Critical evaluation of the reliability of DNA methylation probes on the Illumina MethylationEPIC v1.0 BeadChip microarrays

References

• Moore LD, Le T, Fan G. DNA methylation and its basic function. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013;38(1):23–13. doi: 10.1038/npp.2012.112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabais MF, Laws SM, Lin T, et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide DNA methylation identifies shared associations across neurodegenerative disorders. Genome Biol. 2021;22(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s13059-021-02275-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunnon K, Smith R, Hannon E, et al. Methylomic profiling implicates cortical deregulation of ANK1 in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Neurosci. 2014;17(9):1164–1170. doi: 10.1038/nn.3782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jager PL, Srivastava G, Lunnon K, et al. Alzheimer’s disease: early alterations in brain DNA methylation at ANK1, BIN1, RHBDF2 and other loci. Nat Neurosci. 2014;17(9):1156–1163. doi: 10.1038/nn.3786
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CS T, Young JI, Zhang L, et al. Cross-tissue analysis of blood and brain epigenome-wide association studies in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):4852. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32475-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Silva TC, Young JI, et al. Epigenome-wide meta-analysis of DNA methylation differences in prefrontal cortex implicates the immune processes in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Commun. 2020;11:6114. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19791-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikeska T, Craig JM. undefined. Genes (Basel). 2014;5(3):821–864. doi: 10.3390/genes5030821
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dedeurwaerder S, Defrance M, Bizet M, et al. A comprehensive overview of infinium HumanMethylation450 data processing. Brief Bioinform. 2014;15(6):929–941. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbt054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pidsley R, Zotenko E, Peters TJ, et al. Critical evaluation of the Illumina MethylationEPIC BeadChip microarray for whole-genome DNA methylation profiling. Genome Biol. 2016;17(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-1066-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bose M, Wu C, Pankow JS, et al. Evaluation of microarray-based DNA methylation measurement using technical replicates: the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study. BMC Bioinf. 2014;15(1):312. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-312
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Forest M, O’Donnell KJ, Voisin G, et al. Agreement in DNA methylation levels from the Illumina 450K array across batches, tissues, and time. Epigenetics. 2018;13(1):19–32. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2017.1411443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logue MW, Smith AK, Wolf EJ, et al. The correlation of methylation levels measured using Illumina 450K and EPIC BeadChips in blood samples. Epigenomics. 2017;9(11):1363–1371. doi: 10.2217/epi-2017-0078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon O, MacIsaac J, Quach H, et al. Comparison of DNA methylation measured by Illumina 450K and EPIC BeadChips in blood of newborns and 14-year-old children. Epigenetics. 2018;13(6):655–664. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2018.1497386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Z, Taylor JA. Reliability of DNA methylation measures using Illumina methylation BeadChip. Epigenetics. 2021;16(5):495–502. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2020.1805692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugden K, Hannon EJ, Arseneault L, et al. undefined. Patterns. 2020;1(2):1. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2020.100014
   Google Scholar
• Vasanthakumar A, Davis JW, Idler K, et al. Harnessing peripheral DNA methylation differences in the Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative (ADNI) to reveal novel biomarkers of disease. Clin Epigenetics. 2020;12(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s13148-020-00864-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welsh H, Batalha C, Li W, et al. A systematic evaluation of normalization methods and probe replicability using infinium EPIC methylation data. Clin Epigenetics. 2023;15(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13148-023-01459-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen YA, Lemire M, Choufani S, et al. Discovery of cross-reactive probes and polymorphic CpGs in the Illumina infinium HumanMethylation450 microarray. Epigenetics. 2013;8(2):203–209. doi: 10.4161/epi.23470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller F, Scherer M, Assenov Y, et al. RnBeads 2.0: comprehensive analysis of DNA methylation data. Genome Biol. 2019;20(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1664-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhou W, Triche TJ Jr., Laird PW, et al. SeSAMe: reducing artifactual detection of DNA methylation by Infinium BeadChips in genomic deletions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:e123. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–163. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teschendorff AE, Breeze CE, Zheng SC, et al. A comparison of reference-based algorithms for correcting cell-type heterogeneity in epigenome-wide association studies. BMC Bioinf. 2017;18(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12859-017-1511-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCartney DL, Hillary RF, Stevenson AJ, et al. Epigenetic prediction of complex traits and death. Genome Biol. 2018;19(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s13059-018-1514-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB. lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J Stat Softw. 2017;82(13):1–26. doi: 10.18637/jss.v082.i13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez L, Odom GJ, Young JI, et al. coMethdmr: accurate identification of co-methylated and differentially methylated regions in epigenome-wide association studies with continuous phenotypes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(17):e98. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz590
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min JL, Hemani G, Hannon E, et al. Genomic and phenotypic insights from an atlas of genetic effects on DNA methylation. Nat Genet. 2021;53(9):1311–1321. doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-00923-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min JL, Hemani G, Hannon E et al. Genomic and phenomic insights from an atlas of genetic effects on DNA methylation. medRxiv. 2021. doi: 10.1101/2020.1109.1101.20180406
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yao L, Shen H, Laird PW, et al. Inferring regulatory element landscapes and transcription factor networks from cancer methylomes. Genome Biol. 2015;16(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0668-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Silva TC, Young JI, Martin ER, et al. MethReg: estimating the regulatory potential of DNA methylation in gene transcription. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50(9):e51–e51. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starnawska A, Tan Q, McGue M, et al. Epigenome-wide association study of cognitive functioning in middle-aged monozygotic twins. Front Aging Neurosci. 2017;9:413. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicchetti DV, Sparrow SA. Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. Am J Ment Defic. 1981;86(2):127–137.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dedeurwaerder S, Defrance M, Calonne E, et al. Evaluation of the infinium methylation 450K technology. Epigenomics. 2011;3(6):771–784. doi: 10.2217/epi.11.105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannon E, Lunnon K, Schalkwyk L, et al. Interindividual methylomic variation across blood, cortex, and cerebellum: implications for epigenetic studies of neurological and neuropsychiatric phenotypes. Epigenetics. 2015;10(11):1024–1032. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2015.1100786
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CS T, Zhang W, Young JI, et al. Distinct sex-specific DNA methylation differences in Alzheimer’s disease. Alz Res Ther. 2022;14(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s13195-022-01070-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irizarry RA, Ladd-Acosta C, Carvalho B, et al. Comprehensive high-throughput arrays for relative methylation (CHARM). Genome Res. 2008;18(5):780–790. doi: 10.1101/gr.7301508
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naeem H, Wong NC, Chatterton Z, et al. Reducing the risk of false discovery enabling identification of biologically significant genome-wide methylation status using the HumanMethylation450 array. BMC Genomics. 2014;15(1):51. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-51
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Costa-Santos C, Bernardes J, Ayres-de-Campos D, et al. The limits of agreement and the intraclass correlation coefficient may be inconsistent in the interpretation of agreement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(3):264–269. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.11.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller R, Buttner P. A critical discussion of intraclass correlation coefficients. Stat Med. 1994;13(23–24):2465–2476. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780132310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xin Y, O’Donnell AH, Ge Y, et al. Role of CpG context and content in evolutionary signatures of brain DNA methylation. Epigenetics. 2011;6(11):1308–1318. doi: 10.4161/epi.6.11.17876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dugue PA, English DR, MacInnis RJ, et al. The repeatability of DNA methylation measures may also affect the power of epigenome-wide association studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44(4):1460–1461. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins-Chen AT, Thrush KL, Wang Y, et al. A computational solution for bolstering reliability of epigenetic clocks: implications for clinical trials and longitudinal tracking. Nat Aging. 2022;2(7):644–661. doi: 10.1038/s43587-022-00248-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen J, Just AC, Schwartz J, et al. CpGFilter: model-based CpG probe filtering with replicates for epigenome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics. 2016;32(3):469–471. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv577
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graw S, Henn R, Thompson JA, et al. pwrEWAS: a user-friendly tool for comprehensive power estimation for epigenome wide association studies (EWAS). BMC Bioinf. 2019;20(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12859-019-2804-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar