Digital equipment – a game changer for police training?! Experiences of the Bavarian Police training

References

• Albarano, R. F. (2015). College education and officer performance: Do college educated police officers perform better than those without a college education? International Journal of Education and Social Science, 2(7), 41–48. https://web.archive.org/web/20180410143511id_/http://www.ijessnet.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/5.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Amez, S., & Baert, S. (2020). Smartphone use and academic performance: A literature review. International Journal of Educational Research, 103, 101618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anshari, M., Almunawar, M. N., Shahrill, M., Wicaksono, D. K., & Huda, M. (2017). Smartphones usage in the classrooms: Learning aid or interference? Education and Information Technologies, 22(6), 3063–3079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9572-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baert, S., Vujić, S., Amez, S., Claeskens, M., Daman, T., Maeckelberghe, A., Omey, De Marez, L., & Omey, E. (2020). Smartphone use and academic performance: Correlation or causal relationship? Kyklos, 73(1), 22–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.12214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauchamp, G., & Kennewell, S. (2010). Interactivity in the classroom and its impact on learning. Computers & Education, 54(3), 759–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeland, W. D. (2002). Student engagement, visual learning and technology: Can interactive whiteboards help? Action Research Exchange, 1(1). https://vtext.valdosta.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10428/1252/beeland_am.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
   Google Scholar
• Beinicke, A., & Muff, A. (2019). Effectiveness of simulation-based training in basic police training. European Law Enforcement Research Bulletin, 4, 207–212. http://91.82.159.234/index.php/bulletin/article/view/330/273
   Google Scholar
• Bejinaru, R. (2019). Impact of digitalization in the knowledge economy. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 7(3), 367–380. https://doi.org/10.25019/MDKE/7.3.06
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, A. (2018). Investigating the Impact of interactive whiteboards in higher education: A case study. Journal of Learning Spaces, 7(1), 76–90. http://libjournal.uncg.edu/jls/article/view/1631
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R. M., & Abrami, P. C. (2014). A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: From the general to the applied. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(1), 87–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-013-9077-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camilleri, M. A., & Camilleri, A. C. (2017). Digital learning resources and ubiquitous technologies in education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 22(1), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-016-9287-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, S. P., Greenberg, K., & Walker, M. S. (2017). The impact of computer usage on academic performance: Evidence from a randomized trial at the United States military academy. Economics of Education Review, 56, 118–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2016.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapparo, L. (2017). Digital learning: How to improve knowledge and skills for law enforcement managers. European Law Enforcement Research Bulletin, 3, 131–135. https://bulletin.cepol.europa.eu/index.php/bulletin/article/view/303/233
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Crompton, H. (2013). A historical overview of m-learning: Toward learner-centered education. In Z. L. Berge & L. Y. Muilenberg (Eds.), Handbook of mobile learning (pp. 3–14). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, R. S., Dean, D. L., & Ball, N. (2013). Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(4), 563–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9305-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drijvers, P., Doorman, M., Boon, P., & Gravemeijer, K. (2010). The teacher and the tool: Instrumental orchestrations in the technology-rich mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Math, 75(2), 213–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9254-5
   Google Scholar
• Eisinga, R., Grotenhuis, M. T., & Pelzer, B. (2013). The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, cronbach, or spearman-Brown? International Journal of Public Health, 58(4), 637–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, S., Veen, H. T., & Kop, N. (2021). Technological innovation in a police organization: Lessons learned from the national police of the Netherlands. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 15(3), 1818–1831. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paab003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielding, N. G. (2018). Professionalizing the police. The unfulfilled promise of police training. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• From, J. (2017). Pedagogical digital competence - between values, knowledge and skills. Higher Education Studies, 7(2), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v7n2p43
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, M. (2022). Challenges for police training after COVID-19. European Law Enforcement Research Bulletin, SCE 5, 205–220. https://doi.org/10.7725/eulerb.v0iSCE%205.480
   Google Scholar
• Gerick, J., & Eickelmann, B. (2017): Abschlussbericht im rahmen der wissenschaftlichen begleitung der evaluation des projekts “lernen mit digitalen medien” in schleswig-holstein. [Final report within the framework of the scientific monitoring of the evaluation of the project “Learning with digital media” in schleswig-holstein]. University of Hamburg and University of Paderborn. https://kw.uni-paderborn.de/fileadmin/fakultaet/Institute/erziehungswissenschaft/Schulpaedagogik/PDF/Abschlussbericht_Evaluation_Modellschulen_Gerick_Eickelmann_Feb2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Glass, A. L., & Kang, M. (2019). Dividing attention in the classroom reduces exam performance. Educational Psychology, 39(3), 395–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2018.1489046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glover, D., Miller, D., Averis, D., & Door, V. (2007). The evolution of an effective pedagogy for teachers using the interactive whiteboard in mathematics and modern languages: An empirical analysis from the secondary sector. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880601141146
   Google Scholar
• Graham, C. R., Woodfield, W., & Harrison, J. B. (2013). A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregorcic, B., Etkina, E., & Planinsic, G. (2018). A new way of using the interactive whiteboard in a high school physics classroom: A case study. Research in Science Education, 48(2), 465–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9576-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimes, D., & Warschauer, M. (2008). Learning with laptops: A multi-method case study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(3), 305–332. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.38.3.d
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulek, J. C., & Demirtas, H. (2005). Learning with technology: The impact of laptop use on student achievement. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 3(2), 1-38. https://ejournals.bc.edu/index.php/jtla/article/view/1655/1501
   Google Scholar
• Hall, A. C. G., Lineweaver, T. T., Hogan, E. E., & O’Brien, S. W. (2020). On or off task: The negative influence of laptops on neighboring students’ learning depends on how they are used. Computers & Education, 153, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, C., & Straker, L. (2000). Survey of physical ergonomics issues associated with school children’s use of laptop computers. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 26(3), 337–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(00)00009-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henson, B., Reyns, B. W., Klahm, C. F., IV, & Frank, J. (2010). Do good recruits make good cops? Problems predicting and measuring academy and street-level success. Police Quarterly, 13(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611109357320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, S., Beauchamp, G., & Miller, D. (2007). Reviewing the literature on interactive whiteboards. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880701511040
   Google Scholar
• Holmgren, R., Holmgren, T., & Sjöberg, D. (2019). Teaching and learning in redesigned digitalized learning environments: A longitudinal study at the police education in Sweden. In 12th annual international conference of education, research and innovation, 11-13 November, 2019, Seville, Spain (pp. 1976–1985). Spain: IATED Academy. https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2019.0556.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, G. J., & Tsai, C. (2011). Research trends in mobile and ubiquitous learning: A review of publications in selected journals from 2001 to 2010. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01183.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam, S., & Grönlund, Å. (2016). An international literature review of 1:1 computing in schools. Journal of Educational Change, 17(2), 191–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-016-9271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeno, L. M., Vandvik, V., Eliassen, S., & Grytnes, J.-A. (2019). Testing the novelty effect of an m-learning tool on internalization and performance: A self-determination theory approach. Computers & Education, 128, S. 398–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.008
   Google Scholar
• Keengwe, J., Schnellert, G., & Mills, C. (2012). Laptop initiative: Impact on instructional technology integration and student learning. Education and Information Technologies, 17(2), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-010-9150-8
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H. J., Choi, J., & Lee, S. (2019). Teacher experience of integrating tablets in one-to-one environments: Implications for orchestrating learning. Education Sciences, 9(2), 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H. J., Yi, P., & Hong, J. I. (2020). Students’ academic use of mobile technology and higher-order thinking skills: The role of active engagement. Education Sciences, 10(3), 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10030047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, M., Luck, K. V., Schwarzer, J., & Draheim, S. (2018). The novelty effect in large display deployments – Experiences and lessons-learned for evaluating prototypes. In: Proceedings of 16th European conference on computer-supported cooperative work - Exploratory Papers, Reports of the European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies, Nancy, France. https://doi.org/10.18420/ecscw2018_3.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, H.-J., Model, T., & Wendekamm, M. Eds., (2019). Zukunft der Polizei. Trends und Strategien.[Future of the police. Trends and strategies] VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22591-9.
   Google Scholar
• Le Roux, D. B., & Parry, D. A. (2017). In-lecture media use and academic performance: Does subject area matter? Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 86–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean, S., Attardi, S. M., Faden, L., & Goldszmidt, M. (2016). Flipped classrooms and student learning: Not just surface gains. Advances in Physiology Education, 40(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00098.2015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misra, S., Cheng, L., Genevie, J., & Yuan, M. (2016). The iPhone effect the quality of in-person social interactions in the presence of mobile devices. Environment and Behavior, 48(2), 275–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916514539755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The pen is mightier than the keyboard: Advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614524581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newland, B., & Handley, F. (2016). Developing the digital literacies of academic staff: An institutional approach. Research in Learning Technology, 24(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v24.31501
   Google Scholar
• Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2018). Mobile-based assessment: A literature review of publications in major referred journals from 2009 to 2018. Computer & Science, 125, 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.006
   Google Scholar
• Novak, G. M. (2011). Just-in-time teaching. Special Issue: Evidence-Based Training, 2011(128), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.469
   Google Scholar
• Oppenhäuser, R. (2019). Die anwendung von virtual reality in der aus- und fortbildung von einsatzkräften in Rheinland-Pfalz. [The implementation of virtual reality in vocational and further education for emergency personnel in Rhineland-Palatinate]. Rhineland-Palatinate Police Academy as well as Fire Brigade and Disaster Management Academy Rhineland-Palatinate. https://www.polizei.rlp.de/fileadmin/user_upload/HdP/Dokumente/DB/Praesentationen/Oppenhaeuser_Virtual_Reality_SAFER.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Paoline, E., & Terrill, W. (2007). Police education, experience and the use of force. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(2), 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854806290239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersson, F. (2018). On the issues of digital competence in educational contexts – A review of literature. Education and Information Technologies, 23(3), 1005–1021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9649-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramshaw, P., & Soppitt, S. (2018). Educating the recruited and recruiting the educated: Can the new police education qualifications framework in England and wales succeed where others have faltered? International Journal of Police Science & Management, 20(4), 243–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461355718814850
   Google Scholar
• Rashid, T., & Asghar, H. M. (2016). Technology use, self-directed learning, student engagement and academic performance: Examining the interrelations. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 604–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renz, M., Rayiet, O., & Soltau, A. (2012). Multiplikatorenschulungen zum einsatz interaktiver whiteboards [Training for multipliers on the use of interactive whiteboards]. Landesinstitut für Lehrerbildung und Schulentwicklung [State Institute for Teacher Training and School Development]. https://li.hamburg.de/contentblob/3466092/a5b1eae7458b00091eaae65c97d8bb64/data/download-evaluation-whiteboard.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld, R., Johnson, T. L., & Wright, R. (2020). Are college-educated police officers different? A study of stops, searches, and arrests. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 31(2), 206–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403418817808
   Google Scholar
• Rydberg, J., & Terrill, W. (2010). The effect of higher education on police behavior. Police Quarterly, 13(1), 92–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611109357325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sailer, M., Murböck, J., & Fischer, F. (2021). Digital learning in schools: What does it take beyond digital technology? Teaching and Teacher Education, 103, 103346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sana, F., Weston, T., & Cepeda, N. J. (2013). Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers. Computers & Education, 62, 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 299–323. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sensevy, G., Schubauer-Leoni, M. L., Mercier, A., Ligozat, F., & Perrot, G. (2005). An attempt to model the teacher’s action in the mathematics class. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 59(1–3), 153–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-5887-1
   Google Scholar
• Shi, Y., Zhang, J., Yang, H., & Yang, H. H. (2020). Effects of interactive whiteboard-based instruction on students’ cognitive learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(2), 283-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1769683
   Google Scholar
• Siegfried, C., & Hermkes, R. (2020). Tablet PCs in economics classes – An empirical study on motivational experiences and cognitive load. In E. Wuttke, J. Seifried, & H (Eds.), Niegeman: vocational education and training in the age of digitization (pp. 63–87). Verlag Barbara Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöberg, D., Karp, S., & Rantatalo, O. (2019). What students who perform in “secondary roles” can learn from scenario training in vocational education. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 6(1), 46–67. https://doi.org/10.13152/IJRVET.6.1.3
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. D. (2012). Single-case experimental designs: A systematic review of published research and current standards. Psychological Methods, 17(4), 510–550. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somyürek, S., Atasoy, B., & Özdemir, S. (2009). Board’s IQ: What makes a board smart? Computers & Education, 53(2), 368–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung, Y., Chang, K., & Liu, T. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamim, R. M., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, P. C., & Schmid, R. F. (2011). What forty years of research says about the Impact of technology on learning: A second-order meta-analysis and validation study. Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 4–28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310393361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry, C. A., Mishra, P., & Roseth, C. J. (2016). Preference for multitasking, technological dependency, student metacognition & pervasive technology use: An experimental intervention. Computer in Human Behavior, 65, 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tossell, C. C., Kortum, P., Shepard, C., Rahmati, A., & Zhong, L. (2015). You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make him learn: Smartphone use in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(4), 713–724. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trimmel, M., & Bachmann, J. (2004). Cognitive, social, motivational and health aspects of students in laptop classrooms. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(2), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00076.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wentworth, D. K., & Middleton, J. H. (2014). Technology use and academic performance. Computers & Education, 78, 306–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, F., & Conway, A. R. (2012). Mobile/smartphone use in higher education. In M. Rao (Eds.), Southwest decision sciences institute conference (pp. 831–839). Houston, Texas, USA. http://www.swdsi.org/swdsi2012/proceedings_2012/papers/papers/pa144.pdf.
   Google Scholar