The impacts of social responsibility on the environmental sustainability performance of the Malaysian construction industry

References

• Abbas J. 2020. Impact of total quality management on corporate green performance through the mediating role of corporate social responsibility. J Cleaner Prod. 242:118458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abidin NZ. 2005. Using value management to improve the consideration of sustainability within construction. Loughborough: Loughborough University.
   Google Scholar
• Adeleke AQ, Bahaudin AY, Kamaruddeen AM, Bamgbade JA, Salimon MG, Khan MWA, Sorooshian S. 2018. The influence of organizational external factors on construction risk management among Nigerian construction companies. Saf Health Work. 9(1):115–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ağan Y, Kuzey C, Acar MF, Açıkgöz A. 2016. The relationships between corporate social responsibility, environmental supplier development, and firm performance. J Cleaner Prod. 112:1872–1881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad RAR, Tower G. 2011. Regulatory and industry influences on the communication of environmental information: a comparative study of top French and Australian firms. J Asia-Pacific Centre Environ Account. 17(1):5–27.
   Google Scholar
• Ajibike WA, Adeleke AQ, Mohamad F, Nawi MNM, Bamgbade JA, Riazi SRM, Ahmad MF. 2020. Achieving environmental sustainability in malaysian construction industry through institutional pressure. J Crit Rev. 7(7):1159–1167. https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.07.212.
   Google Scholar
• Alazzani A, Hassanein A, Aljanadi Y. 2017. Impact of gender diversity on social and environmental performance: evidence from Malaysia. Corp Gov. 17(2):266–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamgbade JA, Kamaruddeen AM, Nawi MNM. 2017. Malaysian construction firms’ social sustainability via organizational innovativeness and government support: The mediating role of market culture. J Cleaner Prod. 154:114–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamgbade JA, Kamaruddeen AM, Nawi MNM, Adeleke AQ, Salimon MG, Ajibike WA. 2019. Analysis of some factors driving ecological sustainability in construction firms. J Cleaner Prod. 208:1537–1545. .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansal P, Roth K. 2000. Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Acad Manag J. 43(4):717–736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA. 1986. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Personal Social Psychol. 51(6):1173–1182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brundtland GH. 1985. World commission on environment and development. Environ Policy Law. 14(1):26–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheah J-H, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Ramayah T, Ting H. 2018. Convergent validity assessment of formatively measured constructs in PLS-SEM. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag. 30(11):3192–3210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y-S, Chang C-H. 2013. The determinants of green product development performance: Green dynamic capabilities, green transformational leadership, and green creativity. J Bus Ethics. 116(1):107–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen P-H, Ong C-F, Hsu S-C. 2016. Understanding the relationships between environmental management practices and financial performances of multinational construction firms. J Cleaner Prod. 139:750–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christainsen G, Gollop FM, Haveman RH. 1980. Environmental and health/safety regulations, productivity growth, and economic performance: An assessment. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS. 2013. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad K, Morrison CJ. 1985. The Impact of Pollution Abatement Investment on Productivity Change: AnEmpirical Comparison of the US, Germany, and Canada. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan DM, Dopart P, Ferracini T, Sahmel J, Merryman K, Gaffney S, Paustenbach DJ. 2010. A cross-sectional analysis of reported corporate environmental sustainability practices. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 58(3):524–538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlsrud A. 2008. How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag. 15(1):1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dechezleprêtre A, Sato M. 2017. The impacts of environmental regulations on competitiveness. Rev Environ Econ Policy. 11(2):183–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deegan C, Gordon B. 1996. A study of the environmental disclosure practices of Australian corporations. Account Bus Res. 26(3):187–199.
   Google Scholar
• Demmerling T. 2014. Corporate Social Responsibility Overload? Intention, Abuse, Misinterpretation of CSR from the Companies ‘and the Consumers ‘Point of View. diplom. de.
   Google Scholar
• Donald SS. 2009. Green management matters only if it yieds more green: an economic/strategic perspective. Acad Manag Perspect. 23(3):5–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duanmu J, Bu M, Pittman R. 2018. Does market competition dampen environmental performance? Evidence from China. Strat Mgmt J. 39(11):3006–3030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer R, Lamond D, Haden SSP, Oyler JD, Humphreys JH. 2009. Historical, practical, and theoretical perspectives on green management. Manag Decis. 47(7):1041–1055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A. 2007. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 39(2):175–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernando Y, Jabbour CJC, Wah W-X. 2019. Pursuing green growth in technology firms through the connections between environmental innovation and sustainable business performance: does service capability matter? Resour Conserv Recycl. 141:8–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geng R, Mansouri SA, Aktas E. 2017. The relationship between green supply chain management and performance: A meta-analysis of empirical evidences in Asian emerging economies. Int J Prod Econ. 183:245–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grayson D, Hodges A. 2017. Corporate social opportunity!: Seven steps to make corporate social responsibility work for your business. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gunzler D, Chen T, Wu P, Zhang H. 2013. Introduction to mediation analysis with structural equation modeling. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 25(6):390–394.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. 2010. Multivariate data analysis: Global edition. London: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Celsi M, Ortinau DJ, Bush RP. 2010. Essentials of marketing research (Vol. 2). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Hair J, Hollingsworth CL, Randolph AB, Chong AYL. 2017. An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Ind Manag Data Syst. 117(3):442–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle C, Sarstedt M. 2016. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Risher JJ, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM. 2019. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur Bus Rev 31(1):2–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helfaya A, Moussa T. 2017. Do board’s corporate social responsibility strategy and orientation influence environmental sustainability disclosure? UK evidence. Bus Strat Env. 26(8):1061–1077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. 2015. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J Acad Mark Sci. 43(1):115–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulland J. 1999. Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strateg. Manag. J. 20(2):195–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacobucci D. 2010. Structural equations modeling: Fit indices, sample size, and advanced topics. J. Consum Psychol. 20(1):90–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam MA, Deegan C. 2008. Motivations for an organisation within a developing country to report social responsibility information: Evidence from Bangladesh. Account Audit Account J. 21(6):850–874.
   Google Scholar
• Jamali D, Karam C. 2016. CSR in developed versus developing countries: A comparative glimpse. In Research handbook on corporate social responsibility in context. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kanchan M. 2010. Weaving social responsibility with business strategy: A case study of south India paper mills. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Mgmt. 17(3):169–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kansal M, Joshi M, Batra GS. 2014. Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosures: Evidence from India. Adv Account. 30(1):217–229.
   Google Scholar
• Kenny DA, Judd CM. 1984. Estimating the nonlinear and interactive effects of latent variables. Psychol Bull. 96(1):201–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kock N. 2015. Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. Int J E-Collab. 11(4):1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai K, Wong CWY. 2012. Green logistics management and performance: Some empirical evidence from Chinese manufacturing exporters. Omega. 40(3):267–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu JY, Castka P. 2009. Corporate social responsibility in Malaysia–experts’ views and perspectives. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Mgmt. 16(3):146–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lys T, Naughton JP, Wang C. 2015. Signaling through corporate accountability reporting. J Account Econ. 60(1):56–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malaysian Company Act. 2016. Laws of Malaysia. https://www.wolterskluwer.com.my/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2017/02/Malaysia-Companies-Law_Principles-and-Practices-2017-Supplement.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Md Noor S, Rasoolimanesh SM, Jaafar M, Barghi R. 2019. Inscription of a destination as a world heritage site and residents’ perceptions. Asia Pac. J. Tour. Res. 24(1):14–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mobus JL. 2005. Mandatory environmental disclosures in a legitimacy theory context. Account Audit Account J. 18(4):492–517.
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan N, O’Dwyer B. 2009. Stakeholder perspectives on a financial sector legitimation process. Account Audit Account J. 22(4):553–587.
   Google Scholar
• Ortiz‐de‐Mandojana N, Aguilera‐Caracuel J, Morales‐Raya M. 2016. Corporate governance and environmental sustainability: The moderating role of the national institutional context. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. 23(3):150–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pogutz S. 2008. Sustainable Development, Corporate Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility: The missing link.
   Google Scholar
• Press Information Bureau (PIB). 2015. Partnering the National Agenda. Press Information Bureau, Government of India. http://pib.nic.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=120001.
   Google Scholar
• Rai S, Bansal S. 2014. An analysis of corporate social responsibility expenditure in India. Econ Polit Wkly. 49(50):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Ramayah T, Cheah J, Chuah F, Ting H, Memon MA. 2018. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using smartPLS 3.0. Kuala Lumpur: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Ringle CM, Sarstedt M, Mitchell R, Gudergan SP. 2020. Partial least squares structural equation modeling in HRM research. Int J Hum Resour Manage. 31(12):1617–1643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson MA. 2018. Using multi‐item psychometric scales for research and practice in human resource management. Hum Resour Manage. 57(3):739–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockness J, Schlachter P, Rockness HO. 1986. Hazardous waste disposal, corporate disclosure, and financial performance in the chemical industry. Adv Public Interest Account. 1(1):167–191.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Medina PS, Díaz-Pichardo R, Bautista-Cruz A, Toledo-López A. 2015. Environmental compliance and economic and environmental performance: Evidence from handicrafts small businesses in Mexico. J Bus Ethics. 126(3):381–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarstedt M, Hair JF, Ringle CM, Thiele KO, Gudergan SP. 2016. Estimation issues with PLS and CBSEM: Where the bias lies!. J Bus Res. 69(10):3998–4010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Hair JF. 2017. Partial least squares structural equation modeling. Handb Mark Res. 26(1):1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Sekaran U, Bougie R. 2016. Research methods for business: A skill building approach. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Sezer AA. 2015. Contractor use of productivity and sustainability indicators for building refurbishment. Built Environ Project Asset Manag. 5(2):141–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shmueli G, Ray S, Estrada JMV, Chatla SB. 2016. The elephant in the room: Predictive performance of PLS models. J Bus Res. 69(10):4552–4564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman MC. 1995. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Acad Mange Rev. 20(3):571–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taofeeq DM, Adeleke AQ, Ajibike WA. 2020. Human factors influencing contractors’ risk attitudes: A case study of the Malaysian construction industry. Constr Econ Build. 20(1): 96–116. https://doi.org/10.5130/AJCEB.v20i1.6735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Voorhis CRW, Morgan BL. 2007. Understanding power and rules of thumb for determining sample sizes. Tutor Quant Method Psychol. 3(2):43–50.
   Google Scholar
• Verma A, Kumar CV. 2014. An analysis of CSR expenditure by Indian companies. Indian J Corp Gov. 7(2):82–94.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner M. 2015. The link of environmental and economic performance: Drivers and limitations of sustainability integration. J Bus Res. 68(6):1306–1317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walmart. 2015. 2014 Annual Report. https://cdn.corporate.walmart.com/66/e5/9ff9a87445949173fde56316ac5f/2014-annual-report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Waris M, Liew MS, Khamidi MF, Idrus A. 2014. Criteria for the selection of sustainable onsite construction equipment. Int J Sustain Built Environ. 3(1):96–110.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson D, Lynch-Wood G, Ramsay J. 2006. Drivers of environmental behaviour in manufacturing SMEs and the implications for CSR. J Bus Ethics. 67(3):317–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yam S. 2013. The practice of corporate social responsibility by Malaysian developers. Prop Manag. 31(1):76–91.
   Google Scholar
• You D, Zhang Y, Yuan B. 2019. Environmental regulation and firm eco-innovation: Evidence of moderating effects of fiscal decentralization and political competition from listed Chinese industrial companies. J Cleaner Prod. 207:1072–1083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusliza M-Y, Norazmi NA, Jabbour CJC, Fernando Y, Fawehinmi O, Seles BMRP. 2019. Top management commitment, corporate social responsibility and green human resource management. BIJ. 26(6):2051–2078.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Lynch JG, Jr, Chen Q. 2010. Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. J Consum Res. 37(2):197–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Q, Cordeiro J, Sarkis J. 2012. International and domestic pressures and responses of Chinese firms to greening. Ecol Econ. 83:144–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Q, Cordeiro J, Sarkis J. 2013. Institutional pressures, dynamic capabilities and environmental management systems: Investigating the ISO 9000-environmental management system implementation linkage. J Environ Manage. 114:232–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoogah DB. 2014. Ingenuity spirals and corporate environmental sustainability. In: Honig B, Lampel J, Drori I, editors. Handbook of organizational and entrepreneurial ingenuity. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar