Deploying 3D scanning based geometric digital twins during fabrication and assembly in offsite manufacturing

References

• ACI (American Concrete Institute) 2002. ACI Committee 117, commentary on standard specifications for tolerances for concrete construction and materials. Farmington Hills (MI): ACI. Report No: ACI 117–06.
   Google Scholar
• AIA (The American Institute of Architects) 2008. Building information modeling protocol exhibit. Washington (DC): AIA. Report No: Document E202.
   Google Scholar
• Akanmu A, Anumba C, Messner J. 2014. Critical review of approaches to integrating virtual models and the physical construction. Int J Const Mgt. 14(4):267–282.
   Google Scholar
• Akcamete A, Akinci B, Garrett J, James H. 2009. Motivation for computational support for updating building information models (BIMs). Comput Civ Eng. 523–532. DOI: 10.1061/41052(346)52.
   Google Scholar
• Anil EB, Tang P, Akinci B, Huber D. 2013. Deviation analysis method for the assessment of the quality of the as-is building information models generated from point cloud data. Autom Constr. 35:507–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arashpour M, Heidarpour A, Akbar Nezhad A, Hosseinifard Z, Chileshe N, Hosseini R. 2019. Performance-based control of variability and tolerance in off-site manufacture and assembly: Optimization of penalty on poor production quality. Constr Manage Econ. 38(6):502–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballast DK. 2007. Handbook of construction tolerances. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• BCA (Building and Construction Authority) 2018. Design for manufacturing and assembly (DfMA) prefabricated mechanical, electrical, plumbing (MEP) systems. Singapore: BCA.
   Google Scholar
• BCSA (The British Constructional Steelwork Association) 2017. National structural steelwork specification (NSSS) for building construction. 6th ed. UK: BCSA.
   Google Scholar
• BIMForum 2018. Level of development (LOD) specification part I & commentary. Boston, MA: BIMForum.
   Google Scholar
• Borrmann A, Berkhahn V. 2018. Principles of geometric modeling. In: Building information modeling. New York City, NY: Springer; p. 27–41.
   Google Scholar
• Bosché F, Ahmed M, Turkan Y, Haas CT, Haas R. 2015. The value of integrating scan-to-BIM and scan-vs-BIM techniques for construction monitoring using laser scanning and BIM: The case of cylindrical MEP components. Autom Constr. 49:201–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brilakis I, Lourakis M, Sacks R, Savarese S, Christodoulou S, Teizer J, Makhmalbaf A. 2010. Toward automated generation of parametric BIMs based on hybrid video and laser scanning data. Adv Eng Infor. 24(4):456–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi JO, Chen XB, Kim TW. 2019. Opportunities and challenges of modular methods in dense urban environment. Int J Const Mgt. 19(2):93–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CONSTRUCT 2010. National structural concrete specification for building construction. 4th ed. London (UK): The Concrete Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Eastman C, Eastman CM, Teicholz P, Sacks R. 2011. BIM handbook: A guide to building information modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers and contractors. 2nd ed. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• FARO. 2019. FARO BuildIT construction software techsheet: FARO Technologies, Inc.; [accessed 2020 Nov 26]. https://insights.faro.com/buildit-construction/techsheet-faro-buildit-construction?_ga=2.89244312.2089616917.1606401423-684408283.1602100014.
   Google Scholar
• FARO. 2007. FARO laser scanner LS 840/880; [accessed 2016 Feb 2]. http://www2.faro.com/FaroIP/Files/File/Techsheets%20Download/IN_LS880.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gao T, Akinci B, Ergan S, Garrett J. 2015. An approach to combine progressively captured point clouds for BIM update. Adv Eng Infor. 29(4):1001–1012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of Ontario 2018. Building code act, 1992, S.O. 1992 c. 23.
   Google Scholar
• Grieves M, Vickers J. 2017. Digital twin: Mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems. In: Transdisciplinary perspectives on complex systems. New York City, NY: Springer; p. 85.
   Google Scholar
• Guo J, Wang Q, Park J. 2020. Geometric quality inspection of prefabricated MEP modules with 3D laser scanning. Autom Constr. 111:103053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou L, Tan Y, Luo W, Xu S, Mao C, Moon S. 2020. Towards a more extensive application of off-site construction: A technological review. Int J Const Mgt. 1–12. DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2020.1768463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwashita T, Packer JA, Oliveira J. 2012. Defect tolerance for cast steel connections in braced frames. J Struct Eng. 138(12):1455–1464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim M, Wang Q, Park J, Cheng JC, Sohn H, Chang C. 2016. Automated dimensional quality assurance of full-scale precast concrete elements using laser scanning and BIM. Autom Constr. 72:102–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson M, Ogden R, Goodier C. 2014. Design in modular construction. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lim KYH, Zheng P, Chen C. 2019. A state-of-the-art survey of digital twin: Techniques, engineering product lifecycle management and business innovation perspectives. J Intell Manuf. 18:1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Lu Q, Chen L, Li S, Pitt M. 2020. Semi-automatic geometric digital twinning for existing buildings based on images and CAD drawings. Autom Constr. 115: 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu Q, Xie X, Parlikad AK, Schooling JM. 2020. Digital twin-enabled anomaly detection for built asset monitoring in operation and maintenance. Autom Constr. 118:103277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu R, Brilakis I. 2019. Digital twinning of existing reinforced concrete bridges from labelled point clusters. Autom Constr. 105:102837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu R, Rausch C, Bolpagni M, Brilakis I, Haas CT. 2020. Geometric accuracy of digital twins for structural health monitoring. In: Bridge engineering. London, UK: IntechOpen.
   Google Scholar
• Meadati P, Irizarry J. 2010. BIM–a knowledge repository. Proceedings of the 46th Annual International Conference of the Associated Schools of Construction. Boston (MA): Associated Schools of Construction.
   Google Scholar
• Mostafa S, Kim KP, Tam VW, Rahnamayiezekavat P. 2018. Exploring the status, benefits, barriers and opportunities of using BIM for advancing prefabrication practice. Int J Const Mgt. 20(2):1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahangi M, Haas CT. 2014. Automated 3D compliance checking in pipe spool fabrication. Adv Eng Infor. 28(4):360–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen CHP, Choi Y. 2018. Comparison of point cloud data and 3D CAD data for on-site dimensional inspection of industrial plant piping systems. Autom Constr. 91:44–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noruwa BI, Arewa AO, Merschbrock C. 2020. Effects of emerging technologies in minimising variations in construction projects in the UK. Int J Const Mgt. 1–8. DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2020.1772530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochmann S, Vock R, Klein R. 2019. Automatic reconstruction of fully volumetric 3D building models from oriented point clouds. J Phot Rem Sens. 151:251–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrott A, Warshaw L. 2017. Industry 4.0 and the digital twin. Deloitte University Press; [accessed 2020 Nov 26]. https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/focus/industry-4-0/digital-twin-technology-smart-factory.html.
   Google Scholar
• Pătrăucean V, Armeni I, Nahangi M, Yeung J, Brilakis I, Haas C. 2015. State of research in automatic as-built modelling. Adv Eng Infor. 29(2):162–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rausch C, Edwards C, Haas C. 2020. Benchmarking and improving dimensional quality on modular construction Projects–A case study. Int J Ind Constr. 1(1):2–21.
   Google Scholar
• Rausch C, Haas C. 2021. Automated shape and pose updating of building information model elements from 3D point clouds. Autom Constr. 124:103561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebolj D, Pučko Z, Babič NČ, Bizjak M, Mongus D. 2017. Point cloud quality requirements for scan-vs-BIM based automated construction progress monitoring. Autom Constr. 84:323–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahin O, Miller D, Mohamed S. 2018. Value-based modelling: An Australian case of off-site manufactured buildings. Int J Const Mgt. 18(1):34–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh MM, Sawhney A, Borrmann A. 2019. Integrating rules of modular coordination to improve model authoring in BIM. Int J Const Mgt. 19(1):15–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderberg R, Wärmefjord K, Carlson JS, Lindkvist L. 2017. Toward a digital twin for real-time geometry assurance in individualized production. CIRP Ann. 66(1):137–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang P, Huber D, Akinci B, Lipman R, Lytle A. 2010. Automatic reconstruction of as-built building information models from laser-scanned point clouds: A review of related techniques. Autom Constr. 19(7):829–843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin X, Liu H, Chen Y, Al-Hussein M. 2019. Building information modelling for off-site construction: Review and future directions. Autom Constr. 101:72–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Long Y, Lv S, Xiang Y. 2016. BIM-enabled modular and industrialized construction in China. Proc. Eng. 145:1456–1461.
   Google Scholar