Translating police research into policy: some implications of the National Academies report on proactive policing for policymakers and researchers

References

• Aos, S. (2015). What is the bottom line? Criminology and Public Policy, 14, 633–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auletta, K. (2015, September 7). Fixing broken windows. The New Yorker. Retrieved from https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/09/07/fixing-broken-windows
   Google Scholar
• Bowling, B. (2007). Fair and effective policing methods: Towards ‘good enough’ policing. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 8, 17–32.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Disease Control [CDC] (2017). What would happen if we stopped vaccinations? Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/whatifstop.htm
   Google Scholar
• Chong, D., & Druckman, J. (2007). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. A. (2000). Measuring the costs and benefits of crime and justice. In D. Duffee (Ed.), Criminal Justice, Vol. 4: Measurement and analysis of crime and justice (pp. 263–315). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Committee on the Science of Science Communication. (2017). Communicating science effectively: A research agenda. Division of behavioral and social sciences and education. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlstrom, M. F. (2014). Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences. Proceedings of the National Academies of Sciences, 111, 13614–13620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dominguez, P., & Raphael, S. (2015). The role of the cost-of-crime literature in bridging the gap between social science research and policy making. Criminology and Public Policy, 14, 589–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epp, C. R., Maynard-Moody, S., & Haider-Markel, D. (2014). Pulled over: How police stops define race and citizenship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can matter again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freiberg, A., & Carson, W. G. (2010). The limits to evidence-based policy: Evidence, emotion, and criminal justice. The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 69, 152–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A. (2001). Accountable autonomy: Toward empowered deliberation in Chicago schools and policing. Politics and Society, 29, 73–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawande, A. (2014). Being mortal. New York, NY: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Gawande, A. (2016, June 10). The mistrust of science. The New Yorker.
   Google Scholar
• Geller, A., Fagan, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2017). Police contact and mental health. Columbia public law research paper No. 14-571. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3096076
   Google Scholar
• Gladwell, M. (2006, April 10). Here’s why. The New Yorker.
   Google Scholar
• Goff, P. A. (2018, January 7). On stop-and-frisk, we can’t celebrate just yet. New York Times. Retrieved from https://nyti.ms/2FbWgFj
   Google Scholar
• Green, M. C. (2006). Narratives and cancer communication. Journal of Communication, 56, s163–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J. R. (2014). New directions in policing: Balancing prediction and meaning in police research. Justice Quarterly, 31, 5–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz, J., & Zedlewski, E. (2006). Applying cost-benefit analysis to policing evaluations. Justice Research and Policy, 8, 52–65.
   Google Scholar
• Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis. (2017). Special Issue on Policing, 8, 305–398.
   Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M., Jenkins-Smith, H., & Braman, D. (2010). Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research, 14, 147–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klockars, C. B. (1988). The idea of police. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S., Aos, S., & Pennucci, A. (2015). What works and what does not? Benefit-cost findings from WSIPP (Doc. No. 15- 02–4101). Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13, 106–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, S., & Oberauer, K. (2012). Motivated rejection of science. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25, 217–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lum, C., & Koper, C. (2017). Evidence-based policing: Translating research into practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, E. R., & Katz, C. M. (2002). Community policing, loose coupling, and sensemaking in American police agencies. Justice Quarterly, 19, 501–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manski, C. F., & Nagin, D. S. (2017). Assessing benefits, costs, and disparate racial impacts of confrontational proactive policing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114, 9308–9313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastrofski, S. D. (1988). Community policing as reform: A cautionary tale. In J. R. Greene & S. D. Mastrofski (Eds.), Community policing: Rhetoric or reality? (pp. 47–67). New York, NY: Prager.
   Google Scholar
• Mastrofski, S. D. (1998). Community policing and police organization structure. In J. P. Brodeur (Ed.), Community policing and the evaluation of police service delivery (pp. 161–189). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mastrofski, S. D. (1999). Policing for people. In Ideas in American policing. Washington, DC: Police Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Mastrofski, S. D., & Willis, J. J. (2010). Police organization: Continuity and change. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research, Vol. 39 (pp. 55–144). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mastrofski, S. D. (Forth). Community policing: Critic. In D. Weisburd & A. A. Braga (Eds.), Police innovation: Contrasting perspectives (2nd ed.) (pp. 45–70). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. H. (2006). Improving police through expertise, experience, and experiments. In D. Weisburd & A. A. Braga (Eds.), Police innovation: Contrasting perspectives (pp. 322–338). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morin, R., Parker, K., Stepler, R., & Mercer, A. (2017). Behind the badge. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Muir, W. K., Jr. (1977). Police: Streetcorner politicians. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nagin, D. S. (2015). Cost-benefit analysis of crime prevention policies. Criminology and Public Policy, 14, 583–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagin, D. S., & Telep, C. W. (2017). Procedural justice and legal compliance. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 13, 5–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natapoff, A. (2015). Misdemeanors. Annual Review of Law and Social Sciences, 11, 255–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neyroud, P. W. (2017). Balancing public safety and individual rights in street policing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114, 9231–9233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuccitelli, D. (2017). Climate scientists just debunked deniers’ favorite argument. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2017/jun/28/climate-scientists-just-debunked-deniers-favorite-argument
   Google Scholar
• Nutley, S., Walter, I., & Davies, H. T. O. (2007). Using evidence: How research can inform public services. Bristol, United Kingdom: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petrosino, A., Turpin-Petrosino, C., Hollis-Peel, M., & Lavenberg, J. G. (2013). Scared straight and other juvenile awareness programs for preventing juvenile delinquency: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 9, 1–55.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center (2016). Many Americans believe fake news is sowing confusion. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/2016/12/15/many-americansbelieve-fake-news-is-sowing-confusion/
   Google Scholar
• President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. (2015). Final report of the President’s Task Force on 21st Century policing. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
   Google Scholar
• RAND (2010). Hidden in plain sight: What cost-of-crime research can tell us about investing in policing. Author. Santa Monica, CA: Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/occasional_papers/2010/RAND_OP279.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, D. P., Lawrence, D. S., Hartnett, S. M., McDevitt, J., & Posick, C. (2015). Measuring procedural justice and legitimacy at the local level: The police–community interaction survey. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11, 335–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach (7th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, J. A., Roehl, J., & Johnson, C. C. (2004). Trends in the adoption of community policing. In W. G. Skogan (Ed.), Community policing: Can it work? (pp. 3–29). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J., Winship, C., & Knight, C. (2013). Overview of: “Translating causal claims: Principles and strategies of policy-relevant research.”. Criminology and Public Policy, 12, 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schafer, J. A. (2013). Effective leadership in policing: Successful traits and habits. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Sewell, A. A., Jefferson, K. A., & Lee, H. (2016). Living under surveillance: Gender, psychological distress, and stop-question-and-frisk policing in New York City. Social Science and Medicine, 159, 1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, L. (2003). Reason for emotion: Reinventing justice with theories, innovations and research—The American Society of Criminology 2002 Presidential Address. Criminology, 41, 1–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, L. (2015). A tipping point for “totally evidenced policing”: Ten ideas for building an evidence-based police agency. International Criminal Justice Review, 25, 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, L. W., & Rogan, D. P. (1995). Effects of gun seizures on gun violence: “Hot spots” patrol in Kansas City. Justice Quarterly, 12, 673–693.
   Google Scholar
• Skogan, W. G. (2004). Representing the community in community policing. In W. G. Skogan (Ed.), Community policing: Can it work? (pp. 57–75). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Skogan, W. G. (2006). Police and community in Chicago. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skolnick, J. (1966). Justice without trial. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Suhay, E., & Druckman, J. N. (2015). The politics of science: Political values and the production, communication, and reception of scientific knowledge. The Annals of the American Association of Political and Social Science, 658, 6–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. (1994). Incommensurability and valuation in law. Michigan Law Review, 92, 779–846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thacher, D. (2001). Policing is not a treatment. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38, 387–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thacher, D. (2001b). Equity and community policing: A new view of community partnerships. Criminal Justice Ethics, 20, 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Thacher, D. (2006). The normative case study. American Journal of Sociology, 111, 1631–1676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thacher, D. (2008). Research for the front lines. Policing and Society, 18, 46–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thacher, D. (2016). Channeling police discretion: The hidden potential of focused deterrence. The University of Chicago Legal Forum, Article 13, 101–150.
   Google Scholar
• Thacher, D., & Rein, M. (2004). Managing value conflict in public policy. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 17, 457–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., Fagin, J., & Geller, A. (2014). Street stops and police legitimacy: Teachable moments in young urban men’s legal socialization. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 11, 751–785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vraga, E. K., & Bode, L. (2017). Using expert sources to correct health and misinformation in social media. Science Communication, 1–25. doi:10.1177/1075547017731776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Washington State Institute for Public Policy. (2017b). Deploy one additional police officer with statewide average practices. WA: Olympia.
   Google Scholar
• Washington State Institute for Public Policy [WSIPP]. (2017). Benefit-cost technical documentation (December). WA: Olympia.
   Google Scholar
• Weisburd, D. (2016). Does hot spots policing inevitably lead to unfair and abusive police practices, or can we maximize both fairness and effectiveness in the new proactive policing? University of Chicago Legal Forum, Article16, 661–689.
   Google Scholar
• Weisburd, D., & Majmundar, M. K. (Editors). (2018). Proactive policing: Effects on crime and communities. Committee on proactive policing: Effects on crime, communities, and civil liberties. Committee on law and justice, division of behavioral and social sciences and education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, J. J., & Mastrofski, S. D. (2017). Contrôler l’autonomie policière par un équilibre des forces: Le cas des caméras portées. Cahiers de la Sécurité et de la Justice, 40, 90–102.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, J. J., Mastrofski, S. D., & Weisburd, D. (2007). Making sense of Compstat: A theory-based analysis of organizational change in three police departments. Law and Society Review, 41, 147–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worden, R. E., & McLean, S. (2017). Mirage of police reform: Procedural justice and police legitimacy. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar