1,399
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Towards methodological adventure in cost overrun research: linking process and product

References

  • Ahiaga-Dagbui DD, Smith SD. 2014. Rethinking construction cost overruns: cognition, learning, and estimation. J Financ Manag Prop Constr. 19(1):38–54.
  • Ahiaga-Dagbui DD, Smith SD, Love PED, Ackermann F. 2015. Spotlight on construction cost overrun research: superficial, replicative and stagnated. In, Raiden A, Aboagye-Nimo E, editors. Association of researchers in construction management. 7-9th September, Lincoln, UK. p. 863–872.
  • Al-Tabtabai H. 1998. A framework for developing an expert analysis and forecasting system for construction projects. Expert Syst Appl. 14(3):259–273.
  • Amadi AI. 2016. Explaining cost overruns in highway projects: geospatial regression modelling and cognitive mapping of latent pathogens and contextual drivers [an unpublished dissertation]. Salford: University of Salford.
  • Amadi AI, Higham A. 2017. Latent geotechnical pathogens inducing cost overruns in highway projects. JFMPC. 22(3):269–285.
  • Amadi AI, Higham A. 2018a. Putting context to numbers: a geotechnical risk trajectory to cost overrun extremism. Constr Manag Econ. 37(4):217–237.
  • Amadi AI, Higham A. 2018b. Cognitive mapping of geotechnical practices as cost overrun drivers in highway projects. EPOJ. 8(1):65–86.
  • Amadi AI, Higham A. 2018c. The trickle-down effect of psycho-social constructs and knowledge deficiencies as organizational barriers to cost performance on highway projects. JFMPC. 23(1):57–72.
  • Annamalaisami CD, Kuppuswamy A. 2019. Reckoning construction cost overruns in building projects through methodological consequences. Int J Constr Manag. DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2019.1683689.
  • Asamoah RO, Baiden BK, Nani G, Kissi S. 2019. Review of exogenous economic indicators influencing construction industry. Adv Civ Eng. 2019:1–8.
  • Attala M, Hegazy T. 2003. Predicting cost deviation in reconstruction projects: artificial Networks versus Regression. J Constr Eng Manag. 129(4):25–31.
  • Baccarini D. 1996. The concept of project complexity- a review. Int J Project Manage. 14(4):201–204.
  • Baccarini D. 2004. Accuracy in estimating project cost construction contingency - a statistical analysis. RICS International Construction Conference. Responding to Change, 7-8 September. Headingley Stadium, UK.
  • Barley SR. 2006. When I write my masterpiece: thoughts on what makes a paper interesting. AMJ. 49(1):16–20.
  • Barrett PS, Sutrisna M. 2009. Methodological strategies to gain insights into informality and emergence in construction project case studies. Constr Manag Econ. 27(10):935–948.
  • Brereton P, Kitchenham BA, Budgen D, Turner M, Khalil M. 2007. Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. J Syst Softw. 80(4):571–583.
  • Bresnen M, Goussevskaia A, Swan J. 2005. Editorial: managing projects as complex social settings. Build Res Inform. 33(6):487–493.
  • Brunes F, Lind H. 2014. Explaining cost overruns in infrastructural projects: a new framework with applications to Sweden. Stockholm: School of Architecture and the Built Environment, Royal Institute of Technology. Working Paper 01 Section for Building and Real Estate Economics.
  • Bruzelius N, Flyvbjerg B, Rothengatter W. 2002. Big decisions, big risks. Improving accountability in mega projects. Transp Policy. 9(2):143–154.
  • Bryman A. 1989. Research methods and organization studies: contemporary social research. New York: Uwin Hyman Ltd.
  • Cantarelli CC, Chorus CG, Cunningham SW. 2013. Explaining cost overruns of large-scale transportation infrastructure projects using a signaling game. Transportmetrica A Transp Sci. 9(3):239–258.
  • Cantarelli CC, Flyvbjerg B, Buhl SL. 2012. Geographical variation in project cost performance: the Netherlands versus worldwide. J Transp Geogr. 24:324–331.
  • Cantarelli CC, Flyvbjerg B, Molin EJE, Van Wee B. 2010a. Cost Overruns in Large-scale Transportation Infrastructure Projects: Explanations and Their Theoretical Embeddedness. Eur J Transp Infrastr Res. 10(1):5–18.
  • Cantarelli CC, Flyvbjerg B, Molin EJE, Van Wee B. 2010b. Lock-in and its influence on the project performance of large-scale transportation infrastructure projects. Investigating how lock-in can emerge and affect cost overruns. Environ Plann B. 37(5):792–807.
  • Catalão FP, Cruz CO, Sarmento JM. 2019. Exogenous determinants of cost deviations and overruns in local infrastructure projects. Constr Manag Econ. 37(12):697–711.
  • Cavalieri M, Cristaudo R, Guccio C. 2019. On the magnitude of cost overruns throughout the project life cycle. An assessment for Italian transportation infrastructure projects. Transp Policy. 79(c):21–36.
  • Chan PW. 2020. Revisiting basics: theoretically grounded interesting research that addresses challenges that matter. Constr Manag Econ. 38(1):1–10.
  • Chan PW, Raisanen C. 2009. Informality and emergence in construction. Constr Manag Econ. 27(10):907–912.
  • Creedy GD, Skitmore M, Wong JKW. 2010. Evaluation of risk factors leading to cost overruns in the delivery of highway projects. J Constr Eng Manage. 136(5):528–537.
  • Cresswell JW, Clark VLP. 2011. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage.
  • Dainty ARJ. 2008. Methodological pluralism in construction management research. In Knight A, Ruddock L, editors. Advanced methods in the built environment.West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell; p. 1–13.
  • Darko A, Zhang C, Chan APC. 2017. Drivers for green building: a review of empirical studies. Habit Int. 60:34–49.
  • El-Kholy AM. 2015. Predicting cost overruns in construction projects. Int J Constr Eng Manag. 4(4):95–105.
  • El-Kholy AM. 2019. Exploring the best ANN model based on four paradigms to predict delay and cost overrun percentages of highway projects. Int J Constr Manag. 1–19. DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2019.1580001.
  • Emmitt S, Gorse C. 2009. Construction communication. London: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G. 2008. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, web of science, and Google scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 22(2):338–342.
  • Fellows RF, Liu A. 2015. Research methods for construction. 4th ed. West Sussex: Wiley.
  • Flyvbjerg B. 2014. What you should know about megaprojects and why: an overview. Proj Manag J. 45(2):6–19.
  • Flyvbjerg B, Garbuio M, Lovall D. 2009. Delusion and deception in large infrastructure projects: two models for explaining and preventing executive disaster. Calif Manag Rev. 51(2):170–193.
  • Flyvbjerg B, Skamris Holm MK, Buhl SL. 2002. Underestimating cost in public works. Error or lie? J Am Plann Assoc. 68(3):279–295.
  • Flyvbjerg B, Skamris Holm MK, Buhl SL. 2004. What causes cost overrun in transport infrastructure projects? Transp Rev. 24(1):3–18.
  • Gajendran T, Brewer G, Runeson G, Dainty A. 2011. Investigating informality in construction: philosophy, paradigm, and practice. CEB. 11(2):84–98.
  • Ganuza J. 2003. Competition and cost overruns in procurement. Barcelona: Barcelona Economics. Working Paper No. 1.07.
  • Gil N, Lundriganm C. 2012. The Leadership and governance of megaprojects, Centre for Infrastructure Development (CID). Manchester: The University of Manchester. Report No. 3/2012.
  • Greene JC, Caracelli VJ. 1997. Advances in mixed-method evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms. New directions for evaluations.San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
  • Hall P. 1980. Great planning disasters: what lesson do they hold? Futures. 12(1):45–50.
  • Hammersley M, Gomm R. 2005. Recent radical criticism of the interview in qualitative inquiry. In Holborn M, Haralambos M, editors. Developments in sociology. Ormskirk: Causeway Press.
  • Hartmann A, Dorée A, Martin L. 2010. A constructivist approach for teaching research methodology in construction management. Int J Constr Educ Res. 6(4):253–270.
  • Heesen R, Bright LK, Zucker A. 2019. Vindicating methodological triangulation. Synthese. 196(8):3067–3081.
  • Heravi G, Mohammadian M. 2019. Investigating cost overruns and delay in urban construction projects in Iran. Int J Constr Manag. 1–11. DOI: 10.10180/13501763.2018.1544654.
  • Hinterleitner M. 2019. Salami tactics and the implementation of large-scale public projects. J Eur Publ Policy. 26(11):1696–1714.
  • Hong Y, Chan DWM. 2014. Research trend of joint ventures in construction: a two-decade taxonomic review. J Fac Manag. 12(2):118–141.
  • Huberman AM, Miles MB. 1985. Assessing local causality in qualitative research. In Berg, DN Smith KK, editors. Exploring clinical methods for social research. New York: Sage. p. 351–381.
  • Hughes JA, Sharrock WW. 1997. The philosophy of social science. London: Longman.
  • Kahneman D. 1994. New challenges to the rationality assumption. J Inst Theor Econ. 150:18–36.
  • Kahneman D, Tversky A. 1979a. Prospect theory: an analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica. 47(2):263–327.
  • Kahneman D, Tversky A. 1979b. Intuitive prediction: biases and corrective procedures. In Makridakis, S, Wheelwright SC, editors. Studies in the management sciences: forecasting Amsterdam: North-Holland. p. 12–18.
  • Kain FN. 1990. Deception in Dallas: strategic misrepresentation in rail transit promotion and evaluation. J Am Plann Assoc. 56(2):184–196.
  • Ke Y, Wang S, Chan AP, Cheung E. 2009. Research trend of public-private partnership in construction journals. J Constr Eng Manag. 135(10):1076–1086.
  • Kelle U. 2005. Sociological explanations between micro and macro and the integration of qualitative and quantitative methods. Histor Soc Res. 30(1):95–117.
  • Love PED, Ahiaga-Dagbui DD, Smith SD, Sing MC, Tokede O. 2018. Cost profiling of water infrastructure projects. J Infrastr Syst. (ASCE) 24(4):04018023.
  • Love PED, Edwards DJ, Irani Z. 2008. Forensic project management: an exploratory examination of the causal behavior of design-induced rework. IEEE Trans Eng Manag. 55(2):234–247.
  • Love PED, Edwards DJ, Irani Z. 2012. Moving beyond optimism bias and strategic misrepresentation: an explanation for social infrastructure overruns. IEEE Trans Eng Manag. 59(4):560–571.
  • Love PED, Edwards DJ, Smith J, Walker DHT. 2009. Divergence or congruence: a path model of re-work for building and civil engineering projects. J Perform Constr Facil. 23(6):480–488.
  • Love PED, Irani Z, Smith J, Regan M, Liu H. 2017. Cost performance of public infrastructure projects: the nemesis and nirvana of change-orders. Prod Plann Contr. 28(13):1081–1092.
  • Mackie P, Preston J. 1998. Twenty-one sources of error and bias in transport project appraisal. Transp Policy. 5(1):1–7.
  • McEvoy P, Richards D. 2006. A critical realist rationale for using a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods. J Res Nurs. 11(1):66–78.
  • Miles MB, Huberman AM, editors. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded source book. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
  • Mingers J. 1997. Multi-paradigm methodology. In Mingers J, Gill A, editors. Multimethodology: the theory and practice of combining management science methodologiesChichester: Wiley; p. 1–20.
  • Morris S. 1990. Cost and time overruns in public sector projects. Econ Polit Weekly. 47:154–168.
  • Odeck J. 2004. Cost overruns in road construction: what are their sizes and determinants. ? J Transp Policy. 11(1):43–53.
  • Odeck J. 2019. Variation in cost overruns of transportation projects: an econometric meta-regression analysis of studies reported in the literature. Transportation. 46(4):1345–1368.
  • O‘Leary Z. 2004. The essential guide to doing research. London: SAGE.
  • Osei-Kyei R, Chan APC. 2015. Review of studies on the critical success factors for public-private partnership (PPP) projects from 1990 to 2013. Int J Proj Manage. 33(6):1335–1346.
  • Oxford Dictionary 2014. Definition of philosophy [online]. [Accessed 2014 Mar 13]. Available from http://www.oxfordreference.com..
  • Panas A, Pantouvakis JP. 2010. Evaluating research methodology in construction productivity studies. Built Human Environ Rev. 3(1):63–85.
  • Raftery J, McGeorge D, Walters M. 1997. Breaking up methodological monopolies: a multi-paradigm approach to construction management research. Constr Manag Econ. 15(3):291–297.
  • Robson C. 1993. Real-world research: a resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Runeson G. 1997. The role of theory in construction management research: comment. Constr Manag Econ. 15(3):299–302.
  • Sarmento JM. Reeneboog L. 2017. Cost overruns in public sector investment projects. Publ Works Manag Policy. 22(2):140–164.
  • Saunders M, Lewis P, Thornhill A. 2009. Research methods for business students. 5th ed. New Jersey: Pearson Education Limited, Prentice-Hall.
  • Schweber L. 2015. Putting theory to work: the use of theory in construction research. Constr Manag Econ. 33(10):840–860.
  • Seymour D, Rooke J. 1995. The culture of the industry and the culture of research. Constr Manag Econ. 13(6):511–523.
  • Seymour D, Rooke J, Crook J. 1997. The role of theory in construction management: a call for debate. Constr Manag Econ. 15(1):117–119.
  • Sodikov J. 2005. Cost estimation of highway projects in developing countries: an artificial neural network approach. J East Asia Soc Transp Stud. 6:1036–1047.
  • Tan F, Wakmasha T. 2010. Best practice’ cost estimation of inland transport infrastructure projects. Australasian transport research forum proceedings. Sept 29 to Oct 1, Canberra, Australia, p. 1–15.
  • Trost SM, Oberlender GD. 2003. Predicting the accuracy of early cost estimates using factor analysis and multivariate regression. J Constr Eng Manage. 129 (2):198–204.
  • Volker L. 2019. Looking out to look in: inspiration from social sciences for construction management research. Constr Manag Econ. 37(1):13–23.
  • Wachs M. 1987. Forecasts in urban transportation planning uses, methods, and dilemmas. Clim Change. 11(1-2):61–80.
  • Wachs M. 1989. When planners lie with numbers. J Am Plann Assoc. 55(4):476–479.
  • Yin RK. 2014. Case study research: design and methods. 5th ed. Los Angeles: Sage.
  • Yu Y, Osei-Kyei R, Chan APC, Chen C, Martek I. 2018. Review of social responsibility factors for sustainable development in public-private partnerships. Sustain Dev. 26(6):510–515.