Embodied carbon reduction strategies for high-rise buildings in Sri Lanka

References

• AkbarNezhad A, Xiao J. 2017. Estimation and minimization of embodied carbon of buildings: a review. Buildings.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asdrubali F, Baldinelli G, D, Alessandro F, Scrucca. 2015. Life cycle assessment of electricity production from renewable energies: Review and results harmonization. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 42:1113–1122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avetisyan HG, Miller-Hooks E, Melanta S. 2012. Decision models to support greenhouse gas emissions reduction from transportation construction projects. J Constr Eng Manage. 138(5):631–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basbagill J, Flager F, Lepech M, Fischer M. 2013. Application of life-cycle assessment to early stage building design for reduced embodied environmental impacts. Build Environ. 60:81–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley PE, Kohler N. 2007. Methodology for the survival analysis of urban building stocks. Build Res Inform. 35(5):529–542. DOI: 10.1080/09613210701266939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brander M, Davis G. 2012. Greenhouse gases, CO2, CO2e, and carbon: what do all these terms mean. Econometrica. 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Bribian I, Capilla A, Uson A. 2011. Life cycle assessment of building materials: Comparative analysis of energy and environmental impacts and evaluation of the eco-efficiency improvement potential. Build Environ. 46(5):1133–1140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bueren EV, De Jong J. 2007. Establishing sustainability: policy successes and failures. Build Res Inform. 35(5):543–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullen P. 2007. Adaptive reuse and sustainability of commercial buildings. Facilities. 25(1/2):20–31.
   Google Scholar
• Chau C, Hui W, Ng W, Powell G. 2012. Assessment of CO2 emissions reduction in high-rise concrete office buildings using different material use options. Resour Conserv Recycl. 61:22–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen T, Burnett J, Chau C. 2001. Analysis of embodied energy use in the residential building of Hong Kong. Energy. 26(4):323–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Ng S. 2015. Integrate an embodied GHG emissions assessment model into building environmental assessment tools. Procedia Eng. 118:318–325.
   Google Scholar
• Chipiliro E, Brown B, Sloan B. 2015. Embodied energy and carbon analysis of urban residential buildings in Malawi. Int J Constr Manag. 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Chou J-S, Yeh K-C. 2015. Life cycle carbon dioxide emissions simulation and environmental cost analysis for building construction. J Clean Prod. 101:137–147. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dakwale V, Ralegaonkar R, Mandavgane S. 2011. Improving environmental performance of building through increased energy efficiency: a review. Sustain Cities Soc. 1(4):211–218. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2011.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixit M, Fernandez-Solis J, Lavy S, Culp CH. 2010. Identification of parameters for embodied energy measurement: A literature review. Energy Build. 42(8):1238–1247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixit M, Fernandez-Solis JL, Lavy S, Culp CH. 2012. Need for an embodied energy measurement protocol for buildings: A review paper. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 16(6):3730–3743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foraboschi P, Mercanzin M, Trabucco D. 2014. Sustainable structural design of tall buildings based on embodied energy. Energ Build. 68:254–269. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan V, Chan C, Tse K, Cheng JC, Lo IM. 2017a. Sustainability analyses of embodied carbon and construction cost in high-rise buildings using different materials and structural forms. HKIE Trans. 24(4):216–227.
   Google Scholar
• Gan V, Chan C, Tse K, Lo I, Cheng J. 2017b. A comparative analysis of embodied carbon in high-rise buildings regarding different design parameters. J Cleaner Prod. 161:663–675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan V, Cheng J, Lo I, Chan C. 2017c. Developing a CO2-e accounting method for quantification and analysis of embodied carbon in high-rise buildings. J Cleaner Prod. 141:825–836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan VJL, Deng M, Tse KT, Chan CM, Lo IMC, Cheng JCP. 2018. Holistic BIM framework for sustainable low carbon design of high-rise buildings. J Cleaner Prod. 195:1091–1104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giesekam J, Barrett J, Taylor P. 2015. Construction sector views on low carbon building materials. Build Res Inform. 44(4):423–444. DOI: 10.1080/09613218.2016.1086872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green Building Council Sri Lanka (GBCSL). 2015. Green Building Council Sri Lanka [online]. Colombo, GBCSL. [Accessed 20 April 2015]. http://srilankagbc.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez MJ, Navarro JG. 2006. Assessment of the decrease of CO2 emissions in the construction field through the selection of materials: Practical case study of three houses of low environmental impact. Build Environ. 41(7):902–909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustavsson L, Joelsson A, Sathre R. 2010. Life cycle primary energy use and carbon emission of an eight-story wood-framed apartment building. Energy Build. 42(2):230–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammad A, Akbarnezhad A, Rey D, Waller S. 2016. A computational method for estimating travel frequencies in site layout planning. J Constr Eng Manage. 142(5):04015102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmouche N, Ammouri A, Srour I, Chehab G, Hamade R. 2012. Developing a carbon footprint calculator for construction buildings. Constr Res Congr. 2012:1689–1699.
   Google Scholar
• Huang W, Li F, Cui S-H, Li F, Huang L, Lin J-Y. 2017. Carbon footprint and carbon emission reduction of urban buildings: A case in Xiamen city, China. Procedia Eng. 198:1007–1017.
   Google Scholar
• Imbabi MS, Carrigan C, Mckenna S. 2013. Trends and developments in green cement and concrete technology. Int J Sustain Built Environ. 1(2):194–216. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsbe.2013.05.001.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for standardization (ISO). 2012. Carbon footprint of products-Requirements and guidelines for quantification and communication. Colombo: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• Iwaro J, Mwasha A. 2013. The impact of sustainable building envelope design on building sustainability using Integrated Performance Model. Int J Sustainable Built Environ. 2(2):153–171.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr W. 2004. Adaptive re-use. s.l.: Pirion.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis P, Rasdorf W, Frey HC, Pang S-H, Kim K. 2009. Requirements and incentives for reducing construction vehicle emissions and comparison of nonroad diesel engine emissions data sources. J Constr Eng Manage. 135:341–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Mesa B, Pitarch A, Tomas A, Gallego T. 2009. Comparison of environmental impacts of building structures with in situ cast floors and with precast concrete floors. Build Environ. 44(4):699–712. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.05.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Environment, Sri Lanka. 2012. Sri Lankaʼs Middle Path to Sustainable Development Through Mahinda Chintana: Vision for the Future [online]. Colombo: Ministry of Environment. [Accessed 30 May 2019]. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/1013SriLankaRio+20.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Monahan J, Powell J. 2011. An embodied carbon and energy analysis of modern methods of construction in housing: A case study using a lifecycle assessment framework. Energy Build. 43(1):179–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz O, Castells F, Sonnemann G. 2009. Sustainability in the construction industry: a review of recent developments based on LCA. Constr Build Mater. 23:28–39. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.11.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy BV. 2009. Sustainable materials for low carbon buildings. Int J Low-Carbon Technol. 4(3):175–181.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS). 2012. Methodology to calculate embodied carbon of materials. London: Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors.
   Google Scholar
• Saadah Y, AbuHijleh B. 2010. Decreasing CO2 emissions and embodied energy during the construction phase using sustainable building materials. Int J Sustain Build Technol Urban Dev. 1(2):115–120.
   Google Scholar
• Saghafi MD, Teshnizi ZS. 2011. Recycling value of building materials in building assessment systems. Energy Build. 43(11):3181–3188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serrano AR, Alvarez SP. 2016. Life cycle assessment in building: A case study on the energy and emissions impact related to the choice of housing typologies and construction process in Spain. Sustainability. 8(3):287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upton B, Miner R, Spinney M, Heath L. 2008. The greenhouse gas and energy impacts of using wood instead of alternatives in residential construction in the United States. Biomass Bioenergy. 32(1):1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson S, James K, Reed R. 2009. Using building adaptation to deliver sustainability in Australia. Struct Surv. 27(1):46–61.
   Google Scholar
• Wong PSP, Ng TST, Shahidi M. 2013. Towards understanding the contractor's response to carbon reduction policies in the construction projects. Int J Proj Manage. 31(7):1042–1056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu P, Xia B, Pienaar J, Zhao X. 2014. The past, present and future of carbon labelling for construction materials – a review. Build Environ. 77:160–168. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.03.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeo D, Gabbai R. 2011. Sustainable design of reinforced concrete structures through embodied energy optimization. Energ Build. 43(8):2028–2033. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.04.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu D, Tan H, Ruan Y. 2011. A future bamboo-structure residential building prototype in China: life cycle assessment of energy use and carbon emission. Energ Build. 43(10):2638–2646. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.06.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar