Factors affecting international construction joint ventures: a systematic literature review

References

• Abdul Rashid K. 2015. Terms and conditions agreed on by parties in construction work joint ventures. In: Kobayashi K, Khairuddin AR, Ofori G, Ogunlana S, editors. Joint ventures in construction. Vol. 2. London: Thomas Telford, ICE Publishing; p. 29–40.
   Google Scholar
• Alashwal AM, Ann TS. 2019. Application of home-country joint venture (HJV) for international construction contractors. Int J Constr Manage. 11:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Almohsen AS, Ruwanpura JY. 2016. Establishing success measurements of joint ventures in mega projects. J Manage Eng. 32(6):04016018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Sabah R, Menassa CC, Hanna A. 2014. Evaluating impact of construction risks in the Arabian Gulf Region from perspective of multinational architecture, engineering, and construction firms. Constr Manage Econ. 32(4):382–402.
   Google Scholar
• Baker R. 1997. Financial crisis affecting Aussie Asian joint ventures. (accessed 2020 Nov 19). http://www.asial.com.sg/cgi-bin/b...1211.
   Google Scholar
• Bing L, Tiong RL. 1999. Risk management model for international construction joint ventures. J Constr Eng Manage. 125(5):377–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bing L, Tiong RLK, Fan WW, Chew DAS. 1999. Risk management in international construction joint ventures. J Constr Eng Manage. 125(4):277–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bu-Qammaz AS, Dikmen I, Birgonul MT. 2009. Risk assessment of international construction projects using the analytic network process. Can J Civ Eng. 36(7):1170–1181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrillo P. 1996. Technology transfer on joint venture projects in developing countries. Constr Manage Econ. 14(1):45–54.
   Google Scholar
• Chan AP, Tetteh MO, Nani G. 2020. Drivers for international construction joint ventures adoption: a systematic literature review. Int J Constr Manage. 5:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Chan AP, Owusu EK. 2017. Corruption forms in the construction industry: literature review. J Constr Eng Manage. 143(8):04017057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan EH, Suen HC. 2005. Disputes and dispute resolution systems in Sino-foreign joint venture construction projects in China. J Prof Issues Eng Educ Pract. 131(2):141–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chau WK. 1997. The ranking of construction management journals. Constr Manage Econ. 15(4):387–398.
   Google Scholar
• Chen C, Messner JI. 2009. Entry mode taxonomy for international construction markets. J Manage Eng. 25(1):3–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui Z, Liu J, Xia B, Cheng Y. 2019. Beyond national culture difference. The role of cultural intelligence in cooperation within international construction joint ventures and insights from Chinese companies. Eng Constr Archit Manage. 26(7):1476–1497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalle G, Potts K. 1999. Joint ventures in the construction industry. Proceedings of COBRA; September 1–2; London, p. 68–76.
   Google Scholar
• Darko A, Chan AP. 2016. Critical analysis of green building research trend in construction journals. Habitat Int. 57:53–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darko A, Zhang C, Chan AP. 2017. Drivers for green building: a review of empirical studies. Habit Int. 60:34–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng X, Low SP, Zhao X, Chang T. 2018. Identifying micro variables contributing to political risks in international construction projects. Eng Constr Archit Manage. 25(3):317–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Do M, Lee SH. 2015. Key factors of successful joint ventures in Korea—Two different case scenarios. In: Kobayashi K, Khairuddin AR, Ofori G, Ogunlana S, editors. Joint ventures in construction, Vol. 2. London: Thomas Telford, ICE Publishing; p. 173–184.
   Google Scholar
• Drott MC. 1995. Reexamining the role of conference papers in scholarly communication. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 46(4):299–305.
   Google Scholar
• Drouin N, Bourgault M, Saunders SB. 2009. Investigation of contextual factors in shaping HR approaches and determining the success of international joint venture projects: Evidence from the Canadian telecom industry. Int J Project Manage. 27(4):344–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwaikat LN, Ali KN. 2016. Green buildings cost premium: a review of empirical evidence. Energy Build. 110:396–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gale A, Luo J. 2004. Factors affecting construction joint ventures in China. Int J Project Manage. 22(1):33–42.
   Google Scholar
• Ghauri PN, Cave AH, Il Park B. 2013. The impact of foreign parent control mechanisms upon measurements of performance in IJVs in South Korea. Crit Perspect on Int Bus. 9(3):251–270.
   Google Scholar
• Ghobadi S. 2015. What drives knowledge sharing in software development teams: a literature review and classification framework. Inf Manage. 52(1):82–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girmscheid G, Brockmann C. 2010. Inter-and intraorganizational trust in international construction joint ventures. J Constr Eng Manage. 136(3):353–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunhan S, Arditi D. 2005. Factors affecting international construction. J Constr Eng Manage. 131(3):273–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han L, Zhang S, Ma P, Gao Y. 2019. Management control in international joint ventures in the infrastructure sector. J Manage Eng. 35(1):04018051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillson D. 2002. Extending the risk process to manage opportunities. Int J Proj Manage. 20(3):235–240.
   Google Scholar
• Ho PS, Lin YH, Wu HL, Chu W. 2009a. Empirical test of a model for organizational governance structure choices in construction joint ventures. Constr Manage Econ. 27(3):315–324.
   Google Scholar
• Ho SP, Lin YH, Chu W, Wu HL. 2009b. Model for organizational governance structure choices in construction joint ventures. J Constr Eng Manage. 135(6):518–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong Y, Chan DW, Chan AP, Yeung JF. 2012. Critical analysis of partnering research trend in construction journals. J Manage Eng. 28(2):82–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong Y, Chan DW. 2014. Research trend of joint ventures in construction: a two-decade taxonomic review. J Facil Manage. 12(2):118–141.
   Google Scholar
• Hong Y. 2014. An empirical study of partners' collaboration in construction joint venture (CJV) projects and its impacts on project performance in Hong Kong [Doctoral dissertation]. Hung Hom: The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
   Google Scholar
• Hsueh SL, Perng YH, Yan MR, Lee JR. 2007. On-line multi-criterion risk assessment model for construction joint ventures in China. Autom Constr. 16(5):607–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung ALW, Naidu GM, Cavusgil ST, Yam RC. 2002. An exploratory study of project based international joint ventures: the case of Chek Lap Kok Airport in Hong Kong. Int Bus Rev. 11(5):505–522.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang BG, Zhao X, Chin EWY. 2017. International construction joint ventures between Singapore and developing countries: Risk assessment and allocation preferences. Eng Constr Archit Manage. 24(2):209–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang BG, Zhao X, Yu GS. 2015. Risk identification and allocation in underground rail construction joint ventures: contractors’ perspective. J Civ Eng Manage. 22(6):758–767.
   Google Scholar
• Kwok H-CA, Then D, Skitmore M. 2000. Risk management in Singapore construction joint ventures. J Constr Res. 1(2):139–149.
   Google Scholar
• Li X, Love PE. 2020. State-of-the-art review of urban rail transit public–private partnerships. J Infrastruct Syst. 26(3):03120002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang R, Zhang J, Wu C, Sheng Z, Wang X. 2019. Joint-venture contractor selection using competitive and collaborative criteria with uncertainty. J Constr Eng Manage. 145(2):04018123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin YH, Ho SP. 2013. Impacts of governance structure strategies on the performance of construction joint ventures. J Constr Eng Manage. 139(3):304–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling FYY, Hoi L. 2006. Risks faced by Singapore firms when undertaking construction projects in India. Int J Proj Manage. 24(3):261–270.
   Google Scholar
• Ling FY, Gui Y. 2009. Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats: case study of consulting firms in Shenzhen, China. J Constr Eng Manage. 135(7):628–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling FYY, Ibbs CW, Chew EW. 2008. Strategies adopted by international architectural, engineering, and construction firms in Southeast Asia. J Prof Issues Eng Educ Prac. 134(3):248–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Cui Z, Feng Y, Perera S, Han J. 2020. Impact of culture differences on performance of international construction joint ventures: the moderating role of conflict management. Eng Constr Archit Manage. 27(9):2353–2377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• London K, Siva J. 2012. Reflexive Capability Maturity Assessment for Firm Management of Multi-partner International Projects. In: Kobayashi K, Khairuddin AR, Ofori G, Ogunlana S, editors. Joint ventures in construction. Vol. 2. London: Thomas Telford, ICE Publishing; p. 83–96.
   Google Scholar
• Lu C, Yu Z, Wang X, Hong Y. 2020. Empirical study on the obstacles to the success of joint ventures in construction projects. Adv Civ Eng. 2020:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo J, Gale A, He X. 2001. Investing in the Chinese industry via joint ventures construction. Build Res Inf. 29(4):277–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maemura Y, Kim E, Ozawa K. 2018. Root causes of recurring contractual conflicts in international construction projects: five case studies from Vietnam. J Constr Eng Manage. 144(8):05018008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield NR, Sasillo SMI. 1990. International construction contracts in Tanzania. Int J Project Manage. 8(2):90–94.
   Google Scholar
• Maqsoom A, Hamad M, Ashraf H, Thaheem MJ, Umer M. 2020. Managerial control mechanisms and their influence on project performance: an investigation of the moderating role of complexity risk. Eng Constr Archit Manage. 27(9):2451–2475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntosh K, McCabe B. 2003. Risk and benefits associated with international construction–consulting joint ventures in the English-speaking Caribbean. Can J Civ Eng. 30(6):1143–1152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mjoen H, Tallman S. 1997. Control and performance in international joint ventures. Organ Sci. 8(3):257–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamed S. 2003. Performance in international construction joint ventures: Modeling perspective. J Constr Eng Manage. 129(6):619–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munns AK, Aloquili O, Ramsay B. 2000. Joint venture negotiation and managerial practices in the new countries of the former Soviet Union. Int J Project Manage. 18(6):403–413.
   Google Scholar
• National Joint Consultative Committee (NJCC) for Building. 1985. Guidance note 1: Joint venture tendering for contracts in the United Kingdom. London: NJCC for Building.
   Google Scholar
• Neves JC, Bugalho A. 2008. Coordination and control in emerging international construction firms. Constr Manage Econ. 26(1):3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Norwood SR, Mansfield NR. 1999. Joint venture issues concerning European and Asian construction markets of the 1990's. Int J Project Manage. 17(2):89–93.
   Google Scholar
• Odediran SJ, Windapo AO. 2017. Mitigating risks in African construction markets through the interactive behavior of resources and capabilities in multinational construction companies and entry decisions. J Manage Eng. 33(2):04016040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odediran SJ, Windapo AO. 2016. Mitigating risks in African construction markets through the interactive behavior of resources and capabilities in multinational construction companies and entry decisions. J Manage Eng. 33(2):04016040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppong GD, Chan AP, Dansoh A. 2017. A review of stakeholder management performance attributes in construction projects. Int J Project Manage. 35(6):1037–1051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osei-Kyei R, Chan AP. 2015. Review of studies on the Critical Success Factors for Public–Private Partnership (PPP) projects from 1990 to 2013. Int J Project Manage. 33(6):1335–1346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozorhon B, Arditi D, Dikmen I, Birgonul MT. 2007a. Effect of host country and project conditions in international construction joint ventures. Int J Project Manage. 25(8):799–806.
   Google Scholar
• Ozorhon B, Arditi D, Dikmen I, Birgonul MT. 2008a. Implications of culture in the performance of international construction joint ventures. J Constr Eng Manage. 134(5):361–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozorhon B, Arditi D, Dikmen I, Birgonul MT. 2008b. Effect of partner fit in international construction joint ventures. J Manage Eng. 24(1):12–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozorhon B, Arditi D, Dikmen I, Birgonul MT. 2010a. Performance of international joint ventures in construction. J Manage Eng. 26(4):209–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozorhon B, Arditi D, Dikmen I, Birgonul MT. 2010b. Toward a multidimensional performance measure for international joint ventures in construction. J Constr Eng Manage. 137(6):403–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozorhon B, Dikmen I, Birgonul MT. 2007b. Using analytic network process to predict the performance of international construction joint ventures. J Manage Eng. 23(3):156–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panibratov A. 2016. Unraveling the IJV rationale in emerging markets: The case of multinational enterprises in the Russian construction industry. J East-West Bus. 22(2):97–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piney C. 2012. Integrated project risk and issue management. Paper presented at PMI Global Congress 2012—EMEA, Marsailles, France. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Prasitsom A, Likhitruangsilp V. 2015a. Design of administrative structures for construction joint ventures. In: Kobayashi K, Khairuddin AR, Ofori G, Ogunlana S, editors. Joint ventures in construction Vol. 2. London: Thomas Telford, ICE Publishing; p. 29–40.
   Google Scholar
• Prasitsom A, Likhitruangsilp V. 2015b. Managing risks in forming international construction joint ventures in Thailand. Int J Constr Eng Manage. 4(4):106–121.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos‐Rodríguez AR, Ruíz‐Navarro J. 2004. Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980–2000. Strategic Manage J. 25(10):981–1004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razzaq A, Thaheem MJ, Maqsoom A, Gabriel HF. 2018. Critical external risks in international joint ventures for construction industry in Pakistan. Int J Civ Eng. 16(2):189–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabug BJR, Pheng LS. 2020. Competitive and entry strategies for UK transnational contractors in the Singapore rail sector. Int J Constr Manage. 20(7):737–760.
   Google Scholar
• Samanta PK, Singla HK. 2019. Factors affecting the success of joint ventures in Indian construction firms. IUP J Manage Res. 18(3):40–50.
   Google Scholar
• Sankararajan D, Shrivastava NK. 2012. Risks vs. issues. PM Network. 26(6):28–29.
   Google Scholar
• Shen LY, Wu GW, Ng CS. 2001. Risk assessment for construction joint ventures in China. J Constr Eng Manage. 127(1):76–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen L, Cheung SO. 2018. How forming joint ventures may affect market concentration in construction industry? Int J Constr Manage. 18(2):151–162.
   Google Scholar
• Shi WS, Sun SL, Pinkham BC, Peng MW. 2014. Domestic alliance network to attract foreign partners: evidence from international joint ventures in China. J Int Bus Stud. 45(3):338–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sillars DN, Kangari R. 2004. Predicting organizational success within a project-based joint venture alliance. J Constr Eng Manage. 130(4):500–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sridharan G. 1995. Determinant of joint venture performance in the construction industry: Case from the Mass Rapid Transit Project in Singapore [Ph.D. thesis]. London: University College.
   Google Scholar
• Swierczek FW. 1994. Culture and conflict in joint ventures in Asia. Int J Project Manage. 12(1):39–47.
   Google Scholar
• Tetteh MO, Chan AP, Nani G. 2019. Combining process analysis method and four-pronged approach to integrate corporate sustainability metrics for assessing international construction joint ventures performance. J Cleaner Prod. 237:117781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetteh MO, Chan AP. 2019. Review of concepts and trends in international construction joint ventures research. J Constr Eng Manage. 145(10):04019057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker DH, Johannes DS. 2003. Construction industry joint venture behaviour in Hong Kong—Designed for collaborative results? Int J Project Manage. 21(1):39–49.
   Google Scholar
• Williams RG, Lilley MM. 1993. Partner selection for joint-venture agreements. Int J Project Manage. 11(4):233–237.
   Google Scholar
• Young BA. 1992. Managing joint ventures: the channel tunnel: detailed case study of managing the channel tunnel construction joint venture. Build Res Inf. 20(6):343–349.
   Google Scholar
• Yu Y, Chan AP, Chen C, Darko A. 2018. Critical risk factors of transnational public–private partnership projects: literature review. J Infrastruct Syst. 24(1):04017042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang G, Zou PX. 2007. Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process risk assessment approach for joint venture construction projects in China. J Constr Eng Manage. 133(10):771–779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Shu C, Jiang X, Malter AJ. 2010. Managing knowledge for innovation: the role of cooperation, competition, and alliance nationality. J Int Market. 18(4):74–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Hwang BG, Yu GS. 2013. Identifying the critical risks in underground rail international construction joint ventures: case study of Singapore. Int J Project Manage. 31(4):554–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar