud: what have we learned about the natural history and ecology of the mangrove rivulus, Kryptolebias marmoratus?  Integr Comp Biol. 2012; 52:724-736.
   Google Scholar
• Edenbrow M, Croft DP. Environmental and genetic effects shape the development of personality traits in the mangrove killifish Kryptolebias marmoratus. Oikos. 2013;122:667–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin H-C, Dunson WA. An explanation of the high strain diversity of a self‐fertilizing hermaphroditic fish. Ecology. 1995;76:593–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earley RL, Hanninen AF, Fuller A, et al. Phenotypic plasticity and integration in the mangrove rivulus (Kryptolebias marmoratus): a prospectus. Integr Comp Biol. 2012;52:814–827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fellous A, Labed‐Veydert T, Locrel M, et al. DNA methylation in adults and during development of the self‐fertilizing mangrove rivulus, Kryptolebias marmoratus. Ecol Evol. 2018;8:6016–6033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fellous A, Earley RL, Silvestre F. The Kdm/Kmt gene families in the self-fertilizing mangrove rivulus fish, Kryptolebias marmoratus, suggest involvement of histone methylation machinery in development and reproduction. Gene. 2019;687:173–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laskowski KL, Doran C, Bierbach D, et al. Naturally clonal vertebrates are an untapped resource in ecology and evolution research. Nat Ecol Evol. 2019;3:161–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu J, Pérez‐Jvostov F, Blondel L, et al. Genome‐wide DNA methylation signatures of infection status in Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Mol Ecol. 2018;27:3087–3102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näslund J, Aarestrup K, Thomassen ST, et al. Early enrichment effects on brain development in hatchery-reared Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): no evidence for a critical period. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 2012;69:1481–1490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kihslinger RL, Lema SC, Nevitt GA. Environmental rearing conditions produce forebrain differences in wild Chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha. Comp Biochem Physiol Part A Mol Integr Physiol. 2006;145:145–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Krogh K, Sørensen C, Nilsson GE, et al. Forebrain cell proliferation, behavior, and physiology of zebrafish, Danio rerio, kept in enriched or barren environments. Physiol Behav. 2010;101:32–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lema SC, Hodges MJ, Marchetti MP, et al. Proliferation zones in the salmon telencephalon and evidence for environmental influence on proliferation rate. Comp Biochem Physiol Part A. 2005;141:327–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvanes AG, Moberg O, Ebbesson LO, et al. Environmental enrichment promotes neural plasticity and cognitive ability in fish. Proc Biol Sci. 2013;280:20131331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner BJ, Fisher MT, Taylor DS, et al. Evolution of ‘maleness’ and outcrossing in a population of the self-fertilizing killifish, Kryptolebias marmoratus. Evol Ecol Res. 2006;8:1475–1486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells MW, Wright PA. Do not eat your kids: embryonic kin recognition in an amphibious fish. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2017;71:140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earley RL, Hsu Y. Reciprocity between endocrine state and contest behavior in the killifish, Kryptolebias marmoratus. Horm Behav. 2008;53:442–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawluk RJ, Uren Webster TM, Cable J, et al. Immune-related transcriptional responses to parasitic infection in a naturally inbred fish: roles of genotype and individual variation. Genome Biol Evol. 2018;10:319–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson G, Dworkin I. Uncovering cryptic genetic variation. Nat Rev Genet. 2004;5:681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Zhu J, Hu F, et al. Single-base resolution maps of cultivated and wild rice methylomes and regulatory roles of DNA methylation in plant gene expression. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez-Arcelus M, Lappalainen T, Montgomery SB, et al. Passive and active DNA methylation and the interplay with genetic variation in gene regulation. Elife. 2013;2:e00523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Graaf A, Wardenaar R, Neumann DA, et al. Rate, spectrum, and evolutionary dynamics of spontaneous epimutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2015; 112:6676–6681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker C, Hagmann J, Müller J, et al. Spontaneous epigenetic variation in the Arabidopsis thaliana methylome. Nature. 2011;480:245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvath R, Laenen B, Takuno S, et al. Single-cell expression noise and gene-body methylation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Heredity (Edinb). 2019;1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riviere G, He Y, Tecchio S, et al. Dynamics of DNA methylomes underlie oyster development. PLoS Genet. 2017;13:e1006807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGaughey DM, Abaan HO, Miller RM, et al. Genomics of CpG methylation in developing and developed zebrafish. G3 (Bethesda). 2014;4:861–869.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eichten SR, Briskine R, Song J, et al. Epigenetic and genetic influences on DNA methylation variation in maize populations. Plant Cell. 2013;tpc:113.114793.
   Google Scholar
• Des Marais DL, Hernandez KM, Juenger TE. Genotype-by-environment interaction and plasticity: exploring genomic responses of plants to the abiotic environment. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2013;44:5–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatarenkov A, Ring BC, Elder JF, Bechler DL, Avise JC. Genetic composition of laboratory stocks of the self-fertilizing fish Kryptolebias marmoratus: a valuable resource for experimental research. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e12863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lins LSF, Trojahn S, Sockell A, et al. Whole-genome sequencing reveals the extent of heterozygosity in a preferentially self-fertilizing hermaphroditic vertebrate. Genome. 2017.61:241–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison A, Allainguillaume J, Girdwood S, et al. Maintaining functional major histocompatibility complex diversity under inbreeding: the case of a selfing vertebrate. Proc R Soc London B 2012; 279:5004–5013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts L, Taylor J, de Leaniz CG. Environmental enrichment reduces maladaptive risk-taking behavior in salmon reared for conservation. Biol Conserv. 2011;144:1972–1979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KihslingerRL, Lema SC, Nevitt GA. Environmental rearing conditions produce forebrain differences in wild Chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha. Comp Biochem Physiol Part A. 2006;145:145–151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champagne FA. Epigenetic mechanisms and the transgenerational effects of maternal care. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2008;29:386–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison A, Cable J, Consuegra S. Best of both worlds? Association between outcrossing and parasite loads in a selfing fish. Evolution. 2011;65:3021–3026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews S FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Available from: http://wwwbioinformaticsbabrahamacuk/projects/fastqc/2010.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger F TrimGalore! A wrapper around cutadapt and FastQC to consistently apply adapter and quality trimming to FastQ files, with extra functionality for RRBS data. Available from: https://wwwbioinformaticsbabrahamacuk/projects/trim_galore/2016.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger F, Andrews SR. Bismark: a flexible aligner and methylation caller for Bisulfite-Seq applications. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:1571–1572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng S, Cokus SJ, Zhang X, et al. Conservation and divergence of methylation patterning in plants and animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2010; 107:8689–8694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafi A, Mitrea C, Nguyen T, et al. A survey of the approaches for identifying differential methylation using bisulfite sequencing data. Brief Bioinform. 2018;19:737–753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews S SeqMonk: A tool to visualise and analyse high throughput mapped sequence data. Available from: https://wwwbioinformaticsbabrahamacuk/projects/seqmonk/2007.
   Google Scholar
• Tang Y, Horikoshi M, Li W. ggfortify: unified interface to visualize statistical results of popular R Packages. R J. 2016;8:478–489.
   Google Scholar
• Warde-Farley D, Donaldson SL, Comes O, et al. The GeneMANIA prediction server: biological network integration for gene prioritization and predicting gene function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:W214–W20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Rio G, Koschützki D, Coello G. How to identify essential genes from molecular networks? BMC Syst Biol. 2009;3:102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assenov Y, Ramirez F, Schelhorn SE, et al. Computing topological parameters of biological networks. Bioinformatics. 2008;24:282–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mi H, Huang X, Muruganujan A, et al. PANTHER version 11: expanded annotation data from gene ontology and reactome pathways, and data analysis tool enhancements. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;45:D183–D9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar