What do we know about blended learning to inform police education? A rapid evidence assessment

References

• *Abbott, B. L., & Provident, I. (2016). Changing occupational therapists’ knowledge of their role in secondary transition planning. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, and Early Intervention, 9(4), 382–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2016.1227760
   Google Scholar
• *Asiri, Y., Millard, D., & Weal, M. (2019). Evaluating the impact of the components of a mobile behavior change intervention to support critical thinking in research projects. Paper presented at the international association for development of the information society (IADIS) international conference on mobile learning (15th, Utrecht, The Netherlands, Apr 11-13, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• *Beinicke, A., & Bipp, T. (2018). Evaluating training outcomes in corporate E-learning and classroom training. Vocations and Learning, 11(3), 501–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-018-9201-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Betihavas, V., Bridgman, H., Kornhaber, R., & Cross, M. (2016). The evidence for ‘flipping out’: A systematic review of the flipped classroom in nursing education. Nurse Education Today, (38), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.12.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Bolsen, T., Evans, M., & Fleming, A. M. (2016). A comparison of online and face-to-face approaches to teaching introduction to American Government. Journal of Political Science Education, 12(3), 302–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2015.1090905
   Google Scholar
• *Butz, N. T., & Stupnisky, R. H. (2016). A mixed methods study of graduate students’ self-determined motivation in synchronous hybrid learning environments. Internet and Higher Education, (28), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Callister, R. R., & Love, M. S. (2016). A comparison of learning outcomes in skills-based courses: online versus face-to-face formats. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 14(2), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12093
   Google Scholar
• *Cho, M. H., & Tobias, S. (2016). Should instructors require discussion in online courses? Effects of online discussion on community of inquiry, learner time, satisfaction, and achievement. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 17(2), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i2.2342
   Google Scholar
• *Ebner, C., & Gegenfurtner, A. (2019). Learning and satisfaction in webinar, online, and face-to-face instruction: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Education, 4, 92. doi:10.3389/feduc.2019.00092.
   Google Scholar
• *Ee, M. S., Yeoh, W., Boo, Y. L., & Boulter, T. (2018). Examining the effect of time constraint on the online mastery learning approach towards improving postgraduate students’ achievement. Studies in Higher Education, 43(2), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1161611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Fu, K., Hainey, T., & Baxter, G. (2016). A systematic literature review to identify empirical evidence on the use of computer games in business education and training. In 10th European Conference on Games Based Learning. Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited, 232-239.
   Google Scholar
• *Gegenfurtner, A., & Ebner, C. (2019). Webinars in higher education and professional training: A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Educational Research Review, 4(28), 100293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Goedhart, N. S., Blignaut-van, W., Moser, C., & Zweekhorst, M. B. M. (2019). The flipped classroom: Supporting a diverse group of students in their learning. Learning Environments Research, 22(2), 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09281-2
   Google Scholar
• *Karay, Y., Reiss, B., & Schauber, S. K. (2020). Progress testing anytime and anywhere–Does a mobile-learning approach enhance the utility of a large-scale formative assessment tool? Medical Teacher, 42(10), 1154–1162. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1798910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lee, S., Barker, T., & Kumar, V. S. (2016). Effectiveness of a learner-directed model for e-Learning. Educational Technology and Society, 19(3), 221–233. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.19.3.221?seq=1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Littenberg-Tobias, J., & Reich, J. (2020). Evaluating access, quality, and equity in online learning: A case study of a MOOC-based blended professional degree program. Internet and Higher Education, 47, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100759
