The integration of building information modeling (BIM) and system dynamic modeling to minimize construction waste generation from change orders

References

• Abdulaal B, Bouferguene A. 2017. Benchmark Alberta' s architectural, engineering and construction industry knowledge of building information modelling (BIM). Can J Civ Eng. 67:1–34.
   Google Scholar
• AIA. 2012. Integrated project delivery: a guide. [accessed 2012 Jan 10]. www.aia.org/contractdocs/AIA. S07 7630.
   Google Scholar
• Akinade OO, Oyedele LO, Bilal M, Ajayi SO, Owolabi HA, Alaka HA, Bello, SA. 2015. Resources, conservation and recycling waste minimisation through deconstruction: a BIM based Deconstructability Assessment Score (BIM-DAS). Resour Conserv Recycl. 105:167–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.10.018.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Nassar F, Ruparathna R, Chhipi-Shrestha G, Haider H, Hewage K, Sadiq R. 2016. Sustainability assessment framework for low rise commercial buildings: life cycle impact index-based approach. Clean Techn Environ Policy. 18(8):2579–2590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arno S, Frank T. 2008. Building information model based energy/exergy performance assessment in early design stages. Autom Constr. 18 :153–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badi S, Diamantidou D. 2017. A social network perspective of building information modelling in Greek construction projects. Architect Eng Des Manage. 13(6):406–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakchan A, Faust KM, Leite F. 2019. Seven-dimensional automated construction waste quantification and management framework: integration with project and site planning. Resour Conserv Recycl. 146:462–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrie DS, Paulson BC. 1992. Professional construction management. In: McGraw-Hill Series in Construction Engineering and Project Management. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Bossink BAG, Brouwers HJH. 1996. Construction waste: quantification and source evaluation. J Constr Eng Manage. 122(1):55–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruno S, De Fino M, Fatiguso F. 2018. Historic building information modelling: performance assessment for diagnosis-aided information modelling and management. Autom Constr. 86:256–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CCME. 2014. Current priorities. [accessed 2018 Jun 30]. https://www.ccme.ca/en/current_priorities/waste/waste/crd-waste.html.
   Google Scholar
• Chandrakanthi M, Hettiaratchi P, Prado B, Ruwanpura JY. 2002. Optimization of the waste management for construction projects using simulation. Proceedings of the 2002 Winter Simulation Conference, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc, San Diego (CA); p. 1771–1777.
   Google Scholar
• Chang C. 1990. Applying R&D project dynamics to construction management, AIT Research No. IE-90-1. Bangkok (Thailand): Asian Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Chritamara S, Ogunlana SO, Bach NL. 2002. System dynamics modeling of design and build construction projects. Constr Innov. 2(4):269–295.
   Google Scholar
• Chen X, Liu YS. 2016. The construction of the coordinated dynamic model of owners' integrated management organization of governmental non-profitable investment projects. J Discrete Math Sci Cryptogr. 19(3):663–676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chhipi-Shrestha G, Hewage K, Sadiq R. 2017a. Impacts of neighborhood densification on water-energy-carbon nexus: investigating water distribution and residential landscaping system. J Cleaner Prod. 156:786–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chhipi-Shrestha G, Hewage K, Sadiq R. 2017b. Water–energy–carbon nexus modeling for urban water systems: system dynamics approach. J Water Resour Plann Manage. 143(6):04017016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper KG. 1993. The rework cycle… How it really works… and reworks… PMNetwork magazine. Project Management Journal, USA.
   Google Scholar
• CURT. 2004. Collaboration, integrated information, and the project lifecycle in building design. Construction Users Roundtable, Construction and Operation, August (2004), P16 United States.
   Google Scholar
• De Marco A, Rafele C, Thaheem MJ. 2016. Dynamic management of risk contingency in complex design-build projects. J Constr Eng Manage. 142(2):04015080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du L, Li X, Zhao H, Ma W, Jiang P. 2018. System dynamic modeling of urban carbon emissions based on the regional national economy and social development plan: a case study of Shanghai city. J Cleaner Prod. 172:1501–1513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastman C, Teicholz P, Sacks R, Liston K. 2008. BIM handbook: a guide to building information modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers, and contractors. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Edirisinghe R, London KA, Kalutara P, Aranda-Mena G. 2017. Building information modelling for facility management: are we there yet? Eng, Const Arch Man. 24(6):1119–1154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekanayake EL, Ofori G. 2004. Building waste assessment score: design-based tool. Building Environ. 39(7):851–861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford DN, Sterman JD. 1998. Dynamics modeling of product development process. Syst Dyn Rev. 14(1):31–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Formoso CT, Isatto EL, Hitomi H. 1999. Method for waste control in the building industry. Proceedings IGLC-7, 7th Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Berkeley, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester JM. 1958. Industrial dynamics: a major breakthrough for design makers. Harv Bus Rev. 26 (4) :37–66.
   Google Scholar
• Goedert JD, Meadati P. 2008. Integrating construction process documentation into building information modelling. J Constr Eng Manage. 134(7):509–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GSA. 2012. Bidding on federal construction projects. U.S. General Service Administration [accessed March 2012]. http://www.gsa.gov/portal/content/103328.
   Google Scholar
• Guerra BC, Bakchan A, Leite F, Faust KM. 2019. BIM-based automated construction waste estimation algorithms: the case of concrete and drywall waste streams. Waste Manage. 87:825–832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamid-Abdel T. 1989. The dynamics of software project staffing. A system dynamics based simulation approach. IEEE Trans Softw Eng. 15(2):109–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibbs CW, Kwak YH, Ng T, Odabasi AM. 2003. Project delivery systems and project change: quantitative analysis. J Constr Eng Manage. 129(4):382–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalaei F, Zoghi M, Khoshand A. 2019. Life cycle environmental impact assessment to manage and optimize construction waste using Building Information Modeling (BIM). Int J Constr Manage. 19:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1583850.
   Google Scholar
• Kamali M, Hewage K. 2017. Development of performance criteria for sustainability evaluation of modular versus conventional construction methods. J Cleaner Prod. 142:3592–3606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kangari R, Riggs LS. 1989. Construction risk assessment by linguistics. IEEE Trans Eng Manage. 36(2):126–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karamouz M, Goharian E, Nazif S. 2012. Development of a reliability based dynamic model of urban water supply system: a case study. Proceedings of the World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2012: Crossing Boundaries; p. 2067–2078. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412312.208
   Google Scholar
• Kim Y-C, Hong W-H, Park J-W, Cha G-W. 2017. An estimation framework for building information modeling (BIM)-based demolition waste by type. Waste Manag Res. 35(12) :1285–1295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollikkathara N, Feng H, Yu D. 2010. A system dynamic modeling approach for evaluating municipal solid waste generation, landfill capacity and related cost management issues. Waste Manage. 30(11):2194–2203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutamanis A. 2017. Briefing and building information modelling: potential for integration. Int J Architect Comput. 15(2):119–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed AB. 2019. Applying BIM to achieve sustainability throughout a building life cycle towards a sustainable BIM model. Int J Constr Manage. 0(0):1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Napier T. 2016. Construction waste management. [accessed 2020 March 27]. https://www.wbdg.org/resources/construction-waste-management.
   Google Scholar
• Lee S, Peña-Mora F, Park M. 2003. Dynamic quality and change management framework for con-current design and construction. ASCE Construction Research Congress. Honolulu (HI): ASCE (Electronic Book).
   Google Scholar
• Lim J. 1994. Management of civil engineering design project: a system dynamics model [AIT Thesis No ST-94-10]. Bangkok (Thailand): Asian Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Osmani M, Demian P, Baldwin AN. 2011. The potential use of BIM to aid construction waste minimization. Proceedings of the CIB W78-W102 2011: International Conference – Sophia Antipolis, France; p. 26–28.
   Google Scholar
• Love PED, Edwards DJ, Han S, Goh YM. 2011. Design error reduction: toward the effective utilization of building information modeling. Res Eng Design. 22(3):173–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love PED, Mandal P, Smith J, Li H. 2000. Modeling the dynamics of design error induced rework in construction. Constr Manage Econ. 18(5):567–574.
   Google Scholar
• Lyneis MJ, Cooper KG, Els SA. 2001. Strategic management of complex projects: a case study using system dynamics. Syst Dyn Rev. 17(3):237–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyneis MJ, Ford DN. 2007. System dynamics applied to project and management. Syst Dyn Rev. 23(2-3):157–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maryani A, Wignjosoebroto S, Partiwi SG. 2015. A system dynamics approach for modeling construction accidents. Procedia Manuf. 4:392–401.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell WJ. 2005. Construction complexity. In: Martens B, Brown A, editors. Computer aided architectural design futures. 1st ed. Springer Netherlands; p. 41–50.
   Google Scholar
• NBS. 2012. National BIM report, building information modeling. The National BIM Library [accessed 2012 Feb 03]. www.thenbs.com/corporate/about.asp.
   Google Scholar
• Nepal MP, Zhang J, Webster A, Staub-French S, Pottinger R, Lawrence M. 2009. Querying IFC-based building information models to support construction management function. In: Construction Research Congress, ASCE, Seattle, Washington; p. 506–515.
   Google Scholar
• Ogunlana S, Lim J, Saeed K. 1998. DESMAN: a dynamic model for managing civil engineering projects. Comput Struct. 67 (5):401–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osmani M. 2013. Design waste mapping: a project lifecycle approach. Proc ICE Waste Resour Manage. 166(3):114–127.
   Google Scholar
• Park M. 2005. Model-based dynamic resource management for construction projects. Autom Constr. 14(5):585–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PCCBC. 1998. Procedures and guidelines recommended for use on publically-funded construction projects. Produced by the Public Construction Council of British Columbia [accessed 2012 Mar 15]. www.pccbc.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Popov V, Juocevicius V, Migilinskas D, Ustinovichius L, Mikalauskas S. 2010. The use of virtual building design and construction model for developing an effective project concept in 5D environment. Autom Constr. 19(3):357–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porwal A. 2013. Construction waste management at source: a building information modelling based system dynamics approach [PhD dissertation]. Faculty of Graduate Studies, University of British Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Porwal A, Hewage KN. 2012. Building information modeling–based analysis to minimize waste rate of structural reinforcement. J Constr Eng Manage. 138(8):943–954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RCD. 2013. RSMeans. Reed Construction Data Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson GP, Pugh AL. 1981. Introduction to system dynamics modelling with DYNAMO. Cambridge (MA): MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Robert JC. 1998. The role of system dynamics in understanding the impact of changes to key project personnel on design production within construction projects. Int J Project Manage. 16 (4):235–247.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues AG, Williams TM. 1998. System dynamics in project management: assessing the impacts of client behavior on project performance. J Oper Res Soc. 49(1):2–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruparathna R. 2013. Emergy based procurement framework to improve sustainability performance in construction [Masters dissertation]. Faculty of Graduate Studies, University of British Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Ruparathna R, Hewage K. 2015. Review of contemporary construction procurement practices. J Manage Eng. 31(3):04014038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruwanpura J, Prado B, Hettiaratchi P. 2003. A computer simulation model to predict waste generation and promote sustainable construction practices at construction sites. Canadian Society for Civil Engineering – 31st Annual Conference: 2003 Building our Civilization, June 4, 2003–June 7, Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, Moncton, NB, Canada; p. 499–508.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks R, Eastman C, Lee G, Teicholz P. 2018. BIM handbook: a guide to building information modeling for owner, managers, designers, engineers, and contractors. 3rd ed. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Singh MM, Sawhney A, Borrmann A. 2019. Integrating rules of modular coordination to improve model authoring in BIM. Int J Constr Manage. 19(1):15–31.
   Google Scholar
• Song S, Yang J, Kim N. 2012. Development of a BIM-based structural framework optimization and simulation system for building construction. Comput Indus. 63(9):895–912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2012.08.013.
   Google Scholar
• Srijariya W, Riewpaiboon A, Chaikledkaew U. 2008. System dynamic modeling: an alternative method for budgeting. Value Health. 11:S115–S123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterman JD. 1992. System dynamic modelling for project management. Cambridge (MA): Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• TBR. 1982. The business roundtable, measuring productivity in construction. A-1 Report of the Construction Industry Cost Effectiveness Project, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Teo MMM, Loosemore M. 2001. A theory of waste behaviour in the construction industry. Constr Manage Econ. 19(7):741–751.
   Google Scholar
• Wan SKM, Kumaraswamy MM, Liu DTC. 2009. Contributors to construction debris from electrical and mechanical work in Hong Kong infrastructure projects. J Constr Eng Manage. 135 (7):637–646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Kunc M, Bai S. j. 2017. Realizing value from project implementation under uncertainty: an exploratory study using system dynamics. Int J Project Manage. 35(3):341–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WBDG. 2010. Design guidance. Whole Building Design Guide, National Institute of Building Sciences [accessed 2012 Feb 16]. www.wbdg.org/design/.
   Google Scholar
• Won J, Cheng JCP. 2017. Identifying potential opportunities of building information modeling for construction and demolition waste management and minimization. Automat Constr. 79:3–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Won J, Cheng JCP, Lee G. 2016. Quantification of construction waste prevented by BIM-based design validation: case studies in South Korea. Waste Manage. 49:170–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WRAP. 2013. Civil engineering projects: waste less and save money. Material change for a better environment, England [accessed 2013 May 08]. www.wrap.org.uk.
   Google Scholar
• Xia B, Chan A. 2012. Measuring complexity for building projects: a Delphi study. Eng Constr Arch Man. 19(1):7–24.
   Google Scholar
• Xu J, Shi Y, Xie Y, Zhao S. 2019. A BIM-based construction and demolition waste information management system for greenhouse gas quantification and reduction. J Clean Prod. 229:308–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.158.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan H, Chini AR, Lu Y, Shen L. 2012. A dynamic model for assessing the effects of management strategies on the reduction of construction and demolition waste. Waste Manage. 32(3):521–531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun S, Jun K, Son C, Kim S. 2014. Preliminary study for performance analysis of BIM-based building construction simulation system. KSCE J Civ Eng. 18(2):531–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-0174-2.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Zhang X, Zhang B. 2009. System dynamics approach to urban water demand forecasting: a case study of Tianjin. Trans Tianjin Univ. 15(1):70–74.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Wu Y, Shen L, Skitmore M. 2014. A prototype system dynamic model for assessing the sustainability of construction projects. Int J Project Manage. 32(1):66–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar