Exploration of the reasons for delays in construction

References

• Alarcón LF, Diethelm S, Rojo O, Calderon R. 2005. Assessing the impacts of implementing lean construction. In: Proceedings for the 13th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Sidney, Australia, p. 387–393.
   Google Scholar
• Ala-Risko T, Kärkkäinen M. 2006. Material delivery problems in construction projects: a possible solution. Int J Prod Econ. 104(1):19–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlSehaimi A, Tzortzopoulos P, Koskela L. 2009. Last planner system: experiences from pilot implementation in the Middle East. In: Proceedings for the 17th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Taiwan, p. 53–66.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard G. 1999. Improving work flow reliability. In: Proceedings for the 7th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 26–28 July, Berkeley, CA, USA, p. 275–286.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard G. 1997. Lookahead planning: the missing link in production control. In: Proceedings for the 5th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, p. 13–26.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard G. 2000. The last planner system of production control. University of Birmingham. Birmingham.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard G, Howell G. 1998. Shielding production: essential step in production control. J Constr Eng Manage. 124(1):11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burati JL, Farrington JJ, Ledbetter WB. 1992. Causes of quality deviations in design and construction. J Constr Eng Manage. 118(1):34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua CK, Shen LJ. 2005. Key constraints analysis with integrated production scheduler. J Constr Eng Manage. 131(7):753–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Acad Manage Rev. 14(4):532–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Formoso CT, Moura CB. 2009. Evaluation of the impact of the last planner system on the performance of construction projects. In: Proceedings of 17th Annual Conference of the International Group of Lean Construction, Taiwan, p. 153–164.
   Google Scholar
• Friblick F, Olsson V, Reslow J. 2009. Prospects for implementing last planner in the construction industry. In: Proceedings of 17th Annual Conference of the International Group of Lean Construction, Taiwan, p. 197–206.
   Google Scholar
• Garza JM de la, Leong M. 2000. Last planner technique: a case study. In: Building together for a better tomorrow in an increasingly complex world. In: Proceedings of Construction Congress VI, Orland, FL, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzarlez V, Alarcon LF, Mundaca F. 2008. Investigating the relationship between planning reliability and project performance. Prod Plan Control. 19(5):461–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamzeh FR, Ballard G, Tommelein ID. 2008. Improving construction work flow – the connective role of lookahead planning. In: Proceedings for the 16th annual conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 16–18 July, Manchester, UK, p. 635–644.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley J. 2004. Case study research. In: Cassell C, Symon G, editors. Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research. London: SAGE, p. 323–333.
   Google Scholar
• Howell G, Ballard G. 1995. Factors affecting project success in the piping function. In: Proceedings for the 3rd Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction.
   Google Scholar
• Ibironke OT, Oladinrin TO, Adeniyi O, Eboreime IV. 2013. Analysis of non-excusable delay factors influencing contractors’ performance in Lagos State, Nigeria. J Constr Dev Countries. 18(1):53–72.
   Google Scholar
• Jang JW, Kim YW. 2008. The relationship between the make-ready process and project schedule performance. In: Proceedings for the 16th annual conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 16–18 July, Manchester, UK, p. 647–656.
   Google Scholar
• Koskela L. 1999. Management of production in construction: a theoretical view. In: Proceeding for the 8th Annual Conference if the International Group for Lean Construction, Berkeley, CA, p. 241–252.
   Google Scholar
• Koskela L, Howell G. 2001. Reforming project management: the role of planning, execution and controlling. In: Proceeding for the 9th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 6–8 August, Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Lindhard S, Wandahl S. 2012. Improving the making ready process – exploring the preconditions to work tasks in construction. In: Proceedings for the 20th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 17–22 July, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Lindhard S, Wandahl S. In press. Scheduling of large, complex, and constrained construction projects – an exploration of LPS application. Int J Proj Organ Manage.
   Google Scholar
• Lindhard S, Wandahl S. 2011. Handling soundness and quality to improve reliability in LPS – a case study of an offshore construction site in Denmark. In: The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors annual construction, building and real estate research conference, 11–12 September.
   Google Scholar
• Love PED, Li HL. 2000. Quantifying the causes and costs of rework in construction. Constr Manage Econ. 18(4):479–490.
   Google Scholar
• Love PED. 2002. Auditing the indirect consequences of rework in construction: a case based approach. Manage Audit J. 17(3):138–146.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H. 1979. An emerging strategy of “direct” research. Admin Sci Q. 24(4):582–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitropoulos P, Michita T. 2010. Critical concerns of production control system on projects with labor constraints: lessons from a residential case study. J Manage Eng. 26(3):153–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romano C. 1989. Research strategies for small business: a case study. Int Bus J. 7(4):35–43.
   Google Scholar
• Sambasivan M, Soon YW. 2007. Causes and effects of delays in Malaysian construction industry. Int J Proj Manage. 25(5):517–526.
   Google Scholar
• Seppänen O, Aalto E. 2005. A case study of line-of-balance based schedule planning and control system. In: Proceedings for the 13th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Sidney, Australia, p. 271–279.
   Google Scholar
• Steyn H. 2001. An investigation into the fundamentals of critical chain project scheduling. Int J Proj Manage. 19(6):363–369.
   Google Scholar
• Yin RK. 2003. Case study research – design and methods. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar