GIS-based locational evaluation of infrastructure facilities in hilly regions: a case study of an institute campus

References

• Abushandi E, Alatawi S. 2015. Dam site selection using remote sensing techniques and geographical information system to control flood events in Tabuk city. J Hydrol Curr Res. 6(1):189.
   Google Scholar
• Amiri M, Kazemi A, Sadaghiani JS, Yaghoubi A, Mashatzadegan H. 2009. Developing and solving a new model for the location problems: fuzzy-goal programming approach. J Appl Sci. 9:1344–1349.
   Google Scholar
• Anumba CEH, Dainty A, Ison S, Sergeant A. 2006. Understanding structural and cultural impediments to ICT system integration. Eng Const Arch Man. 13(6):616–633.
   Google Scholar
• Athawale V, Chakraborty MS. 2010. Facility location selection using PROMETHEE II method. Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Dhaka, Bangladesh.
   Google Scholar
• Awasthi A, Chauhan SS, Goyal SK. 2011. A Multi-criteria decision making approach for location planning for urban distribution centers under uncertainty. Math Comput Model. 53(1–2):98–109.
   Google Scholar
• Bansal VK. 2011a. Use of GIS and topology in the identification and resolution of space conflicts. J Comput Civ Eng. 25(2):159–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansal VK. 2011b. Application of geographic information systems in construction safety planning. Int J Project Manage. 29(1):66–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansal VK. 2012. Application areas of GIS in construction projects and future research directions. Int J Const Manage. 12(4):17–36.
   Google Scholar
• Baz I, Geymen A, Nogay S. 2009. Development and application of GIS-based analysis/synthesis modelling techniques for urban planning of Istanbul area. Adv Eng Softw. 40(2):128–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennui A, Rattanamanee P, Puetpaiboon U, Phukpattaranont P, Chetpattananondh K. 2007. Site selection for large wind turbine using GIS. PSU-UNS, International Conference on Engineering and Environment. Phuket: ICEE-2007.
   Google Scholar
• Bouyssou D, Merchant T, Pirlot M, Perny P, Tsoukias A, Vincke P. 2000. Evaluation models: a critical perspective. Boston: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Carsjens GJ, Ligtenberg A. 2007. A GIS-based support tool for sustainable spatial planning in metropolitan areas. Landsc Urban Plan. 80(1–2):72–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Central Public Works Department (CPWD). 2014. Guidelines for sustainable habitat, 2014 by Director General. Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi: CPWD.
   Google Scholar
• Chang Q, Liu X, Wu J, He P. 2014. MSPA-based urban green infrastructure planning and management approach for urban sustainability: case study of Longgang in China. J Urban Plann Dev. 141(3):39–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen K, Liao C, Wu L. 2014. A selection model to logistics centers based on TOPSIS and MCGP methods: a case of airline industry. J Appl Math. 2014, Article ID 470128, pp. 1–10, doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/470128.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng CH, Yang KL, Hwang CL. 1999. Evaluating attack helicopters by AHP based on linguistic variable weight. Eur J Oper Res. 116(2):423–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng EWL, Li H, Yu L. 2007. A GIS approach to shopping mall location selection. J Build Environ. 42(2):884–892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng MY, Ko CH. 2002. Computer-aided decision support system for hillside safety monitoring. Automat Constr. 11(4):453–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng MY, Ko CH, Chang CH. 2002. Computer-aided DSS for safety monitoring of geotechnical construction. Automat Constr. 11(4):375–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu TC. 2002. Facility location selection using fuzzy TOPSIS under group decisions. Int J Unc Fuzz Knowl Based Syst. 10(06):687–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dan L, Guoxin T, Liuyin W, Shujun Z. 2008. A study for 3D virtual campus navigation system based on GIS. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing. Dalian, China.
   Google Scholar
• Das M, Cheng JCP, Law KH. 2015. An ontology-based web service framework for construction supply chain collaboration and management. Eng Const Arch Man. 22(5):551–572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinler D, Tural MK, Iyigun C. 2015. Heuristics for a continuous multi-facility location problem with demand regions. J Comput Oper Res. 62:237–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dosal E, Viguri JR, Andrés A. 2013. Multi-criteria decision-making methods for the optimal location of construction and demolition waste (C&DW) recycling facilities. In: Handbook of recycled concrete and demolition waste a volume in Woodhead publishing limited, Cambridge (currently Elsevier). Series in civil and structural engineering; p. 76–107.
   Google Scholar
• Drezner Z, Scott C, Song J. 2003. The central warehouse location problem revisited. J Manage Math. 14(4):321–336.
   Google Scholar
• Erensal YC, Oncan T, Demircan ML. 2006. Determining key capabilities in technology management using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: a case study of Turkey. Inf Sci. 176(18):2755–2770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farahani RZ, Steadieseifi M, Asgari N. 2010. Multiple criteria facility location problems: a survey. Appl Math Model. 34(7):1689–1709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forzieri G, Guarnieri L, Vivoni ER, Castelli F, Preti F. 2009. Multiple attribute decision making for individual tree detection using high-resolution laser scanning. Forest Ecol Manage. 258(11):2501–2510. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.006.
   Google Scholar
• Forzieri GL, Gardenti M, Caparrini F, Castelli F. 2008. A methodology for the pre-selection of suitable sites for surface and underground small dams in arid areas: a case study in the region of Kidal. Phys Chem Earth. 33(1–2):74–85.
   Google Scholar
• Gambatese J, Hinze J. 1999. Addressing construction worker safety in the design phase-designing for construction worker safety. Automat Constr. 8(6):643–649.
   Google Scholar
• Ghobarah A. 1987. Civil Engineers’ role in site selection studies. J Prof Issues Eng. 113(4):351–359.
   Google Scholar
• Greene R, Devillers R, Eddy AB. 2011. GIS-based multiple-criteria decision analysis. In: Geography Compass. Vol. 5/6. Canada: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.; p. 412–432. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2011.00431.x.
   Google Scholar
• Hall GB, Wang F, Subaryono. 1992. Comparison of Boolean and fuzzy classification methods in land suitability analysis by using geographical information systems. Environ Plan A. 24:497–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haughton G, Allmendinger P, Counsell D, Vigar G. 2009. The new spatial planning: territorial management with soft spaces and fuzzy boundaries. London, UK: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández J, Garcı́a L, Ayuga F. 2004. Assessment of the visual impact made on the landscape by new buildings: a methodology for site selection. Landsc Urban Plan. 68(1):15–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinze J, Raboud P. 1988. Safety on large building construction projects. J Constr Eng Manage. 114(2):286–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu TH, Hung LC, Tang JW. 2012. A hybrid ANP evaluation model for electronic service quality. Appl Soft Comput. 12(1):72–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huifeng J, Aigong X. 2008. The Method of warehouse location selection based on GIS and remote sensing images. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XXXVII. Part B2. Beijing.
   Google Scholar
• International Building Code. 2009. Country Club Hills, IL: International Code Council.
   Google Scholar
• Isikdag U, Underwood J, Aouad G. 2008. An investigation into the applicability of building information models in geospatial environment in support of site selection and fire response management processes. Adv Eng Inform. 22(4):504–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katpatal YP, Rama Rao BVS. 2011. Urban spatial decision support system for municipal solid waste management of Nagpur urban area using high-resolution satellite data and geographic information system. J Urban Plann Dev. 141(1):65–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koçak H. 2010. Convex programming approach to the shopping mall (AVM) site selection problem and sakarya. Eur J Soc Sci. 13(2):219–228.
   Google Scholar
• Kolli SS, Damodaran PS, Evans GW. 1993. Geographic information system based decision support systems for facility location, routing, and scheduling. Comput Ind Eng. 25(1–4):369–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Küçükdeniz T, Baray A, Ecerkale K, Esnaf S. 2012. Integrated use of fuzzy c-means and convex programming for capacitated multi-facility location problem. Exp Syst Appl. 39(4):4306–4314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulak O, Kahraman C. 2005. Fuzzy multi-attribute selection among transportation companies using axiomatic design and analytic hierarchy process. Inform Sci. 170(2–4):191–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar M, Biswas V. 2013. Identification of potential sites for urban development using GIS multi-criteria evaluation technique. J Settlements Spatial Plan. 4(1):45–51.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar M, Shaikh VR. 2013. Site suitability analysis for urban development using GIS based multi-criteria evaluation technique. J Indian Soc Remote Sens. 41(2):417–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Yu L, Cheng EWL. 2005. A GIS-based site selection system for real estate projects. Constr Innov. 5(4):231–241.
   Google Scholar
• Long Y, Shen ZJ, Mao QZ. 2011. An urban containment planning support system for Beijing. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 35(4):297–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malczewski J. 1996. A GIS-based approach to multiple criteria group decision-making. Int J Geogr Inform Syst. 10(8):955–971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malczewski J. 2004. GIS-based land-use suitability analysis: a critical overview. Prog Plan. 62(1):3–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malczewski J. 2006. GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature. Int J Geogr Inform Sci. 20(7):703–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manase D, Heesom D, Oloke D, Proverbs D, Young C, Luckhurst D. 2011. A GIS analytical approach for exploiting construction health and safety information. J Inform Technol Constr. 16:335–356.
   Google Scholar
• Manual on norms and standards for environment Clearance of large construction projects by Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF). 2006. New Delhi: Government of India.
   Google Scholar
• National Building Code (NBC) of India. 2005. SP 7:2005, Second Revision 2005. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.
   Google Scholar
• National Highways Authority of India (NHAI). 2006. Works Manual published by Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport and Highways. New Delhi: Department of Road Transport and Highways.
   Google Scholar
• Önüt S, Soner S. 2008. Transhipment site selection using the AHP and TOPOSIS approaches under Fuzzy Environment. Waste Manage. 28(9):1552–1559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özdağoğlu A. 2012. A multi-criteria decision-making methodology on the selection of facility location: fuzzy ANP. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 59(5–8):787–803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira JMC, Duckstein L. 1993. A multiple criteria decision-making approach to GIS base land suitability evaluation. Int J Geogr Inform Syst. 7(5):407–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettit C, Pullar D. 1999. An integrated planning tool based upon multiple criteria evaluation of spatial information. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 23(5):339–357.
   Google Scholar
• Rajendran S. 2006. Sustainable construction safety and health rating system [Ph.D. dissertation]. Corvallis, Ore: Oregon State University.
   Google Scholar
• Rajendran S, Gambatese JA. 2009. Development and initial validation of sustainable construction safety and health rating system. J Constr Eng Manage. 135(10):1067–1075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell RS, Taylor BW. 2003. Operation management. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. 1994. Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks R, Rozenfeld O, Rozenfeld Y. 2009. Spatial and temporal exposure to safety hazards in construction. J Constr Eng Manage. 135(8):726–736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebastian R. 2011. Changing roles of the clients, architects and contractors through BIM. Eng Const Arch Man. 18(2):176–187.
   Google Scholar
• Senes G, Toccolini A. 1998. Sustainable land-use planning in protected rural areas in Italy. Landsc Urban Plan. 41(2):107–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SketchUp. 2010. Google sketch up plug-in. [accessed 2010 May 15] http://sketchup.google.com/intl/en/download/plugins.html.
   Google Scholar
• Tomić V, Marinkovi D, Markovi D. 2014. The selection of logistic centers location using multi-criteria comparison: case study of the Balkan Peninsula. Acta Polytech Hung. 11(10):97–113.
   Google Scholar
• Toole TM. 2007. Design engineers’ responses to safety situations. J Prof Issues Eng Educ Pract. 133(2):126–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuzkaya G, Önüt S, Tuzkaya UR, Gülsün B. 2008. An analytical network process approach for locating undesirable facilities: an example from Istanbul Turkey. J Environ Manage. 88(4):970–983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ugo PD. 2015. Multi-criteria decision making for location selection in the Niger Delta using fuzzy TOPSIS approach. Int J Manage Bus Res. 5(3):215–224.
   Google Scholar
• Vahidnia MH, Alesheikh A, Alimohammadi A, Bassiri A. 2008. Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process in GIS application. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. XXXVII. Part B2, Beijing.
   Google Scholar
• Vimal J, Chaturvedi V, Dubey A. 2012. Apllication of TOPSIS method for supplier selection in manufacturing industry. Int J Res Eng Appl Sci. 2(5):25–35.
   Google Scholar
• Waly AF, Thabet WY. 2003. A virtual construction environment for pre-construction planning. Automat Constr. 12(2):139–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang F. 1994. The use of artificial neural networks in a geographical information system for agricultural land-suitability assessment. Environ Plan A. 26(2):265–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Shen Q, Tang B. 2014. GIS-based framework for supporting land use planning in urban renewal: case study in Hong Kong. J Urban Plann Dev. 141(3).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YW, Zou ZC. 2010. Spatial decision support system for urban planning: case study of Harbin City in China. J Urban Plann Dev. 136(2):147–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yong D. 2006. Plant location selection based on Fuzzy TOPSIS. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 28(7):323–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar