Whole human genome 5’-mC methylation analysis using long read nanopore sequencing

References

• Frommer M, McDonald LE, and Millar DS. A genomic sequencing protocol that yields a positive display of 5- methylcytosine residues in individual DNA strands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89:1827–1831.
   Google Scholar
• Schatz MC. Nanopore sequencing meets epigenetics. Nat Methods. 2017;14:347–348.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee A, Rodger EJ, Morison IM, et al. Tools and strategies for analysis of genome-wide and gene-specific DNA methylation patterns. Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1537:249–277.
   Google Scholar
• Yong WS, Hsu, FM, Chen, PY. Profiling genome-wide DNA methylation. Epigenetics & Chromatin. 2016;9:26. DOI:10.1186/s13072-016-0075-3.
   Google Scholar
• Gouil Q, Keniry A. Latest techniques to study DNA methylation. Essays Biochem. 2019;63:639–648.
   Google Scholar
• Fraga MF, Esteller M. Review DNA methylation: a profile of methods. Biotechniques. 2002;33:632–649.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrich M, Zoll S, Sur S, et al. A new method for accurate assessment of DNA quality after bisulfite treatment. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:e29.
   Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Pastor, WA, Shen, Y, et al. The behaviour of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in bisulfite sequencing. PLoS One. 2010;5:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Leontiou CA, Hadjidaniel MD, Mina P, et al. Bisulfite Conversion of DNA: performance comparison of different kits and methylation quantitation of epigenetic biomarkers that have the potential to be used in non-invasive prenatal testing. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0135058.
   Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Sebra R, Pullman BS, et al. Quantitative and multiplexed DNA methylation analysis using long-read single-molecule real-time bisulfite sequencing (SMRT-BS). BMC Genomics. 2015;16:350.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson JT, Workman RE, Zuzarte PC, et al. Detecting DNA cytosine methylation using nanopore sequencing. Nat Methods. 2017;14:407–410.
   Google Scholar
• Jain M, Koren S, Miga KH, et al. Nanopore sequencing and assembly of a human genome with ultra-long reads. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36:338–345.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Fang L, Yu G, et al. Detection of DNA base modifications by deep recurrent neural network on Oxford Nanopore sequencing data. Nat Commun. 2019;10:2449.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Rosikiewicz W, Pan Z, et al. DNA methylation-calling tools for Oxford Nanopore sequencing: a survey and human epigenome-wide evaluation. Genome Biol. 2021;22:295.
   Google Scholar
• Iorio F, Knijnenburg TA, Vis DJ, et al. A landscape of pharmacogenomic interactions in cancer. Cell. 2016;166:740–754.
   Google Scholar
• Jelinek J, Liang S, Lu Y, et al. Conserved DNA methylation patterns in healthy blood cells and extensive changes in leukemia measured by a new quantitative technique. Epigenetics. 2012;7:1368–1378.
   Google Scholar
• Ghandi M, Huang FW, Jané-Valbuena J, et al. Next-generation characterization of the cancer cell line encyclopedia. Nature. 2019;569(7757):503–508.
   Google Scholar
• Bibikova M, Barnes B, Tsan C, et al. High density DNA methylation array with single CpG site resolution. Genomics. 2011;98:288–295.
   Google Scholar
• Meer A, Gnirke A, Bell GW, et al. Reduced representation bisulfite sequencing for comparative high-resolution DNA methylation analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33(18):5868–5877.
   Google Scholar
• Martin P, Papayannopoulou T. HEL cells: a new human erythroleukemia cell line with spontaneous and induced globin expression. Science. 1982;216:1233–1235.
   Google Scholar
• De Coster W, D’Hert S, Schultz DT, et al. NanoPack: visualizing and processing long-read sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:2666–2669.
   Google Scholar
• Giesselmann P, Hetzel S, Müller F-J, et al. Nanopype: a modular and scalable nanopore data processing pipeline. Bioinformatics. 2019;35:4770–4772.
   Google Scholar
• Guppy protocol. Accessed 14 05 2021. https://community.nanoporetech.com/protocols/Guppy-protocol/
   Google Scholar
• Sedlazeck FJ, Rescheneder, P, Smolka, M, et al. Accurate detection of complex structural variations using single-molecule sequencing. Nat Methods. 2018;15:461–468.
   Google Scholar
• Li H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:3094–3100.
   Google Scholar
• Okonechnikov K, Conesa A, García-Alcalde F. Qualimap 2: advanced multi-sample quality control for high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:292–294.
   Google Scholar
• Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078–2079.
   Google Scholar
• Accessed 08 03 2022 https://depmap.org/portal/download/all/
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn RM, Haussler D, James Kent W. The UCSC genome browser and associated tools. Brief Bioinform. 2013;14:144–161.
   Google Scholar
• Quinlan AR, Hall IM. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:841–842.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn M, Jackson S, Cimentada J Corrr: correlations in R. R package version 0.4.3. 1–15 (2020).
   Google Scholar
• Wright K corrgram: plot a correlogram 1.13. 1–9 (2018).
   Google Scholar
• Olson N, Wagner J, McDaniel J, et al. precisionFDA truth challenge V2: calling variants from short- and long-reads in difficult-to-map regions. BioRxiv. 2021. DOI:10.1101/2020.11.13.380741.
   Google Scholar
• Zook J. Genome in A bottle - v3.0 genome stratifications. National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2021. cited 2022 March 29. https://doi.org/10.18434/mds2-2499
   Google Scholar
• Cavalcante RG, Sartor MA. Annotatr: genomic regions in context. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:2381–2383.
   Google Scholar
• Chen H, Boutros PC. VennDiagram: a package for the generation of highly-customizable Venn and Euler diagrams in R. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:35.
   Google Scholar
• Wickham H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2016. DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4.
   Google Scholar
• Youk J, An Y, Park S, et al. The genome-wide landscape of C:g>T: a polymorphism at the CpG contexts in the human population. BMC Genomics. 2020;21:270.
   Google Scholar
• Du P, Zhang X, Huang -C-C, et al. Comparison of Beta-value and M-value methods for quantifying methylation levels by microarray analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:587.
   Google Scholar
• Delahaye C, Nicolas J. Sequencing DNA with nanopores: troubles and biases. PLoS One. 2021;16(10):e0257521.
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki M, Liao, W, Wos, F, et al. Whole-genome bisulfite sequencing with improved accuracy and cost. Genome Res. 2018;28:1364–1371.
   Google Scholar
• Xu L, Seki M. Recent advances in the detection of base modifications using the Nanopore sequencer. J Hum Genet. 2020;65:25–33.
   Google Scholar
• Stoiber AM, Quick, J, Egan, R, et al. De novo Identification of DNA modifications enabled by genome-guided nanopore signal processing. bioRxiv. 2017. DOI:10.1101/094672.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Georgieva DC, Egli D, et al. NanoMod: a computational tool to detect DNA modifications using Nanopore long- read sequencing data. BMC Genomics. 2019;20:78.
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre ABR, Alexander, N, Grigorev, K, et al. Single-molecule sequencing detection of N6-methyladenine in microbial reference materials. Nat Commun. 2019;10:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Rand AC, Jain M, Eizenga JM, et al. Mapping DNA methylation with high-throughput nanopore sequencing. Nat Methods. 2017;14:411–413.
   Google Scholar
• Ni P, Huang N, Zhang Z, et al. DeepSignal: detecting DNA methylation state from Nanopore sequencing reads using deep-learning. Bioinformatics. 2019;35:4586–4595.
   Google Scholar
• Flappie. Accessed 14 05 2021. https://github.com/nanoporetech/flappie.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson-Smith AC. Genomic imprinting: the emergence of an epigenetic paradigm. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12:565–575.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk SJ, Tellam RL, Morrison JL, et al. Recent developments on the role of epigenetics in obesity and metabolic disease. Clinical Epigenetics. 2015;7(1). DOI:10.1186/s13148-015-0101-5
   Google Scholar
• Liu C, Jiao C, and Wang K, et al. DNA methylation and psychiatric disorders. In: Grayson, Dennis R.ed. Progress in molecular biology and translational science. Vol. 157. Academic Press; 2018. p. 175–232.
   Google Scholar
• Rosa-Garrido M, Chapski DJ, Vondriska TM. Epigenomes in cardiovascular disease. Circ Res. 2018;122:1586–1607.
   Google Scholar
• Wu H, Chen Y, Zhu H, et al. The pathogenic role of dysregulated epigenetic modifications in autoimmune diseases. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Wang H, Li, Y, Lv, N, et al. Predictors of clinical responses to hypomethylating agents in acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes. Ann Hematol. 2018;97:2025–2038.
   Google Scholar