Long-range chromosomal interactions increase and mark repressed gene expression during adipogenesis

References

• Virani SS, Alonso A, Aparicio HJ, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2021 update: a report from the American heart association. Circulation. 2021;143:e254–2743.
   Google Scholar
• Cercato C, Fonseca FA. Cardiovascular risk and obesity. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2019;11(74). 10.1186/s13098-019-0468-0
   Google Scholar
• Lavie CJ, Arena R, Alpert MA, et al. Management of cardiovascular diseases in patients with obesity. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2018;15:45–56.
   Google Scholar
• Ades PA, Savage PD. Obesity in coronary heart disease: an unaddressed behavioral risk factor. Prev Med. 2017;104:117–119.
   Google Scholar
• Hotamisligil GS. Inflammation and metabolic disorders. Nature. 2006;444:860–867.
   Google Scholar
• Blüher M. Metabolically healthy obesity. Endocr Rev. 2020;41:405–420.
   Google Scholar
• Haczeyni F, Bell-Anderson KS, Farrell GC. Causes and mechanisms of adipocyte enlargement and adipose expansion. Obesity Rev. 2018;19:406–420.
   Google Scholar
• Lefterova MI, Haakonsson AK, Lazar MA, et al. PPARγ and the global map of adipogenesis and beyond. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2014;25:293–302.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson R, Sandelin A, Danko CG. A unified architecture of transcriptional regulatory elements. Trends Genet. 2015;31:426–433.
   Google Scholar
• Mifsud B, Tavares-Cadete F, Young AN, et al. Mapping long-range promoter contacts in human cells with high-resolution capture Hi-C. Nat Genet. 2015;47(6):598–606.
   Google Scholar
• Siersbæk R, Madsen JGS, Javierre BM, et al. Dynamic rewiring of Promoter-Anchored chromatin loops during adipocyte differentiation. Mol Cell. 2017;66:420–435.e5.
   Google Scholar
• Javierre BM, Burren OS, Wilder SP, et al. Lineage-Specific genome architecture links enhancers and non-coding disease variants to target gene promoters. Cell. 2016;167:1369–1384.e19.
   Google Scholar
• Jung I, Schmitt A, Diao Y, et al. A compendium of promoter-centered long-range chromatin interactions in the human genome. Nat Genet. 2019;51:1442–1449.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi O, Wang S-Y, Kuznetsova T, et al. Dynamic reorganization of extremely Long-Range promoter-Promoter interactions between two states of pluripotency. Cell Stem Cell. 2015;17:748–757.
   Google Scholar
• Chandra V, Bhattacharyya S, Schmiedel BJ, et al. Promoter-interacting expression quantitative trait loci are enriched for functional genetic variants. Nat Genet. 2021;53:110–119.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfelder S, Sugar R, Dimond A, et al. Polycomb repressive complex PRC1 spatially constrains the mouse embryonic stem cell genome. Nat Genet. 2015;47:1179–1186.
   Google Scholar
• Cairns J, Freire-Pritchett P, Wingett SW, et al. Chicago : robust detection of DNA looping interactions in capture Hi-C data. Genome Biol. 2016;17:127.
   Google Scholar
• Holgersen EM, Gillespie A, Leavy OC, et al. Identifying high-confidence capture Hi-C interactions using CHiCANE. Nat Protoc. 2021;16:2257–2285.
   Google Scholar
• Pan DZ, Garske KM, Alvarez M, et al. Integration of human adipocyte chromosomal interactions with adipose gene expression prioritizes obesity-related genes from GWAS. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1512.
   Google Scholar
• Laakso M, Kuusisto J, Stančáková A, et al. METabolic syndrome in men (METSIM) study: a resource for studies of metabolic and cardiovascular diseases. J Lipid Res. 2017;58:481–493.
   Google Scholar
• Pulit SL, Stoneman C, Morris AP, et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for body fat distribution in 694 649 individuals of European ancestry. Hum Mol Genet. 2019;28:166–174.
   Google Scholar
• Rauch A, Haakonsson AK, Madsen JGS, et al. Osteogenesis depends on commissioning of a network of stem cell transcription factors that act as repressors of adipogenesis. Nat Genet. 2019;51:716–727.
   Google Scholar
• Ernst J, Kellis M. ChromHMM: automating chromatin-state discovery and characterization. Nat Methods. 2012;9:215–216.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt AD, Hu M, Jung I, et al. A compendium of chromatin contact maps reveals spatially active regions in the human genome. Cell Rep. 2016;17:2042–2059.
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez M, Rahmani E, Jew B, et al. Enhancing droplet-based single-nucleus RNA-seq resolution using the semi-supervised machine learning classifier DIEM. Sci Rep. 2020;10:11019.
   Google Scholar
• Garske KM, Pan DZ, Miao Z, et al. Reverse gene–environment interaction approach to identify variants influencing body-mass index in humans. Nat Metab. 2019;1:630–642.
   Google Scholar
• Wingett SW, Ewels P, Furlan-Magaril M, et al. HiCUP: pipeline for mapping and processing Hi-C data. F1000Research. 2015;4:1310.
   Google Scholar
• van der Kolk BW, Saari S, Lovric A, et al. Molecular pathways behind acquired obesity: adipose tissue and skeletal muscle multiomics in monozygotic twin pairs discordant for BMI. Cell Reports Med. 2021; 2: 100226.
   Google Scholar
• Quinlan AR, Hall IM. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:841–842.
   Google Scholar
• Corces MR, Trevino, AE, Hamilton, EG, et al. An improved ATAC-seq protocol reduces background and enables interrogation of frozen tissues. Nat Methods. 2017;14:959–962.
   Google Scholar
• Buenrostro JD, Wu B, Chang HY, et al. ATAC-seq: a method for assaying chromatin accessibility genome-wide. Curr Protoc Mol Biol. 2015;2015:21.29.1–21.29.9.
   Google Scholar
• Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078–2079.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Liu T, Meyer CA, et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 2008;9:R137.
   Google Scholar
• Fortin JP, Hansen KD. Reconstructing A/B compartments as revealed by Hi-C using long-range correlations in epigenetic data. Genome Biol. 2015;16:180.
   Google Scholar
• Amemiya HM, Kundaje A, Boyle AP. The ENCODE Blacklist: identification of problematic regions of the genome. Sci Rep. 2019;9:9354.
   Google Scholar
• Rohart F, Gautier B, Singh A, et al. A. mixOmics: an R package for ‘omics feature selection and multiple data integration. PLOS Comput Biol. 2017;13:e1005752.
   Google Scholar
• Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9:357–359.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte WA, Orlando D, Hnisz D, et al. Master transcription factors and mediator establish super-enhancers at key cell identity genes. Cell. 2013;153:307–319.
   Google Scholar
• Lovén J, Hoke H, Lin C, et al. Selective inhibition of tumor oncogenes by disruption of super-enhancers. Cell. 2013;153:320–334.
   Google Scholar
• Heinz S, Benner, C, Spann, N, et al. Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol Cell. 2010;38:576–589.
   Google Scholar
• Stančáková A, Civelek M, Saleem NK, et al. Hyperglycemia and a common variant of GCKR are associated with the levels of eight amino acids in 9,369 Finnish men. Diabetes. 2012;61:1895–1902.
   Google Scholar
• Pan DZ, Miao Z, Comenho C, et al. Identification of TBX15 as an adipose master trans regulator of abdominal obesity genes. Genome Med. 2021;13:123.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connell J, Gurdasani D, Delaneau O, et al. A general approach for haplotype phasing across the full spectrum of relatedness. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004234.
   Google Scholar
• Howie BN, Donnelly P, Marchini J. A flexible and accurate genotype imputation method for the next generation of genome-wide association studies. PLoS Genet. 2009;5:e1000529.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81:559–575.
   Google Scholar
• Chang CC, Chow CC, Tellier LC, et al. Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. Gigascience. 2015;4(7). DOI:10.1186/s13742-015-0047-8.
   Google Scholar
• Stegle O, Parts L, Piipari M, et al. Using probabilistic estimation of expression residuals (PEER) to obtain increased power and interpretability of gene expression analyses. Nat Protoc. 2012;7:500–507.
   Google Scholar
• Shabalin AA. Matrix eQTL: ultra fast eQTL analysis via large matrix operations. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:1353–1358.
   Google Scholar