Construction claims prediction using ANN models: a case study of the Indian construction industry

References

• Abd El-Razek ME, Bassioni H, Abd El-Salam W. 2007. Investigation into the causes of claims in Egyptian building construction. In The 23rd Annual Association of Researchers in Construction Management (ARCOM) Conference, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, Belfast, UK. Citeseer, p. 147–156.
   Google Scholar
• Abdul-Malak MAU, El-Saadi MM, Abou-Zeid MG. 2002. Process model for administrating construction claims. J Manage Eng. 18(2):84–94. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2002)18:2(84).
   Google Scholar
• Acharya NK, Dai Lee Y, Man Im H. 2006. Conflicting factors in construction projects: Korean perspective. Eng Constr Architect Manage. 13(6):543–566. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699980610712364.
   Google Scholar
• Acheampong AO, Boateng EB. 2019. Modelling carbon emission intensity: Application of artificial neural network. J Cleaner Prod. 225:833–856. Elsevier,
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adrian JJ. 1988. Construction claims: a quantitative approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Akhund MA, et al. 2017. Time overrun in construction projects of developing countries. Imper J Interdisciplin Res. 3(5):124–129.
   Google Scholar
• Al Malki YM, Alam MS. 2021. Construction claims, their types and causes in the private construction industry in the Kingdom of Bahrain. Asian J Civ Eng. 22(3):477–484.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Mohsin M. 2012. Claim analysis of construction projects in Oman. Int J Adv Sci Eng Inform Technol. 2(2):73–78.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Qershi MT, Kishore R. 2017. Claim causes and types in Indian construction industry–contractor’s perspective. Am J Civil Eng Archit. 5(5):196–203.
   Google Scholar
• Al‐Sobiei OS, Arditi D, Polat G. 2005. Predicting the risk of contractor default in Saudi Arabia utilizing artificial neural network (ANN) and genetic algorithm (GA) techniques. Construct Manage Econ. 23(4):423–430.
   Google Scholar
• Apte B, Pathak S. 2016. Review of types and causes of construction claims. Int J Res Civil Eng Archit Des. 4(2):43–50.
   Google Scholar
• Assaf S, Hassanain MA, Abdallah A, Sayed AMZ, Alshahrani A. 2019. Significant causes of claims and disputes in construction projects in Saudi Arabia. BEPAM. 9(5):597–615.
   Google Scholar
• Bristow DI, Vasilopoulos R. 1995. The new CCDC 2: facilitating dispute resolution of construction projects. Construct Law J. 11:95.
   Google Scholar
• Chan EHW, Suen HCH. 2005. Dispute resolution management for international construction projects in China. Manage Decis. 43(4):589–602.
   Google Scholar
• Chaphalkar N, Iyer KC. 2014. Factors including decisions on delay claims in construction contracts for Indian scenario. CEB. 14(1):32–44.
   Google Scholar
• Chaphalkar NB, Iyer KC, Patil SK. 2015. Prediction of outcome of construction dispute claims using multilayer perceptron neural network model. Int J Project Manage. 33(8):1827–1835. Elsevier.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaphalkar NB, Sandbhor SS. 2015. Application of neural networks in resolution of disputes for escalation clause using neuro-solutions. KSCE J Civ Eng. 19(1):10–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chau KW. 2007. Application of a PSO based neural network in analysis of outcomes of construction claims. Autom Constr. 16(5):642–646.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng M-Y, Wu Y-W, Wu C-F. 2010. Project success prediction using an evolutionary support vector machine inference model. Autom Constr. 19(3):302–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung SO, Tam CM, Harris FC. 2000. Project dispute resolution satisfaction classification through neural network. J Manage Eng. 16(1):70–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung SO, Wong PSP, Fung ASY, Coffey WV. 2006. Predicting project performance through neural networks. Int J Project Manage. 24(3):207–215.
   Google Scholar
• Dief MA, Metwally A, Elsayed A. 2020. Construction claims mitigation in design and build contracts.
   Google Scholar
• Dikmen I, Birgonul MT. 2004. Neural network model to support international market entry decisions. J Constr Eng Manage. 130(1):59–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doloi H, Sawhney A, Iyer KC, Rentala S. 2012. Analysing factors affecting delays in Indian construction projects. Int J Project Manage. 30(4):479–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dvir D, Ben-David A, Sadeh A, Shenhar AJ. 2006. Critical managerial factors affecting defense projects success: A comparison between neural network and regression analysis. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 19(5):535–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Adaway IH. 2017. Review of construction contract claims, changes, and dispute resolution, 3rd edition edited by Paul Levin. J Legal Aff Disput Resolut Eng Constr. 9(4):477–479.
   Google Scholar
• El-Adaway IH, Kandil AA. 2009. Contractors’ claims insurance: A risk retention approach. J Constr Eng Manage. 135(9):819–825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Sayegh S, Ahmad I, Aljanabi M, Herzallah R, Metry S, El-Ashwal O. 2020. Construction disputes in the UAE: Causes and resolution methods. Buildings. 10(10):171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enshassi A, Choudhry RM, El-Ghandour S. 2009a. Contractors’ perception towards causes of claims in construction projects. Int J Construct Manage. 9(1):79–92.
   Google Scholar
• Enshassi A, Mohamed S, El‐Ghandour S. 2009b. Problems associated with the process of claim management in Palestine: Contractors’ perspective. Eng Constr Architect Manage. 16(1):61–72. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699980910927895.
   Google Scholar
• Farooqui RU, Azhar S, Umer M. 2014. Key causes of disputes in the Pakistani construction industry-assessment of trends from the viewpoint of contractors. Karachi, Pakistan: NED University of Engineering and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Gebken RJ, Gibson E, Groton JP. 2005. Dispute resolution transactional cost quantification: What does resolving a construction dispute really cost? In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2005: Broadening Perspectives—Proc., of the Congress. Reston, VA: ASCE; p. 889–898.
   Google Scholar
• Georgy ME, Chang L-M, Zhang L. 2005. Prediction of engineering performance: a neurofuzzy approach. J Constr Eng Manage. 131(5):548–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh YM, Binte Sa’adon NF. 2015. Cognitive factors influencing safety behavior at height: a multimethod exploratory study. J Constr Eng Manage. 141(6):04015003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh YM, Chua D. 2013. Neural network analysis of construction safety management systems: a case study in Singapore. Construct Manage Econ. 31(5):460–470.
   Google Scholar
• Hadikusumo BHW and Tobgay, S 2015. Construction claim types and causes for a large-scale hydropower project in Bhutan. J Construct Develop Countries. 20(1):49.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen S. 2016. Investigation on types and causes of construction claims in Indonesia. In Proceeding of Seminar Nasional Aplikasi Teknologi Prasarana, Wilayah IX.
   Google Scholar
• Hewitt A. 2016. Construction claims and responses: Effective writing and presentation. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hinton P, McMurray I, Brownlow C. 2014. SPSS explained. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Iyer KC, Chaphalkar NB, Joshi GA. 2008. Understanding time delay disputes in construction contracts. Int J Project Manage. 26(2):174–184.
   Google Scholar
• Jergeas GF, Hartman FT. 1994. Contractors’ construction-claims avoidance. J Construct Eng Manage. 120(3):553–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jha KN, Chockalingam CT. 2009. Prediction of quality performance using artificial neural networks: Evidence from Indian construction projects. J Adv Mgmt Res. 6(1):70–86.
   Google Scholar
• Jha KN, Chockalingam CT. 2011. Prediction of schedule performance of Indian construction projects using an artificial neural network. Construct Manage Econ. 29(9):901–911.
   Google Scholar
• Jin X-H, Zhang G. 2011. Modelling optimal risk allocation in PPP projects using artificial neural networks. Int J Project Manage. 29(5):591–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khahro SH, Ali TH. 2014. Causes leading to conflicts in construction projects: A viewpoint of pakistani construction industry. In International Conference on Challenges in IT, Engineering and Technology (ICCIET’2014) July, p. 17–18.
   Google Scholar
• Ko C-H, Cheng M-Y. 2007. Dynamic prediction of project success using artificial intelligence. J Constr Eng Manage. 133(4):316–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko C-H, Cheng M-Y, Wu T-K. 2007. Evaluating sub-contractors performance using EFNIM. Autom Constr. 16(4):525–530. Elsevier.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kululanga GK, Kuotcha W, McCaffer R, Edum-Fotwe F. 2001. Construction contractors’ claim process framework. J Constr Eng Manage. 127(4):309–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumaraswamy MM. 1998. Consequences of construction conflict: A Hong Kong perspective. J Manage Eng. 14(3):66–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le-Hoai L, Dang CN, Lee SB, Lee YD. 2019. Benchmarking claim causes against contractors in emerging markets: empirical case study. Int J Construct Manage. 19(4):307–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin P. 1998. Construction contract claims, changes & dispute resolution. American Society of Civil Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784402764. ISBN: 9780784470268.
   Google Scholar
• Levy SM. 2018. Project management in construction. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ling FYY, Liu M. 2004. Using neural network to predict performance of design-build projects in Singapore. Build Environ. 39(10):1263–1274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linoff GS, Berry MJA. 2011. Data mining techniques: for marketing, sales, and customer relationship management. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• McCord J, McCord M, Davis PT, Haran M, Rodgers WJ. 2015. Understanding delays in housing construction: evidence from Northern Ireland. J Financial Manage Property Construct. 20(3):286–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishmish M, El-Sayegh SM. 2018. Causes of claims in road construction projects in the UAE. Int J Construct Manage. 18(1):26–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narh OC, Metwally A, Elsayed A. 2015. An exploratory study of professional conflicts and disputes within the construction industry. Int J Manage Stud Res. 3(12):44–65.
   Google Scholar
• Patel DA, Jha KN. 2015. Neural network model for the prediction of safe work behavior in construction projects. J Constr Eng Manage. 141(1):04014066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajasekaran S, Pai GV. 2003. Neural networks, fuzzy logic and genetic algorithm: synthesis and applications (with cd). PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Semple C, Hartman FT, Jergeas G. 1994. Construction claims and disputes: causes and cost/time overruns. J Construct Eng Manage. 120(4):785–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soni S, Pandey M, Agrawal S. 2017. Evaluation of factors causing conflicts & dispute in construction projects by AHP & IMPI method. Int Res J Eng Technol. 4(6):2516–2520.
   Google Scholar
• Tadesse Z, Patel KA, Chaudhary S, Nagpal AK. 2012. Neural networks for prediction of deflection in composite bridges. J Constr Steel Res. 68(1):138–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripathi KK, Jha KN. 2019. An empirical study on factors leading to the success of construction organizations in India. Int J Construct Manage. 19(3):222–239.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y-R, Gibson GE. Jr, 2010. A study of preproject planning and project success using ANNs and regression models. Autom Constr. 19(3):341–346. Elsevier.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaneldin EK. 2006. Construction claims in United Arab Emirates: Types, causes, and frequency. Int J Project Manage. 24(5):453–459.
   Google Scholar