91
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Assessing covariate effects using Jeffreys-type prior in the Cox model in the presence of a monotone partial likelihood

, , &
Pages 23-41 | Received 25 Oct 2016, Accepted 21 Feb 2017, Published online: 12 Apr 2017

References

  • Beyersmann, J., and T. Scheike. 2013. Classical regression models for competing risks. In ed. J. P. Klein, H. C. van Houwelingen, J. G. Ibrahim, and T. H. Scheike, Handbook of survival analysis, 157–77. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
  • Bryson, M. C., and M. E. Johnson. 1981. The incidence of monotone likelihood in the Cox model. Technometrics 23:381–83.
  • Chen, M.-H., Q.-M. Shao, and J. G. Ibrahim. 2000. Monte Carlo methods in Bayesian computation. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Chen, M.-H., J. G. Ibrahim, and Q.-M. Shao. 2006. Posterior propriety and computation for the Cox regression model with applications to missing covariates. Biometrika 93:791–807.
  • Chen, M.-H., J. G. Ibrahim, and Q.-M. Shao. 2009. Maximum likelihood inference for the Cox regression model with applications to missing covariates. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 100: 2018–30.
  • Chen, M.-H., M. de Castro, M. Ge, and Y. Zhang. 2013. Bayesian regression models for competing risks. In ed. J. P. Klein, H. C. van Houwelingen, J. G. Ibrahim, and T. H. Scheike, Handbook of survival analysis, 179–98. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
  • Cox, D. R. 1972. Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 34:187–220.
  • Cox, D. R. 1975. Partial likelihood. Biometrika 62:269–76.
  • Fine, J., and B. H. Lindqvist. 2014. Competing risks. Lifetime Data Analysis 20:159–60.
  • Firth, D. 1993. Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika 80:27–38.
  • Gaynor, J. J., E. J. Feuer, C. C. Tan, D. H. Wu, C. R. Little, D. J. Straus, B. D. Clarkson, and M. F. Brennan. 1993. On the use of cause-specific failure and conditional failure probabilities: Examples from clinical oncology data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 88:400–9.
  • Ge, M., and M.-H. Chen. 2012. Bayesian inference of the fully specified subdistribution model for survival data with competing risks. Lifetime Data Analysis 18:339–63.
  • Greenland, S., and M. A. Mansournia. 2015. Penalization, bias reduction, and default priors in logistic and related categorical and survival regressions. Statistics in Medicine 34:3133–43.
  • Heinze, G., and D. Dunkler. 2008. Avoiding infinite estimates of time-dependent effects in small-sample survival studies. Statistics in Medicine 27:6455–69.
  • Heinze, G., and M. Ploner. 2002. SAS and SPLUS programs to perform Cox regression without convergence problems. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 67:217–23.
  • Heinze, G., and M. Schemper. 2001. A solution to the problem of monotone likelihood in Cox regression. Biometrics 57:114–19.
  • Ibrahim, J. G., and P. W. Laud. 1991. On Bayesian analysis of generalized linear models using Jeffreys’s prior. Journal of the American Statistical Association 86:981–86.
  • Kalbfleisch, J. D. 1978. Non-parametric Bayesian analysis of survival time data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 40:214–21.
  • Kalbfleisch, J. D., and R. L. Prentice. 2011. The statistical analysis of failure time data, 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Ploner, M., and G. Heinze. 2010. coxphf: Cox regression with Firth’s penalized likelihood. R package version 1.05 http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=coxphf.
  • Roberts, G. O., and J. S. Rosenthal. 2009. Examples of adaptive MCMC. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 18:349–67.
  • Roy, V., and J. P. Hobert. 2007. Convergence rates and asymptotic standard errors for Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for Bayesian probit regression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 69:607–623.
  • Sinha, D., J. G. Ibrahim, and M.-H. Chen. 2003. A Bayesian justification of Cox’s partial likelihood. Biometrika 90:629–41.
  • Tierney, L. 1994. Markov chains for exploring posterior distributions. Annals of Statistics 22:1701–62.
  • Zhang, F. 1999. Matrix theory. Basic results and techniques. New York, NY: Springer.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.