Integrating analytical hierarchy process and regression for assessing construction organizations’ performance

References

• Abraham GL. 2002. Identification of critical success factors for construction organizations in the architectural/engineering/construction (A/E/C) industry [PhD Thesis]. Georgia Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Barqawi H, Zayed T. 2006. Assessment model of water main conditions. In: The pipeline division specialty conference. Pipeline Division Specialty Conference 2006. Chicago, IL: ASCE. doi: 10.1061/40854(211)27.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Barqawi H, Zayed T. 2008. Infrastructure management: integrated AHP/ANN model to evaluate municipal water mains’ performance. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 14(4):305–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Harbi KMA-S. 2001. Application of the AHP in project management. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 19(1):19–27.
   Google Scholar
• Al Khalil MI. 2002. Selecting the appropriate project delivery method using AHP. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 20(6):469–474.
   Google Scholar
• Ashley DB, Lurie CS, Jaselskis EJ. 1987. Determinants of construction project success. J. Proj. Manag. 18(2):69–79.
   Google Scholar
• Barakat O, Bendou A, Martin JC. 2015. Success factors for local development project management case of Taroudant Province – Morocco. J. North Afr. Res. Bus. 2015:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Belassi W, Tukel OI. 1996. A new framework for determining critical success/failure factors in projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 14(3):141–151.
   Google Scholar
• Boynton AC, Zmud RW. 1984. An assessment of critical success factors. Sloan Manag. Rev. 25(4):17–27.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke-Davies T. 2002. The ‘real’ success factors on projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 20(3):185–190.
   Google Scholar
• Eisinga R, Te Grotenhuis M, Pelzer B. 2013. The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown? Int. J. Public Health. 58(4):637–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwakil E, Ammar M, Zayed T, Mahmoud M, Eweda A, Mashhour I. 2009. Investigation and modeling of critical success factors in construction organizations. In: Construction research congress 2009 @ Building a sustainable future. Seattle, Washington: ASCE; p. 350–359.
   Google Scholar
• Fayek AR, Oduba A. 2005. Predicting industrial construction labor productivity using fuzzy expert systems. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 131(8):938–941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghanem A, El-Gafy M. 2009. Utility assessment model for wireless technology in construction. In: Proceedings of the 45th Annual International Conference on Associated Schools of Construction; Gainesville, FL; p. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Goepel KD. 2013. Implementing the analytic hierarchy process as a standard method for multi-criteria decision making in corporate enterprises–a new AHP Excel template with multiple inputs. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on the analytic hierarchy process, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; p. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Holohan J. 1992. Use of executive information systems in measuring business performance. J. Inf. Technol. 7(3):177–186.
   Google Scholar
• Hu Y, Chan AP, Le Y, Xu Y, Shan M. 2016. Developing a program organization performance index for delivering construction megaprojects in China: fuzzy synthetic evaluation analysis. J. Manag. Eng. 05016007.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan RS, Norton DP. 1995. Putting the balanced scorecard to work. In: Performance measurement, management, and appraisal sourcebook. Amherst, MA: Human Resource Development Press; p. 66–74.
   Google Scholar
• Korpela J, Tuominen M. 1996. A decision aid in warehouse site selection. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 45(1):169–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao P, Li S, Ye K, Cai H. 2016. A field theory based model for identifying the effect of organizational structure on the formation of organizational culture in construction projects. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 2:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil KA, Newman I, Kelly FJ. 1996. Testing research hypotheses with the general linear model. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neter JM, Kutner H, Nachtsheim CJ, Wasserman W. 1996. Applied linear statistical models. Chicago, IL: Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Parvaneh FHA, El-Sayegh SM. 2016. Project selection using the combined approach of AHP and LP. J. Financ. Manag. Prop. Constr. 21(1):39–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockart JF. 1978. Chief executives define their own data needs. Harv. Bus. Rev. 57(2):81–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. 1990. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 48(1):9–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. 2008. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Serv. Sci. 1(1):83–98.
   Google Scholar
• Vaidya OS, Kumar S. 2006. Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 169(1):1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang C-C, Chen B-S. 2004. Key quality performance evaluation using fuzzy AHP. J. Chin. Inst. Ind. Eng. 21(6), 543–50.
   Google Scholar
• Zayed T, Elwakil E, Ammar M. 2012. A framework for performance assessment of organisations in construction industry. Int. J. Archit. Eng. Constr. 1(4):199–212.
   Google Scholar
• Zayed TM, Halpin DW. 2004. Quantitative assessment for piles productivity factors. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 130(3):405–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao C, Lo S, Lu J, Fang Z. 2004. A simulation approach for ranking of fire safety attributes of existing buildings. Fire Saf. J. 39(7):557–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Župerkienė E, Žilinskas VJ. 2015. Analysis of factors motivating the managers’ career. Eng. Econ. 57(2):85–91.
   Google Scholar