Insights into the application of risk tools and techniques by construction project managers

References

• Adighibe C, Skitmore M, Wong J. 2010. The management of transport construction projects: a survey of public sector organisations in Queensland Australia. Int J Constr Manag. 10(1):17–33.
   Google Scholar
• Balan P, Balan-Vnuk E, Metcalfe M, Lindsay N. 2015. Concept mapping as a methodical and transparent data analysis process. In: Elsbach KD, Kramer RM, editors. Handbook of qualitative organizational research: innovative pathways and methods. Florence (KY): Routledge; p. 318–330.
   Google Scholar
• Cagliano A, Grimaldi S, Rafele C. 2015. Choosing project risk management techniques: a theoretical framework. J Risk Res. 18(2):232–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsen A. 2016. On the tacit side of organizational identity: narrative unconscious and figured practice. Culture Organization. 22(2):107–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman CB, Ward S. 2011. How to manage project opportunity and risk why uncertainty management can be a much better approach than risk management: the updated and re-titled 3rd ed of Project risk management, processes, techniques and insights. 3rd edn. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. 2008. 'Grounded theory in the 21st century: applications for advancing social justice studies. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editor. Strategies of qualitative inquiry. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage 3rd Publications. p. 203–241.
   Google Scholar
• De Almeida AT, Alencar MH, Garcez TV, Ferreira JP. 2017. A systematic literature review of multicriteria and multi-objective models applied in risk management. IMA J Manag Math. 28(2):153–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennink MM, Kaiser BN, Marconi VC. 2017. Code saturation versus meaning saturation. Qual Health Res. 27(4):591–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillson D. 2014. Managing risk in projects—New concepts, viewed Nov 12, 2013, <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SCb8p4OJa9I>.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchison AJ, Johnston LH, Breckon JD. 2010. Using QSR‐NVivo to facilitate the development of a grounded theory project: an account of a worked example. Int J Social Res Methodol. 13(4):283–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO. 2009. IEC/ISO 31010:2009 Risk management – Risk assessment techniques. Geneva Switzerland: International Standards Organisation.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2018. ISO 31000. Risk management – Guidelines. Geneva Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization: p. 16.
   Google Scholar
• Jepson J, Kirytopoulos K. 2016. Investigating the usage of risk management tools and techniques in the construction industry: a literature perspective. In Ruiz R, Alvarez-Valdes R, editors. 15th International Conference on Project Management and Scheduling. Spain: Universitat de València. p. 173–176.
   Google Scholar
• Kutsch E, Hall M. 2010. Deliberate ignorance in project risk management. Int J Project Manag. 28(3):245–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons T, Skitmore M. 2004. Project risk management in the Queensland engineering construction industry: a survey. Int J Project Manag. 22(1):51–61.
   Google Scholar
• Leopoulos V, Kirytopoulos K, Malandrakis C. 2006. Risk management for SMEs: tools to use and how. Product Plan Control. 17(3):322–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of Government Commerce. 2011. Management of Risk (M_o_R): Guidance for Practitioners. London, UK: AXELOS.
   Google Scholar
• Perey R. 2015. Making sense of sustainability through an individual interview narrative. Cult Organization. 21(2):147–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PMI. 2017. A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide). 6th edn, Project Management Institute, Newtown Square, Pa. Purdy, G 2010, 'ISO 31000:2009—Setting a New Standard for Risk Management. Risk Analysis. 30(6):881–886.
   Google Scholar
• Safe Work Australia Act 2008. Australian Government ComLaw. 25 September 2009. Viewed 28 August 2017.
   Google Scholar
• San Cristóbal JR. 2015. ‘Management Science methods and methodologies for Project Management: What they model, how they model and why they model’. pmworldlibrary.net, viewed 15/09/2017.
   Google Scholar
• Serpella AF, Ferrada X, Howard R, Rubio L. 2014. Risk management in construction projects: a knowledge-based approach. Proc Social Behav Sci. 119:653–662.
   Google Scholar
• SA/SNZ HB 89:2013. 2013. Standards Australia Limited & Standards Australia International Limited & Standards New Zealand. Risk management: guidelines on risk assessment techniques, SAI Global Limited Sydney, NSW.
   Google Scholar
• Suri H. 2011. Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis. Qualitat Res J. 11(2):63–75.
   Google Scholar
• Taroun A. 2014. Towards a better modelling and assessment of construction risk: insights from a literature review. Int J Project Mana. 32(1):101–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou PX, Zhang G. 2009. Managing risks in construction projects: Life cycle and stakeholder perspectives. Int J Constr Manag. 9(1):61–77.
   Google Scholar