   Google Scholar
• *Lockman, A. S., & Schirmer, B. R. (2020). Online instruction in higher education: promising, research-based, and evidence-based practices. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 7(2), 130–152. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2020.72.130.152
   Google Scholar
• *Lucero, J. L., Evers, J., Roark, J., & Parker, D. (2017). Using community-based research to improve BSW students’ learning in community practice: bringing the macro into focus for traditional and distance learners. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 37(3), 260–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2017.1320621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Mattila, A., Martin, R. M., & Deiuliis, E. D. (2020). Simulated fieldwork: A virtual approach to clinical education. Education Sciences, 10(10), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10100272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Michael, B., & Michael, R. (2019). Show me and I’ll remember: Association between instructional modality and memory for learning. Journal of International Education in Business, 12(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIEB-06-2018-0020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Mitra, S., & Beenen, G. (2019). A comparative study of learning styles and motivational factors in traditional and online sections of a business course. INFORMS Transactions on Education, 20(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1287/ited.2019.0211
   Google Scholar
• *Monk, E. F., Guidry, K. R., Pusecker, K. L., & Ilvento, T. W. (2020). Blended learning in computing education: It’s here but does it work? Education and Information Technologies, 25(1), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09920-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Phillips, C., & O’flaherty, J. (2019). Evaluating nursing students’ engagement in an online course using flipped virtual classrooms. Student Success, 10(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.v10i1.1098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Soper, T. (2017). Knowledge into learning: Comparing lecture, e-learning and self-study take-home packet instructional methodologies with nurses. Nursing Open, 4(2), 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Stöhr, C., Demazière, C., & Adawi, T. (2016). Comparing student activity and performance in the classroom and a virtual learning environment. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the European Conference on e-Learning, ECEL. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Christian-Stoehr-2/publication/310303396_Comparing_Student_Activity_and_Performance_in_the_Classroom_and_a_Virtual_Learning_Environment/links/582b229008ae004f74af9f0a/Comparing-Student-Activity-and-Performance-in-the-Classroom-and-a-Virtual-Learning-Environment.pdf
   Google Scholar
• *Theelen, H., Willems, M. C., van den, B., Conijn, R., & den, B. (2020). Virtual internships in blended environments to prepare preservice teachers for the professional teaching context. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(1), 194–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Van Der Beek, S., Bellhäuser, H., Karlen, Y., & Hertel, S. (2020). New ways in fostering self-regulated learning at university: How effective are web-based courses when compared to regular attendance-based courses? Zeitschrift fur Padagogische Psychologie, 34(2), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Vo, H. M., Zhu, C., & Diep, N. A. (2017). The effect of blended learning on student performance at course-level in higher education: A meta-analysis. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 53, 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Webster, D. R., Kadel, R. S., & Newstetter, W. C. (2020). What do we gain by a blended classroom? A comparative study of student performance and perceptions in a fluid mechanics course. International Journal of Engineering Education, 36(1A), 2–17. https://www.ijee.ie/1atestissues/Vol36-1A/02_ijee3853.pdf
   Google Scholar
• *Weightman, A., Farnell, D., Morris, D., Strange, H., & Hallam, G. (2017). A systematic review of information literacy programs in higher education: Effects of face-to-face, online, and blended formats on student skills and views. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 12(3), 20–55. https://doi.org/10.18438/B86W90
   Google Scholar
• Anderle, J. S. (2018). Procedural learning: A comparison of skills acquisition between an online environment and traditional classroom training. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, PO Box 1346.
   Google Scholar
• Belur, J., Agnew-Pauley, W., McGinley, B., & Tompson, L. (2020). A systematic review of police recruit training programmes. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 14(1), 76–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paz022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belur, J., Bentall, C., Glasspoole-Bird, H., & Laufs, J. (2021) Blended learning for police learning and development: A report on the research evidence, College of Policing, https://library.college.police.uk/docs/Blended-learning-for-police-learning-and-development.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Berry, G., Briggs, P., Erol, R., & van Staden, L. (2011). The effectiveness of partnership working in a crime and disorder context: A rapid evidence assessment. H. Office (Ed.), Research Report, 52. Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (2003). Aligning teaching for constructing learning. Higher Education Academy, 1(4), 1-4. http://egusdsecondaryed.pbworks.com/f/aligning_teaching_for_constructing_learning.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, R., & Movahedazarhouligh, S. (2018). Successful stories and conflicts: A literature review on the effectiveness of flipped learning in higher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(4), 409–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britten, N., Campbell, R., Pope, C., Donovan, J., Morgan, M., & Pill, R. (2002). Using meta ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: A worked example. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 7(4), 209–215.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cordner, G., & Shain, C. (2011). The changing landscape of police education and training. Police Practice and Research, 12(4), 281–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2011.587673
   Google Scholar
• Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. (2018). CASP Qualitative Checklist. https://casp-uk.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/CASP-Qualitative-Checklist-2018_fillable_form.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Donavant, B. W. (2009). The new, modern practice of adult education: Online instruction in a continuing professional education setting. Adult Education Quarterly, 59(3), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713609331546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, J. M., Moir, E., & Newman, M. (2021). Financial crime investigation: An evaluation of an online training program for police. Policing: An International Journal, 44(3), 525–539. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-08-2020-0131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryer-Beers, E., Clarke-Darby, O., Karbo, W., & Wheller, L. (2020). What works in police training and behaviour change? Rapid Evidence Assessment. College of Policing (unpublished.
   Google Scholar
• Effective Public Health Practice Project. (2017). Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. https://www.ephpp.ca/PDF/Quality%20Assessment%20Tool_2010_2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Galvis, Á. H. (2018). Supporting decision-making processes on blended learning in higher education: Literature and good practices review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0106-1
   Google Scholar
• Hong, Q. N., Pluye, P., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M.et al, (2018). Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), version 2018. Registration of Copyright (#1148552), Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Industry Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Hoon, C. (2013). Meta-synthesis of qualitative case studies: an approach to theory building. Organizational Research Methods, 16(4), 522–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428113484969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopewell, S., Clarke, M., & Mallett, S. (2005). Grey literature and systematic reviews. Publication Bias in Meta-analysis. In H. Rothstein, A. Sutton and M. Borenstein (Eds)., Prevention, assessment and adjustments (pp. 48-72). Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, D., & Kirkpatrick, J. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Q., Peng, W., Zhang, F., Hu, R., Li, Y., & Yan, W. (2016). The effectiveness of blended learning in health professions: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(1), e4807. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mali, D., & Lim, H. (2021). How do students perceive face-to-face/blended learning as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic? The International Journal of Management Education, 19(3), 100552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mubayrik, H. F. B. (2018). The present and future state of blended learning at workplace-learning settings in adult education: A systematic review. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 9(4), 247–273. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jsser/issue/43626/534260
   Google Scholar
• Philipsen, B., Tondeur, J., Roblin, N. P., Vanslambrouck, S., & Zhu, C. (2019). Improving teacher professional development for online and blended learning: A systematic meta-aggregative review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(5), 1145–1174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09645-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramshaw, P., & Soppitt, S. (2018). Educating the recruited and recruiting the educated: Can the new police education qualifications framework in England and Wales succeed where others have faltered. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 20(4), 243–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461355718814850
   Google Scholar
• Staker, H., & Horn, M. B. (2012). Classifying K-12 blended learning. Innosight Institute. (Accessed 12 January 2021). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED535180
   Google Scholar
• Stephan, M., Markus, S., & Gläser-Zikuda, M. (2019). Students’ achievement emotions and online learning in teacher education. Frontiers in Education, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00109
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varker, T., Forbes, D., Dell, L., Weston, A., Merlin, T., Hodson, S., & O’Donnell, M. (2015). Rapid evidence assessment: Increasing the transparency of an emerging methodology. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 21(6), 1199–1204. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, D. R., Schafer, J., & Kyle, M. (2022). The impact of COVID-19 on police training academies. Policing: An International Journal, 45(1), 9- 22 https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-06-2021-0078.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. R. (1997). Virtual environments and ergonomics: Needs and opportunities. Ergonomics, 40(10), 1057–1077. https://doi.org/10.1080/001401397187603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, D., & Tong, S. (2009). The future of initial police training: A university perspective. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 11(3), 294–305. https://doi.org/10.1350/ijps.2009.11.3.131
   Google Scholar