Enhancing the effectiveness of risk management practices in Sri Lankan road construction projects: A Delphi approach

References

• Adams FK. 2006. Expert elicitation and Bayesian analysis of construction contract risks: an investigation. Constr Manage Econ. 24:81–96.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed A, Kayis B, Amornsawadwatana S. 2007. A review of techniques for risk management in projects. Benchmark Int J 14:22–36.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Bahar JF, Crandall KC. 1990. Systematic risk management approach for construction projects. JConstr Eng Manage. 116:533–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andi 2006. The importance and allocation of risks in Indonesian construction projects. Constr ManageEcon. 24:69–80.
   Google Scholar
• Bajaj D, Oluwoye J, Lenard D. 1997. An analysis of contractors’ approaches to risk identification in New South Wales, Australia. Constr Manage Econ. 15:363–369.
   Google Scholar
• Baker S, Ponniah D, Smith S. 1999. Survey of risk management in major UK companies. J Profess Issue Eng Edu Prac. 125:94–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baloi D, Price ADF. 2003. Modelling global risk factors affecting construction cost performance. Int J Proj Manage. 21:261–269.
   Google Scholar
• Banaitienė N, Banaitis A, Norkus A. 2011. Risk management in projects: peculiarities of Lithuanian construction companies. Int J Strateg Prop Manage. 15:60–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabaniss K. 2002. Computer-related technology use by counselors in the new millennium: a Delphi study. J Tech Counsel. 2(2) (available at http://jtc.columbusstate.edu/vol2_2/index.htm).
   Google Scholar
• Central Bank of Sri Lanka. 2005. Central Bank of Sri Lanka Annual Report. Colombo.
   Google Scholar
• Central Bank of Sri Lanka. 2006. Central Bank of Sri Lanka Annual Report. Colombo.
   Google Scholar
• Chan APC, Yung EHK, Lam PTI, Tam C, Cheung S. 2001. Application of Delphi method in selection of procurement systems for construction projects. Constr Manage Econ. 19:699–718.
   Google Scholar
• Chan DW, Chan AP, Lam PT, Yeung JF, Chan JH. 2011. Risk ranking and analysis in target cost contracts: empirical evidence from the construction industry. Int J Proj Manage. 29:751–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman C. 1997. Project risk analysis and management—PRAM the generic process. Int J Proj Manage. 15:273–281.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman C, Ward S. 2003. Project risk management: processes, techniques and insights, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper D, Macdonald D, Chapman C. 1985. Risk analysis of a construction cost estimate. Int J Proj Manage. 3:141–149.
   Google Scholar
• Dai J, Goodrum P, Maloney W, Srinivasan C. 2009. Latent structures of the factors affecting construction labor productivity. J Constr Eng Manage. 135:397–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalkey N, Helmer O. 1963. An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Manage Sci. 458–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalkey NC, Brown BB, Cochran S. 1969. The Delphi method: an experimental study of group opinion. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Deb M. 2012. Evaluation of customer's mall preferences in India using fuzzy AHP approach. J Adv Manage Res. 9:29–44.
   Google Scholar
• Delbecq AL, Van De Ven AH, Gustafson DH. 1975. Group techniques for program planning: a guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
   Google Scholar
• Dey PK. 2002. Project risk management: a combined analytic hierarchy process and decision tree approach. Cost Eng. 44:13–27.
   Google Scholar
• Dikmen I, Birgonul MT, Anac C, Tah JHM, Aouad G. 2008. Learning from risks: a tool for post-project risk assessment. Autom Constr. 18:42–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwivedula R, Bredillet CN. 2010. Profiling work motivation of project workers. Int J Proj Manage. 28:158–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Sayegh SM. 2008. Risk assessment and allocation in the UAE construction industry. Int J Proj Manage. 26:431–438.
   Google Scholar
• Fan M, Lin N-P, Sheu C. 2008. Choosing a project risk-handling strategy: an analytical model. Int J Prod Econ. 112:700–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang D, Li M, Fong PS-W, Shen L. 2004. Risks in Chinese construction market-contractors’ perspective. J Constr Eng Manage. 130:853–861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forman EH, Selly MA. 2001. Decision by objectives: how to convince others that you are right. River Edge, NJ: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Ghoddousi P, Hosseini MR. 2012. A survey of the factors affecting the productivity of construction projects in Iran. Tech Econ Dev Economy. 18:99–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackman JR, Oldham GR. 1976. Motivation through the design of work: test of a theory. Organ Behav Human Perform. 16:250–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallowell MR, Gambatese JA. 2010. Qualitative research: application of the Delphi method to CEM research. J Constr Eng Manage. 136:99–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han SH, Diekmann JE. 2001. Approaches for making risk-based go/no-go decision for international projects. J Constr Eng Manage. 127:300–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastak M, Shaked A. 2000. ICRAM-1: model for international construction risk assessment. J Manage Eng. 16:59–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helander M. 1981. Human factors/ergonomics for building and construction. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Herzberg F, Mausner B, Snyderman BB. 1959. The motivation to work. 2nd ed.Wiley, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang B-G, Zhao X, Toh LP. 2014. Risk management in small construction projects in Singapore: Status, barriers and impact. Int J Proj Manage. 32(1):116–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaming PF, Olomolaiye PO, Holt GD, Harris FC. 1997. Factors influencing construction time and cost overruns on high-rise projects in Indonesia. Constr Manage Econ. 15:83–94.
   Google Scholar
• Kangari R. 1995. Risk management perceptions and trends of U.S. construction. J Constr Eng Manage. 121:422–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kartam NA, Kartam SA. 2001. Risk and its management in the Kuwaiti construction industry: a contractors’ perspective. Int J Proj Manage. 19:325–335.
   Google Scholar
• Kazaz A, Manisali E, Ulubeyli S. 2008. Effect of basic motivational factors on construction workforce productivity in Turkey. J Civil Eng Manage. 14:95–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kululanga G, Kuotcha W. 2010. Measuring project risk management process for construction contractors with statement indicators linked to numerical scores. Eng Constr Architect Manage. 17:336–351.
   Google Scholar
• Kwak YH, Dewan, S. Risk management in international development projects. Project Management Institute Annual Seminars & Symposium, 1–10 November 2001, Nashville, TN.
   Google Scholar
• Li S. 2009. Risk management for overseas development projects. Int Bus Res. 2:193.
   Google Scholar
• Ludwig B. 1997. Predicting the future: have you considered using the Delphi methodology. J Extension. 35:1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Mak S, Picken D. 2000. Using risk analysis to determine construction project contingencies. JConstr Eng Manage. 126:130–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maloney WF. 1983. Productivity improvement: the influence of labor. J Constr Eng Manage. 109:321–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masini E. 1993. Why future studies. London: Grey Seal.
   Google Scholar
• Maslow AH. 1943. A theory of human motivation. Psychol Rev. 370–396.
   Google Scholar
• Mcclelland C. 1961. The achieving story. Organizational behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Mills A. 2001. A systematic approach to risk management for construction. Struct Survey. 19:245–252.
   Google Scholar
• Nieto-Morote A, Ruz-Vila F. 2011. A fuzzy approach to construction project risk assessment. Int JProj Manage. 29:220–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. 1994. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Ofori G, Toor S-U-R. 2012. Leadership and construction industry development in developing countries. J Constr Dev Countries. 1:1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Okoli C, Pawlowski SD. 2004. The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Inf Manage. 42:15–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osipova E, Eriksson PE. 2011. How procurement options influence risk management in construction projects. Constr Manage Econ. 29:1149–1158.
   Google Scholar
• Othman A. 2008. Incorporating value and risk management concepts in developing low cost housingprojects. Emirates J Eng Res. 13:45–52.
   Google Scholar
• Outhred G. 2001. The Delphi method: a demonstration of its use for specific research types. In: Proceedingof the RICS Foundation, Construction & Building.
   Google Scholar
• Oyewobi L, Ogunsemi D. 2010. Factors influencing reworks occurrence in construction: a study of selected building projects in Nigeria. J Build Perform. 1:1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Öztaş A, Ökmen Ö. 2004. Risk analysis in fixed-price design–build construction projects. Building and Environment, 39:229–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perera BAKS, Rameezdeen R. 2008. Risk identification and risk handling in road construction projects in Sri Lanka. Faculty of Architecture Research Symposium 2008, University of Moratuwa, Sri Lanka.
   Google Scholar
• Perera BAKS, Dhanasinghe I, Rameezdeen R. 2009. Risk management in road construction: the case of Sri Lanka. Int J Strateg Prop Manage. 13:87–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perera KBD. 2006. Simulation modelling for time and cost overrun in road rehabilitation projects in Sri Lanka (Bachelor of Sciences unpublished dissertation). University of Moratuwa.
   Google Scholar
• Porter LW, Lawler EE. 1968. Managerial attitudes and performance. Homewood, IL: RD Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman MM, Kumaraswamy MM. 2004. Potential for implementing relational contracting and joint risk management. J Manage Eng. 20:178–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren H. 1994. Risk lifecycle and risk relationships on construction projects. Int J Proj Manage. 12:68–74.
   Google Scholar
• Ruthankoon R, Ogunlana SO. 2003. Testing Herzberg's two-factor theory in the Thai construction industry. Eng Constr Architect Manage. 10:333–341.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. 1980. The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. 1990. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European J Oper Res. 48:9–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. 2008. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Service Sci. 1:83–98.
   Google Scholar
• Shokri S, Haas CT. 2012. Risk management for design and construction. Constr Manage Econ. 30:711–713.
   Google Scholar
• Siew Goh C, Abdul-Rahman, H. 2013. The identification and management of major risks in the Malaysian construction industry. J Constr Dev Countries. 18(1):19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Skorupka D. 2008. Identification and initial risk assessment of construction projects in Poland. JManage Eng. 24:120–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Fang D, Wang S, Dai M, Lv X. 2008. Safety risk identification and assessment for Beijing Olympic venues construction. J Manage Eng. 24:40–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabassi AA, Bakar A. 2009. Training, motivation, and performance: the case of human resource management in construction projects in Mashhad, Iran. Int J Proj Manage. 27:471–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadayon M, Jaafar M, Nasri E. 2012. An assessment of risk identification in large construction projects in Iran. J Constr Dev Countries. 17:57–69.
   Google Scholar
• Tah J, Carr V. 2000. A proposal for construction project risk assessment using fuzzy logic. Constr Manage Econ. 18:491–500.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor H. 2005. Congruence between risk management theory and practice in Hong Kong vendor-driven IT projects. Int J Proj Manage. 23:437–444.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson P, Perry JG. 1992. Engineering construction risks: a guide to project risk analysis and assessment implications for project clients and project managers. London: Thomas Telford.
   Google Scholar
• Tummala R, Schoenherr T. 2011. Assessing and managing risks using the supply chain risk managementprocess (SCRMP). Supply Chain Manage Int J. 16:474–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uher TE, Toakley AR. 1999. Risk management in the conceptual phase of a project. Int J Proj Manage.17:161–169.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh MP, Renuka SM, Umarani C. 2012. Causes of delay in Indian construction industry. Appl Mech Mater. 174:2768–2773.
   Google Scholar
• Vidal L-A, Marle F, Bocquet J-C. 2011. Measuring project complexity using the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Proj Manage. 29:718–727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward SC, Chapman CB, Curtis B. 1991. On the allocation of risk in construction projects. Int J Proj Manage. 9:140–147.
   Google Scholar
• Wang SQ, Dulaimi MF, Aguria MY. 2004. Risk management framework for construction projects in developing countries. Constr Manage Econ. 22:237–252.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward JF. 1997. Construction project management: getting it right first time. London: Thomas Telford.
   Google Scholar
• Xia B, Chan APC. 2012. Measuring complexity for building projects: a Delphi study. Eng Constr Architect Manage. 19:7–24.
   Google Scholar
• Zaghloul R, Hartman F. 2003. Construction contracts: the cost of mistrust. Int J Proj Manage. 21:419–424.
   Google Scholar
• Zakeri M, Olomolaiye PO, Holt GD, Harris FC. 1996. A survey of constraints on Iranian construction operatives’ productivity. Constr Manage Econ. 14:417–426.
   Google Scholar
• Zayed T, Amer M, Pan J. 2008. Assessing risk and uncertainty inherent in Chinese highway projects using AHP. Int J Proj Manage. 26:408–419.
   Google Scholar
• Zou PX, Zhang G, Wang J-Y. 2006. Identifying key risks in construction projects: life cycle and stakeholder perspectives. Presented at: Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Zou PX, Zhang G, Wang J. 2007. Understanding the key risks in construction projects in China. Int J Proj Manage. 25:601–614.
   Google Scholar