Developing a building-performance evaluation framework for post-disaster reconstruction: the case of hospital buildings in Aceh, Indonesia

References

• Abulnour AH. 2014. The post-disaster temporary dwelling: fundamentals of provision, design and construction. Hous Build Natl Res Cent. 10(1):10–24.
   Google Scholar
• Adamy A. 2009. BRR, nilai proyek dan evaluasi. Rehab rekon. Online article ed. Banda Aceh: The Aceh Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Adamy A, Abu Bakar AH. 2011. Asset evaluation for post-disaster project built by central government in Banda Aceh Indonesia. Asian J Environ Disast Manage. 03(04):405–423.
   Google Scholar
• Adewunmi Y, Omirin M, Famuyiwa F, Farinloye O. 2011. Post-occupancy evaluation of postgraduate hostel facilities. Facilities. 29(3–4):149–168.
   Google Scholar
• AEDET. 2003. Achieving excellence design evaluation. London (UK): Department of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Akter S, D’Ambra J, Ray P. 2010. Service quality of health: development and validation of a hierarchical model using PLS. Electron Market. 20(3–4):209–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amaratunga D, Baldry D. 2003. A conceptual framework to measure facilities management performance. Proper Manage. 21(2):171–189.
   Google Scholar
• Arain F. 2015. Knowledge-based approach for sustainable disaster management: empowering emergency response management team. Proc Eng. 118:232–239.
   Google Scholar
• Asian Development Bank. 2005. An initial assessment of the impact of the earthquake and tsunami of December 26, 2004 on south and Southeast Asia. Philippines, Manila.
   Google Scholar
• Baird G. 2009. Incorporating user performance criteria into building sustainability rating tools (BSRTs) for buildings in operation. Sustainability. 1(4):1069–1086.
   Google Scholar
• Bambang, Firdaus. 2006. Budget tracking: Aceh rehabilitation and reconstruction. In: Foundation T, editor. Banda Aceh, Indonesia: GERAK Aceh.
   Google Scholar
• Becker F. 1990. The total workplace. New York (NY): Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Bordass B, Leaman A, Ruyssevelt P. 2001. Assessing building performance in use 5: conclusions and implications. Build Res Inform. 29(2):144–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouaicha R, Bouri A. 2013. Modeling the quality of external audit: emperical validation in the Tunisian context. J Emerg Trend Econ Manage Sci. 4(2):233–242.
   Google Scholar
• BRR NAD-Nias. 2008. Asset management and administering results for rehabilitation and reconstruction (on-budget). Center for accounting and asset management. Banda Aceh, Indonesia: BRR NAD-Nias.
   Google Scholar
• BRR NAD-Nias. 2009. Education, health, women empowerment: preparing quality generation. Banda Aceh, Indonesia: BRR NAD-Nias.
   Google Scholar
• Chin WW. 1998. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In: Marcoulides GA, editor. Modern business research methods. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Chin WW. 2010. How to write up and report PLS analyses. In: Vinci VE, Chin WW, Henseler J, editors. Modern methods for business research. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Asscociates.
   Google Scholar
• Chin WW, Newsted PR. 1999. Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares. In: Hoyle R, editor. Statical strategies for small sample research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; p. 307–341.
   Google Scholar
• Cole RJ. 1998. Emerging trend in building environmental assessment methods. Build Res Inform. 26(1):3–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Silva J. 2010. Lessons from Aceh: key considerations in post-disaster reconstruction. Warwickshire (UK): Practical Action Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dinas Kesehatan Provinsi NAD. 2006. Profil kesehatan provinsi nangroe aceh darussalam 2005. Banda Aceh.
   Google Scholar
• Dorasol N, Sarrazin I, Hakim A, Hamadan N, Nik Lah NMI. 2012. POE Performance criteria and parameters for hospital building in Malaysia. 3rd International Conference on Business and Economic Research, Golden Flower Hotel; 12–13 March; Bandung, Indonesia.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas J. 1996. Building performance and its relevance to facilities management. Facilities. 14(3–4):23–32.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards JR. 2001. Multidimensional constructs in organizational behavior research: an integrative analytical framework. Organ Res Method. 4(2):144–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans H. 2010. Provincial human development report aceh 2010. Banda Aceh, Indonesia: UNDP – Indonesia: Dinas Kesehatan Provinsi NAD.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA. 2007. Design guide for improving hospital safety in earthquake, floods, and high winds. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Bookstein FL. 1982. Two structural equations models: LISREL and PLS applied to costumer exit-voice theory. J Market Res. 19(4):440–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of Aceh. 2011. The progress of rehab recon and exit strategy after earthquake and tsunami. Banda Aceh, Indonesia: Government of Aceh.
   Google Scholar
• Green Building Council Indonesia. 2012. Greenship Rating Tools. Jakarta: Green Building Council Indonesia.
   Google Scholar
• GTZ. 2002. Disaster risk management. Eschborn, Germany: GTZ.
   Google Scholar
• Haigh R, Amaratunga D. 2010. An integrative review of the built environment discipline’s role in the development of society’s resilience to disasters. Int J Dis Res Built Enviorn. 1(1):11–24.
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Hilt TM, Tingle C, Sarstedt M. 2013. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Mena JA. 2012. An assessment of the use of partial least sqaures structural equation modeling in marketing research. J Acad Mark Sci. 40(3):414–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayat E, Amaratunga D. 2014. The impact of the local political and socio-economic condtition to the capacity of the local governments in the maintenance of post-disaster road infrastructure reconstruction assets. Proc Econ Financ. 18:718–726.
   Google Scholar
• Hulland J. 1999. Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal. 20(2):195–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [IOM] Institute of Medicine. 1999. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington (DC): National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ismail D, Majid TA, Roosli R, Samah NA. 2014. Project management success for post-disaster reconstruction projects: international NGOs perspectives. Proc Econ Financ. 18:120–127.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis CB, MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff PM. 2003. A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. J Consum Res. 30(2):199–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayasuriya S, McCawley P. 2010. The Asian tsunami. Aid and reconstruction after a disaster. Tokyo, Japan: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. and the Asian Development Bank Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Jha AK, Barenstein JD, Phelps PM, Pittet D, Sena S. 2010. Safer homes, stronger communities: a handbook for reconstructing after natural disasters. Washington (DC): World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly C. 1996. Limitations to the use of military resources for foreign disaster assistance. Disast Prev Manage. 5(1):22–29.
   Google Scholar
• Kernohan D, Gray J, Daish J, Joiner D. 1992. User participation in building design and anagement. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick C, editor. 1991. Project rehabilitation in developing countries. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Konara S. 2010. Building post occupancy evaluation framework. Colombo, Sri Lanka: University of Colombo.
   Google Scholar
• Krejcie RV, Morgan DW. 1970. Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 30:607–610.
   Google Scholar
• Latham B. 2007. Sampling: what is it? Quantitative research methods. http://webpages.acs.ttu.edu/rlatham/Coursework/5377(Quant))/Sampling_Methodology_Paper.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lavy S, Garcia JA, Dixit MK. 2010. Establishment of KPIs for facility performance measurement: review of literature. Facilities. 28(9–10):440–464.
   Google Scholar
• Leaman A, Stevenson F, Bordass B. 2010. Building evaluation: practice and principles. Build Res Inform. 38(5):564–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe R, Chiu LF, Oreszczyn T. 2017. Socio-technical case study method in building performance evaluation. Build Res Inform. 1:16.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, Boano. 2010. Building back better: delivering people centered housing reconstruction at scale. Rugby (UK): Practical Action Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• MacAskill K, Guthrie P. 2015. A hierarchy of measures for infrastructure resilience - learning from post-disaster reconstruction in Christchurch, New Zealand. Civil Eng Environ Syst. 32(1–2):130–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff PM, Jarvis CB. 2005. The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions. J Appl Psychol. 90(4):710–730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Ruiz A, Aluja-Banet T. 2009. Toward the definition of a structural equation model of patent value: PLS path modeling with formative constructs. Revstat Stat J. 7(3):265–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masyrafah H, McKeon JMJA. 2008. Post-tsunami aid effectiveness in Aceh: proliferation and coordination in reconstruction. Washington (DC): Wolfensohn Center for Development.
   Google Scholar
• Moe TL, Pathranarakul P. 2006. An integrated approach to natural disaster management, public project. Disast Prev Manage. 15(3):396–413.
   Google Scholar
• Myeda NE, Kamaruzzaman SN, Pitt M. 2011. Measuring the performance of office buildings maintenance management in Malaysia. J Facil Manage. 9(3):181–199.
   Google Scholar
• Ofori G. 2001. Construction in disaster management. Singapore: National University of Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Pallant J. 2005. SPPS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using SPPS for windows version 12). 2nd ed. Australia: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Parida A, Kumar U. 2006. Maintenance performance measurement (MPM): issues and challenges. J Qual Maintenance Eng. 12(3):239–251.
   Google Scholar
• Pathirage C, Haigh R, Amaratunga D, Baldry D. 2008. Knowledge management practices in facilities organisations; a case study. J Facil Manage. 6(1):5–22.
   Google Scholar
• Potangaroa R. 2015. Sustainability by design: the challenge of shelter in post-disaster reconstruction. Proc Soc Behav Sci. 179:212–221.
   Google Scholar
• Preiser FE, Schramm U. 1998. Building performance evaluation. Time-saver standards for architectural data. Berlin, Germany: Springer; p. 233–238.
   Google Scholar
• Preiser WFE, Hardy AE, Schramm U, editors. 2017. Building performance evaluation: from delivery process to life cycle phases. 2nd ed. Switzerland: Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Preiser WFE, Vischer JC, editors. 2005. Assessing building performance. Oxford: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• President I. 2017. Laws of the republic Indonesia: construction service. No 2, Jakarta.
   Google Scholar
• Reid A. 2006. Verandah of violence, the background to the aceh problem. Singapore: Singapore University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Resosudarmo B, Nazara S. 2007. Aceh-nias reconstruction and rehabilitation: progress and challenges at the end of 2006. Chiyoda, Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Shafique K, Warren CMJ. 2016. Stakeholders and their significance in post natural disaster reconstruction projects: a systematic review on the literature. Asian Soc Sci. 12(10):1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Shauna MH, Preiser WFE, Watson C, editors. 2012. Enhancing building performance. New York (NY): John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw R. 2006. Indian Ocean tsunami and aftermath. Need for environment-disatser synergy in the reconstruction process. Disast Prev Manage. 15(1):5–20.
   Google Scholar
• Soesastro H, Atje R. 2005. Survey of recent developments. Bull Indonesia Econ Stud. 41(1):5–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi M, Tanaka S, Kimura R, Umitsu M, Tabuchi R, Kuroda T, Ando M, Kimata F. 2007. Restoration after the Sumatra earthquake tsunami in Banda Aceh: based on the results of interdisciplinary researches by Nagoya University. J Nat Dis Sci. 29(2):53–61.
   Google Scholar
• Telford J, Cosgrave J, Houghton R. 2006. Joint evaluation of the international response to the Indian ocean tsunami: synthesis report. London: Tsunami Evaluation Coalition.
   Google Scholar
• Thampi 2005. Ensuring Effective Project Monitoring and Evaluation. Curbing Corruption in Tsunami Relief Operations: Jakarta, Indonesia.
   Google Scholar
• The Aceh Institute. 2010. Post 2009 completion of reconstruction work in Aceh. Banda Aceh, Indonesia: The Aceh Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Transition Sector. 2009. Inventory report asset rehabilitation and reconstruction of Aceh. Banda Aceh, Indonesia: Assistance Team for Aceh Governor.
   Google Scholar
• UNCHS. 2001. Guidelines for the evaluation of post disaster programmes: a resource guide. Nairobi, Kenya: The United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (UNCHS) Habitat, Risk and Disaster Management Unit.
   Google Scholar
• van Beuningen J, Schmeets H. 2013. Social capital in 2009: an index for the Netherlands. Soc Behav Sci. 72:73–90.
   Google Scholar
• Wetzels M, Odekerken-Schroder G, van Oppen C. 2009. Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quart. 33(1):177–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wibisana BH, Bitai CC. 2009. Education, health, women empowerment. BRR NAD-Nias. Banda Aceh, Indonesia: BRR Book Series.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman A, Martin M. 2001. Post-occupancy evaluation: benefits and barriers. Building Research and Information. 29(2):168–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar