The use of qualitative methods and practitioners-as-authors in journal publications of police research

References

• Alpert, G., Rojek, J., & Hansen, A. (2013). Building bridges between police researchers and practitioners: Agents of change in a complex world. Washington, DC: Final Report to the National Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Beal, P., & Kerlikowske, G. R. (2010). Action research in Buffalo and Seattle. Police Practice and Research, 11, 117–121. doi:10.1080/1561426100359085210.1080/15614261003590852
   Google Scholar
• Beckman, K., Lum, C., Wyckoff, L., & Larsen-Vanderwall, K. (2003). Trends in police research: A cross-sectional analysis of the 2000 literature. Police Practice and Research, 4, 79–96. doi:10.1080/156142603200005920410.1080/1561426032000059204
   Google Scholar
• Boba, R. (2010). A practice-based evidence approach in Florida. Police Practice and Research, 11, 122–128. doi:10.1080/1561426100359302110.1080/15614261003593021
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, D., & Nixon, C. (2009). Ending the ‘dialogue of the deaf’: Evidence and policing policies and practices. An Australian case study, Police Practice and Research, 10, 423–435. doi:10.1080/1561426090337838410.1080/15614260903378384
   Google Scholar
• Brent, J. J., & Kraska, B. P. (2010). Moving beyond our methodological default: A case for mixed methods. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 21, 412–430. doi:10.1080/10511253.2010.51656210.1080/10511253.2010.516562
   Google Scholar
• Buckler, K. (2008). The quantitative/qualitative divide revisited: A study of published research, doctoral program curricula, and journal editor perceptions. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 19, 383–403. doi:10.1080/1051125080247621010.1080/10511250802476210
   Google Scholar
• Buerger, E. M. (2010). Policing and research: Two cultures separated by an almost‐common language. Police Practice and Research, 11, 135–143. doi:10.1080/1561426100359318710.1080/15614261003593187
   Google Scholar
• Copes, H., Brown, A., & Tewksbury, R. (2011). A content analysis of ethnographic research published in top criminology and criminal justice journals from 2000–2009. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 22, 341–359. doi:10.1080/10511253.2010.51971410.1080/10511253.2010.519714
   Google Scholar
• Eck, J. (2010). Policy is in the details: Using external validity to help policy makers. Criminology & Public Policy, 9, 859–866. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2010.00676.x
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, R. (Ed.). (2001). Contemporary field research: A collection of readings (2nd ed.). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engel, R. S., & Whalen, J. L. (2010). Police–academic partnerships: Ending the dialogue of the deaf, the Cincinnati experience. Police Practice and Research, 11, 105–116. doi:10.1080/1561426100359080310.1080/15614261003590803
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H. (1979). Improving policing: A problem-oriented approach. Crime & Delinquency, 25, 236–258. doi:10.1177/001112877902500207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillaume, P., Sidebottom, A., & Tilley, N. (2012). On police and university collaborations: A problem-oriented policing case study. Police Practice and Research, 13, 389–401.10.1080/15614263.2012.671621
   Google Scholar
• Hammersely, M., & Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnography: Principles in practice (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, D. (2010). Hope and despair. Police Practice and Research, 11, 166–170. doi:10.1080/1561426100359337710.1080/15614261003593377
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, D. (2011). Don’t shoot: One man, a street fellowship, and the end of violence in inner-city America. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Kleck, G., Tark, J., & Bellows, J. (2006). What methods are most frequently used in research in criminology and criminal justice? Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 147–152. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2006.01.00710.1016/j.jcrimjus.2006.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knutsson, J. (2010). Nordic reflections on the dialogue of the deaf. Police Practice and Research, 11, 132–134. doi:10.1080/1561426100359316110.1080/15614261003593161
   Google Scholar
• Manning, P. K. (2009). Policing as self-audited practice. Police Practice and Research, 10, 451–464. doi:10.1080/1561426090337843410.1080/15614260903378434
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mazeika, D., Bartholomew, B., Distler, M., Thomas, K., Greenman, S., & Pratt, S. (2010). Trends in police research: A cross-sectional analysis of the 2000–2007 literature. Police Practice & Research, 11, 520–547. doi:10.1080/15614263.2010.497390
   Google Scholar
• Morreale, S., & McCabe, J. (2012). The pracademic in criminal justice education. ACJS Now, 6, 8–15.
   Google Scholar
• Rojek, J., Alpert, G., & Smith, H. (2012). The utilization of research by police. Police Practice and Research, 13, 329–341. doi:10.1080/15614263.2012.67159910.1080/15614263.2012.671599
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, D. P. (2010). Police research: Merging the policy and action research traditions. Police Practice and Research, 11, 144–149. doi:10.1080/1561426100359320310.1080/15614261003593203
   Google Scholar
• Scott, M. S. (2010). Policing and police research: Learning to listen, with a Wisconsin case study. Police Practice and Research, 11, 95–104. doi:10.1080/1561426100359077910.1080/15614261003590779
   Google Scholar
• Skogan, W. G., & Frydl, K. (Eds.). (2004). Fairness and effectiveness in policing: The evidence. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Sparrow, M. K. (2011). Governing science, part of the new perspectives in policing series. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Steinheider, B., Wuestewald, T., Boyatzis, & Kroutter, P. (2012). In search of a methodology of collaboration: Understanding researcher–practitioner philosophical differences in policing. Police Practice and Research, 13, 357–374. doi:10.1080/15614263.2012.671620
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, D. W. (2010). Enhancing the impact of research on police practice. Police Practice and Research, 11, 150–154. doi:10.1080/1561426100359327810.1080/15614261003593278
   Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, R., Dabney, D. A., & Copes, H. (2010). The Prominence of qualitative research in criminology and criminal justice scholarship. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 21, 391–411. doi:10.1080/10511253.2010.51655710.1080/10511253.2010.516557
   Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, R., DeMichele, M., & Miller, J. M. (2005). Methodological orientations of articles appearing in criminal justice top journals: Who publishes what and where? Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 16, 265–279. doi:10.1080/1051125050008227810.1080/10511250500082278
   Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, R., & Vito, G. (2012). Research productivity of law enforcement scholars: Are those with practical experience equal to their peers without practical experience? International Journal of Police Science & Management, 14, 107–117. doi:10.1350/ijps.2012.14.2.269
   Google Scholar
• Weisburd, D., & Neyroud, P. (2011). Police science: Toward a new paradigm, part of the new perspectives in policing series. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Weisburd, D., Telep, C., Hinkle, J., & Eck, J. (2010). Is problem-oriented policing effective in reducing crime and disorder? Findings from a campbell systematic review, criminology and public policy, 9, 139–172. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2010.00617.x10.1111/cpp.2010.9.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, R. A., & Miller, J. M. (1998). The most-cited scholars and works in police studies. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 21, 240–254. doi:10.1108/13639519810220154
   Google Scholar