Potential for police investigator bias: the impact of child sexual abuse victims’ background characteristics on perceived statement credibility, case outcome and quality of interview questions

References

• Ahern, E. C., & Lamb, M. E. (2017). Children’s reports of disclosure recipient reactions in forensic interviews: Comparing the NICHD and MoGP protocols. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology,32(2), 85–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-016-9205–x
   Google Scholar
• Ask, K., & Granhag, P. A. (2005). Motivational sources of confirmation bias in criminal investigations: The need for cognitive closure. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 2(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.19
   Google Scholar
• Ask, K., Rebelius, A., & Granhag, P. A. (2008). The ‘elasticity’ of evidence: A moderator of investigator bias. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(9), 1245–1259. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bala, N., Ramakrishnan, K., Linday, R., & Lee, K. (2005). Judicial assessment of the credibility of child witnesses. Alberta Law Review, 42(4), 995–1017. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4640896/pdf/nihms239773.pdf
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Balcetis, E., & Dunning, D. (2006). See what you want to see: Motivational influences on visual perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 612–625. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollingmo, G., Wessel, E., Sandvold, Y., Eilertsen, D. E., & Magnussen, S. (2009). The effect of biased and non-biased information on judgment of witness credibility. Psychology, Crime & Law, 15(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160802131107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollingmo, G. C., Wessel, E., Eilertsen, D. E., & Magnussen, S. (2008). Credibility of the emotional witness: A study of ratings by police investigators. Psychology, Crime & Law, 14(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160701368412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (2012). Reliability of children’s testimony in the era of developmental reversals. Developmental Review, 32(3), 224–267. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2012.06.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruck, M., & Ceci, S. J. (1999). The suggestibility of children’s memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 419–439. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceci, S. J., & Bruck, M. (1995). The role of interviewer bias. In S. J. Ceci & M. Bruck (Eds.), Jeopardy in the courtroom: A scientific analysis of children’s testimony (pp. 87–108). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Charman, S. D., Kavetski, M., & Mueller, D. H. (2017). Cognitive bias in the legal system: Police officers evaluate ambiguous evidence in a belief-consistent manner. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(2), 193–202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
   Google Scholar
• Collins, R. E. (2016). Beauty and bullets: A content analysis of female offenders and victims in four Canadian newspapers. Journal of Sociology, 52(2), 296–310. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783314528594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, G. S., & Meterko, V. (2019). Cognitive bias research in forensic science: A systematic review. Forensic Science International, 297, 35–46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.01.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronch, L. E., Viljoen, J. L., & Hansen, D. J. (2006). Forensic interviewing in child sexual abuse cases: Current techniques and future directions. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11(3), 195–207. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2005.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, T. P., de Vos, E., & Whitcomb, D. (1994). Prosecution of child sexual abuse: Which cases are accepted?. Child Abuse & Neglect, 18(8), 663–677. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0145-2134(94)90016-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, T. P., & Whitcomb, D. (2017). The practice of prosecuting child maltreatment: Results of an online survey of prosecutors. Child Abuse & Neglect, 69, 20–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.04.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curley, L. J., Munro, J., Lages, M., MacLean, R., & Murray, J. (2019). Assessing cognitive bias in forensic decision: A review and outlook. Journal of Forensic Sciences 65(2), 354–360. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14220
   Google Scholar
• Dror, I. E., Charlton, D., & Péron, A. E. (2006). Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications. Forensic Science International, 156(1), 74–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.10.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duron, J. F. (2018). Legal decision-making in child sexual abuse investigations: A mixed-methods study of factors that influence prosecution. Child Abuse & Neglect, 79, 302–314. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.02.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavioral Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fessinger, M. B., & McAuliff, B. D. (2020). A national survey of child forensic interviewers: Implications for research, practice, and law. Law and Human Behavior, 44(2), 113–127. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000368
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Found, B., & Ganas, J. (2013). The management of domain irrelevant context information in forensic handwriting examination casework. Science and Justice, 53(2), 154–158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2012.10.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, G. S., Sharma, A., Thomas, S. F., & Considine, M. G. (1995). Mother knows best: Effects of relationship status and interviewer bias on children’s memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 60(1), 195–228. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1995.1038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman-Delahunty, J. D., Cossins, A., & O’Brien, K. (2010). Enhancing the credibility of complainants in child sexual assault trials: The effect of expert evidence and judicial directions. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 28(6), 769–783. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.936
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, E. (1993). Unequal justice: The prosecution of child sexual abuse. The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greer, C. (2007). News media, victims and crime. In P. Davies, P. Francis, & C. Greer (Eds.), Victims, Crime and society (pp. 49–50). Sage. https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/16998/1/3%20Greer%20-%20News%20Media%20Victims%20and%20Crime%20CRO.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hallgren, K. A. (2012). Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: An overview and tutorial. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.08.1.p023
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world?. Behavior and Brain Science, 33(2–3), 61–83. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, S., & Freitas, T. R. (2010). Error rates in forensic child sexual abuse evaluations. Psychological Injury & Law, 3(2), 133–147. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-010-9073-0
   Google Scholar
• Hughes-Scholes, C. H., Powell, B., & Sharman, S. J. (2014). An examination of police officers’ beliefs about how children report abuse. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 21(1), 127–138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2013.793153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M. (2005). On the psychology of confessions: Does innocence put innocents at risk? American Psychologist, 60(3), 215–228. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.3.215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M., Dror, I. E., & Kukucka, J. (2013). The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koppelaar, L., Lange, A., & Van De Velde, J. (1997). The influence of positive and negative victim credibility on the assessment of rape victims: An experimental study of expectancy-confirmation bias. International Review of Victimology, 5(1), 61–85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/026975809700500104
   Google Scholar
• Kurniasari, A. (2016). Analisis faktor risiko dikalangan anak yang menjadi korban eksploitasi seksual di kota Surabaya. Analysis of Risk Factors among Children to Become Victims of Sexual Exploitation in Surabaya City) Sosio Konsepsia, 5(3),113–134. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33007/ska.v5i3.251
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, M. E., Brown, D. A., Hershkowitz, I., Orbach, Y., & Esplin, P. W. (2018). Tell me what happened: Structured investigative interviews of child victims and witnesses. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, J., Arluke, A., & Irvine, L. (2017). Are people more disturbed by dog or human suffering?. Society & Animals, 25(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/15685306-12341440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meer, C. A., & Kassin, S. M. (2002). He’s guilty: Investigator bias in judgments of truth and deception. Law and Human Behavior, 26(5), 469–480. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020278620751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
   Google Scholar
• O’Neal, E. N. (2019). Victim is not credible: The influence of rape culture on police perceptions of sexual assault complainants. Justice Quarterly, 36(1), 127–160. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2017.1406977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otgaar, H., de Ruiter, C., Howe, M. L., Hoetmer, L., & Van Reekum, P. (2017). A case concerning children’s false memories of abuse: Recommendations regarding expert witness work. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 24(3), 365–378. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2016.1230924
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otgaar, H., Howe, M. L., Merckelbach, H., & Muris, P. (2018). Who is the better eyewitness? Sometimes adults but at other times children. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(5), 378–385. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418770998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, M., Hughes-Scholes, C. H., & Sharman, S. J. (2012). Skill in interviewing reduces confirmation bias. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 9(2), 33–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rassin, E. (2010). Blindness to alternative scenarios in evidence evaluation. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 7(2), 153–163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rassin, E., Eerland, A., & Kuijpers, I. (2010). Find the evidence: An analogue study of confirmation bias in criminal investigations. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 7(3), 231–246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rich, K., & Seffrin, P. (2012). Police interviews of sexual assault reporters: Do attitudes matter?. Violence and Victims, 27(2), 263–279. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.27.2.263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risinger, D. (2009). The NAS/NRC report on forensic science: A glass nine-tenths full (this is about the other tenth). Jurimetrics, 50(1), 21–34. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41550024
   Google Scholar
• Risinger, D. M., Saks, M. J., Thompson, W. C., & Rosenthal, R. (2002). The Daubert/Kumho implications of observer effects in forensic science: Hidden problems of expectation and suggestion. California Law Review, 90(1), 1–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3481305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivard, J. R., & Compo, N.S. (2017). Self-reported current practices in child forensic interviewing: Training, tools, and pre-interview preparation. Behavioral Sciences and Law, 35(3), 253– 268. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2290
   Google Scholar
• Rivard, R. J., Pena, M. M., & Compo, N. S. (2016). “Blind” interviewing: Is ignorance bliss? Memory, 24(9), 1256–1266. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2015.1098705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrabaugh, M., London, K., & Hall, A. K. (2016). Planning the forensic interview. In W. T. O’Donohue, M. Fanetti, W. T. O’Donohue, & M. Fanetti (Eds.), Forensic interviews regarding child sexual abuse: A guide to evidence-based practice(pp. 197–218). Springer International. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21097-1_11
   Google Scholar
• Rumble, L., Febrianto, R. F., Larasati, M. N., Hamilton, C., Mathews, B., & Dunne, M. P. (2018). Childhood sexual violence in Indonesia: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 21(2), 284–299. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2F1524838018767932
   Google Scholar
• Saywitz, K. J., Goodman, G. S., Nicholas, E., & Moan, S. F. (1991). Children’s memories of a physical examination involving genital touch: Implications for reports of child sexual abuse. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(5), 682–691. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.59.5.682
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleath, E., & Bull, R. (2017). Police perceptions of rape victims and the impact on case decision making: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 34, 102–112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K., & Milne, R. (2011). Planning the interview. In M. E. Lamb, D. J. La Rooy, L. C. Malloy, & C. Katz, Eds. Children’s testimony: A handbook of psychological research and forensic practice. 2nd ed (pp. 87–107). Wiley. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119998495.ch5
   Google Scholar
• Stoel, R. D., Dror, I. E., & Miller, L. S. (2014). Bias among forensic document examiners: Still a need for a procedural change. Australian Journal of Forensic Science, 46(1), 91–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2013.797026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumampouw, N.E.J., Otgaar, H., La Rooy, D., & de Ruiter, C. (2020). The quality of forensic child interviewing in child sexual abuse cases in Indonesia. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 35(2), 170–181 (2020). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-019-09342-5
   Google Scholar
• van Koppen, P. J., & Mackor, A. R. (2019). A scenario approach to the Simonshaven case. Topics in Cognitive Science, 12(4), 1132–1151. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12429
   Google Scholar
• White, T. L., Leichtman, M. D., & Ceci, S. J. (1999). The good, the bad, and the ugly: Accuracy, inaccuracy, and elaboration in preschoolers’ reports about a past event. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11(7), 37–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199712)11:7%3CS37::AID-ACP546%3E3.0.CO;2-4
   Google Scholar
• Xie, Q. W., Sun, X., Chen, M., Qiao, D. P., & Chan, K. L. (2017). What prevents Chinese parents from reporting possible cases of child sexual abuse to authority? A holistic-interactionistic approach. Child Abuse & Neglect, 64, 19–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2016.12.006
   Google Scholar