Organizational culture of the architectural firm: a case in a developing country

References

• Abdul-Aziz A-R. 2003. Construction entrepreneurship in Terengganu, Malaysia: an exploration of the influential forces. J Eng Des Tech. 1:15–41.
   Google Scholar
• Abdullah NH, Shamsuddinb A, Wahabc E, Hamid NAA. 2014. The relationship between organizational culture and product innovativeness. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 129:140–147.
   Google Scholar
• Abecassis-Moeda, C, Mahmoud-Jouini SB, Dell'era C, Manceau D, Verganti R. 2012. Key resources and internationalization modes of creative knowledge-intensive business services: the case of design consultancies. Creativity Innov Manag. 21:315–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu-Jarad I. 2011. The relationship between organizational innovativeness and organizational performance: a study on housing developers in peninsular Malaysia [dissertation]. Penang: Universiti Sains Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Adler P, Borys B. 1996. Two types of bureaucracy: enabling and coercive. Admin Sci Q. 41:61–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed PK. 1998. Culture and climate for innovation. EJ Innov Manag. 1:30–43.
   Google Scholar
• Akiner I, Tijhuis W. 2007. Work goal orientation of construction professionals in Turkey: comparison of architects and civil engineers. Constr Manag Econ. 25:1165–1175.
   Google Scholar
• Alutto J, Acito A. 1994. Decisional participation and sources of job satisfaction: a study of manufacturing personnel. Acad Manag J. 17:160–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson M. 2000. Social identity and the problem of loyalty in knowledge-intensive companies. J Manag Stud. 37:1101–1124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile T, Conti R, Coon H, Lazenby J, Herron M. 1996. Assessing the work environment for creativity. Acad Manag J. 39:1157–1184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson NR, West MA. 1998. Measuring climate for work group innovation: development and validation of the team climate inventory. J Org Behav. 19:235–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ankrah NA, Langford DA. 2005. Architects and contractors: a comparative study of organizational cultures. Constr Manag Econ. 23:595–607.
   Google Scholar
• Aouad G, Ozorhon B, Abbott C. 2010. Facilitating innovation in construction-directions and implications for research and policy. Constr Innov. 10:374–394.
   Google Scholar
• Bain PG, Mann L, Pirola-Merlo A. 2001. The innovation imperative: the relationships between team climate, innovation, and performance in research and development teams. Small Group Res. 32:55–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertola P, Teixeira JC. 2003. Design as a knowledge agent: how design as a knowledge process is embedded into organizations to foster innovation. Design Stud. 24:181–194.
   Google Scholar
• Blayse AM, Manley K. 2004. Key influences on construction innovation. Constr Innov Info Process Manag. 4:143–154.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs SR, Cheek JM. 1986. The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales. J Personality. 54:106–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton RM, Lauridsen J, Obel B. 2004. The impact of organizational climate and strategic fit on firm performance. Human Resource Manag. 43:67–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung SO, Wong PSP, Wu AWY. 2011. Towards an organizational culture framework in construction. Int J Proj Manag. 29:33–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung SO, Wong PSP, Lam AL. 2012. An investigation of the relationship between organizational culture and the performance of construction organizations. J Bus Econ Manag. 13:688–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho DS, Kim DJ, Rhee DK. 1998. Latecomer strategies: evidence from the semiconductor industry in Japan and Korea. Org Sci. 9:489–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Churchill GA, Iacobucci D. 2002. Marketing research: methodological foundations. 8th ed. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt College.
   Google Scholar
• Clark LA, Watson D. 1995. Constructing validity: basic issues in objective scale development. Psych Assess. 7:309–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claver E, Llopis J. 1998. Organizational culture for innovation and new technological behaviour. J High Tech Manag Res. 9:78–91.
   Google Scholar
• Coakes SJ, Steed L, Dzidic P. 2006. SPSS version 13.0 for windows: analysis without anguish. Milton, Australia: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper DR, Schindler PS. 2001. Business research method. 7th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Crabtree L, Hes D. 2009. Sustainability uptake in housing in metropolitan Australia: an institutional problem, not a technological one. Housing Stud. 24:203–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui AP, Hu MY, Griffith DA. 2014. What makes a brand manager effective? J Bus Res. 67:144–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarnitzki D, Thorwarth S. 2012. The contribution of in-house and external design activities to product market performance. J Prod Innov Manag. 29:878–895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darroch J. 2005. Knowledge management, innovation and firm performance. J Knowl Manag. 9:101–115.
   Google Scholar
• Dasgupta M, Gupta RK. 2009. Innovation in organizations: a review of the role of organizational learning and knowledge management. Global Bus Rev. 10:203–224.
   Google Scholar
• Dell'era C, Verganti R. 2007. Strategies of innovation and imitation of product languages. J Prod Innov Manag. 24:580–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman DA. 2000. Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dobni CB. 2008. Measuring innovation culture in organizations: the development of a generalized innovation culture construct using exploratory factor analysis. EJ Innov Manag. 14:539–559.
   Google Scholar
• Erbil Y, Akinciturk N. 2010. An exploratory study of innovation diffusion in architecture firms. Sci Res Essays. 5:1392–1401.
   Google Scholar
• Erbil Y, Akıncıtürk N, Acar E. 2012. Inter-organizational context of the innovation process and the role of architectural designers as system integrators: case evidence from Turkey. Arch Eng Des Manag. 9:1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Field A. 2005. Discovering statistics using SPSS. 2nd ed. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Filippetti A. 2011. Innovation modes and design as a source of innovation: a firm-level analysis. EJ Innov Manag. 14:5–26.
   Google Scholar
• Garland R. 1991. The mid-point on a rating scale: is it desirable? Market Bull. 2:66–70.
   Google Scholar
• Garvin DA. 1993. Building a learning organization. Harvard Bus Rev. 71:78–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffee R, Gareth J. 1998. The character of a corporation. New York: Harper Business.
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. 2006. Multivariate data analysis. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. 2010. Multivariate data analysis: a global perspective. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Hardie M, Newell G. 2011. Factors influencing technical innovation in construction SMEs: an Australian perspective. Eng Constr Arch Manag. 18:618–636.
   Google Scholar
• Haskins WA. 1996. Freedom of speech: construct for creating a culture which empowers organizational members. J Bus Comm. 33:85–97.
   Google Scholar
• Herbig P, Dunphy S. 1998. Culture and innovation. Cross Cultural Manag. 5:13–21.
   Google Scholar
• Hilmi MF, Ramaya T, Mustapha Y, Pawanchik S. 2010. Product and process innovativeness: evidence from Malaysian SMEs. EJ Soc Sci. 16:547–555.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede G. 1997. Cultures and organizations: software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede G. 2001. Culture's consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede G, Bond MH. 1984. Hofstede's culture dimensions: an independent validation using Rokeach's value survey. J Cross-Cult Psych. 15:417–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede G, Neuijen B, Ohayv DD, Sanders G. 1990. Measuring organizational cultures: a qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases. Admin Sci Q. 35:286–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House R, Javidan M, Hanges P, Dorfman P. 2002. Understanding cultures and implicit leadership theories across the globe: an introduction to project globe. J World Bus. 37:3–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber GP. 1991. Organizational learning: the contributing process and the literatures. Org Sci. 2:88–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jantan M, Nasurdin AM, Fadzil NFA. 2003. Designing innovative organizations in Malaysia: do structure and culture matter? Global Bus Rev. 4:216–226.
   Google Scholar
• Kamal EM, Flanagan R. 2012. Understanding absorptive capacity in Malaysian small and medium sized (SME) construction companies. J Eng Des Tech. 10:180–198.
   Google Scholar
• Katsoulacos Y, Tsounis N. 2000. Knowledge-intensive business services and productivity growth: the Greek evidence. In: Boden M, Miles I, editors. Services and the knowledge-based economy. London: Continuum; p. 192–207.
   Google Scholar
• Khan RA, Liew MS, Ghazali ZB. 2014. Malaysian construction sector and Malaysia vision 2020: developed nation status. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 109:507–513.
   Google Scholar
• Kong-Seng L, Yusof NA. 2011. Organizational culture and innovation adoption/generation: a proposed model. World Acad Sci Eng Tech. 58:268–273.
   Google Scholar
• Laws of Malaysia. 2006. Act 117, architect act 1967. Kuala Lumpur: Commissioner of Law Revision.
   Google Scholar
• Leentjens AFG, Dujardin K, Marsh L, Richard IH, Starkstein SE, Martinez-Martin P. 2011. Anxiety rating scales in Parkinson's disease: a validation study of the Hamilton anxiety rating scale, the Beck anxiety inventory, and the hospital anxiety and depression scale. Movement Disorders. 26:407–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman MB, Montgomery DB. 1988. First-mover advantages. Strat Manag J. 9:41–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard HC, Francis V, Turner M. 2010. Work–family enrichment in the Australian construction industry: implications for job design. Constr Manag Econ. 28:467–480.
   Google Scholar
• Liu AMM, Shuibo Z, Meiyung L. 2006. A framework for assessing organisational culture of Chinese construction enterprises. Eng Constr Arch Manag. 13:327–342.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd-Walker BM, Mills AJ, Walker DHT. 2014. Enabling construction innovation: the role of a no-blame culture as a collaboration behavioural driver in project alliances. Constr Manag Econ. 32:229–245.
   Google Scholar
• Lu S-L, Sexton M. 2006. Innovation in small construction knowledge-intensive professional service firms: a case study of an architectural practice. Constr Manag Econ. 24:1269–1282.
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson M, Martini A. 2008. Dual organisational capabilities: from theory to practice-the next challenge for continuous innovation. Int J Tech Manag. 42:1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manley K. 2004. Brite innovation survey. [Internet]. [cited 2013 Jan 18]. Available from: http://www.construction-innovation.info/index65f0.html?id=769
   Google Scholar
• Martins EC, Terblanche F. 2003. Building organizational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation. EJ Innov Manag. 6:64–74.
   Google Scholar
• Mathew J, Ogbonna E, Harris LC. 2012. Culture, employee work outcomes and performance: an empirical analysis of Indian software firms. J World Bus. 47:194–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcginnis MA, Ackelsberg MR. 1983. Effective innovation management: missing link in strategic planning? J Bus Strat. 4:59–66.
   Google Scholar
• Mclean LD. 2005. Organizational culture's influence on creativity and innovation: a review of the literature and implications for human resource development. Advances Develop Human Resourc. 7:226–246.
   Google Scholar
• Me'an M, Limacher A, Kahn SR, Aujesky D. 2014. The VEINES-QOL/Sym questionnaire is a reliable and valid disease-specific quality of life measure for deep vein thrombosis in elderly patients. Qual Life Res. 23:2463–2471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon AH, Rahman IA, Abdullah MR, Azis AAA. 2010. Factors affecting construction cost in Mara large construction project: perspective of project management consultant. Int J Sust Constr Eng Tech. 1:6–15.
   Google Scholar
• Milne A, Leifer L. 1999. The ecology of innovation in engineering design. In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED '99), August 24–26, Munich.
   Google Scholar
• Miron E, Erez M, Naveh E. 2004. Do personal characteristics and cultural values that promote innovation, quality and efficiency compete or complement each other? J Org Behav. 25:175–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monge PR, Cozzens MD, Contractor NS. 1992. Communication and motivational predictors of the dynamics of organizational innovation. Org Sci. 3:250–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy ME, Perera RS, Heaney SG. 2008. Building design innovation: expansion of classification linkages through case study analysis. J Eng Des Tech. 6:99–111.
   Google Scholar
• Nadim W, Goulding JS. 2009. Offsite production in the UK: the construction industry and academia. Arch Eng Des Manag. 5:136–152.
   Google Scholar
• Naranjo-Valencia JC, Jimenez-Jimenez D, Sanz-Valle R. 2011. Innovation or imitation? The role of organizational culture. Manag Decision. 49:55–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. 1994. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Nystrom PC, Ramamurthya K, Wilson AL. 2002. Organizational context, climate and innovativeness: adoption of imaging technology. J Eng Tech Manag. 19:221–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ofori G. 1990. The construction industry: aspects of its economics and management. Singapore: Singapore University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oney-Yazıcı E, Giritli H, Topcu-Oraz G, Acar E. 2007. Organizational culture: the case of Turkish construction industry. Eng Constr Arch Manag. 14:519–531.
   Google Scholar
• Oyedele LO. 2013. Analysis of architects' demotivating factors in design firms. Int J Proj Manag. 31:342–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallant J. 2010. SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS. 4th ed. East Melbourne: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• [PAM] Pertubuhan Akitek Malaysia. 1999. [Internet] Malaysian architectural policy [cited 2013 Jan 9]. Available from: http://www.mo.org.tr/UIKDocs/Malaysian.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Panuwatwanich K. 2008. Modelling the innovation diffusion process in Australian architectural and engineering design organisations [dissertation]. South East Queensland: Griffith University.
   Google Scholar
• Panuwatwanich K, Stewart RA, Mohamed S. 2008. The role of climate for innovation in enhancing business performance: the case of design firms. Eng Constr Arch Manag. 15:407–422.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson MG, West MA, Shackleton VJ, Dawson JF, Lawthom R, Maitlis S, Robinson DL, Wallace AM. 2005. Validating the organizational climate measure: links to managerial practices, productivity and innovation. J Org Behav. 26:379–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne R. 1990. The effectiveness of research teams: a review. In: West MA, Farr JL, editors Innovation and creativity at work. Chichester: Wiley; p. 101–122.
   Google Scholar
• Peansupap V, Walker DHT. 2009. Exploratory factors influencing design practice learning within a Thai context. Eng Constr Arch Manag. 16:238–253.
   Google Scholar
• Perks H, Cooper R, Jones C. 2005. Characterizing the role of design in new product development: an empirically derived taxonomy. J Prod Innov Manag. 22:111–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, Organ DW. 1986. Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. J Manag. 12:531–544.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, Mackenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Applied Psych. 88:879–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prabhu J. 2010. The importance of building a culture of innovation in a recession. Strat HR Rev. 9:5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Pullen A, Weerd-Nederhof PD, Groen A, Song M, Fisscher O. 2009. Successful patterns of internal SME characteristics leading to high overall innovation performance. Creativity Innov Manag. 18:209–223.
   Google Scholar
• Raaijmakers QAW, Hoof AV, Hart HT, Verbogt TFM, Vollebergh WAM. 2000. Adolescents’ midpoint response on Likert-type scale items: neutral or missing values? Int J Public Opinion Res. 12:208–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rameezdeen R, Ramachandra T. 2008. Construction linkages in a developing economy: the case of Sri Lanka. Constr Manag Econ. 26:499–506.
   Google Scholar
• [REHDA] Real Estate and Housing Developers' Association Malaysia. 2008. Construction industry master plan Malaysia 2006–2015: the way forward for the construction industry [Internet]; [cited 2014 Jun 6]. Available from: http://www.rehda.com/bulletin/08/bulletin-0810.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Reichstein T, Salter AJ, Gann DM. 2008. Break on through: sources and determinants of product and process innovation among UK construction firms. Industry Innov. 15:601–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saidon IM. 2012. Moral disengagement in manufacturing: a Malaysian study of antecedents and outcomes [dissertation]. Perth: Curtin University.
   Google Scholar
• Schein EH. 1986. What you need to know about organizational culture. Training Develop J. 40:30–33.
   Google Scholar
• Seaden G, Manseau A. 2001. Public policy and construction innovation. Build Res Info. 29:182–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekaran U, Bougie R. 2009. Research methods for business: a skill building approach. 5h ed. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Shane SA. 1992. Why do some societies invent more than others? J Bus Ventur. 7:29–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidek S, Zainol FA. 2011. Psychological traits and business performance of entrepreneurs in small construction industry. Int Bus Manag. 2:170–185.
   Google Scholar
• Smart JC, John EPS. 1996. Organizational culture and effectiveness in higher education: a test of the ‘culture type’ and ‘strong culture’ hypotheses. Educ Eval Pol Anal. 18:219–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soosay C, Hyland PWB. 2008. Exploration and exploitation: the interplay between knowledge and continuous innovation. Int J Tech Manag. 42:20–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svyantek DJ, Bott JP. 2004. Organizational culture and organizational climate measures: an integrative review. In: Thomas JC, editor. Comprehensive handbook of psychological assessment: Industrial and organizational assessment. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; p. 507–524.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick BG, Fidel LS. 2007. Using multivariate statistics. 5th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Talke K, Salomo SR, Wieringa JE, Lutz A. 2009. What about design newness? Investigating the relevance of a neglected dimension of product innovativeness. J Prod Innov Manag. 26:601–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The importance of original ideas in real estate. 2007 Feb 5. The Star.
   Google Scholar
• Trompenaars F, Hampden-Turner C. 1998. Riding the waves of culture: understanding cultural diversity in business. 2nd ed. London: Nicholas Brealey.
   Google Scholar
• Tsang KK. 2012. The use of midpoint on Likert scale: the implications for educational research. HK Teachers’ Centre J. 11:121–130.
   Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, O'Reilly CAI. 1997. Winning through innovation: a practical guide to leading organizational change and renewal. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verganti R. 2008. Design, meanings, and radical innovation: A metamodel and a research agenda. J Prod Innov Manag. 25:436–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verona G, Ravasi D. 2003. Unbundling dynamic capabilities: an exploratory study of continuous product innovation. Indust Corporate Change. 12:577–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh V. 1996. Design, innovation and the boundaries of firms. Res Pol. 25:509–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan D, Ong CH, Lee F. 2005. Determinants of firm innovation in Singapore. Technovation. 25:261–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams A. 2003. How to... write and analyse a questionnaire. J Orthodontics. 30:245–252.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Windrum P, Tomlinson M. 1999. Knowledge-intensive services and international competitiveness: a four country comparison. Tech Anal Strat Manag. 11:391–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worcester R, Burns T. 1975. A statistical examination of the relative precision of verbal scales. J Market Res Soc. 17:181–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi W. 2009. E-business assimilation and organizational dynamic capability: antecedents and consequences [dissertation]. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Baptist University.
   Google Scholar
• Yusof NA, Zainul-Abidin N. 2011. Does organizational culture influence the innovativeness of public-listed housing developers? Am J Appl Sci. 8:724–735.
   Google Scholar
• Yusof NA, Kamal EM, Kong-Seng L, Iranmanesh M. 2014. Are innovations being created or adopted in the construction industry? Exploring innovation in the construction industry. SAGE Open. 4:1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhou KZ, Yim CK, Tse DK. 2005. The effects of strategic orientations on technology- and market-based breakthrough innovations. J. Market. 69:42–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar