High policing and access to information

References

• Brodeur, J.-P. (1983). High policing and low policing: Remarks about the policing of political activities. Social Problems, 30, 507–520.10.2307/800268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodeur, J.-P. (2007). High and low policing in post-9/11 times. Policing, 1, 25–37.10.1093/police/pam002
   Google Scholar
• Brodeur, J.-P. (2010). The policing web. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199740598.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Brodeur, J.-P., & Leman-Langlois, S. (2006). Surveillance fiction or higher policing? In K. Haggerty & R. Ericson (Eds.), The new politics of visibility and surveillance (pp. 171–198). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buckley Owen, B., Cooke, L., & Matthews, G. (2013). The development of UK government policy on citizens’ access to public sector information. Information Polity, 18, 5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Calland, R., & Bentley, K. (2013). The impact and effectiveness of transparency and accountability initiatives: Freedom of information. Development Policy Review, 31, 569–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canada. (2007). SIRC annual report 2006–2007: An operational review of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service. Canada: Security Intelligence Review Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, S. (2012). Do freedom of information laws decrease corruption? Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 29, 1317–1343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crank, J., & Kadleck, C. (2009). Remarks by the guest editors. Police Practice and Research, 10, 283–284.10.1080/15614260903254981
   Google Scholar
• Cribb, R., Jobb, D., McKie, D., & Vallance-Jones, F. (2006). Digging deeper: A Canadian reporter’s research guide. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, J. (2009). Information access and protest policing post-9/11: Studying the policing of the 2004 Republican National Convention. American Behavioral Scientist, 53, 44–60.10.1177/0002764209338784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericson, R. (1995). The news media and account ability in criminal justice. In P. Stenning (Ed.), Accountability in criminal justice (pp. 135–161). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ericson, R. (2007). Crime in an insecure world. London: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Gingras, A. (2012). Access to information: An asset for democracy or ammunition for political conflict, or both? Canadian Public Administration, 55, 221–246.10.1111/capa.2012.55.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocking, J. (1994). Charting political space: Surveillance and the rule of law. Social Justice, 21, 66–82.
   Google Scholar
• Holsen, S., & Pasquier, M. (2011). What’s wrong with this picture? The case of access to information requests in two continental federal states – Germany and Switzerland. Public Policy and Administration, 27, 283–302.
   Google Scholar
• Huey, L. (2009). Subverting surveillance systems: Access to information mechanisms as tools of counter-surveillance. In S. Hier & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Surveillance: Power, problems and politics (pp. 219–235). Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jonathan-Zamir, T., & Aviv, G. (2014). How has the Israel National Police perceived its role in counterterrorism and the potential outcomes? A qualitative analysis of annual police reports. Police Practice and Research, 15, 143–157.10.1080/15614263.2013.874172
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, P. (2006). Information is power. Open Government: A Journal of Freedom of Information, 2(1).
   Google Scholar
• Kirtley, J. (2006). Transparency and accountability in a time of terror: The Bush Administrations assault on freedom of information. Communication Law & Policy, 11, 479–509.
   Google Scholar
• Luscombe, A., & Walby, K. (2014). Occupy Ottawa, conservation officers, and policing networks in Canada’s capital city. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale, 56, 295–322.10.3138/CJCCJ.2014.E34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, B. (1986). The federal information coordinator as meat in the sandwich. Canadian Public Administration/Administration publique du Canada, 29, 579–582.10.1111/capa.1986.29.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, G. (1984). Notes on the discovery, collection, and assessment of hidden and dirty data. In J. Schneider & J. Kitsuse (Eds.), Studies in the sociology of social problems (pp. 78–113). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, G. (2014). High policing. In G. Bruinsma & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justice (pp. 2062–2074). Amsterdam: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• McDonagh, M. (2013). The right to information in international human rights law. Human Rights Law Review, 13, 25–55.10.1093/hrlr/ngs045
   Google Scholar
• Monaghan, J., & Walby, K. (2012). Making up ‘terror identities’: Security intelligence, Canada’s integrated threat assessment centre and social movement suppression. Policing and Society, 22, 133–151.10.1080/10439463.2011.605131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, C. (2007). “Securitizing” Canadian policing: A new policing paradigm for the post 9/11 security state? The Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie, 32, 449–475.10.2307/20460665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, C., & Ellison, G. (2006). Eye spy private high: Re-conceptualizing high policing theory. British Journal of Criminology, 46, 641–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, D., & Whelan, C. (2006). Counter‐terrorism across the policing continuum. Police Practice and Research, 7, 449–465.10.1080/15614260601076082
   Google Scholar
• Prior, L. (2008). Repositioning documents in social research. Sociology, 42, 821–836.10.1177/0038038508094564
   Google Scholar
• Ransley, J., & Mazerolle, L. (2009). Policing in an era of uncertainty. Police Practice and Research, 10, 365–381.10.1080/15614260802586335
   Google Scholar
• Rappert, B. (2012). States of ignorance: The unmaking and remaking of death tolls. Economy and Society, 41, 42–63.10.1080/03085147.2011.637334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Relly, J. (2012). Freedom of information laws and global diffusion: Testing Rogers’s model. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89, 431–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Relyea, H. (2009). Federal freedom of information policy: Highlights of recent developments. Government Information Quarterly, 26, 314–320.10.1016/j.giq.2008.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigakos, G., & Worth, S. (2011). Access to information (ATI) as a double-edged sword for critical policing research. Canadian journal of law and society, 26, 645–652.10.3138/cjls.26.3.645
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, A. (2004). Treatment of sensitive requests under British Columbia’s freedom of information law. Freedom of Information Review, 10, 2–4.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, A. (2005). Spin control and freedom of information: Lessons for the United Kingdom from Canada. Public Administration, 83(1), 1–23.10.1111/padm.2005.83.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, A. (2006). Blacked out: Government secrecy in the information age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165518
   Google Scholar
• Rosner, C. (2008). Behind the headlines: A history of investigative journalism in Canada. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, S., & Steinzor, R. (2006). The people’s agent: Executive branch secrecy and accountability in an age of terrorism. Law and Contemporary Problems, 66, 98–129.
   Google Scholar
• Sheptycki, J. (2007). High policing in the security control society. Policing, 1, 70–79.10.1093/police/pam005
   Google Scholar
• Tie, W. (2011). High policing theory and the question of ‘what is to be done?’ Critical Criminology, 19, 155–174.10.1007/s10612-010-9109-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tromp, S. (2008). Fallen behind: Canada’s access to information act in the world context. Retrieved from http://www3.telus.net/index100/report
   Google Scholar
• Walby, K., & Larsen, M. (2011). Getting at the live archive: On access to information research in Canada. Canadian Journal of Law and Society, 26, 623–633.10.3138/cjls.26.3.623
   Google Scholar
• Walby, K., & Larsen, M. (2012). Access to information and freedom of information requests: Neglected means of data production in the social sciences. Qualitative Inquiry, 18, 31–42.10.1177/1077800411427844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisburd, D., Hasisi, B., & Jonathan-Zamir, T. (2014). Trends in Israeli policing: Terrorism, community, victimization and crime control. Police Practice and Research, 15, 97–100.10.1080/15614263.2013.874167
   Google Scholar
• Woodbury, M. (1995). Clinton, Reno, and freedom of information: From Waldheim to Whitewater. Social Justice, 22, 49–66.
   Google Scholar
• Worthy, B. (2013). “Some are more open than others”: Comparing the impact of the freedom of information act 2000 on local and central Government in the UK. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 15, 395–414.10.1080/13876988.2013.836300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar