Genome-wide DNA methylation alteration in prenatally stressed Brahman heifer calves with the advancement of age

References

• Reik W. Stability and flexibility of epigenetic gene regulation in mammalian development. Nature. 2007;447(7143):425–432. PMID:17522676.
   Google Scholar
• Jaenisch R, Bird A. Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nat Genet. 2003;33:245–254. PMID:12610534.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds RM, Labad J, Buss C, et al. Transmitting biological effects of stress in utero: implications for mother and offspring. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013;38:1843–1849. PMID:23810315.
   Google Scholar
• Glover V. Prenatal stress and its effects on the fetus and the child: possible underlying biological mechanisms. Adv Neurobiol. 2015;10:269–283. PMID:25287545.
   Google Scholar
• Weinstock M. The potential influence of maternal stress hormones on development and mental health of the offspring. Brain Behav Immun. 2005;19:296–308. PMID:15944068.
   Google Scholar
• Lay DC, Randel RD Jr, Friend TH, et al. Effects of prenatal stress on suckling calves. J Anim Sci. 1997;75:3143–3151. PMID:9419987.
   Google Scholar
• Tobi EW, Slieker RC, Stein AD, et al. Early gestation as the critical time-window for changes in the prenatal environment to affect the adult human blood methylome. Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44:1211–1223. PMID:25944819.
   Google Scholar
• Littlejohn BP, Price DM, Banta JP, et al. Prenatal transportation stress alters temperament and serum cortisol concentrations in suckling Brahman calves. J Anim Sci. 2016;94:602–609. PMID:27065130.
   Google Scholar
• Price DM, Lewis AW, Neuendorff DA, et al. Physiological and metabolic responses of gestating Brahman cows to repeated transportation. J Anim Sci. 2015;93:737–745. PMID:26020755.
   Google Scholar
• Littlejohn BP, Price DM, Neuendorff DA, et al. Influence of prenatal transportation stress-induced differential DNA methylation on the physiological control of behavior and stress response in suckling Brahman bull calves. J Anim Sci. 2020;98(1). PMID:31807776. DOI:10.1093/jas/skz368.
   Google Scholar
• Baker EC, Cilkiz KZ, Riggs PK, et al. Effect of prenatal transportation stress on DNA methylation in Brahman heifers. Livest Sci. 2020;240:104116. DOI:10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104116.
   Google Scholar
• Littlejohn BP, Price DM, Neuendorff DA, et al. Prenatal transportation stress alters genome-wide DNA methylation in suckling Brahman bull calves. J Anim Sci. 2018;96:5075–5099. PMID:30165450.
   Google Scholar
• Schlafer DH, Fisher PJ, Davies CJ. The bovine placenta before and after birth: placental development and function in health and disease. Anim Reprod Sci. 2000;60:145–160. PMID:10844191.
   Google Scholar
• Senger PL. Pathways to pregnancy and parturition. 2nd ed. Pullman; Washington: Current Conceptions; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Hopper RM, ed. “Inducing parturition or abortion in cattle” Chapter 44 in bovine reproduction. Ames: John Wiley & Sons; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Zimin AV, Delcher AL, Florea L, et al. A whole-genome assembly of the domestic cow, Bos taurus. Genome Biol. 2009;10(4):R42. PMID:19393038.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger F, Andrews SR. Bismark: a flexible aligner and methylation caller for Bisulfite-Seq applications. Bioinformatics. 2017;27:1571–1572. PMID: 21493656.
   Google Scholar
• Ziller MJ, Hansen KD, Meer A, et al. Coverage recommendations for methylation analysis by whole genome bisulfite sequencing. Nat Methods. 2015;12:230–232. PMID:25362363.
   Google Scholar
• Akalin A, Kormaksson M, Li S, et al. methylKit: a comprehensive R package for the analysis of genome-wide DNA methylation profiles. Genome Biol. 2012;13:R87. PMID:23034086.
   Google Scholar
• McCullagh P, Nelder JA. Generalized linear models. New York: Routledge; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Wang HQ, Tuominen LK, Tsai CJ. SLIM: a sliding linear model for estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses in datasets with dependence structures. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:225–231. PMID:21098430.
