A Comprehensive Overview of Software Programs for Green Building Design

References

• AI-Rabghi, O. M. & Hittle, D. C. (2001). ‘Energy simulation in buildings: overview and BLAST example’, Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 42, no. 13, pp. 1623–1635.
   Google Scholar
• ASHRAE (1997). ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals, American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Atlanta, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Augenbroe, G. (1992). ‘Integrated building performance evaluation in the early design stages’, Building and Environment, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 149–161.
   Google Scholar
• BRE, British Research Establishment (2002). BREEAM for Offices: Assessment Prediction Checklist, viewed: August 2002, http://www.bre.co.uk/pdf/BREEAMchecklist.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cofaigh, E. O., Olley, J. A., & Lewis, J. O. (1998). The Climatic Dwelling - an introduction to climaticresponsive residential architecture, James & James (Science Publishers) Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, R. J. (1999). ‘Building environmental assessment methods: clarifying intentions’, Building Research & Information, vol. 27, no. 4/5, pp. 230–246.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, R. J. & Kernan, P. C. (1996). ‘Life-cycle energy use in office buildings’, Building and Environment, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 307–317.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, R. J. & Larsson, N. (2000). GBC 2000 Assessment Manual: volume 1: overview.
   Google Scholar
• Dickie, L. & Howard, N. (2000). ‘Assessing environmental impacts of construction: industry consensus, BREEAM and UK ecopoints’, BRE Digest no. 446, May, Building Research Establishment, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Green Building Advisor, viewed: October 15, 2002, http://www.greenbuildingadvisor.com/
   Google Scholar
• Green Building Council, U.S. (2002). LEED Rating System Version 2.1 Draft.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrickson, C. & Horvath, A. (2000). ‘Resource use and environmental emissions of US construction sectors’, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, vol. 126, no. 1, Jan./Feb., pp. 38–44.
   Google Scholar
• Hien, W. N., Poh, L. K., & Feriadi, H. (2000). ‘The use of performance-based simulation tools for building design and evaluation - a Singapore perspective’, Building and Environment, vol. 35, pp. 709–736.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, T., Chou, S. K., & Bong, T. Y. (2000). ‘Building simulation: an overview of developments and information sources’, Building and Environment, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 347–361.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, H. C., Levitt, R. E., Paulson, B. C., Pold, J. G., & Tatum, C. B. (1989). ‘Computer integration: reducing fragmentation in AEC industry’, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, ASCE, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• IVAM, Netherlands, viewed: October 15, 2002, http://www.ivambv.uva.nl/uk/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• Lippiatt, B. C. (1999). ‘Selecting cost-effective green building products: BEES approach’, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, vol. 125, no. 6, pp. 448–455.
   Google Scholar
• Menke, D. M., Davis, G. A. & Vigon, B. W. (1996). Evaluation of life-cycle assessment tools, Technical report, Centre for Clean Products and Clean Technologies, University of Tennessee, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Peuportier, B. & Polster, B., EQUER: A life cycle simulation tool for buildings, Centre for Energy Studies, Paris, viewed: October 15, 2002, http://www-cenerg.ensmp.fr/english/themes/
   Google Scholar
• Sjostrom, C. & Bakens, W. (1999). ‘CIB agenda 21 for sustainable construction: why, how and what’, Building Research & Information, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 348–354.
   Google Scholar
• Trusty, W. B. (2000). ‘Introducing an assessment tool classification system’, Advanced Building Newsletter, no. 25, pp.18–19.
   Google Scholar
• Trusty, W. B., Meil, J. K., & Norris, G. A. (1998). ATHENATM: a LCA decision support tool for the building community: proceedings of Green Building Challenge ’98, Vancouver, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Yohanis, Y. G. & Norton, B. (2000). ‘Early design model for prediction of energy and cost performance of building design options’, International Journal of Solar Energy, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 207–226.
   Google Scholar