Evaluation of road design performance in delivering community project social benefits in Indonesian PPP

References

• Abascal J, Nicolle C. 2005. Moving towards inclusive design guidelines socially and ethically aware HCI. Interact Comput. 17(5):484–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). 2010. Hasilsensuspenduduk: data agregat per provinsi. https://www.bps.go.id/linkTabelStatis/view/id/1267.
   Google Scholar
• Bhakti IN. 2004. The transition to democracy in Indonesia: some outstanding problems. Asia Pac Cent Secur Stud. 195–206.
   Google Scholar
• Burgstahler S. 2012. Universal design: process, principles and applications. Seatle: College of Engineering, University of Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Centre for Universal Design. 2013. Available from: http://www.ncsu.edu/ncsu/design/cud/about_ud/about_ud.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Chan E, Lee GKL. 2007. Critical factors for improving social sustainability of urban renewal projects. Soc Indic Res. 85(2):243–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colantonio A, Dixon T, Ganser R, Carpenter J, Ngombe A. 2009. Measuring socially sustainable urban regeneration in Europe. Oxford Institute for Sustainable Development (OISD). Oxford: School of the Built Environment, Oxford Brookes University.
   Google Scholar
• Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment (CABE) and Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR). 2001. The value of urban design. London.
   Google Scholar
• Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment (CABE). 2006. The principle of inclusive design (they include you). Available from: www.cabe.org.uk.
   Google Scholar
• Dalsgaard P. 2012. Participatory design in large-scale public projects: challenges and opportunities. Design, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 28:34–37.
   Google Scholar
• Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR) and Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment (CABE). 2000. By design: urban design in the planning system: towards better practice. London (UK): Bressenden Place.
   Google Scholar
• Doloi H. 2012. Assessing stakeholders' influence on social performance of infrastructure projects. Facilities. 30(11/12):531–550.
   Google Scholar
• El-Gohary NM, Osman H, El-Diraby TE. 2006. Stakeholder management for public private partnerships. Int J Project Manag. 24(7):595–604.
   Google Scholar
• Elkington J. 1998. Partnerships from cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Environ Qual Manag. 8(1):37–51.
   Google Scholar
• Enyedi G. 2000. Social sustainability of large cities. Ekistics. 69:412–414.
   Google Scholar
• Field A. 2005. Discovering statistics using SPSS. London (UK): Sage Publication Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Black WC, Barin BJ, Anderson RE. 2010. Multivariate data analysis, a global perspective, Rutherford (NJ): Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Handayani A. 2008. Environmental management in toll road sector towards sustainable urban transport a study of Jakarta intra urban toll road, Indonesia [MSc thesis in Urban Management and Development]. The Netherlands: Erasmus University of Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Heylighen A. 2008. Sustainable and inclusive design: a matter of knowledge?. Local Environ. 13(6):531–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heylighen A, Bianchin M. 2013. How does inclusive design relate to good design? Designing as deliberative enterprise. Des Stud. 34(1):93–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwangbo H, Kim J, Kim S, Ji YG. 2015. Toward universal design in public transportation systems: an analysis of low-floor bus passenger behavior with video observations. Hum Factors Ergon Man. 25(2):183–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inclusive Design Toolkit University of Cambridge. 2013. Available from: http://www.inclusivedesigntoolkit.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Jeurissen R. 2000. John Elkington, cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business. J Bus Ethics. 23:231–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadir S, Jamaludin M. 2012. Applicability of Malaysian standards and universal design in public buildings in Putrajaya. ASEAN Conference on Environment-Behaviour Studies. Bandung, Indonesia. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 36:659–669.
   Google Scholar
• Kompas. 2010. Tol JORR W1 mulai beroperasi, warga protes. Available from: http://bola.kompas.com/read/2010/02/19/16005379/Tol.JORR.W1.Mulai.Beroperasi.Warga.Protes.
   Google Scholar
• Langdon P, Johnson D, Huppert F, Clarkson PJ. 2013. A framework for collecting inclusive design data for the UK population. Appl Ergon. 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2013.03.011.
   Google Scholar
• Li TH, Ng ST, Skitmore M. 2013. Evaluating stakeholder satisfaction during public participation in major infrastructure and construction projects: a fuzzy approach. Autom Constr. 29:123–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majamaa W, Junnila S, Doloi H, Niemostö E. 2008. End-user oriented public-private partnerships in real estate industry. Int J Strateg Prop Manag. 12(1):1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooi E, Sarstedt M. 2014. A concise guide to market research. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ng ST, Wong YMW, Wong JMW. 2010. A structural equation model of feasibility evaluation and project success for public–private partnerships in Hong Kong. IEEE Trans Eng Manag. 57(2):310–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng ST, Wong JMW, Wong KKW. 2013. A public private people partnerships (P4) process framework for infrastructure development in Hong Kong. Cities. 31:370–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osei-Kyei R, Chan APC. 2017. Implementing public–private partnership (PPP) policy for public construction projects in Ghana: critical success factors and policy implications. Int J Constr Manag. 17(2):113–123.
   Google Scholar
• Rio Charter. 2004. Universal design for sustainable and inclusive development. Available from: http://www.disabilityworld.org/12-02_05/access/riocharter.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• Rohman MA. 2017. Stakeholders' perspective on achieving project social benefit from Indonesian toll roads [PhD Thesis]. Australia: Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning. The University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Rohman MA, Doloi H, Heywood CA. 2017. Success criteria of toll road projects from a community societal perspective. Built Environ Proj Ass Manag. 7(1):32–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossetti R. 2006. The Seven Principles of Universal Design. Action Magazine.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders EB-N, Rim S. 2002. From user-centered to participatory design approaches. In: Frascara J, editor. Design and the social sciences. Taylor & Francis Books Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Vavik T, Keitsch MM. 2010. Exploring relationships between universal design and social sustainable development: some methodological aspects to the debate on the sciences of sustainability. Sust Dev. 18(5):295–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogt WP. 2007. Quantitative methods for professionals. Boston (MA): Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Waller S, Bradley M, Hosking I, Clarkson PJ. 2013. Making the case for inclusive design. Appl Ergon. xxx:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Wibowo A. 2005. Estimating general threshold traffic levels of typical build, operate, and transfer toll road projects in Indonesia. Constr Manag Econ. 23(6):621–630.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan J, Zeng AY, Skibniewski MJ, Li Q. 2009. Selection of performance objectives and key performance indicators in public–private partnership projects to achieve value for money. Constr Manag Econ. 27(3):253–270.
   Google Scholar