   Google Scholar
• Cavalcante RG, Sartor MA. annotatr: genomic regions in context. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:2381–2383. PMID:28369316.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty R, Couldrey C. Exploring genome wide bisulfite sequencing for DNA methylation analysis in livestock: a technical assessment. Front Genet. 2014;5:126. PMID:24860595.
   Google Scholar
• Oberdoerffer P, Sinclair DA. The role of nuclear architecture in genomic instability and ageing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8:692–702. PMID:17700626.
   Google Scholar
• Horvath S. DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome Biol. 2013;14:R115. PMID: 24138928.
   Google Scholar
• Bollati V, Schwartz J, Wright R, et al. Decline in genomic DNA methylation through aging in a cohort of elderly subjects. Mech Ageing Dev. 2009;130:234–239. PMID:19150625.
   Google Scholar
• Bird A. DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Genes Dev. 2002;16:6–21. PMID:11782440.
   Google Scholar
• Chow A, Erisir A, Farb C, et al. K(+) channel expression distinguishes subpopulations of parvalbumin- and somatostatin-containing neocortical interneurons. J Neurosci. 1999;19:9332–9345. PMID:10531438.
   Google Scholar
• Vinten J, Bromley RL, Taylor J, et al. The behavioral consequences of exposure to antiepileptic drugs in utero. Epilepsy Behav. 2009;14:197–201. PMID:18992367.
   Google Scholar
• Lauber E, Filice F, Schwaller B. Prenatal valproate exposure differentially affects parvalbumin-expressing neurons and related circuits in the cortex and striatum of mice. Front Mol Neurosci. 2016;9:150. PMID:28066177.
   Google Scholar
• Schraut KG, Jakob SB, Weidner MT, et al. Prenatal stress-induced programming of genome-wide promoter DNA methylation in 5-HTT-deficient mice. Transl Psychiatry. 2014;4:e473. PMID:25335169.
   Google Scholar
• Sun W, Maffie JK, Lin L, et al. DPP6 establishes the A-type K(+) current gradient critical for the regulation of dendritic excitability in CA1 hippocampal neurons. Neuron. 2011;71:1102–1115. PMID:21943606.
   Google Scholar
• Maussion G, Cruceanu C, Rosenfeld JA, et al. Implication of LRRC4C and DPP6 in neurodevelopmental disorders. Am J Med Genet A. 2017;173:395–406. PMID:27759917.
   Google Scholar
• Lin L, Murphy JG, Karlsson RM, et al. DPP6 loss impacts hippocampal synaptic development and induces behavioral impairments in recognition, learning and memory. Front Cell Neurosci. 2018;12:84. DOI:10.3389/fncel.2018.00084.
   Google Scholar
• Pillai A, Mansouri A, Behringer R, et al. Lhx1 and Lhx5 maintain the inhibitory-neurotransmitter status of interneurons in the dorsal spinal cord. Development. 2007;134:357–360. PMID:17166926.
   Google Scholar
• Symmank J, Zimmer-Bensch G. LHX1-a multifunctional regulator in preoptic area-derived interneuron development. Neural Regen Res. 2019;14:1213–1214. PMID:30804249.
   Google Scholar
• Leblond CS, Cliquet F, Carton C, et al. Both rare and common genetic variants contribute to autism in the Faroe Islands. NPJ Genom Med. 2019;4:1. PMID:30675382.
   Google Scholar
• Goes FS, McGrath J, Avramopoulos D, et al. Genome‐wide association study of schizophrenia in Ashkenazi Jews. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2015;168:649–659. PMID:26198764.
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki MM, Bird A. DNA methylation landscapes: provocative insights from epigenomics. Nat Rev Genet. 2008;9:465–476. PMID:18463664.
   Google Scholar
• Aran D, Sabato S, Hellman A. DNA methylation of distal regulatory sites characterizes dysregulation of cancer genes. Genome Biol. 2013;14:R21. PMID:23497655.
   Google Scholar
• Almamun M, Kholod O, Stuckel AJ, et al. Inferring a role for methylation of intergenic DNA in the regulation of genes aberrantly expressed in precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma. 2017;58:1–12. PMID: 28094574.
   Google Scholar
• Lister R, Pelizzola M, Dowen RH, et al. Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences. Nature. 2009;462:315–322.
   Google Scholar
• Smith KR, Davenport EC, Wei J, et al. GIT1 and betaPIX are essential for GABA(A) receptor synaptic stability and inhibitory neurotransmission. Cell Rep. 2014;9:298–310. PMID:25284783.
   Google Scholar
• Smith KR, Muir J, Rao Y, et al. Stabilization of GABA(A) receptors at endocytic zones is mediated by an AP2 binding motif within the GABA(A) receptor β3 subunit. J Neurosci. 2012;32:2485–2498. PMID:22396422.
   Google Scholar
• Won H, Mah W, Kim E, et al. GIT1 is associated with ADHD in humans and ADHD-like behaviors in mice. Nat Med. 2011;17:566–572. PMID:21499268.
   Google Scholar
• Craddock N, Jones L, Jones IR, et al. Strong genetic evidence for a selective influence of GABAA receptors on a component of the bipolar disorder phenotype. Mol Psychiatry. 2010;15:146–153. PMID:19078961.
   Google Scholar
• Sellgren CM, Kegel ME, Bergen SE, et al. A genome-wide association study of kynurenic acid in cerebrospinal fluid: implications for psychosis and cognitive impairment in bipolar disorder. Mol Psychiatry. 2016;21:1342–1350. PMID:26666201.
   Google Scholar
• Horning KJ, Caito SW, Tipps KG, et al. Manganese is essential for neuronal health. Annu Rev Nutr. 2015;35:71–108. PMID:25974698.
   Google Scholar
• Quadri M, Federico A, Zhao T, et al. Mutations in SLC30A10 cause parkinsonism and dystonia with hypermanganesemia, polycythemia, and chronic liver disease. Am J Hum Genet. 2012;90:467–477. PMID:22341971.
   Google Scholar
• Aschner M, Erikson KM, Hernández EH, et al. Manganese and its role in Parkinson’s disease: from transport to neuropathology. Neuromol Med. 2009;11:252–266. PMID:19657747.
   Google Scholar
• Autissier N, Rochette L, Dumas P, et al. Dopamine and norepinephrine turnover in various regions of the rat brain after chronic manganese chloride administration. Toxicology. 1982;24:175–182. PMID:7135412.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson JG, Fordahl SC, Cooney PT, et al. Manganese exposure alters extracellular GABA, GABA receptor and transporter protein and mRNA levels in the developing rat brain. Neurotoxicology. 2008;29:1044–1053. PMID:18771689.
   Google Scholar
• Small DM, Zatorre RJ, Dagher A, et al. Changes in brain activity related to eating chocolate: from pleasure to aversion. Brain. 2001;124:1720–1733. PMID:11522575.
   Google Scholar
• de Quervain DJ, Kolassa IT, Ertl V, et al. A deletion variant of the α2b-adrenoceptor is related to emotional memory in Europeans and Africans. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10:1137–1139. PMID:17660814.
   Google Scholar
• Zoladz PR, Dailey AM, Nagle HE, et al. ADRA2B deletion variant influences time-dependent effects of pre-learning stress on long-term memory. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2017;140:71–81. PMID:28254464.
   Google Scholar
• Liberzon I, King AP, Ressler KJ, et al. Interaction of the ADRB2 gene polymorphism with childhood trauma in predicting adult symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014;71:1174–1182. PMID:25162199.
   Google Scholar
• Aron R, Pellegrini P, Green EW, et al. Deubiquitinase Usp12 functions noncatalytically to induce autophagy and confer neuroprotection in models of Huntington’s disease. Nat Commun. 2018;9:3191. PMID:30266909.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Taylor CJ, Newcombe EA, et al. EphA4 regulates hippocampal neural precursor proliferation in the adult mouse brain by d-serine modulation of n-methyl-d-aspartate receptor signaling. Cereb Cortex. 2018;29:4381–4397. PMID:30590507.
   Google Scholar
• Bender CM, Gonzalgo ML, Gonzales FA, et al. Roles of cell division and gene transcription in the methylation of CpG islands. Mol Cell Biol. 1999;19:6690–6698. PMC84656.
   Google Scholar
• Maunakea AK, Nagarajan RP, Bilenky M, et al. Conserved role of intragenic DNA methylation in regulating alternative promoters. Nature. 2010;466:253–257. PMID:20613842.
   Google Scholar
• Carrera N, Arrojo M, Sanjuán J, et al. Association study of nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 2012;71:169–177. PMID:22078303.
   Google Scholar
• Wahlberg KE, Guazzetti S, Pineda D, et al. Polymorphisms in manganese transporters SLC30A10 and SLC39A8 are associated with children’s neurodevelopment by influencing manganese homeostasis. Front Genet. 2018;9:664. PMID:30619481.
   Google Scholar
• Nadal MS, Ozaita A, Amarillo Y, et al. The CD26-related dipeptidyl aminopeptidase-like protein DPPX is a critical component of neuronal A-type K+ channels. Neuron. 2003;37:449–461. PMID:12575952.
   Google Scholar
• Qi C, Liu S, Qin R, et al. Coordinated regulation of dendrite arborization by epigenetic factors CDYL and EZH2. J Neurosci. 2014;34:4494–4508. PMID:24671995.
   Google Scholar
• Qin R, Cao S, Lyu T, et al. CDYL deficiency disrupts neuronal migration and increases susceptibility to epilepsy. Cell Rep. 2017;18:380–390. PMID:28076783.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Li M, Fan M, et al. Chromodomain y-like protein–mediated histone crotonylation regulates stress-induced depressive behaviors. Biol Psychiatry. 2019;85:635–649. PMID:30665597.
   Google Scholar
• Lei H, Oh SP, Okano M, et al. De-novo DNA cytosine methyltransferase activities in mouse embryonic stem cells. Development. 1996;122:3195–3205. PMID:8898232.
   Google Scholar
• Massart R, Nemoda Z, Suderman MJ, et al. Early life adversity alters normal sex-dependent developmental dynamics of DNA methylation. Dev Psychopathol. 2016;28:1259–1272. PMID:27687908.
   Google Scholar
• Wang H, Xu J, Lazarovici P, et al. cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB): A possible signaling molecule link in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Front Mol Neurosci. 2018;11:255. PMID:30214393.
   Google Scholar
• Iguchi-Ariga SM, Schaffner W. CpG methylation of the cAMP-responsive enhancer/promoter sequence TGACGTCA abolishes specific factor binding as well as transcriptional activation. Genes Dev. 1989;3:612–619. PMID:2545524.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Odom DT, Koo SH, et al. Genome-wide analysis of cAMP-response element binding protein occupancy, phosphorylation, and target gene activation in human tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2005;102:4459–4464. PMID:15753290.
   Google Scholar
• Cisternas P, Henriquez JP, Brandan E, et al. Wnt signaling in skeletal muscle dynamics: myogenesis, neuromuscular synapse and fibrosis. Mol Neurobiol. 2014;49:574–589. PMID:24014138.
   Google Scholar
• Brafman D, Willert K. Wnt/β-catenin signaling during early vertebrate neural development. Dev Neurobiol. 2017;77:1239–1259. PMID:28799266.
   Google Scholar
• Zucchi FC, Yao Y, Ward ID, et al. Maternal stress induces epigenetic signatures of psychiatric and neurological diseases in the offspring. PloS One. 2013;8:e56967. PMID:23451123.
   Google Scholar
• Prager EM, Bergstrom HC, Wynn GH, et al. The basolateral amygdala γ-aminobutyric acidergic system in health and disease. J Neurosci Res. 2016;94:548–567. PMID: 26586374.
   Google Scholar
• de Kloet ER, Joëls M, Holsboer F. Stress and the brain: from adaptation to disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;6:463–475. PMID:15891777.
   Google Scholar
• Xu L, Sun Y, Gao L, et al. Prenatal restraint stress is associated with demethylation of corticotrophin releasing hormone (CRH) promoter and enhances CRH transcriptional responses to stress in adolescent rats. Neurochem Res. 2014;39:1193–1198. PMID:24682755.
   Google Scholar
• Daëron M, Latour S, Malbec O, et al. The same tyrosine-based inhibition motif, in the intra-cytoplasmic domain of FcγRIIB, regulates negatively BCR-, TCR-, and FcR-dependent cell activation. Immunity. 1995;3:635–646. PMID:7584153.
   Google Scholar
• Isakov N, Altman A. Protein kinase Cθ in T cell activation. Annu Rev Immunol. 2002;20:761–794. PMID:11861617.
   Google Scholar
• Cao-Lei L, Massart R, Suderman MJ, et al. DNA methylation signatures triggered by prenatal maternal stress exposure to a natural disaster: project ice storm. PLoS One. 2014;9:e107653. PMID:25238154.
   Google Scholar