The impact of context on real-life serious crime interviews

References

• Alison, L. J., Alison, E., Noone, G., Elntib, S., & Christiansen, P. (2013). Why tough tactics fail and rapport gets results: Observing Rapport-Based Interpersonal Techniques (ORBIT) to generate useful information from terrorists. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19(4), 411. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, J. (1992). Video-taping of police interviews with suspects: An evaluation. Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, J. (1993). Police interview techniques: Establishing truth or proof. The British Journal of Criminology, 33(3), 325. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a048329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee, M., Capozzoli, M., McSweeney, L. & Sinha, D. (1999). Beyond kappa: A review of interrater agreement measures. The Canadian Journal of Statistics, 27(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.2307/3315487
   Google Scholar
• Bull, R., & Soukara, S. (2010). Four studies of what really happens in police interviews. In G. D. Lassiter & C. A. Meer (Eds.), Police interrogations and false confessions: Current research, practice, and policy recommendations (pp. 81–95). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bull, R. (2013). What is ‘believed’ or actually ‘known’ about characteristics that may contribute to being a good/effective interviewer? Investigative interviewing: Research and practice, 5, 128–143.
   Google Scholar
• Bull, R. (2014). When in interviews to disclose information to suspects and to challenge them? In R. Bull (Ed.), Investigative interviewing. Springer (pp. 167–181).
   Google Scholar
• Bull, R., & Cherryman, J. (1996). Helping to identify skills gaps in specialist investigative interviewing: Enhancement of professional skills. Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Bull, R., & Rachlew, A. (2019). Investigative interviewing: From England to Norway and beyond.  In S. Barela, M. Fallon, G. Gaggioli, and J. Ohlin (Eds.) Interrogation and torture: Research on efficacy, and its integration with morality and legality (pp. 171–196).  Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, C., Milne, R., & Bull, R. (2011). Interviewing suspects of crime: The impact of PEACE training, supervision and the presence of a legal advisor. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 8(2), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary, H. (2014). Police interviewing and interrogation of juvenile suspects: A descriptive examination of actual cases. Law and Human Behaviour, 38(3), 271–282. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1960). A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Education and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
   Google Scholar
• Collins, K., & Carthy, N. (2019). No rapport, no comment: The relationship between rapport and communication during investigative interviews with suspects. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 16(1), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, V., & Daly, Y. (2019). From legal advice to legal assistance: Recognising the changing role of the solicitor in the Garda station. Irish Judicial Studies Journal, 2019(1), 103–123. http://doras.dcu.ie/24145/
   Google Scholar
• Deslauriers-Varin, N., Lussier, P., & St-Yves, M. (2011). Confessing their crime: Factors influencing the offender’s decision to confess to the police. Justice Quarterly, 28(1), 113–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820903218966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deslauriers-Varin, N., & St-Yves, M. (2006, June). An empirical investigation of offenders’ decision to confess their crimes during police interrogation [Paper Presentation]. Second International Conference on Investigative Interviewing. University of Portsmouth.
   Google Scholar
• Ede, R., & Shepherd, E. (1997). Active defence: A solicitor’s guide to police and defence investigation and prosecution and defence disclosure in criminal cases. Law Society.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, D., & Stokoe, E. (2011). ‘You Don’t Have to Answer’: Lawyers’ contributions in police interrogations of suspects. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 44(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2011.543877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, R. (1993). The conduct of police interviews with juveniles. Royal Commission on Criminal Justice, Research Study 8. HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Feld, B. C. (2013). Kids, cops and interrogation: Inside the interrogation room. New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS:(and sex and drugs and rock’n’roll). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, A., & Rachlew, A. (2018). From interrogation to investigative interviewing: The application of psychology. In A. Griffiths & R. Milne (Eds.) The Psychology of Criminal Investigation; From theory to practice (pp. 154–178). Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G. H. (2018). The psychology of false confessions: Forty years of science and practice. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G. H., & Pearse, J. (2011). Suspect interviews and false confessions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(1), 33–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmberg, U., & Christianson, S. (2002). Murderers’ and sexual suspects’ experiences of police interview and their inclination to admit or deny crimes. Behavioural Science and the Law, 20(1–2), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Home Office. (2008). Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984. Code C. Code of Practice for the detention, treatment and questioning of persons by police officers. The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Kebbell, M., Alison, L., & Hurren, E. (2006). Sex offenders’ perceptions of the effectiveness and fairness of humanity, dominance, and displaying an understanding of cognitive distortions in police interviews: A vignette study. Psychology, Crime and Law, 14(5), 435–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160801950523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, C., Miller, J., & Redlich, A. (2016). The dynamic nature of interrogation. Law and Human Behavior, 40(3), 295–309. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, L., & Snook, B. (2009). Peering inside a Canadian interrogation room: An examination of the Reid model of interrogation, influence tactics, and coercive strategies. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(7), 674–694. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809335142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leahy-Harland, S., & Bull, R. (2017). Police strategies and suspect responses in real-life serious crime interviews. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 32(2), 138–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-016-9207-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leo, R. (1996). Inside the interrogation room. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86(2), 266–303. https://doi.org/10.2307/1144028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276–282. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milne, R., & Bull, R. (1999). Investigative interviewing: Psychology and practice. John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Mols, V. (2017). Bringing directives on procedural rights of the EU to police stations: Practical training for criminal defence lawyers. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 8(3), 300–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/2032284417723421
   Google Scholar
• Mortimer, A., & Shepherd, E. (1999). Frames of mind: Schemata guiding cognition and conduct in the interviewing of suspected offenders. In A. Memon & R. Bull (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of interviewing (pp. 294–315). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Moston, S., Stephenson, G., & Williamson, T. (1992). The effects of case characteristics on suspect behaviour during police questioning. British Journal of Criminology, 32(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a048178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Crime Faculty. (1998). A practical guide to investigative interviewing (2nd ed.). Training and Development Unit, Bramshill Police College.
   Google Scholar
• Oxburgh, G., Ost, J., Morris, P., & Cherryman, J. (2015). Police officers’ perceptions of interviews in cases of sexual offences and murder involving children and adult victims. Police Practice and Research, 16(1), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2013.849595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearse, J., & Gudjonsson, G. (1997). Police interviewing and legal representation: A field study. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 8(1), 200–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585189708412005
   Google Scholar
• Pearse, J., & Gudjonsson, G. (1999). Measuring influential police interviewing tactics: A factor analytical approach. Legal and Criminology Psychology, 4(2), 221–238. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532599167860
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, C., & Brown, D. (1998). Entry into the criminal justice system: A survey of police arrests and their outcomes (Home Office research study 185). Home office.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, K., & Jackson, J. (2007). Of rights and roles: Police interviews with young suspects in Northern Ireland. British Journal of Criminology, 47(2), 234–255. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azl043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N., & Ployhart, R. (1999). Estimates of cross-validity for stepwise regression and with predictor selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(1), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.50
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, E., Ede, R., & Hickman, J. (2005). Active Defence. Law Society.
   Google Scholar
• Soukara, S. (2004). Investigating interviewing of suspects: Piecing together the picture [ Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Portsmouth.
   Google Scholar
• Soukara, S., Bull, R., Vrij, A., Turner, M., & Cherryman, J. (2009). What really happens in police interviews of suspects? Tactics and confessions. Psychology, Crime and Law., 15(6), 493–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160802201827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(17). Retrieved from: http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=17
   Google Scholar
• Stokoe, E., Edwards, D., & Edwards, H. (2016). “No Comment” responses to questions in police investigative interviews. In S. Ehrlich, D. Eades, & J. Ainsworth (Eds.), Discursive constructions of consent in the legal process (pp. 289–317). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• St-Yves, M., & Deslauriers-Varin, N. (2009). The psychology of suspects’ decision-making during interrogation. In R. Bull, T. Valentine, & T. Williamson (Eds.), Handbook of psychology of investigative interviewing: Current developments and future directions (pp. 1–15). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, W. (2018). The complex relationship between interrogation techniques, suspects changing their statement and legal assistance. Evidence from a Dutch sample of police interviews. Policing and Society, 28(3), 308–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2016.1157594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, D., & Bull, R. (2010). What really is effective in interviews with suspects? A study comparing interviewing skills against interviewing outcomes. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15(2), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532509X463356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar