Critical success factors in implementing flexible IT infrastructure in the Malaysian construction industry

References

• Adnan H, Morledge R. 2003. Joint venture projects in Malaysian construction industry: factors critical to success. In: Greenwood DJ, editor. 19th Annual ARCOM Conference. Brighton: University of Brighton, Association of Researchers in Construction Management; p. 765–774.
   Google Scholar
• Afuah A, Werner R. 2007. Technological change and the negative effects of embeddedness. In: DRUID Summer Conference on Appropriability, Proximity, Routines, and Innovation, Copenhagen, CBS, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Akintoye A, Goulding J, Zawdie G. 2012. Construction innovation and process improvement. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Akintoye A, McIntosh G, Fitzgerald E. 2000. A survey of supply chain collaboration and management in the UK construction industry. Eur J Purchasing Supply Manage. 6(3–4):159–168.
   Google Scholar
• Ashworth S, Tucker M, Druhmann CK. 2019. Critical success factors for facility management employer's information requirements (EIR) for BIM. Facilities. 37(1/2):103–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourgeois DT. 2014. Information system for business and beyond. Washington DC, USA: The Saylor Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent M, Weill P, O’Brien T, Neo BS. 1996. Firm context and patterns of it infrastructure capability. In: 17th International Conference on Information Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Butler Group. 2006. Achieving it flexibility: moving from inhibitior to enabler of change. London: Technology Management and Strategy Report.
   Google Scholar
• Byrd TA, Lewis BR, Turner DE. 2004. The impact of IT personnel skills on IS infrastructure and competitive IS. Inform Resour Manage J. 17(2):38.
   Google Scholar
• Byrd TA, Turner DE. 2000. Measuring the flexibility of information technology infrastructure: exploratory analysis of a construct. J Manage Inform Syst. 17(1):167–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrd TA, Turner DE. 2001. An exploratory examination of the relationship between flexible it infrastructure and competitive advantage. Inform Manage. 39(1):41–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanapos A, Krairit D, Khang DB. 2006. Managing information technology infrastructure: a new flexibility framework. Manage Res News. 29(10):632.
   Google Scholar
• Chung SH, Byrd TA, Lewis BR, Ford FN. 2005. An empirical study of the relationships between it infrastructure flexibility, mass customization, and business performance. SIGMIS Database. 36(3):26–44.
   Google Scholar
• Chung SH, Rainer RK, Lewis BR. 2003. The impact of information technology infrastructure flexibility on strategic alignment and applications implementation. Commun Assoc Inform Syst. 11(11):1–31.
   Google Scholar
• CIDB Malaysia. 2011. A case study of BIM implementation in Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Davison SC, Ward K. 1999. Leading international teams. Berkshire, UK: McGraw-Hill International.
   Google Scholar
• Dobbis JH. 2001 September–October. Identifying and analyzing critical success factors. Prog Manage. 30(5):46–63.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan NB. 1995. Capturing flexibility of information technology infrastructure: a study of resource characteristics and their measure. J Manage Inform Syst. 12(2):37–58.
   Google Scholar
• Edum-Fotwe FT, McCaffer R. 2000. Developing project management competency: perspectives from the construction industry. Int J Project Manage. 18(2):111–124.
   Google Scholar
• Erzil T, Zhen S. 2012. Research on influence of corporate R&D and staff training investment on productivity. Sci Sci Manage S. T. (11):18.
   Google Scholar
• Fan L, Rajib MSU, Alam MS. 2012. Business process re-engineering in the smes: critical success factors perspective of an emerging economy. Int J Contemp Bus Stud. 3(110):6–18.
   Google Scholar
• Field A. 2013. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fink L. 2009. Towards a flexible information technology infrastructure: a multidimensional analysis. Saarbrucken: VDM Verlag Dr. Muller Aktiengelsellschaft and Co. KG.
   Google Scholar
• Fink L, Neumann S. 2007. Gaining agility through it personnel capabilities: the mediating role of it infrastructure capabilities. JAIS. 8(8):440–462.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher K. 2000. Leading self-directed work teams: a guide to developing new team leadership skills. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Ganesh L, Mehta A. 2011. A survey instruent for ranking of the critical success factors for the successful ERP implementation at Indian SMES. BIOINFO Bus Econ. 1(1):6–12.
   Google Scholar
• Gates LP. 2010. Strategic planning with critical success factors and future scenarios: an integrated strategic palnning framework. Hanscom AFB, MA: Carnegie Mellon University.
   Google Scholar
• Gray J, Liu DT, Nieto-Santisteban M, Szalay AS, DeWitt D, Heber G. 2005. Scientific data management in the coming decade. Redmond: Microsoft Research.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg A, Hamilton JR, Jain N, Kandula S, Kim C, Lahiri P, Maltz DA, Patel P, Sengupta S. 2009. Vl2: a scalable and flexible data center network. In: SIGCOMM’09, Barcelona, Spain. p. 51–62.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith A, Stephenson P, Watson P. 2014. Management systems for construction. Chicago, IL: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hashim J. 2007. Information Communication (ICT) Adoption among Sme Owners in Malaysia. Int J Bus Inform. 2(2):221–240.
   Google Scholar
• Hennig C, Müllensiefen D, Bargmann J. 2003. Comparison of changes in a pretest-posttest design with likert scales. In: Seminar für Statistik, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule (ETH), Zürich.
   Google Scholar
• Hinssen P. 2011. The new normal: explore the limits of the digital world. United States: Lannoo Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hou CK. 2019. The effects of IT infrastructure integration and flexibility on supply chain capabilities and organizational performance: An empirical study of the electronics industry in Taiwan. Inform Dev. 1–27. DOI: 10.1177/0266666919884352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howes R. 2000. Making governance mechanisms effective in a coordinated industry: the case of construction in the United Kingdom. Int J Technol Manage. 20(1–2):194–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang H-G, Yeh R, Chen H-G, Jiang JJ, Klein G. 2002. IT investment strategy and IT infrastructure services. Rev Bus Inform Syst. 6(2):55–64.
   Google Scholar
• Idrus AB, Newman JB. 2002. Construction related factors influencing the choice of concrete floor systems. Constr Manage Econ. 20(1):13–19.
   Google Scholar
• Ifinedo P, Ifinedo A. 2011. A snapshot of key information systems (Is) issues in Estonian Organizations for the 2000s. Baltic J Manage. 6(2):163–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irfan M, Putra SJ. 2019 December. Combining statistical and interpretative analyses for testing IT implementation readiness. J Phys: Conf Ser. 1402(2):022076.
   Google Scholar
• Jafari SM, Yusuff RM, Tang SH. 2006. Erp systems implementation in Malaysia: The importance of critical success factors. Int J Eng Technol. 3(1):125–131.
   Google Scholar
• Jaferian P, Botta D, Hawkey K, Beznosov K. 2008. Design guidelines for it security management tools. In: SOUPS Workshop on Usable IT Security Management (USM), Pittsburgh, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Jie Z, Han L, Jennifer LZ. 2009. Resource or capability? A dissection of SMEs' IT infrastructure flexibility and its relationship with IT responsiveness. J Comp Inform Syst. 50(1):46–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorfi S, Nor KM, Najjar L. 2011. Assessing the impact of IT connectivity and IT capability on IT-business strategic alignment: an empirical study. Comp Inform Sci. 4(3):76–87.
   Google Scholar
• Kandelousi NS, Ooi J, Abdollahi A. 2011. Key success factors for managing projects. Int J Econ Manage Eng. 5(11):1541–1545.
   Google Scholar
• KPMG IT Advisory. 2010. From cost to value: 2010 Global Survey on Cios Agenda. KPMG International.
   Google Scholar
• KPMG. 2010. Improved flexibility with XBRL. KPMG International.
   Google Scholar
• KPMG. 2019. Global Construction Survey 2019. KPMG International.
   Google Scholar
• Kulatunga U, Amaratunga D, Haigh R. 2011. Structured approach to measure performance in construction research and development: performance measurement system development. Int J Prod Perf Manage. 60(3):289–310.
   Google Scholar
• Laan S. 2017. IT infrastructure architecture: Infrastructure building blocks and concepts. 3rd ed. North Carolina: Lulu Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Lacerda R. T d O, Ensslin L, Ensslin SR. 2011. A performance measurement view of it project management. Int J Productivity & Perf Mgmt. 60(2):132–151.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen ER. 2010 June. Making the team: teams, teamwork, and teambuilding. Chem Eng Prog. 106(6):41–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latiffi AA, Mohd S, Kasim N, Fathi MS. 2013. Building information modeling (BIM) application in Malaysian construction industry. Int J Constr Eng Manage. 2(A):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Leana CR, Barry B. 2000. Stability and change as simultaneous experiences in organisational life. Acad Manage Rev. 25(4):753–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loosemore M, Teo MMM. 2012. The crisis management practices of Australian construction companies. Constr Econ Build. 2(2):15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Macmillan Dictionary. 2011. Ad Hoc. http://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/ad-hoc
   Google Scholar
• Mantelaers P, Berg W. v d. 2000. Transnational information systems: development and management issues. J Global Inform Manage. 8(1):34–44.
   Google Scholar
• Masrek MN, Jusoff K. 2009. The effect of information technology infrastructure flexibility on intranet effectiveness. Comput Inform Sci. 2(2):57–67.
   Google Scholar
• MASTIC. 2008. National Survey of Resarch and Development. Putrajaya: Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Meng CC, Samah BA, Omar SZ. 2013. A review paper: critical factors affecting the development of ICT projects in Malaysia. Asian Soc Sci. 9(4):42–50.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Works Malaysia. 2011. Application system directory. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Works Malaysia,.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan GA, Leech NL, Gloeckner GW, Barrett KC. 2011. IBM SPSS for introduction statistics: use and interpretation. 4th ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Napshin SA, De Carolis DM. 2011. The ability to change or the willingness to change: stakeholder interpretation of adversity. J Emerging Knowledge Emerging Markets 3(1):1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Ness LR. 2005. Assessing the relationships among IT flexibility, strategic alignment, and IT effectiveness: study overview and findings. J Inform Technol Manage. 16(2):1–17.
   Google Scholar
• NetApp. 2011. 53% of it professionals say infrastructure is not flexible. in: News@NetApp. London, UK: NetApp.
   Google Scholar
• NetApp. 2020. Why is monitoring modern IT infrastructures so hard? Part 1. In: News:NetApp, London, UK: NetApp.
   Google Scholar
• Noe RA, Hollenbeck JR, Gerhart B, Wright PM. 2017. Human resource management: Gaining a competitive advantage. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Nordin RM. 2012. Transparency initiatives (Ti) of construction industry of Malaysia. In: IEEE Symposium on Humanities, Science, and Engineering Research, Kuala Lumpur.
   Google Scholar
• Ogwueleka A. 2011. The critical success factors in influencing project performance in Nigeria. Int J Manage Stud Eng Manage. 6(5):343–349.
   Google Scholar
• Omar R, Lo M-C, Sang TY, Siron R. 2010. Information sharing, information quality and usage of information technology (IT) tools in Malaysian organisations. Afr J Bus Manage. 4(12):2486–2499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyewobi LO, Ogunsemi DR. 2010. Factors influencing reworks occurence in construction: a study of selected building projects in Nigeria. J Build Perform. 1(1):1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Ozer M. 2002. The role of flexibility in online business. Bus Horiz. 45(1):61–69.
   Google Scholar
• Palit M, Stein C. 2009. How to collaborate in a virtual world: teaching teamwork and technology. Am J Educ Stud. 2(1):39–50.
   Google Scholar
• Paschke J, Martin AMB. 2008. The extent of it-enabled organisational flexibility: an exploratory study among Australian Organisations. In: 19th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Christchurch.
   Google Scholar
• Pataki GE, Dillon JT, McCormack M. 2003. The New York State Project Management Guidebook, Release 2. New York: New York State Office for Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Perkova TG. 2011. Constructing the integral olap-model based on formal concept analysis. In: 34th International Convention MIPRO, Krasnoyarsk, Russia. p. 1544–1548.
   Google Scholar
• Rivard H. 2000. A survey on the impact of information technology in the Canadian architecture, engineering and construction industry. ITcon. 5:37–56.
   Google Scholar
• Rong G, Grover V. 2009. Keeping up-to-date with information technology: testing a model of technological knowledge renewal effectiveness for it professionals. Inform Manage. 46(7):376–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salman A. 2009. Ict, the New Media (Internet) and Development: Malaysian experience. Innov J: Public Sector Innov. 15(1):5.
   Google Scholar
• Sew GS. 2007. Bridging the gap between R&D and construction industry. In: Master Builders (1st Quarter); p. 54–68.
   Google Scholar
• Spiceworks. 2020. The 2020 state of IT: the annual report on IT budgets and tech trend. Austin, Texas: Spiceworks.
   Google Scholar
• Standish Group. 2009. The chaos report. http://www.csus.edu/indiv/v/velianitis/161/ChaosReport.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Stanford University. 1995. New information technology slowly transforming construction industry. http://news.stanford.edu/pr/95/950829Arc5107.html.
   Google Scholar
• Stefanovic I, Prokic S, Vukosavljevic D. 2011. The response to the changing landscape of tomorrow: reconfigurable organizations. Afr J Bus Manage. 5(35):13344–13351.
   Google Scholar
• Tajuddin MZM, Rohman I. 2017, October 16. ICT to shape country’s future. Kuala Lumpur: New Straits Times.
   Google Scholar
• Takim R, Adnan H. 2009. Analysis of effectiveness measures of construction project success in Malaysia. Asian Soc Sci. 4(7):74–91.
   Google Scholar
• Tallon PP, Kraemer KL. 2004. Using flexibility to enhance the alignment between information systems and business strategy: implications for it business value. Irvine: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations (CRITO), University of California, Irvine.
   Google Scholar
• Turner DE, Lankford WM. 2005. Information technology infrastructure flexibility: a historical perspective of flexibility. J Inform Technol Manage. XVI(2):37–47.
   Google Scholar
• Underwood J, Khosrowshahi F. 2012. ICT expenditure and trends in the UK construction industry in facing the challenges of the global economic crisis. J Inform Technol Constr (ITcon) (17):26–41.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2010. Measuring RandD: challenges faced by developing countries. Quebec, Canada: UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Wan-Abdullah WMT, Deris MS, Mohamad M, Tarmidi M. 2012. Perception of government officials towards the government procurement system: evidence from the eastern region of Malaysia. Afr J Bus Manage. 6(23):6853–6859.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Wang X, Wang J, Yung P, Jun G. 2013. Engagement of facilities management in design stage through BIM: framework and a case study. Adv Civil Eng. 2013:18.
   Google Scholar
• White C. 2012, March 11. Survey: telecommunicating becoming more prevalent (infographic). http://mashable.com/2012/03/11/telecommuting-infographic/
   Google Scholar
• Willcocks L, Venters W, Whitley E. 2012. Cloud and future of business: from costs to innovation. London: Accenture.
   Google Scholar
• Xu X, Liu Q. 2011. Creation and integration mechanism of instrumentation flexible developing system. Front Mech Eng. 6(2):235–240.
   Google Scholar
• Yang J, Shen PQ, Bourne L, Ho C, Xue X. 2011. A typology for operational approaches for stakeholder analysis and engagement: findings from Hong Kong and Australia. Constr Manage Econ. 29(2):145–162.
   Google Scholar
• Yap JBH, Chow IN, Shavarebi K. 2019. Criticality of construction industry problems in developing countries: analyzing Malaysian projects. J Manage Eng. 35(5):04019020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youngs G. 2013. Digital world: connectivity, creativity and rights. Oxon, MD: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yusuf MI, Owoyale OS, Keftin NA, Dzasu WE. 2011. Analysis of factors responsible for low utilization of mechanical plants and equipment by indigenous construction firms. FUTY J Environ. 6(1):28–36.
   Google Scholar
• Zamli KZ, Isa NAM, Klaib MFJ, Azizan SN. 2007. A tool for automated test data generation (and execution) based on combinatorial approach. Int J Software Eng Appl. 1(1):19–36.
   Google Scholar