A qualitative examination of major barriers in implementation of reverse logistics within the South Australian construction sector

References

• Abdulrahman MD, Gunasekaran A, Subramanian N. 2014. Critical barriers in implementing reverse logistics in the Chinese manufacturing sectors. Int J Prod Econ. 147:460–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Addis W. 2006a. The world of reclamation, reuse and recycling. In: Addis W, editor. Building with reclaimed components and materials: a design handbook for reuse and recycling. London: Earthscan; p. 5–24.
   Google Scholar
• Addis W. 2006b. Case studies of reuse and recycling. In: Addis W, editor. Building with reclaimed components and materials: a design handbook for reuse and recycling London: Earthscan; p. 25–54.
   Google Scholar
• Aidonis D, Xanthopoulos A, Vlachos D, Iakovou E. 2008. An analytical methodological framework for managing reverse supply chains in the construction industry. WSEAS Trans Environ Develop. 4:1036–1046.
   Google Scholar
• Amaratunga D, Baldry D, Sarshar M, Newton R. 2002. Quantitative and qualitative research in the built environment: application of ‘mixed’ research approach. Work Study. 51:17–31.
   Google Scholar
• Bai C, Sarkis J. 2013. Flexibility in reverse logistics: a framework and evaluation approach. J Clean Prod. 47:306–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazeley P. 2006. The contribution of computer software to integrating qualitative and quantitative data and analyses. Res Schools. 13:64–74.
   Google Scholar
• Bazeley P. 2007. Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Bazeley P. 2009. Editorial: integrating data analyses in mixed methods research. J Mixed Methods Res. 3:203–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazeley P. 2013. Qualitative data analysis: practical strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard HR, Ryan GW. 2010. Analyzing qualitative data: systematic approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bohne RA, Wærner ER. 2014. Barriers for deconstruction and reuse/recycling of construction materials in Norway. In: Nakajima S, Russell M, editors. Barriers for deconstruction and reuse/recycling of construction materials. CIB Publication 397. Working Commission W115. Construction Materials Stewardship; p. 89–107.
   Google Scholar
• Brito M, Dekker R. 2004. A framework for reverse logistics. In: Dekker R, Fleischmann M, Inderfurth K, Van Wassenhove Luk N, editors. Reverse logistics. Berlin: Springer; p. 3–27.
   Google Scholar
• Carter CR, Ellram LM. 1998. Reverse logistics: a review of the literature and framework for future investigation. J Bus Logistics. 19:85–102.
   Google Scholar
• Catterall M. 1996. Using computer programs to code qualitative data. Market Intell Plann. 14:29–33.
   Google Scholar
• Chini A, Buck R. 2014. Barriers for deconstruction and reuse/recycling of construction materials in U.S.A. In: Nakajima S, Russell M, editors. Barriers for deconstruction and reuse/recycling of construction materials. CIB Publication 397. Rotterdam: CIB Publications, CIB General Secretariat; p. 53–73.
   Google Scholar
• Chini AR, Bruening S. 2003. Deconstruction and materials reuse in the United States. The Future of Sustainable Construction. International e-Journal of Construction. Available from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=92BABF571B92A553CDB94558B4E51D1C?doi=10.1.1.115.6066&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Google Scholar
• Creswell JW. 2009. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Crowther P. 2001. Developing an inclusive model for Design for Deconstruction. In: Chini A, editor. Deconstruction and materials reuse; technology, economics, and policy. CIB Publication 266. Proceedings of the CIB Task Group 39 ‒ Deconstruction, Annual Meeting; 2001 April 6; Wellington, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Crowther P. 2002. Design for buildability and the deconstruction consequences. In: Chini A, Schultmann F, editors. Deconstruction and materials reuse; technology, economics, and policy. CIB Publication 272. Proceedings of the CIB Task Group 39 ‒ Deconstruction, Annual Meeting; 2002 April; Karlsruhe, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Crowther, P. 2009. Designing for disassembly. In: Newton P, Hampson K, Drogemuller R, editors. Technology, design and process innovation in the built environment. Abingdon: Taylor and Francis; p. 224–237.
   Google Scholar
• Da Rocha CG, Sattler MA. 2009. A discussion on the reuse of building components in Brazil: an analysis of major social, economic and legal factors. Resourc Conserv Recycl. 54:104–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dantata N, Touran A, Wang J. 2005. An analysis of cost and duration for deconstruction and demolition of residential buildings in Massachusetts. Resourc Conserv Recycl. 44:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denhart H. 2010. Deconstructing disaster: economic and environmental impacts of deconstruction in post-Katrina New Orleans. Resourc Conserv Recycl. 54:194–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Densley Tingley D, Davison B. 2012. Developing an LCA methodology to account for the environmental benefits of design for deconstruction. Build Environ. 57:387–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowlatshahi S. 2005. A strategic framework for the design and implementation of remanufacturing operations in reverse logistics. Int J Produc Res. 43:3455–3480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durmisevic E, Yeang K. 2009. Designing for Disassembly (DfD). Arch Des. 79:134–137.
   Google Scholar
• Earle J, Ergun D, Gorgolewski M. 2014. Barriers for deconstruction and reuse/recycling of construction materials in Canada. In: Nakajima S, Russell M, editors. Barriers for deconstruction and reuse/recycling of construction materials. CIB Publication 397. Rotterdam: CIB Publications, CIB General Secretariat; p. 20–37.
   Google Scholar
• Fellows R, Liu A. 2008. Research methods for construction. 3rd ed. Singapore: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Fillis I, Johansson U, Wagner B. 2004. A qualitative investigation of smaller firm e-business development. J Small Bus Enterp Manag. 11:349–361.
   Google Scholar
• González-Torre P, Alvarez M, Sarkis J, Adenso‐Díaz B. 2010. Barriers to the implementation of environmentally oriented reverse logistics: evidence from the automotive industry sector. British J Manag. 21:889–904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorgolewski M. 2008. Designing with reused building components: some challenges. Build Res Info. 36:175–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govindan K, Palaniappan M, Zhu Q, Kannan D. 2012. Analysis of third party reverse logistics provider using interpretive structural modeling. Int J Prod Econ. 140:204–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith A, Shen L-Y. 2011. Editorial comments. Int J Constr Manag. 11:iii–iv.
   Google Scholar
• Guy B. 2014. Survey of deconstruction operations by building materials reuse organizations in the US. In: Nakajima S, Russell M, editors. Barriers for deconstruction and reuse/recycling of construction materials. CIB Publication 397. Rotterdam: CIB Publications, CIB General Secretariat; p. 146–160.
   Google Scholar
• Guy B, Shell S, Esherick H. 2006. Design for deconstruction and materials reuse. Proc CIB Task Group. 39:189–209.
   Google Scholar
• Hao JL, Tam VWY, Yuan HP, Wang JY. 2011. Construction waste challenges in Hong Kong and Pearl River Delta region. Int J Constr Manag. 11:37–47.
   Google Scholar
• Hiete M, Stengel J, Ludwig J, Schultmann F. 2011. Matching construction and demolition waste supply to recycling demand: a regional management chain model. Build Res Info. 39:333–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höglmeier K, Weber-Blaschke G, Richter K. 2013. Potentials for cascading of recovered wood from building deconstruction ‒ a case study for south-east Germany. Resourc Conserv Recycl. 78:81–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbell GL, Garcia C.M. 1991. Computer assistance for testing hypotheses about qualitative data: the software package AQUAD 3.0. Qual Sociol. 14:325–47.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchison AJ, Johnston LH, Breckon JD. 2010. Using QSR-NVivo to facilitate the development of a grounded theory project: an account of a worked example. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 13:283–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kibert CJ. 2012. Closing materials loop. In: Kibert CJ, editor. Sustainable construction: green building design and delivery. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kuehlen A, Thompson N, Schultmann F. 2014. Barriers for deconstruction and reuse/recycling of construction materials in Germany. In: Nakajima S, Russell M, editors. Barriers for deconstruction and reuse/recycling of construction materials. CIB Publication 397. Rotterdam: CIB Publications, CIB General Secretariat; p. 38–52.
   Google Scholar
• Lau KH, Wang Y. 2009. Reverse logistics in the electronic industry of China: a case study. Supply Chain Manag Int J. 14:447–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leigh NG, Patterson LM. 2006. Deconstructing to redevelop: a sustainable alternative to mechanical demolition: the economics of density development finance and pro formas. J American Plann Assoc. 72:217–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewins A, Silver C. 2007. Using software in qualitative research. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Maclaran P, Catterall M. 2002. Analysing qualitative data: computer software and the market researcher practitioner. Qual Market Res Int J. 5:28–39.
   Google Scholar
• Mason M. 2010. Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum Qualitative Soc Res. 3:1–19.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald WJ. 2015. Theory building from the quantitative analysis of qualitative information. In: Wilson EJ, William CB, editors. Proceedings of the 1994 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference. New York, NY: Springer International Publishing p. 40–46.
   Google Scholar
• Nakajima S. 2014. Barriers for deconstruction and reuse/recycling of construction materials in Japan. In: Nakajima S, Russell M, editors. Barriers for deconstruction and reuse/recycling of construction materials. CIB Publication 397. Rotterdam: CIB Publications, CIB General Secretariat; p. 53–73.
   Google Scholar
• Nakajima S, Russell M. 2014. Overview: global barriers for deconstruction and reuse/recycling of construction materials. In: Nakajima S, Russell M, editors. Barriers for deconstruction and reuse/recycling of construction materials. CIB Publication 397. Rotterdam: CIB Publications, CIB General Secretariat; p. 7–19.
   Google Scholar
• Nordby AS, Berge B, Hakonsen F, Hestnes AG. 2009. Criteria for salvageability: the reuse of bricks. Build Res Info. 37:55–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunes KRA, Mahler CF, Valle RA. 2009. Reverse logistics in the Brazilian construction industry. J Environ Manag. 90:3717–3720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirlet IA. 2013. Standardization of the reverse logistics process: characteristics and added value. In: Nikolaidis Y, editor. Quality management in reverse logistics. London: Springer-Verlag; p. 39–51.
   Google Scholar
• Qu SQ, Dumay J. 2011. The qualitative research interview. Qual Res Acc Manag. 8:238–264.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmus SM, Allen J, Ford T. 2014. ‘Where I have to learn the ways how to live’: youth resilience in a Yup'ik village in Alaska. Transcult Psych. 51:713–734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravi V, Shankar R. 2005. Analysis of interactions among the barriers of reverse logistics. Techn Forecast Soc Change. 72:1011–1029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razaz ZE. 2010. Design for dismantling strategies. J Build Appraisal. 6:49–61.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña J. 2009. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Sassi P. 2004. Designing buildings to close the material resource loop. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Engineering Sustainability 157 Issue ES3, Sep (ISSN 1478 4637) .
   Google Scholar
• Sassi P. 2008. Defining closed-loop material cycle construction. Build Res Info. 36:509–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultmann F, Sunke N. 2007a. Organisation of reverse logistics tasks in the construction industry. In: Bragança L, Pinheiro M, Jalali S, editors. Portugal SB07 – Sustainable construction, materials and practices: challenge of the industry for the New Millennium. Amsterdam: IOS Press; p. 577–584
   Google Scholar
• Schultmann F, Sunke N. 2007b. Energy-oriented deconstruction and recovery planning. Build Res Info. 35:602–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidman I. 2006. Interviewing as qualitative research: a guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaharudin MR, Zailani S, Tan KC. 2015. Barriers to product returns and recovery management in a developing country: investigation using multiple methods. J Clean Prod. 96:220–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakantu WM, Emuze FA. 2012. Assessing reverse logistics in South African construction. In: Tommelein ID, Pasquire CL, editors. Proceedings for the 20th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction; San Diego, CA; 2012 Jul 18‒20.
   Google Scholar
• Simms C, Rogers B. 2006. The significance of flexibility in improving return on property investment: the UK perspective. Facilities. 24:106–119.
   Google Scholar
• Sinha S, Shankar R, Taneerananon P. 2010. Modelling and case study of reverse logistics for construction aggregates. Int J Logistics Syst Manag. 6:39–59.
   Google Scholar
• Smith E, Boone MWE, Shami MP. 2007. Sustainable approaches to landfill diversion: the global sustainability of deconstruction. In: Chun YM, Claisse P, Naik TR, Ganjian E, editors. Proceedings of the international conference: Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies (SCMT); Coventry, UK; 2007 Jun 11‒13.
   Google Scholar
• Srour I, Chong WK, Zhang F. 2012. Sustainable recycling approach: an understanding of designers' and contractors' recycling responsibilities throughout the life cycle of buildings in two US cities. Sust Develop. 20:350–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storey JB, Pedersen Zari M. 2003. Overcoming the barriers to deconstruction and materials re-use in New Zealand. In: Chini A, editor. Proceedings of Deconstruction and Materials Re-use Conference. Gainesville, FL: Powell Center for Construction and Environment. p. 15..
   Google Scholar
• Subramanian N, Gunasekaran A, Abdulrahman MD, Liu C, Su D. 2014. Reverse logistics in the Chinese auto-parts firms: implementation framework development through multiple case studies. Int J Sust Devel World Ecol. 21:223–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennant S, Fernie S. 2014. Theory to practice: a typology of supply chain management in construction. Int J Constr Manag. 14:56–66.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan V. 2013. Possible options for reuse and recycling of end-of-life waste glass from deconstruction projects. University of British Columbia. Report prepared at the request of City of Vancouver in partial fulfilment of UBC Geog 419. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2429/44459
   Google Scholar
• Zainul-Abidin N. 2008. Achieving sustainability through value management: a passing opportunity? Int J Constr Manag. 8:79–91.
   Google Scholar
• Zhai X, Reed R, Mills A. 2014. Embracing off-site innovation in construction in China to enhance a sustainable built environment in urban housing. Int J Constr Manag. 14:123–133.
   Google Scholar
• Zou PXW, McGeorge D, Ng S. 2005. Small and medium-sized enterprises' perspectives towards construction supply chain management and e-commerce. Int J Constr Manag. 5:1–19.
   Google Scholar