Negative factors in implementing public–private partnership in Indian road projects

References

• Abd Karim NA. 2011. Risk allocation in public-private partnership (PPP) project: a review on risk factors. Int J Sustain Constr Eng Technol. 2(2):8–16.
   Google Scholar
• Abdul-Aziz A-R, Jahn Kassim PS. 2011. Objectives, success and failure factors of housing public–private partnerships in Malaysia. Habitat Int. 35(1):150–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akintoye A, Beck M, Kumaraswamy MM. 2016. Public private partnership: a global review. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Birnie J. 1999. Private finance initiative (PFI) – UK construction industry response. J Constr Procurement. 5(1):5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Chan APC, Lam PTI, Chan DWM, Cheung E, Ke Y. 2010. Critical success factors for PPPs in infrastructure developments: Chinese perspective. J Constr Eng Manag. 136(5):484–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaturvedi DK. 2009. Final report of BKC Committee on NHDP.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung E, Chan APC, Kajewski S. 2010. Suitability of procuring large public works by PPP in Hong Kong. Eng Constr Archit Manag. 17(3):292–308.
   Google Scholar
• Coakes SJ. 2005. SPSS: Analysis without Anguish: Version 12.0 for Windows. Sydney, Australia: Willey & Sons Australia Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Crosslin RL. 1991. Decision‐support methodology for planning and evaluating public‐private partnerships. J Urban Plann Dev. 117(1):15–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui C, Liu Y, Hope A, Wang J. 2018. Review of studies on the public–private partnerships (PPP) for infrastructure projects. Int J Project Manag. 36(5):773–794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabarera GKM, Perera BAKS, Rodrigo MNN. 2019. Suitability of public-private-partnership procurement method for road projects in Sri Lanka. BEPAM. 9(2):199–213.
   Google Scholar
• DEA. 2010. Public-private partnership projects in India compendium of case studies. New Delhi, India: Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance, Government of India.
   Google Scholar
• DEA. 2015. Report of the committee on revisiting and revitalising public private partnership model of infrastructure. New Delhi, India: Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance, Government of India.
   Google Scholar
• Devkar GA, Mahalingam A, Kalidindi SN. 2013. Competencies and urban Public Private Partnership projects in India: a case study analysis. Policy and Society. 32(2):125–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolla T, Laishram BS. 2018. Procurement of low carbon municipal solid waste infrastructure in India through public-private partnerships. BEPAM. 8(5):449–460.
   Google Scholar
• Dolla T, Laishram B. 2020. Factors affecting public-private partnership preference in Indian municipal waste sector. Int J Constr Manag. 20(6):518–567.
   Google Scholar
• Eadie R, Millar P, Grant R. 2013. PFI/PPP, private sector perspectives of UK transport and healthcare. Built Environ Project Asset Manag. 3(1):89–104.
   Google Scholar
• Eaton D, Akbiyikli R, Dickinson M. 2006. An evaluation of the stimulants and impediments to innovation within PFI/PPP projects. Constr Innov. 6(2):63–67.
   Google Scholar
• Fellows R, Liu A. 2015. Research methods for construction. 4th ed. Singapore: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg B, Skamris Holm MK, Buhl SL. 2004. What causes cost overrun in transport infrastructure projects? Transp Rev. 24(1):3–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunjeet K, Sanjib B, Raj R. 2009. An empirical investigation of the inter-sectoral linkages in India. Reserve Bank of India Occasional Papers. 30(1):29–72.
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. 2018. Multivariate data analysis. 7th ed. Essex: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Hans A. 2017. Rebooting public private partnership in India; [accessed 2018 Nov 30]. http://niti.gov.in/content/rebooting-public-private-partnership-india.
   Google Scholar
• Henjewele C, Sun M, Fewings P. 2014. Comparative performance of healthcare and transport PFI projects: empirical study on the influence of key factors. Int J Project Manag. 32(1):77–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henjewele C, Sun M, Fewings P. 2011. Critical parameters influencing value for money variations in PFI projects in the healthcare and transport sectors. Constr Manag Econ. 29(8):825–839.
   Google Scholar
• HMT. 2012. A new approach to public private partnerships. London: HM Treasury.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge G, Greve C. 2010. Public-private partnerships: governance scheme or language game? Aust J Public Adm. 69:S8–S22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang BG, Zhao X, Gay MJS. 2013. Public private partnership projects in Singapore: Factors, critical risks and preferred risk allocation from the perspective of contractors. Int J Project Manag. 31(3):424–433. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismail S, Haris F. 2014. Constraints in implementing public private partnership (PPP) in Malaysia. Built Environ Proj Asset Manag. 4(3):238–250.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick LA, Feeney BC. 2001. A simple guide to SPSS for Windows: Versions 8.0,9.0 and 10.0. 4th ed. Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinbaum Kupper DG, Muller LL. 1998. Applied regression analysis and other multivariate methods. Boston: PWS-KENT.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn E, Teisman G. 2000. Governing public-private partnerships: analysing and managing the processes and institutional characteristics of public-private partnerships. In: Osborne SP, editor. Public-private partnerships theory and practice in international perspective. London: Routledge; p. 84–102.
   Google Scholar
• Lee M, Han X, Quising PF, Villaruel ML. 2018. Hazard analysis on public-private partnership projects in developing Asia (Working Paper No. 548), ADB Economics working paper series. Mandaluyong, Philippines: Asian Development Bank. http://dx.doi.org/10.22617/WPS189453-2.
   Google Scholar
• Levin RI, Rubin DS, Rastogi S, Siddiqui MH. 2013. Statistics for management. 7th ed. India: Dorling Kindersley (India) Pvt. Ltd., licensees of Pearson Education in South Asia.
   Google Scholar
• Li B, Akintoye A, Edwards PJ, Hardcastle C. 2005. Perceptions of positive and negative factors influencing the attractiveness of PPP/PFI procurement for construction projects in the UK – findings from a questionnaire survey. Eng Constr Archit Manag. 12(2):125–148.
   Google Scholar
• Mahalingam A, Devkar GA, Kalidindi SN. 2011. A comparative analysis of public-private partnership (PPP) coordination agencies in India. Public Works Manag Policy. 16(4):341–372.
   Google Scholar
• Malek S, Akalkotkar P. 2016. Negative factors adopting Public Private Partnership for highway projects: a case study of Gujarat. Int J Sci Technol Eng. 2(8):30–35.
   Google Scholar
• Malek M, Bhatt V, Patel A. 2020. Global national and local growth of road projects through PPP. TEST Eng Manage. March-April(2020):25837–25860.
   Google Scholar
• Malek M, Gundaliya P. 2020. Value for money factors in Indian public-private partnership road projects: an exploratory approach. J Proj Manage. 6(2021):23–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.5267/j.jpm.2020.10.002.
   Google Scholar
• Mendenhall W. 1971. Introduction to probability and statistics. 3rd ed. Belmont, California: Duxbury Press.
   Google Scholar
• NHDP & Other NHAI Projects. 2013. Retrieved July 15, 2013, from http://www.nhai.org.
   Google Scholar
• Nourusis MJ. 1992. SPSS for Windows, Profession Statistics. 5th ed. Chicago, USA: SPSS INC.
   Google Scholar
• Patil NA, Tharun D, Laishram B. 2016. Infrastructure development through PPPs in India: criteria for sustainability assessment. J Environ Plan Manag. 59(4):708–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajan TA, Gopinath G, Behera M. 2014. PPPs and project overruns: evidence from road projects in India. J Constr Eng Manag. 140(5):04013070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reijniers J. 1994. Organization of public-private partnership projects. Int J Project Manag. 12(3):137–142.
   Google Scholar
• Singaravelloo K. 2010. PPP: The right marriage between local government and the private sector in Malaysia? Int J Inst Econ. 2(2):142–166.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan JJ, Pett MA, Lackey NR. 2003. Making sense of factor analysis the use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research. California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Tam VWY, Tam CM, Yiu KTW, Cheung SO. 2006. Critical factors for environmental performance assessment (EPA) in the Hong Kong construction industry. Constr Manag Econ. 24(11):1113–1123.
   Google Scholar
• Takim R, Ismail K, Nawawi AD, Jaafar A. 2009. The Malaysian private finance initiative and value for money. ASS. 5(3):103–111.
   Google Scholar
• The Indian Express. 2015. Plans for a regional waste management plant back on the drawing board. [accessed 2019 Sep 18]. https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/mumbai/plans-for-a-regional-waste-management-plant-backon-the-drawing-board/.
   Google Scholar
• Thillai Rajan A, Deep A. 2019. More highways should be built by States. Bus Line. http://thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/more-highways-should-be-built-by-states/article29401496.ece.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas AV, Kalidindi SN, Ananthanarayanan K. 2003. Risk perception analysis of BOT road project participants in India. Constr Manag Econ. 21(4):393–407.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank Group. 2016. The state of PPPs: infrastructure public- private partnerships in emerging markets and developing economies 1991-2015. Washington, D.C: The World Bank and PPIAF.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Kumaraswamy MM. 2001. Hong Kong experience in managing BOT projects. J Constr Eng Manag. 127(2):154–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar