The assessment of the effect of BIM and IPD on construction projects in Ukraine

References

• Angelo WJ, Reina P. 2002. Megaprojects need more study up front to avoid cost overruns. New York: McGraw-Hill. http://flyvbjerg.plan.aau.dk/News%20in%20English/ENR%20Costlies%20150702.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Asaul AN, Ivanov SN. 2008. Snizhenie transaktsionnyih zatrat v stroitelstve za schYot optimizatsii informatsionnogo prostranstva. [Reducing transaction costs in the building by optimizing the information space]. St. Petersburg, Russian; p. 300.
   Google Scholar
• Autodesk. 2019. BIM - Polish perspective. Research report. [accessed 2019 Sep 30]. http://damassets.autodesk.net/content/dam/autodesk/www/campaigns/bim-event/BIM_raport_final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Azhar S, Khalfan M, Maqsood T. 2015. Building information modelling (BIM): now and beyond. CEB. 12(4):15–28.
   Google Scholar
• Azhar S. 2011. Building information modeling (BIM): trends, benefits, risks, and challenges for the AEC industry. Leadersh Manage Eng. 11(3):241–252.
   Google Scholar
• Barki H, Pinsonneault A. 2005. A model of organizational integration, implementation effort, and performance. Organ Sci. 27:165–179.
   Google Scholar
• Benitez-Amado J, Walczuch R. 2012. Information technology, the organizational capability of proactive corporate environmental strategy and firm performance: a resource-based analysis. European J Inf Sys. 21(6):664–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannistraro JC. 2012. Metrics measure the value gained from BIM. The Business Value of BIM in North America. Multi-Year Trend Analysis and User Ratings (2007–2012). p. 16–17. [accessed 2019 Sep 30]. https://bimforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/MHC-Business-Value-of-BIM-in-North-America-2007-2012-SMR.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Integrated Facility Engineering (CIFE). 2012. CIFE's VDC vision and overview. [accessed 2019 Sep 30]. https://web.stanford.edu/class/cee320/CEE320A/Fischer280912.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Damodaran A. 2005. The value of synergy (working paper). New York: Stern School of Business.
   Google Scholar
• Eastman C, Teicholz P, Sacks R, Liston K. 2011. BIM handbook: a guide to building information modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers and contractors. 2nd ed. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and of the Council. 2014. Directive 2014/24/EU of the European parliament and of the council of 26 february 2014 on public procurement and repealing directive 2004/18/EC. [accessed 2019 Sep 30]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32014L0024&from=EN.
   Google Scholar
• Evans R, Haryott R, Haste N, Jones A. 2004. The long-term costs of owning and using buildings. Designing Better Buildings: Quality and Value in the Built Environment. p. 42.
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca FB, Vanalle R, Camarotto J. 2018. Identification of ex-ante and ex-post transaction costs in industrial construction engineering projects. J Civil Eng Manage. 24:424–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giel BK, Issa RR, Olbina S. 2009. Return on investment analysis of building information modeling in construction [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Giel BK, Issa RR. 2013. Return on investment analysis of using building information modeling in construction. J Comput Civ Eng. 27(5):511–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham І. 2006. Re-examining the costs and value ratios of owning and occupying buildings. Building Res Inf. 34:230–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismail WNW, Isa SSM, Yusop N. 2018. Ideal construction procurement system based on transaction cost approach. IJARBSS. 8:807–814.
   Google Scholar
• Itami H, Roehl T. 1987. Mobilizing invisible assets. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jin X, Zhang G, Ke Y, Xia B. 2017. Factors influencing transaction costs in construction projects: a critical review. Proceedings of the 20Th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate. p. 949–958.
   Google Scholar
• Jones D. 2014. Integrated project delivery (IPD) for maximizing design and construction considerations regarding sustainability. Procedia Eng. 95:528–538.
   Google Scholar
• Jongeling R. 2008. BIM istället för 2D-CAD i byggprojekt. Forskningsrapport. [BIM instead of 2D CAD in construction projects. Research report]. Lulea. Swedish: Lulea University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Jorgensen B, Emmit S. 2009. Investigating the integration of design and construction from a “lean”. Perspect Constr Innov. 9(2):225–240.
   Google Scholar
• Kent DC, Becerik-Gerber B. 2010. Understanding construction industry experience and attitudes toward integrated project delivery. J Constr Eng Manage. 136(8):815–825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S, Chin S, Han J, Choi C-H. 2017. Measurement of construction BIM value based on a case study of a large-scale building project. J Manage Eng. 33(6):05017005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuibida V, et al. 2018. InformatsIyne modelyuvannya budIvel v upravlInnI vartIstyu zhittEvogo tsiklu ob’EktIv: monografIya [Building information modeling in facilities life cycle cost management: monograph]. Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine: Yaryna; p. 128.
   Google Scholar
• Kwofie TE, Alhassan A, Botchway E, Afranie I. 2015. Factors contributing towards the effectiveness of construction project teams. Int J Constr Manage. 15(2):170–178.
   Google Scholar
• Lebedev A. 2018. The ministry of regional development begins BIM-evolution in Ukraine. Build J. 5-6 (135-136):24–30.
   Google Scholar
• Lee G, Park H, Won J. 2012. D3 city project - economic impact of BIM-assisted design validation. Autom Constr. 22:577–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SK, An HK, Yu JH. 2012. An extension of the technology acceptance model for BIM-based FM. In: Construction research congress 2012: construction challenges in a flat world. West Lafayette, United states. p. 602–611.
   Google Scholar
• Li H, Arditi D, Wang Z. 2014. Transaction costs incurred by construction owners. Eng Const Arch Manage. 21(4):444–458.
   Google Scholar
• Li H, Arditi D, Wang Z. 2015. Determinants of transaction costs in construction projects. J Civil Eng Manage. 21(5):548–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao L, Teo L. 2019. Managing critical drivers for building information modelling implementation in the Singapore construction industry: an organizational change perspective. Int J Constr Manage. 19(3):240–256.
   Google Scholar
• Love P, Simpson I, Hill A, Standing C. 2013. From justification to evaluation: building information modeling for asset owners. Autom Constr. 35:208–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews O, Howell G. 2005. Integrated project delivery an example of relational contracting. Lean Constr J. 2(1):46–61.
   Google Scholar
• Mesa HA, Molenaar KR, Alarcon LF. 2016. Exploring performance of the integrated project delivery process on complex building projects. Int J Project Manage. 34(7):1089–1101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscow State University of Civil Engineering. 2016. Otsenka primeneniya BIM-tehnologiy v stroitelstve.[Evaluation of the use BIM technologies in construction]. [accessed 2019 Sep 30]. http://nopriz.ru/upload/iblock/2cc/4.7_bim_rf_otchot.pdf. Russian.
   Google Scholar
• Nical AK, Wodynski N. 2016. Enhancing facility management through BIM 6D. Procedia Eng. 164:299–306.
   Google Scholar
• Nofera W, Korkmaz S, Miller VD, Toole TM. 2011. Innovative features of integrated project delivery shaping project team communication. In: The 2011 Engineering Project Organizations Conference. Working Paper Proceedings Engineering Project Organizations Conference, Colorado, Bucknell University.
   Google Scholar
• Patacas J, Dawood N, Vukovic V, Kassem M. 2015. BIM for facilities management: evaluating BIM standards in asset register creation and service life planning. J Inf TechnolConstr. 20:313–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rached F, Hraoui Y, Karam A, Hamzeh F, Hamzeh F. 2014. Implementation of IPD in the Middle East and its challenges. Conference International Group for Lean Construction, IGLC 22At; Volume: 22, Oslo, Norway. [accessed 2019 Sep 30]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265122240_Implementation_of_IPD_in_the_Middle_East_and_its_Challenges.
   Google Scholar
• Romanenko YO, Chaplaі IV. 2017. Public administration by the modern information technologies in construction of Ukraine. Public Governance. 2(7):172–179. [accessed 2019 Sep 30]. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/public-administration-by-the-modern-information-technologiesin-construction-of-ukraine.
   Google Scholar
• Rozen-Bakher Z. 2018. The trade-off between synergy success and efficiency gains in M&A strategy. Euromed J Bus. 13:163–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks L, Eastman CM. 2006. Specifying parametric building object behavior (BOB) for a building information modeling system. Autom Constr. 15:758–776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen S. 2012. The impact of BIM/VDC on ROI - developing a financial model for saving and ROI calculation of construction projects. Real Estate and Construction Management, Royal Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Shaver M. 2006. A paradox of synergy: contagion and capacity effects in mergers and acquisitions. AMR. 31(4):962–976.
   Google Scholar
• Siniak N, Źróbek S, Nikolaiev V, Shavrov S. 2019. Building Information Modeling for Housing Renovation - Example for Ukraine. Real Estate Manage Val. 27(2):97–107.
   Google Scholar
• Succar B. 2009. Building information modelling framework: а research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders. Autom Constr. 18(3):357–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tafti A, Mithas S, Krishnan MS. 2013. The effect of information technology-enabled flexibility on formation and market value of alliances. Manage Sci. 59(1):207–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tekla. 2018. [accessed 2019 Sep 30]. https://www.tekla.com/baltic/bim-awards/diamond-city-shopping-center.
   Google Scholar
• Teng Y, Li X, Wu P, Wang X. 2019. Using cooperative game theory to determine profit distribution in IPD projects. Int J Constr Manage. 19(1):32–45.
   Google Scholar
• The American Institute of Architects. 2007. Integrated project delivery: a guide. [accessed 2019 Sep 30]. http://info.aia.org/siteobjects/files/ipd_guide_2007.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• The Ministry of Regional Development and Construction of Ukraine. 2018. [accessed 2019 Sep 30]. http://www.minregion.gov.ua/press/news/2019-rik-maye-stati-rokom-pochatku-vprovadzhennya-bim-tehnologiy-v-ukrayini-partshaladze/.
   Google Scholar
• Trach R, Lendo-Siwicka M, Pawluk K, Bilous N. 2019a. Assessment the effect of the integration realisation in construction projects. Teh Glas (Online). 13(3):254–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trach R, Polonski M, Hrytsiuk P. 2019b. Modelling of efficiency evaluation of traditional project delivery methods and integrated project delivery (IPD). IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng. 471:30. [accessed 2019 Sep https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/471/11/112043.
   Google Scholar
• Walasek D, Barszcz A. 2017. Analysis of the adoption rate of building information modeling [BIM] and its return on investment [ROI]. Procedia Eng. 172:1227–1234.
   Google Scholar
• Whittington JM, Dowall D. 2006. Transaction-cost economic analysis of institutional change toward design–build contracts for public transportation. Institute of Urban and Regional Development University of California at Berkeley. [accessed 2019 Sep 30]. https://iurd.berkeley.edu/wp/2006-09.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Xia J, Ma X, Tong TW, Li W. 2018. Network information and cross-border M&A activities. Global Strategy J. 8:301–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young NW, Jones SA, Bernstein HM. 2008. Building information modeling (BIM) - Transforming design and construction to achieve greater industry productivity, smart market report. Bedford, MA: McGraw Hill Construction.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Azhar S, Nadeem A. 2018. Using building information modelling to achieve lean principles by improving efficiency of work teams. Int J Constr Manage. 25:293–300.
   Google Scholar
• Zima K, Mitera-Kiełbasa E. 2018. BIM w zamówieniach publicznych w Polsce. Inżynier Budownictwa. [BIM in public procurement in Poland] [accessed 2019 Sep 30]. http://www.inzynierbudownictwa.pl/technika,materialy_i_technologie,artykul,bim_w_zamowieniach_publicznych_w_polsce,11388. Polish.
   Google Scholar