Diverging from Traditional Paths: Reconstructing Fairy Tales in the EFL Classroom

References

• Albers, P., Frederick, T., & Cowan, K. (2009). Features of gender: An analysis of the visual texts of third grade children. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 9(2), 234–260. doi:10.1177/1468798409105588
   Google Scholar
• Barajas, K. E. (2008). Beyond stereotypes? Talking about gender in school booktalk. Ethnography and Education, 3(2), 129–144. doi:10.1080/17457820802062367
   Google Scholar
• Browne, A. (1986). Piggybook. New York, NY Dragonfly Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cadiero-Kaplan, K. (2002). Literacy ideologies: Critically engaging the language arts curriculum. Language Arts, 79(5), 372–381.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, M. (2008). Transactional theory and the study of multicultural literature. Language Arts, 85(3), 212–220.
   Google Scholar
• Cherland, M. (2008). Harry’s girls: Harry Potter and the discourse of gender. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(4), 273–282. doi:10.1598/JAAL.52.4.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damico, J. S., Campano, G., & Harste, J. (2009). Transactional theory and critical theory in reading comprehension. In S. E. Israel, & G. G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 178–188). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Ernst, S. B. (2001). Gender issues in books for children and young adults. In S. Lehr (Ed.), Battling dragons: Issues and controversy in children’s literature (pp. 66–78). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Faust, M. (2000). Reconstructing familiar metaphors: John Dewey and Louise Rosenblatt on literary art as experience. Research in the Teaching of English, 35, 9–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, M. (1993). Men who weep, boys who dance. Language Arts, 70, 84–88.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum. Translated from Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1983). The importance of the act of reading. Journal of Education, 165, 5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, P. (1989). Personally (and passively) yours: Girls, literacy and education. Oxford Review of Education, 15(3), 257–265. doi:10.1080/0305498890150306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, P. (1992). The story so far: Gender, literacy and social regulation. Gender and Education, 4(3), 185–199. doi:10.1080/0954025920040301
   Google Scholar
• Harste, J. (2005). Evoking a poem: Connecting to the words of Louise Rosenblatt (Editors’ note). Language Arts, 8, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Harwood, D. (2011). Deconstructing and reconstructing Cinderella: Theoretical defense of critical literacy for young children. Language and Literacy, 10(2), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Hayik, R. (in press). What does this story say about females? Challenging gender-biased texts in the English-language classroom. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy. International Literacy Association. doi:10.1002/jaal.468. Available for early view through http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jaal.468/abstract.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, R. S., & Power, B  M. (2003). The art of classroom inquiry: A handbook for teacher-researchers (rev. ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, E. (1994). Cinder Edna. New York, NY: Mulberry Books.
   Google Scholar
• Janks, H., Dixon, K., Ferreira, A., Granville, S., & Newfield, D. (2013). Doing critical literacy: Texts and activities for students and teachers. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Janks, H., & McKay, S. L. (2010). Language, power and pedagogies. In N. Hornberger & S. L. McKay (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language education (pp. 40–61). New York, NY: Multilingual Matters Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ko, M. (2007). Critical literacy in EFL teaching. Paper presented in the Fifth International Conference on Humanities. Retrieved online from http://sparc.nfu.edu.tw/~tcs/encouraging/95/95TCS051.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lagonegro, M. (2005). A dream for a princess. RH Disney.
   Google Scholar
• Leland, C. (2012). Literature response strategies (Chapter 10). In C. Leland, M. Lewison, & J. Harste (Eds.), Teaching children's literature: It's critical! (pp. 179–202). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lewison, M., Flint, A. S., & Van Sluys, K. (2002). Taking on critical literacy: The journey of newcomers and novices. Language Arts, 79(5), 382–392.
   Google Scholar
• Lewison, M., Leland, C., & Harste, J. C. (2008). Creating critical classrooms: K–8 reading and writing with an edge. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Louie, B. (2001). Why gender stereotypes still persist in contemporary children’s literature. In S. Lehr (Ed.), Beauty, brains, and brown: The construction of gender in children’s literature (pp. 142–151). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• MacPhee, J. (1997). “That’s not fair!”: A white teacher reports on white first graders’ responses to multicultural literature. Language Arts, 74, 33–40.
   Google Scholar
• Pennycook, A. (1999). Introduction: Critical approaches to TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 33(3), 329–348. doi:10.2307/3587668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, P. S. (2005). It “ain’t” always so: Sixth graders’ interpretations of Hispanic-American stories with universal themes. Children’s Literature in Education, 36(4), 343–362. doi:10.1007/s10583-005-8316-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: Transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, L. M. (1982). The literary transaction: Evocation and response. Theory Into Practice, 21, 268–277. doi:10.1080/00405848209543018
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, L. M. (1995). Literature as exploration (5th ed.). New York, NY: Modern Language Association.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, L. M. (1991). Literary theory. In J. Flood, J. M. Jensen, D. Lapp, & J. R. Squire (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (pp. 58–61). New York: Macmillan
   Google Scholar
• Serafini, F. (2003). Informing our practice: Modernist, transactional, and critical perspectives on children’s literature and reading instruction. Reading Online, 6(6), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Taber, N., & Woloshyn, V. (2011). Dumb dorky girls and wimpy boys: Gendered themes in diary cartoon novels. Children's Literature in Education, 42(3), 226–242. doi:10.1007/s10583-011-9131-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wason-Ellam, L. (1997). If only I was like Barbie. Language Arts, 74(6), 430–437.
   Google Scholar