Prenatal medication exposure and epigenetic outcomes: a systematic literature review and recommendations for prenatal pharmacoepigenetic studies

References

• Griffiths SK, Campbell JP. Placental structure, function and drug transfer. Contin Educ Anaesthesia Crit Care Pain. 2015;15(2):84–89.
   Google Scholar
• Tetro N, Moushaev S, Rubinchik-Stern M, et al. The placental barrier: the gate and the fate in drug distribution. Pharm Res. 2018;35(4):1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Goasdoué K, Miller SM, Colditz PB, et al. Review: the blood-brain barrier; protecting the developing fetal brain. Placenta. 2017;54:111–116.
   Google Scholar
• Ek CJ, Dziegielewska KM, Habgood MD, et al. Barriers in the developing brain and Neurotoxicology. Neurotoxicology. 2012;33:586–604.
   Google Scholar
• Barker DJP. The origins of the developmental origins theory. J Intern Med. 2007;261(5):412–417.
   Google Scholar
• Gillman MW. Developmental origins of health and disease. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(17):1848–1850.
   Google Scholar
• Gluckman PD, Hanson MA, Pinal C. The developmental origins of adult disease. Matern Child Nutr. 2005;1(3):130–141.
   Google Scholar
• Godfrey K. The ‘developmental origins’ hypothesis: epidemiology. In: Gluckman PD, Hanson MA, editors. Dev Orig Heal Dis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. p. 6–32.
   Google Scholar
• Godfrey KM, Lillycrop KA, Burdge GC, et al. Epigenetic mechanisms and the mismatch concept of the developmental origins of health and disease. Pediatr Res. 2007;61(5 Part 2):5–10.
   Google Scholar
• Hjorth S, Bromley R, Ystrom E, et al. Use and validity of child neurodevelopment outcome measures in studies on prenatal exposure to psychotropic and analgesic medications – A systematic review. PLoS One. 2019;14(7):e0219778.
   Google Scholar
• Bromley R, Weston J, Adab N, et al. Treatment for epilepsy in pregnancy: neurodevelopmental outcomes in the child. Cochrane Database Syst Rev J. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Weston J, Bromley R, Jackson CF, et al. Monotherapy treatment of epilepsy in pregnancy: congenital malformation outcomes in the child. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11(11).
   Google Scholar
• El Marroun H, White T, Verhulst FC, et al. Maternal use of antidepressant or anxiolytic medication during pregnancy and childhood neurodevelopmental outcomes: a systematic review. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014;23(10):973–992.
   Google Scholar
• Prady SL, Hanlon I, Fraser LK, et al. A systematic review of maternal antidepressant use in pregnancy and short- and long-term offspring’s outcomes. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2018;21(2):127–140.
   Google Scholar
• Tosato S, Albert U, Tomassi S, et al. A systematized review of atypical antipsychotics in pregnant women: balancing between risks of untreated illness and risks of drug-related adverse effects. J Clin Psychiatry. 2017;78(5):e477–89. Physicians Postgraduate Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer AZ, Kriebel D, Herbert MR, et al. Prenatal paracetamol exposure and child neurodevelopment: a review. Horm Behav. Academic Press Inc. 2018;101:125–147. .
   Google Scholar
• Yazdy M, Desai R, Brogly S. Prescription opioids in pregnancy and birth outcomes: a review of the literature. J Pediatr Genet. 2015;04(2):056–70. Georg Thieme Verlag KG.
   Google Scholar
• Ornoy A, Weinstein-Fudim L, Ergaz Z. Antidepressants, antipsychotics, and mood stabilizers in pregnancy: what do we know and how should we treat pregnant women with depression. Birth Defects Res. 2017;109(12):933–956. John Wiley and Sons Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Schaefer C, Peters PWJ, Miller RK, editors. Drugs during pregnancy and lactation: treatment options and risk assessment. 3rd ed. Academic Press, London, UK; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Barouki R, Melén E, Herceg Z, et al. Epigenetics as a mechanism linking developmental exposures to long-term toxicity. Environ Int. 2018;114:77–86.
   Google Scholar
• Lötsch J, Schneider G, Reker D, et al. Common non-epigenetic drugs as epigenetic modulators. Trends Mol Med. 2013;19(12):742–753.
   Google Scholar
• Viuff ACF, Pedersen LH, Kyng K, et al. Antidepressant medication during pregnancy and epigenetic changes in umbilical cord blood: a systematic review. Clin Epigenetics. 2016;8(1). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-016-0262-x
   Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.
   Google Scholar
• Centre for Reviews and Dissemination University of York; National Institute for Health Research. PROSPERO [Internet].
   Google Scholar
• Page MJ, Shamseer L, Tricco AC. Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting. Syst Rev. 2018;7(1):32.
   Google Scholar
• Counsell C. Formulating questions and locating primary studies for inclusion in systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127(5):380–387.
   Google Scholar
• WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. ATC/DDD Index 2020 [Internet].
   Google Scholar
• Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, et al. Rayyan – a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
   Google Scholar
• Cardenas A, Faleschini S, Cortes Hidalgo A, et al. Prenatal maternal antidepressants, anxiety, and depression and offspring DNA methylation: epigenome-wide associations at birth and persistence into early childhood. Clin Epigenetics. 2019;11(1). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-019-0653-x.
   Google Scholar
• Yeung EH, Guan W, Zeng X, et al. Cord blood DNA methylation reflects cord blood C-reactive protein levels but not maternal levels: a longitudinal study and meta-analysis. Clin Epigenetics. 2020;12(1). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-020-00852-2.
   Google Scholar
• Gurnot C, Martin-Subero I, Mah SM, et al. Prenatal antidepressant exposure associated with CYP2E1 DNA methylation change in neonates. Epigenetics. 2015;10(5):361–372.
   Google Scholar
• Non AL, Binder AM, Kubzansky LD, et al. Genome-wide DNA methylation in neonates exposed to maternal depression, anxiety, or SSRI medication during pregnancy. Epigenetics. 2014;9(7):964–972.
   Google Scholar
• Ciesielski TH, Marsit CJ, Williams SM. Maternal psychiatric disease and epigenetic evidence suggest a common biology for poor fetal growth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15(1). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0627-8
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin P, Mactier H, Gillis C, et al. Increased DNA methylation of ABCB1, CYP2D6, and OPRM1 genes in newborn infants of methadone-maintained opioid-dependent mothers. J Pediatr. 2017;190:180–184.
   Google Scholar
• Gervin K, Nordeng H, Ystrom E, et al. Long-term prenatal exposure to paracetamol is associated with DNA methylation differences in children diagnosed with ADHD. Clin Epigenetics. 2017;9(1). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-017-0376-9
   Google Scholar
• Oberlander TF, Weinberg J, Papsdorf M, et al. Prenatal exposure to maternal depression, neonatal methylation of human glucocorticoid receptor gene (NR3C1) and infant cortisol stress responses. Epigenetics. 2008;3(2):97–106.
   Google Scholar
• Galbally M, Watson SJ, van Ijzendoorn M, et al. The role of glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid receptor DNA methylation in antenatal depression and infant stress regulation. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2020;115:104611.
   Google Scholar
• Gartstein MA, Hookenson KV, Brain U, et al. Sculpting infant soothability: the role of prenatal SSRI antidepressant exposure and neonatal SLC6A4 methylation status. Dev Psychobiol. 2016;58(6):745–758.
   Google Scholar
• Weisenberger DJ, van den Berg D, Pan F, et al. Comprehensive DNA Methylation Analysis on the Illumina® Infinium® Assay Platform. Appl Note, Illumina.
   Google Scholar
• Teschendorff AE, Relton CL. Statistical and integrative system-level analysis of DNA methylation data. Nat Rev Genet. 2018;19:129–147.
   Google Scholar
• van Rooij J, Mandaviya PR, Claringbould A, et al. Evaluation of commonly used analysis strategies for epigenome- and transcriptome-wide association studies through replication of large-scale population studies. Genome Biol. 2019;20(1):235. BioMed Central Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Mansell G, Gorrie-Stone TJ, Bao Y, et al. Guidance for DNA methylation studies: statistical insights from the Illumina EPIC array. BMC Genomics. 2019;20(1):366. BioMed Central Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder JW, Smith AK, Brennan PA, et al. DNA methylation in neonates born to women receiving psychiatric care. Epigenetics. 2012;7(4):409–414.
   Google Scholar
• Devlin AM, Brain U, Austin J, et al. Prenatal exposure to maternal depressed mood and the MTHFR C677T variant affect SLC6A4 methylation in infants at birth. PLoS One. 2010;5(8):e12201.
   Google Scholar
• Mansell T, Vuillermin P, Ponsonby AL, et al. Maternal mental well-being during pregnancy and glucocorticoid receptor gene promoter methylation in the neonate. Dev Psychopathol. 2016;28(4pt2):1421–1430.
   Google Scholar
• Emes RD, Clifford H, Haworth KE, et al. Antiepileptic drugs and the fetal epigenome. Epilepsia. 2013;54(1):e16–9.
   Google Scholar
• Smith AK, Conneely KN, Newport DJ, et al. Prenatal antiepileptic exposure associates with neonatal DNA methylation differences. Epigenetics. 2012;7:458–463.
   Google Scholar
• Addo KA, Bulka C, Dhingra R, et al. Acetaminophen use during pregnancy and DNA methylation in the placenta of the extremely low gestational age newborn (ELGAN) cohort. Environ Epigenetics. 2019;5(2). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/eep/dvz010.
   Google Scholar
• Schisterman EF, Silver RM, Lesher LL, et al. Preconception low-dose aspirin and pregnancy outcomes: results from the EAGeR randomised trial. Lancet. 2014;384(9937):29–36.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman JM. The principles of teratology: are they still true? Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2010;88(10):766–768.
   Google Scholar
• Galbally M, Ryan J, van Ijzendoorn M, et al. Maternal depression, antidepressant use and placental oxytocin receptor DNA methylation: findings from the MPEWS study. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2018;90:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Soubry A, Murphy S, Huang Z, et al. The effects of depression and use of antidepressive medicines during pregnancy on the methylation status of the IGF2 imprinted control regions in the offspring. Clin Epigenetics. 2011;3(1):2.
   Google Scholar
• Cook AM, Bensalem-Owen MK. Mechanisms of action of antiepileptic drugs. Therapy. 2011;8(3):307–313.
   Google Scholar
• White HS, Smith MD, Wilcox KS. Mechanisms of action of antiepileptic drugs. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2007;81:85–110.
   Google Scholar
• Monti B, Polazzi E, Contestabile A. Biochemical, molecular and epigenetic mechanisms of valproic acid neuroprotection. Curr Mol Pharmacol. 2010;2(1):95–109.
   Google Scholar
• Göttlicher M, Minucci S, Zhu P, et al. Valproic acid defines a novel class of HDAC inhibitors inducing differentiation of transformed cells. Embo J. 2001;20(24):6969–6978.
   Google Scholar
• Graw S, Henn R, Thompson JA, et al. PwrEWAS: a user-friendly tool for comprehensive power estimation for epigenome wide association studies (EWAS). BMC Bioinformatics. 2019;20(1). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-019-2804-7
   Google Scholar
• Tsai PC, Bell JT. Power and sample size estimation for epigenome-wide association scans to detect differential DNA methylation. Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44(4):1429–1441.
   Google Scholar
• Saffari A, Silver MJ, Zavattari P, et al. Estimation of a significance threshold for epigenome-wide association studies. Genet Epidemiol. 2018;42(1):20–33. Wiley-Liss Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Heijmans BT, Commentary: MJ. The seven plagues of epigenetic epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41(1):74–78.
   Google Scholar
• Mill J, Heijmans BT. From promises to practical strategies in epigenetic epidemiology. Nat Rev Genet. 2013;14(8):585–594.
   Google Scholar
• Breton CV, Marsit CJ, Faustman E, et al. Small-magnitude effect sizes in epigenetic end points are important in children’s environmental health studies: the children’s environmental health and disease prevention research center’s epigenetics working group. Environ Health Perspect. 2017;125(4):511–526. Public Health Services, US Dept of Health and Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• Joubert BR, Felix JF, Yousefi P, et al. DNA methylation in newborns and maternal smoking in pregnancy: genome-wide consortium meta-analysis. Am J Hum Genet. 2016;98(4):680–696. Cell Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wood ME, Lapane KL, van Gelder MMHJ, et al. Making fair comparisons in pregnancy medication safety studies: an overview of advanced methods for confounding control. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018;27(2):140–147.
   Google Scholar
• Medicines Agency E The European Network of Centres for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance (ENCePP) Guide on Methodological Standards in Pharmacoepidemiology [Internet].
   Google Scholar
• Skurtveit S, Selmer R, Odsbu I, et al. Self-reported data on medicine use in the Norwegian mother and child cohort study compared to data from the Norwegian prescription database. Nor Epidemiol. 2014;24:209–216.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph RM, van Staa TP, Lunt M, et al. Exposure measurement error when assessing current glucocorticoid use using UK primary care electronic prescription data. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019;28(2):179–186.
   Google Scholar
• Gnjidic D, Du W, Pearson SA, et al. Ascertainment of self-reported prescription medication use compared with pharmaceutical claims data. Public Heal Res Pract. 2017;27.
   Google Scholar
• Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL. Chapter 9: validity in Epidemiologic Studies. In: Mod Epidemiol. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. p. 128–147.
   Google Scholar
• Lash TL, Fox MP, Maclehose RF, et al. Good practices for quantitative bias analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2014;43(6):1969–1985. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Textor J, Hardt J, Knüppel, S. DAGitty, Epidemiology: 2011;22(5):745). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e318225c2be
   Google Scholar
• VanderWeele TJ. Principles of confounder selection. Eur J Epidemiol. 2019;34(3):211–219. Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Houseman EA, Kim S, Kelsey KT, et al. DNA methylation in whole blood: uses and challenges. Curr Environ Heal Reports. Springer. 2015;2(2):145–154.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Aryee MJ, Padyukov L, et al. Epigenome-wide association data implicate DNA methylation as an intermediary of genetic risk in rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31(2):142–147. Nature Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Gervin K, Andreassen BK, Hjorthaug HS, et al. Intra-individual changes in DNA methylation not mediated by cell-type composition are correlated with aging during childhood. Clin Epigenetics. 2016;8(1):110. Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Ollikainen M, Ismail K, Gervin K, et al. Genome-wide blood DNA methylation alterations at regulatory elements and heterochromatic regions in monozygotic twins discordant for obesity and liver fat. Clin Epigenetics. 2015;7(1). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-015-0073-5.
   Google Scholar
• Jones MJ, Moore SR, Kobor MS. Principles and challenges of applying epigenetic epidemiology to psychology. Annu Rev Psychol. 2018;69(1):459–485.
   Google Scholar
• Liu H, Liu X, Zhang S, et al. Systematic identification and annotation of human methylation marks based on bisulfite sequencing methylomes reveals distinct roles of cell type-specific hypomethylation in the regulation of cell identity genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(1):75–94.
   Google Scholar
• Lister R, Pelizzola M, Dowen RH, et al. Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences. Nature. 2009;462(7271):315–322.
   Google Scholar
• Gu J, Stevens M, Xing X, et al. Mapping of variable DNA methylation across multiple cell types defines a dynamic regulatory landscape of the human genome. G3 Genes, Genomes, Genet. 2016;6:973–986.
   Google Scholar
• Ollikainen M, Smith KR, Joo EJ-H, et al. DNA methylation analysis of multiple tissues from newborn twins reveals both genetic and intrauterine components to variation in the human neonatal epigenome. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19(21):4176–4188.
   Google Scholar
• de Carli MM, Baccarelli AA, Trevisi L, et al. Epigenome-wide cross-tissue predictive modeling and comparison of cord blood and placental methylation in a birth cohort. Epigenomics. 2017;9(3):231–240.
   Google Scholar
• Ma B, Allard C, Bouchard L, et al. Locus-specific DNA methylation prediction in cord blood and placenta. Epigenetics. 2019;14(4):405–420.
   Google Scholar
• Herzog EM, Eggink AJ, Willemsen SP, et al. The tissue-specific aspect of genome-wide DNA methylation in newborn and placental tissues: implications for epigenetic epidemiologic studies. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2020;12(1):113–123.
   Google Scholar
• Relton CL, Gaunt T, McArdle W, et al. Data resource profile: accessible resource for integrated epigenomic studies (ARIES). Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44(4):1181–1190.
   Google Scholar
• Abbott A. Tissue-bank shortage: brain child. Nature. 2011;478(7370):442–443. Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Conesa A, Beck S. Making multi-omics data accessible to researchers. Sci Data. 2019;6(1):251.
   Google Scholar
• van Dongen J, Nivard MG, Willemsen G, et al. Genetic and environmental influences interact with age and sex in shaping the human methylome. Nat Commun. 2016;7(1):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Gaunt TR, Shihab HA, Hemani G, et al. Systematic identification of genetic influences on methylation across the human life course. Genome Biol. 2016;17(1). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-0926-z.
   Google Scholar
• Banovich NE, Lan X, McVicker G, et al. Methylation QTLs are associated with coordinated changes in transcription factor binding, histone modifications, and gene expression levels. PLoS Genet. 2014;10(9):e1004663. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004663
   Google Scholar
• Relton CL, Davey Smith G. Two-step epigenetic Mendelian randomization: a strategy for establishing the causal role of epigenetic processes in pathways to disease. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41(1):161–176.
   Google Scholar
• Walton E, Relton CL, Caramaschi D. Using openly accessible resources to strengthen causal inference in epigenetic epidemiology of neurodevelopment and mental health. Genes (Basel). 2019;10(3):193. MDPI AG.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkbride JB, Susser E, Kundakovic M, et al. Prenatal nutrition, epigenetics and schizophrenia risk: can we test causal effects? Epigenomics. 2012;4(3):303–315.
   Google Scholar
• Pingault JB, O’Reilly PF, Schoeler T, et al. Using genetic data to strengthen causal inference in observational research. Nat Rev Genet. 2018;19(9):566–580.
   Google Scholar
• Relton CL, Smith GD. Mendelian randomization: applications and limitations in epigenetic studies. Epigenomics. 2015;7(8):1239–1243.
   Google Scholar
• Caramaschi D, Sharp GC, Nohr EA, et al. Exploring a causal role of DNA methylation in the relationship between maternal vitamin B12 during pregnancy and child’s IQ at age 8, cognitive performance and educational attainment: a two-step Mendelian randomization study. Hum Mol Genet. 2017;26(15):3001–3013.
   Google Scholar
• Allard C, Desgagné V, Patenaude J, et al. Mendelian randomization supports causality between maternal hyperglycemia and epigenetic regulation of leptin gene in newborns. Epigenetics. 2015;10(4):342–351.
   Google Scholar
• Pearl J. An introduction to causal inference. Int J Biostat. 2010;6(2). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2202/1557-4679.1203
   Google Scholar
• Felix JF, Joubert BR, Baccarelli AA, et al. Cohort profile: pregnancy and childhood epigenetics (PACE) consortium. Int J Epidemiol. 2018;47(1):22–23.
   Google Scholar
• Addo KA, Bulka C, Dhingra R, et al. Acetaminophen use during pregnancy and DNA methylation in the placenta of the extremely low gestational age newborn (ELGAN) cohort [corrected]. Environ Epigenetics. 2020;6(1). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/eep/dvaa006.
   Google Scholar
• Gervin K, Salas LA, Bakulski KM, et al. Systematic evaluation and validation of reference and library selection methods for deconvolution of cord blood DNA methylation data. Clin Epigenetics. 2019;11(1). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-019-0717-y.
   Google Scholar
• Houseman EA, Accomando WP, Koestler DC, et al. DNA methylation arrays as surrogate measures of cell mixture distribution. BMC Bioinformatics. 2012;13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-86.
   Google Scholar
• Gervin K, Page CM, Aass HCD, et al. Cell type specific DNA methylation in cord blood: a 450K-reference data set and cell count-based validation of estimated cell type composition. Epigenetics. 2016;11(9):690–698.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes AF. Beyond Baron and Kenny: statistical mediation analysis in the New Millennium. Commun Monogr. 2009;76(4):408–420.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyo C, Murtha AP, Schildkraut JM, et al. Methylation variation at IGF2 differentially methylated regions and maternal folic acid use before and during pregnancy. Epigenetics. 2011;6(7):928–936.
   Google Scholar