Identifying barriers to the implementation and development of sustainable construction

References

• Abdoh S. B., Ouahrani D. 2017. Sustainability practices in facility management. Qatar Univ Coll Eng. 53(4):130.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed AM. 2018. Application of value engineering approach for improving the quality and productivity of readymixed concrete used in construction and hydraulic projects, p. 52. http://www.qscience.com/doi/pdf/10.5339/qfarc.2018.EEPD52.
   Google Scholar
• Akintoye AS, Macleod MJ. 1997. Risk analysis and management in construction. Int J Proj Manag. 15(1):31–38.
   Google Scholar
• Al Attar ME, Moubarak LM, Gimaily ZHA. 2018. The current methodology of assessment of sustainable buildings in Egypt between probabilities and obstacles. JES J Eng Sci. 46(2):263–281.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Mansour A, et al. 2019. The role of inorganic polymer technology in the development of ‘green concrete’. Sustain. 10(1):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Alnaser NW. 2008. Towards sustainable buildings in Bahrain, Kuwait and United Arab Emirates. TOBCTJ. 2(1):30–45.
   Google Scholar
• Alrashed F, Asif M. 2012. Prospects of renewable energy to promote zero-energy residential buildings in the KSA. Energy Procedia. 18:1096–1105.
   Google Scholar
• Alrashed F, Asif M. 2014. Saudi building industry’s views on sustainability in buildings: questionnaire survey. Energy Procedia. 62:382–390.
   Google Scholar
• Alsanad S. 2015. Awareness, drivers, actions, and barriers of sustainable construction in Kuwait. Procedia Eng. 118:969–983.
   Google Scholar
• Altoryman A. 2014. Identification and assessment of risk factors affecting construction projects in the Gulf region: Kuwait and Bahrain The School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering. [Online]. https://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/files/54550522/FULL_TEXT.PDF.
   Google Scholar
• Apine A, Valdés FJE. 2017. Risk Management in sustainable projects in the construction industry: cases of Swedish companies. 1–80.
   Google Scholar
• Bagdad M, Mohammad MF. 2016. Green initiatives development: a case study on strategy development process (SDP) of green building-integrated energy efficiency (EE). Procedia - Soc Behav Sci. 234:372–382.
   Google Scholar
• Baglou M, Ghoddousi P, Saeedi M. 2017. Evaluation of building materials based on sustainable development indicators. JSD. 10(4):143.
   Google Scholar
• BBC.com. 2017. Qatar crisis. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-40173757.
   Google Scholar
• Berry M, Cross D, Stephens J. 2009. Changing the environment: an alternative ‘green’ concrete produced without Portland cement.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattarai P, Kumar B. 2013. Green buildings and need of its flexibility to create sustainability in every society [Online]. http://www.rspublication.com/ijeted/ijeted_index.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Burden G, Factors R. 2007. Global burden of disease and risk factors. 44(08).
   Google Scholar
• Celik K, Meral C, Petek Gursel A, Mehta PK, Horvath A, Monteiro PJM. 2015. Mechanical properties, durability, and life-cycle assessment of self-consolidating concrete mixtures made with blended portland cements containing fly ash and limestone powder. Cem Concr Compos. 56:59–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang RD, Soebarto V, Zhao ZY, Zillante G. 2016. Facilitating the transition to sustainable construction: China’s policies. J Clean Prod. 131:534–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan APC, Darko A, Ameyaw EE, Owusu-Manu DG. 2017. Barriers affecting the adoption of green building technologies. J Manage Eng. 33(3):04016057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan APC, Darko A, Olanipekun AO, Ameyaw EE. 2018. Critical barriers to green building technologies adoption in developing countries: the case of Ghana. J Clean Prod. 172(January):1067–1079.
   Google Scholar
• Charlesraj VPC. 2019. Analysis of construction material-related risks in green building projects in India.
   Google Scholar
• Cole RJ. 2005. Building environmental assessment methods: redefining intentions.
   Google Scholar
• Danciu V. 2013. The sustainable company: new challenges and strategies for more sustainability. Theor Appl Econ. 20(9):7–26.
   Google Scholar
• Darko A, Chan APC. 2017. Review of barriers to green building adoption. Sust Dev. 25(3):167–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darko A, Chan APC, Ameyaw EE, He BJ, Olanipekun AO. 2017a. Examining issues influencing green building technologies adoption: the United States green building experts’ perspectives. Energy Build. 144:320–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darko A, Chan APC, Owusu-Manu DG, Ameyaw EE. 2017b. Drivers for implementing green building technologies: an international survey of experts. J Clean Prod. 145:386–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darko A, Chan A, Yang Y, Shan M, He B, Gou Z. 2018. Influences of barriers, drivers, and promotion strategies on green building technologies adoption in developing countries: the Ghanaian case. J Clean Prod. 200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djokoto SD, Dadzie J, Ohemeng-Ababio E. 2014. Barriers to sustainable construction in the ghanaian construction industry: consultants perspectives. JSD. 7(1):134–143.
   Google Scholar
• Durst S, Zieba M. 2020. Knowledge risks inherent in business sustainability. J Clean Prod. 251:119670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elfiky U. 2011. Towards a green building law in Egypt: opportunities and challenges. Energy Procedia. 6(December 2011):277–283.
   Google Scholar
• El-Sayegh SM, Manjikian S, Ibrahim A, Abouelyousr A, Jabbour R. 2018. Risk identification and assessment in sustainable construction projects in the UAE. Int J Constr Manag. 21(4):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Goyena R, et al. 2019. Green concrete: a review of recent developments. Int J Proj Manag. 3(2):157–170.
   Google Scholar
• Goyena R, et al. 2020. Design, material properties and structural performance of sustainable concrete. Green Energy Technol. 60(3):22–32.
   Google Scholar
• Gunawardhana T. 2020. The authenticity of sustainable practices in Sri Lankan construction industry, no. October.
   Google Scholar
• Gürgün AP, Polat G, Bayhan HG. 2016. Contractor perspective on material risks in green building projects. ACE 2016 12th International Congress on Advances in Civil Engineering, 21–23 September, p. 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Gurgun AP, Bayhan HG, Polat G, Turkoglu H. 2020. Schedule risk assessment in green building projects. Proc Int Struct Eng Constr. 5(1).
   Google Scholar
• Habert G, Miller SA, John VM, Provis JL, Favier A, Horvath A, Scrivener KL. 2020. Environmental impacts and decarbonization strategies in the cement and concrete industries. Nat Rev Earth Environ. 1(11):559–573.
   Google Scholar
• Holdren JP, et al. 2000., Energy and the challenge of sustainability. In World energy assessment: energy and the challenge of sustainability. https://www.undp.org/publications/world-energy-assessmentenergy-and-challenge-sustainability.
   Google Scholar
• House a. G P, et al. 2013. Identifying, assessing, and evaluating risks affecting the educational construction projects in Saudi Arabia. Int J Proj Manag. 25(6):105–116.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang B, Tan JS. 2012. Sustainable Project Management for green construction: challenges, impact and solutions. Proceedings of the World Construction Conference 2012: Global Challenges in Construction Industry.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang BG, Ng WJ. 2013. Project management knowledge and skills for green construction: overcoming challenges. Int J Proj Manag. 31(2):272–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang BG, Shan M, Phua H, Chi S. 2017. An exploratory analysis of risks in green residential building construction projects: the case of Singapore. Sustain. 9(7):1116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang BG, Shan M, Lye JM. 2018. Adoption of sustainable construction for small contractors: major barriers and best solutions. Clean Techn Environ Policy. 20(10):2223–2237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang B-G, Tan JS. 2012. Sustainable project management for green construction. Challenges Impact Solut. June 2012 Conference: CIOB World Construction Conference 2012 in conjunction with the Joint Meeting of the CIB W107 “Construction in Developing Country, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
   Google Scholar
• Ifije O, Aigbavboa C. 2020. Identifying barriers of sustainable construction: a Nigerian case study. MATEC Web Conf. 312:04004.
   Google Scholar
• Imbabi MS, Carrigan C, McKenna S. 2012. Trends and developments in green cement and concrete technology. Int J Sustainable Built Environ. 1(2):194–216.
   Google Scholar
• Iqbal S, Choudhry RM, Holschemacher K, Ali A, Tamošaitienė J. 2015. Risk management in construction projects. Technol Econ Dev Econ. 21(1):65–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismael D, Shealy T. 2018. Sustainable construction risk perceptions in the Kuwaiti construction industry. Sustainability 10(6):1854. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061854.
   Google Scholar
• Karaca F, Guney M, Kumisbek A, Kaskina D, Tokbolat S. 2020. A new stakeholder opinion-based rapid sustainability assessment method (RSAM) for existing residential buildings. Sustain Cities Soc. 60(February):102155.
   Google Scholar
• Karji A, Namian M, Tafazzoli M. 2020. Identifying the key barriers to promote sustainable construction in the United States: a principal component analysis. Sustainability 12(5088):5088. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125088.
   Google Scholar
• Karsan KR, Hoseini AG. 2015. Investigating the effectiveness of using green concrete towards promotion of sustainable built. Univ Putra Malaysia. 8(3):49–59. [Online]. http://www.frsb.upm.edu.my/dokumen/FKRSE1_49-59.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Khan MWA, Ting NH, Kuang LC, Darun MR, Mehfooz U, Khamidi MF. 2018. Green procurement in construction industry: a theoretical perspective of enablers and barriers. MATEC Web Conf. 203:02012.
   Google Scholar
• Klufallah M, Ibrahim IS, Moayedi F. 2019. Sustainable practices barriers towards green projects in Malaysia. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci. 220(1):012053.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar M. 2007. Cements and concrete mixtures for sustainability. Proceedings of Structural Engineering World Congress, no. April. p. 15–22.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar Suman B, Srivastava V. 2015. Utilization of stone dust as fine aggregate replacement in concrete. J Multidiscip Eng Sci Technol. 2(4). ISSN: 3159-0040.
   Google Scholar
• Lam PTI, Chan EHW, Poon CS, Chau CK, Chun KP. 2010. Factors affecting the implementation of green specifications in construction. J Environ Manage. 91(2010):654–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liew KM, Sojobi AO, Zhang LW. 2017. Green concrete: prospects and challenges. Constr Build Mater. 156:1063–1095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little JC, Hester ET, Carey CC. 2016. Assessing and enhancing environmental sustainability: a conceptual review. Environ Sci Technol. 50(13):6830–6845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu R, Durham SA, Rens KL, Ramaswami A. 2012. Optimization of cementitious material content for sustainable concrete mixtures. J Mater Civ Eng. 24(6):745–753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luomi M, Crist JT, Alam B, Shakir MB. 2013. Environmental sustainability in Qatar’s education city: strategies, initiatives and education. QScience Connect. 2013(1):41.
   Google Scholar
• Maraveas C. 2020. Production of sustainable construction materials using agro-wastes. Materials. 13(2).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh RJ, Brent AC, de Kock IH. 2020. An integrative review of the potential barriers to and drivers of adopting and implementing sustainable construction in South Africa. South African J Ind Eng. 31(3):24–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer C, Vishwakarma V, Xie X, Gou Z, Lawrence T. 2020. Concrete for the new century. Green Energy Technol. 60(3):33–47.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer C. 2018. Concrete materials and sustainable development in the united states. New York, NY [Online]. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2749/101686604777963757?journalCode=tsei20.
   Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM. 1994. Risk management practices in product development companies, and their book: Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook.
   Google Scholar
• Miller SA, John VM, Pacca SA, Horvath A. 2018. Carbon dioxide reduction potential in the global cement industry by 2050. Cem Concr Res. 114(April 2017):115–124.
   Google Scholar
• Mosly I. 2015. Barriers to the diffusion and adoption of green buildings in Saudi Arabia. JMS. 5(4):104.
   Google Scholar
• Müllera HS, Breinera R, Moffatta JS, Haista M. 2014. Design and properties of sustainable concrete.
   Google Scholar
• Naik TR, Moriconi G. 2005. Environmental-friendly durable concrete made with recycled materials for sustainable concrete construction. CANMET/ACI International Symposium: Sustainable Development of Cement and Concrete.
   Google Scholar
• Naik TR. 2008. Sustainability of concrete construction. Pract Period Struct Des Constr. 13(2):98–103.
   Google Scholar
• Naseri H, et al. 2012. Sustainability risks and opportunities report: how sustainability risks and opportunities drive Board-level engagement and organisational enhancement. J Clean Prod. 12(January):10.
   Google Scholar
• Olanipekun AO. 2017. Commitment towards improving the delivery Ayokunle Olubunmi Olanipekun Keywords. Master of Technology, Quantity Surveying - The Federal University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Opoku DGJ, Ayarkwa J, Agyekum K. 2019. Barriers to environmental sustainability of construction projects. SASBE. 8(4):292–306.
   Google Scholar
• Osuizugbo IC, Oyeyipo O, Lahanmi A, Morakinyo A, Olaniyi O. 2020. Barriers to the adoption of sustainable construction. EJSD. 9(2):150–162.
   Google Scholar
• Otobo O. 2016. Risk management system to guide building construction projects in developing countries: a case study of Nigeria. (February):313. Thesis. https://wlv.openrepository.com/handle/2436/618537.
   Google Scholar
• Pade C. 2012. Equivalent performance concept - green concrete, no. March 2005, 9–11.
   Google Scholar
• Paul V, Charlesraj C, Suresh M. 2017. Analysis of construction material-related risks in green building projects in India. 5th Project Management Research & Academic Conference. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.31474.94400.
   Google Scholar
• Polat G, Turkoglu H, Gurgun AP. 2017. Identification of material-related risks in green buildings. Procedia Eng. 196(June):956–963.
   Google Scholar
• Powmya A, Abidin NZ. 2014a. Drivers for green construction in oman and its future prospects. Middle-East J Sci Res. 21(6):929–935.
   Google Scholar
• Powmya A, Abidin NZ. 2014b. The challenges of green construction in Oman. Int J Sustain Constr Eng Technol. 5(1):2180–3242. [Online]. http://penerbit.uthm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/IJSCET.
   Google Scholar
• Powmya A, Zainul Abidin N, Sakina Mokhtar Azizi N. 2019. Strategizing contractor firms to deliver green construction projects: conceptual framework. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng. 601(1):012027.
   Google Scholar
• Prum DA. 2010. Green buildings, high performance buildings and sustainable construction: does it really matter what we call them? Villanova Environ Law J. XXI(1):21–33.
   Google Scholar
• Qatar Green Building Council. 2019. Qatar green council website. https://qatargbc.org/home.
   Google Scholar
• Qatar Petroleum Health Safety and Environment Regulations and Enforcement Directorate. 2013. Sustainability in the Qatar energy and industry, 1–139.
   Google Scholar
• Rajabi M, Sardroud JM, Kheyroddin A, Branch CT, Branch CT. 2018. Green standard model using machine learning: identifying threats and opportunities facing the implementation of green building in Iran.
   Google Scholar
• Richer RA. 2014. Sustainable development in Qatar: challenges and opportunities. QScience Connect. 2014(1):22.
   Google Scholar
• Sabnis GM. 2015. Green building with concrete: sustainable design and construction. 2nd ed. https://www.routledge.com/Green-Building-with-Concrete-Sustainable-Design-and-Construction-Second/Sabnis/p/book/9781498704106.
   Google Scholar
• Safinia S, Al-Hinai Z, Yahia HAM, Abushammala MFM. 2017. Sustainable construction in sultanate of Oman: factors effecting materials utilization. Procedia Eng. 196(September):980–987.
   Google Scholar
• Saleh MS, Alalouch C. 2015. Towards sustainable construction in Oman: challenges & opportunities. Procedia Eng. 118:177–184.
   Google Scholar
• Sang P, Liu J, Zhang L, Zheng L, Yao H, Wang Y. Sep. 2018. Effects of project manager competency on green construction performance: the Chinese context. Sustain. 10(10):3406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulte J, Hallstedt SI. 2018a. Company risk management in light of the sustainability transition. Sustain. 10(11):4137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulte J, Hallstedt SI. 2018b. Sustainability risk management for product innovation. Proceedings of International Design Conference, DESIGN, vol. 1, p. 655–666,
   Google Scholar
• Schulte J. 2019. Sustainability risk management in product development companies-motivating change. Department of Strategic Sustainable Development Blekinge Institute of Technology SWEDEN.
   Google Scholar
• Shan M, Liu WQ, Hwang BG, Lye JM. 2020. Critical success factors for small contractors to conduct green building construction projects in Singapore: identification and comparison with large contractors. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 27(8):8310–8322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivakrishna A, Adesina A, Awoyera PO, Rajesh Kumar K. 2019. Green concrete: a review of recent developments. Mater Today Proc. 27(Part 1):2020.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skanska AB. 2015. Annual report 2015 we build for a better society. Annu Rep. 20. https://group.skanska.com/495459/siteassets/investors/reportspublications/annual-reports/2015/skanska-annual-report-_2015.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Smith TM, Fischlein M, Suh S, Huelman P. 2006. Green building rating systems: a comparison of the LEED and Green Globes Systems in the US FoodS3: food systems sustainable supply chain transparency view project how human brains react to environmental information on products? - Using neuro-marketing tools to assess the effectiveness of life cycle based environmental communication View project. [Online]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230838441.
   Google Scholar
• Srichandum S, et al. 2017. Strategies for promoting green building technologies adoption in the construction industry - an international study. Sustain. 2(1):36.
   Google Scholar
• Suhendro B. 2014. Toward green concrete for better sustainable environment. Procedia Eng. 95(Scescm):305–320.
   Google Scholar
• Surahyo A, et al. 2019. Factors affecting the implementation of green specifications in construction. J Sustain Dev. 4(1):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Susanti B, Filestre SFH, Juliantina I. 2019. The analysis of barriers for implementation of sustainable construction in Indonesia. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci. 396(1):012033.
   Google Scholar
• Tahmasebinia F, M.E. Sepasgozar S, Shirowzhan S, Niemela M, Tripp A, Nagabhyrava S, Mansuri k. k, Z, Alonso-Marroquin F. 2020. Criteria development for sustainable construction manufacturing in Construction Industry 4.0: theoretical and laboratory investigations. CI. 20(3):379–400.
   Google Scholar
• Tam VWY, Hao JL, Zeng SX. 2012. What affects implementation of green buildings? An empirical study in Hong Kong. Int J Strateg Prop Manag. 16(2). https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/IJSPM/article/view/4841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao X, Xiang-Yuan S. 2018. Identification of risk in green building projects based on the perspective of sustainability. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 439(3). https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/439/3/032053.
   Google Scholar
• Tran Q, Nazir S, Nguyen T-H, Ho N-K, Dinh T-H, Nguyen V-P, Nguyen M-H, Phan Q-K, Kieu T-S. 2020. Empirical examination of factors influencing the adoption of green building technologies: the perspective of construction developers in developing economies. Sustain. 12(19):8067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tunji-Olayeni PF, Mosaku TO, Oyeyipo OO, Afolabi AO. 2018. Sustainability strategies in the construction industry: implications on Green Growth in Nigeria. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci. 146(1):012004.
   Google Scholar
• United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2013. Sustainable design and green building toolkit. EPA Reg. 4(June):110.
   Google Scholar
• Wang W, Zhang S, Pasquire C. 2018. Factors for the adoption of green building specifications in China. IJBPA. 36(3):254–267.
   Google Scholar
• Wang X, Ren H, Cai W, Liu Y, Luo L. 2016. Identification of driving factors for green building development in China. OHI. 41(3):92–96.
   Google Scholar
• Wu G, Qiang G, Zuo J, Zhao X, Chang R. 2018. What are the key indicators of mega sustainable construction projects? - A stakeholder-network perspective. Sustain. 10(8):1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xuan D, Poon CS, Zheng W. 2018. Management and sustainable utilization of processing wastes from ready-mixed concrete plants in construction: a review. Resour Conserv Recycl. 136:238–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X, Zhang J, Zhao X. 2018. Factors affecting green residential building development: social network analysis. Sustain. 10(5):1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yas Z, Jaafer K. 2020. Factors influencing the spread of green building projects in the UAE. J Build Eng. 27(August 2019):100894.
   Google Scholar
• Yin B, Laing R, Leon M, Mabon L. 2018. An evaluation of sustainable construction perceptions and practices in Singapore. Sustain Cities Soc. 39:613–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaidan E, Al-Saidi M, Hammad SH. 2019. Sustainable development in the Arab world – is the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region fit for the challenge? Dev Pract. 29(5):670–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavadskas EK, Šaparauskas J, Antucheviciene J. 2018. Sustainability in construction engineering. Sustain. 10(7):2236–2237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, et al. 2019. A survey of the status and challenges of green building development in various countries. Sustain. 11(19):1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou PXW, Couani P. 2012. Managing risks in green building supply chain. Archit Eng Des Manag. 143–158. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17452007.2012.659507.
   Google Scholar
• Zou PXW, Zhang G. 2009. Identifying key risks in construction projects: life cycle and stakeholder perspectives. Int J Constr Manag. 9. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Identifying-Key-Risks-in-Construction-Projects-%3A-Zou-Zhang/40df12d22be8cb8f21a55cc5684a4bfb83654ffb.
   Google Scholar
• Zou PXW, Zhang G, Wang J. 2007. Understanding the key risks in construction projects in China. Int J Proj Manag. 25(6):601–614.
   Google Scholar
• Zou PXW, Zhang G. 2009. Managing risks in construction projects: life cycle and stakeholder perspectives. Int J Constr Manag. 9(1):61–77.
   Google Scholar