The construction and shaping of protesters’ perceptions of police legitimacy: a thematic approach to police information and intelligence gathering

References

• Adang, O. (2011). Initiation and escalation of collective violence: An observational study. In T. Madensen & J. Knutsson (Eds.), Preventing crowd violence (pp. 47–69). Boulder: Reinner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Adang, O., & van Ham, T. (2015). Contextual and individual factors determining escalation of collective violence: Case study of the project X riot in Haren, The Netherlands. The British Journal of Criminology, 55(6), 1226–1244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benyon, J. (1987). Interpretations of civil disorder. In J. Benyon & J. Solomos (Eds.), The roots of urban unrest (pp. 23–41). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2011). Grounded theory: A practical guide. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bottoms, A., & Tankebe, J. (2012). Beyond procedural justice: A dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 102(1), 119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowling, B., Reiner, R., & Sheptycki, J. (2019). The politics of the police (5th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradford, B., Murphy, K., & Jackson, J. (2014). Officers as mirrors: Policing, procedural justice and the (re)production of social identity. The British Journal of Criminology, 54(4), 527–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, V. (2003). Dancing with tax authorities: Motivational postures and noncompliant actions. In V. Braithwaite (Ed.), Taxing democracy: Understanding tax avoidance and evasion (pp. 15–40). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, V. (2009). Defiance in taxation and governance: Resisting and dismissing authority in a democracy. Cheltenham: Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, V. (2010). Defiance and motivational posturing. In D. Weisburd & G. Bruinsma (Eds.), Encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justice (pp. 915–924). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, V. (2011). Resistant and dismissive defiance toward tax authorities. In A. Crawford & A. Hucklesby (Eds.), Legitimacy and compliance in criminal justice (pp. 91–115). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brehm, J. W., & Brehm, S. S. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. A Practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Cherney, A., & Murphy, K. (2011). Understanding the contingency of procedural justice outcomes. Policing, 5(3), 228–235.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, J. (2012). Sampling essentials: Practical guidelines for making sampling choices. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• della Porta, D., Peterson, A., & Reiter, H. (2006). The policing of transnational protest. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• della Porta, D., & Reiter, H. (1998). Policing protest: The control of mass demonstrations in western democracies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Donner, C., Maskaly, J., Fridell, L., & Jennings, W. G. (2015). Policing and procedural justice: A state-of-the-art review. Policing: an International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 38(1), 153–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, P., & Kovalainen, A. (2008). Qualitative methods in business research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmore, J., Jackson, W., & Monk, H. (2019). ‘That is not facilitating peaceful protest. That is dismantling the protest’: Anti-fracking protesters’ experiences of dialogue policing and mass arrest. Policing and Society, 29(1), 36–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorringe, H., & Rosie, M. (2013). ‘We will facilitate your protest’: Experiments with liaison policing. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 7(2), 204–211.
   Google Scholar
• Gorringe, H., Stott, C., & Rosie, M. (2012). Dialogue policing, decision making, and the management of public order during protest crowd events. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 9, 111–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Hinds, L., & Murphy, K. (2007). Public satisfaction with police: Using procedural justice to improve police legitimacy. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 40(1), 27–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HMIC. (2009a). Adapting to protest. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• HMIC. (2009b). Adapting to protest: Nurturing the british model of policing. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• HMIC. (2011a). Policing public order. London: TSO.
   Google Scholar
• HMIC. (2011b). The rules of engagement: A review of the August 2011 disorders. London: TSO.
   Google Scholar
• Hough, M., Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Myhill, A., & Quinton, P. (2010). Procedural justice, trust and institutional legitimacy. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 4(3), 203–210.
   Google Scholar
• Hundley, J. R. (1968). The dynamics of recent ghetto riots. In R. R. Evans (Ed.), Readings in collective behaviour (627–639). Chicago: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, J., & Bradford, B. (2010a). Police legitimacy: A conceptual overview. National Policing Improvement Agency wiki. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstractid=168407
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, J., Hough, M., Bradford, B., Hohl, K., & Kuha, J. (2012). European social survey. Policing by Consent, Understanding the dynamics of police power and legitimacy. ESS Country specific top line results series Issue 1 (UK), The European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, T. (1990). The case against paramilitary policing. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• King, M., & Waddington, D. (2005). Flashpoints revisited: A critical application to the policing of anti-globalization protest. Policing & Society, 15(3), 255–282.
   Google Scholar
• Mazerolle, L., Bennett., S., Davis, J., Sargent, E., & Manning, M. (2013). Procedural justice and police legitimacy: A systematic review of the research evidence. Oslo: Campbell Collaboration.
   Google Scholar
• Meares, T. L., Tyler, T. R., & Gardener, J. (2014). Lawful or fair? How cops and laypeople view good policing. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 105(2), 1–49. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2116645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, J. M. (2007). Sampling in grounded theory. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of grounded theory (pp. 229–244). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Punch, K. (2005). Introduction to social research (2nd ed., pp. 187–188). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Radburn, M., & Stott, C. (2018, June). The social psychological processes of procedural justice: Concepts, critiques and opportunities. Criminology and Criminal Justice, doi: 10.1177/2F1748895818780200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radburn, M., Stott, C., Bradford, B., & Robinson, M. (2016). When is policing fair? Groups, identity and judgements of the procedural justice of coercive crowd policing. Policing and Society, 28(6), 647–664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reicher, S. D. (1984). The St. Pauls riot: An explanation of the limits of crowd behaviour in terms of a social identity model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reicher, S. D. (1996). The battle of westminster, developing the social identity model of crowd behaviour in order to explain the initiation and development of collective conflict. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 115–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reicher, S. D. (2003). The psychology of crowd dynamics. In M. A. Hogg & S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 182–208). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Reicher, S. D. (2011). From crisis to opportunity: New crowd psychology and public order principles. In T. Madensen & J. Knuttson (Eds.), Preventing crowd violence (pp. 7–23). London: Lynne Reinner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Reiner, R. (1998). Policing, protest and disorder in Britain. In D. della Porta & H. Reiter (Eds.), Policing protest: The control of mass demonstrations in western democracies (pp. 35–48). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reiner, R. (2010). The politics of the police (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robson, C. (2011). Real world research (3rd ed.). Chichester: Wiley and Sons, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Schaap, D. (2018). The police, the public, and the pursuit of public trust: A cross-national, dynamic study of trust in the police and police trust-building strategies. The Hague, Netherlands: Eleven International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, A. J. (2001). Justification and legitimacy: Essays on rights and obligations. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
   Google Scholar
• Smelser, N. (1962). Theory of collective behaviour. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spiegel, J. P. (1969). Hostility, aggression and violence. In A. D. Grimshaw (Ed.), Racial violence in the US (pp. 331–339). Chicago: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Stott, C. (2009). Crowd psychology and public order policing: An overview of scientific theory and evidence. Liverpool: University of Liverpool.
   Google Scholar
• Stott, C., Hoggett, J., & Pearson, G. (2011). ‘Keeping the peace’: Social identity, procedural justice and the policing of football crowds. British Journal of Criminology, 52(2), 381–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stott, C., & Reicher, S. (1998). How conflict escalates: The intergroup dynamics of collective football crowd violence. Sociology, 32, 353–377.
   Google Scholar
• Stott, C., Scothern, M., & Gorringe, H. (2013). Advances in liaison based public order policing in England: Human rights and negotiating the management of protest. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 7(2), 212–226.
   Google Scholar
• Stott, C. J., Hutchison, P., & Drury, J. (2001). Hooligans abroad? Intergroup dynamics, social identity and participation in collective disorder at the 1998 world cup finals. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 359–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tankebe, J. (2013). Viewing things differently: Examining the dimensions of public perceptions of police legitimacy. Criminology, 51(1), 103–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (2003). Procedural justice, legitimacy and the effective rule of law. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice- A review of research (pp. 431–505). Chicago: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (2004). Enhancing police legitimacy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593, 84–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (2011a). Trust and legitimacy: Policing in the USA and Europe. European Journal of Criminology, 8, 254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (2011b). Why people co-operate. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2002). Trust in the law encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. New York: Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Waddington, D., Jones, K., & Critcher, C. (1989). Flashpoints: Studies in public disorder. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Waddington, P. A. J. (1987). Towards paramilitarism? Dilemmas in policing civil disorder. The British Journal of Criminology, 27(1), 37–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddington, P. A. J. (1993). The case against paramilitary policing considered. The British Journal of Criminology, 33(3), 353–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddington, P. A. J. (1994). Liberty and order: Public order policing in a capital city. London: UCL press.
   Google Scholar
• Waddington, P. A. J. (1998). Controlling protest in contemporary, historical and comparative perspective. In D. della Porta & H. Reiter (Eds.), Policing protest: The control of mass demonstrations in western democracies (pp. 117–142). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waddington, P. A. J. (1999). Policing citizens: Authority and rights. London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waddington, P. A. J., Williams, K., Wright, M., & Newburn, T. (2015). Dissension in public evaluations of the police. Policing and Society, 25(2), 212–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whelan, C., & Molnar, A. (2019). Policing political mega-events through ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ tactics: Reflections on local and organisational tensions in public order policing. Policing and Society, 29(1), 85–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, D. (2017). Blackstone’s handbook for policing students. 2018. 41–42. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar