Modular method of construction in developing countries: the underlying challenges

References

• Acharya NK, Lee YD, Kim SY, Lee JC, Kim CS. 2006. Analysis of construction delay factor: a Korean perspective. In: 7th Asia Pacific Ind Eng Manag Syst Conf.; Bangkok, China; p. 883–895.
   Google Scholar
• Aigbavboa C, Oke A, Akinradewo O, Aghimien D, Okgonne S. 2019. Quality of low-income housing projects in South Africa. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng. 640(1):012029.
   Google Scholar
• Akinradewo O, Aigbavboa C, Ngwenya L, Thwala W, Ncube T. 2019. Efficiency of insurance as a risk management tool in South African construction projects. In: 14th International Conference of Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Zagreb, Croatia; p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Akinradewo O, Aghimien D, Aigbavboa C, Onyia M. 2020. Factors influencing the adoption of insurance as a risk treatment tool by contractors in the construction industry. Int J Constr Manage. 16:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Akinradewo O, Aigbavboa C, Akinradewo O. 2019. Revisiting causative factors of project cost overrun in building construction projects in Nigeria. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng. 640(1):012002. Institute of Physics Publishing: 012002.
   Google Scholar
• Akinradewo O, Oke A, Aigbavboa C, Ndalamba M. 2018. Benefits of adopting lean construction technique in the South African construction industry. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. Pretoria and Johannesburg, South Africa; p. 1271–1277.
   Google Scholar
• Aldridge G, Pasquire C, Gibb A, Blismas N. 2003. Innovation through standardization and pre-assembly: issues for benefit measurement. In: 10th Symposium Construction Innovation and Global Competitiveness; Ohio, USA. p. 71–84.
   Google Scholar
• Alwan Z, Jones P, Holgate P. 2017. Strategic sustainable development in the UK construction industry, through the framework for strategic sustainable development, using building information modelling. J Cleaner Prod. 140:349–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae B-Y, Kim K-R, Cha H-S, Shin D-W. 2012. To improve production process of the modular using the conveyor system. Korean J Constr Eng Manage. 13(5):103–112.
   Google Scholar
• Banihashemi S, Tabadkani A, Hosseini MR. 2017. Modular coordination-based generative algorithm to optimize construction waste. Procedia Eng. 180:631–639.
   Google Scholar
• Blismas N, Pasquire C, Gibb A. 2006. Benefit evaluation for off-site production in construction. Constr Manage Econ. 24(2):121–130.
   Google Scholar
• Boafo F, Kim J-H, Kim J-T. 2016. Performance of modular prefabricated architecture: case study-based review and future pathways. Sustainability (Switzerland) 8(6):558–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chew DAS, Yan S, Cheah CYJ. 2008. Core capability and competitive strategy for construction SMEs in China. Chinese Manage Stud. 2(3):203–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi JO, Chen XB, Kim TW. 2019. Opportunities and challenges of modular methods in dense urban environment. Int J Constr Manag. 19(2):93–105.
   Google Scholar
• Condit CW, Herbert G. 1979. Pioneers of prefabrication: the British contribution in the nineteenth century. Technol Culture. 20(1):206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell JW. 2014. Research design_ qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Dave M, Watson B, Prasad D. 2017. Performance and perception in prefab housing: an exploratory industry survey on sustainability and affordability. Proc Eng. 180:676–686.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey A, Drahota A. 2016. Introduction to systematic reviews. In: Cochrane training online learning module. https://training.cochrane.org/interactivelearning/module-1-introduction-conducting-systematic-reviews.
   Google Scholar
• Farfán EW. 2015. Making the temporary shelter a ‘home’. Transitional housing in Chile and Peru’. Scroope: Cambridge Archit J. 25:1–16. http://146.155.94.41/handle/11534/23636.
   Google Scholar
• Ferdous W, Bai Y, Ngo TD, Manalo A, Mendis P. 2019. New advancements, challenges and opportunities of multi-storey modular buildings – a state-of-the-art review. Eng Struct. 183:883–893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Generalova EM, Generalov VP, Kuznetsova AA. 2016. Modular buildings in modern construction. Proc Eng. 153:167–172
   Google Scholar
• Gibb AG. 1999. Off-site fabrication: prefabrication, pre-assembly and modularisation. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; p. 109–112.
   Google Scholar
• Gibb AGF, Isack F. 2003. Re-engineering through pre-assembly: client expectations and drivers. Build Res Inf. 31(2):146–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibb AGF. 2000. Client’s guide and toolkit for optimising standardisation and pre-assembly in construction. CIRIA Report CP/75. London: Construction Industry Research and Information Association.
   Google Scholar
• Goodchild CH, Glass J. 2004. Best practice guidance for hybrid concrete construction. UK: Concrete Construction.
   Google Scholar
• Goulding JS, Pour Rahimian F, Arif M, Sharp MD. 2015. New offsite production and business models in construction: priorities for the future research agenda. Archit Eng Des Manag. 11(3):163–184.
   Google Scholar
• Groak S. 1996. The idea of building: thought and action in the design and protection of buildings. J Manage Eng. 12(4):15–17.
   Google Scholar
• Hackitt J. 2018. Building a safer future - Independent Review of Building Regulations and Fire Safety. London.
   Google Scholar
• Hammad AWA, Akbarnezhad A, Wu P, Wang X, Haddad A. 2019. Building information modelling-based framework to contrast conventional and modular construction methods through selected sustainability factors. J Cleaner Prod. 228:1264–1281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homes and Community Agency. 2010. Designed for manufacture: the challenge to build a quality home for £60k, lessons learnt. London: HCA. www.designformanufacture.info.
   Google Scholar
• Hou L, Tan Y, Luo W, Xu S, Mao C, Moon S. 2020. Towards a more extensive application of off-site construction: a technological review. Int J Constr Manag. 16:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Inyim P, Ha HY, Phan L, Zhu Y, S. Chen. 2014. Integration of video image processing and BIM-based energy simulation for analyzing the impact of dynamic user patterns on building energy consumption. In: Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Construction and Real Estate Management, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE); p. 526–534.
   Google Scholar
• Javanifard N, Markert D, Strobel K, Yap J, Azari R, Dossick CS, El-Anwar O, and K. Simonen. 2013. Modular prefabricated residential construction: constraints and opportunities. Seattle (WA): Pacific Northwest Center for Construction Research and Education.
   Google Scholar
• Kamali M, Hewage K, Milani AS. 2018. Life cycle sustainability performance assessment framework for residential modular buildings: aggregated sustainability indices. Build Environ. 138:21–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamali M, Hewage K, Sadiq R. 2019. Conventional versus modular construction methods: a comparative cradle-to-gate LCA for residential buildings. Energy Build. 204:109479.109479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamali M, Hewage K. 2016. Life cycle performance of modular buildings: a critical review. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 62:1171–1183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamali M, Hewage K. 2017. Development of performance criteria for sustainability evaluation of modular versus conventional construction methods. J Cleaner Prod. 142:3592–3606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kibert CJ, Chini AR, Rumpf-Monadizadeh S, Razkenari MA, Fenner AE, Hakim H, Garg Y. 2017. Advanced topics in manufactured construction. 2nd Student ed. Gainesville: University of Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Kim H, Hwang Y, Kim K. 2014. Study on the application of multi-skilled labors to factory production process for securing economic feasibility of modular unit. Korean J Constr Eng Manage. 15(1):11–19.
   Google Scholar
• Kim H, Shin D, Cha H, Kim K. 2015. Application effect analysis of the modular construction method in the extension works. Korean J Constr Eng Manage. 16(6):101–111.
   Google Scholar
• Knaack U, Chung-Klatte S, Hasselbach R. 2012. Prefabricated systems: principles of construction. Basel, Switzerland: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Kothari CCR. 2004. Research methodology: methods and techniques. 2nd ed. New Delhi: New Age International (P) Ltd., Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson RM, Ogden RG, Bergin R. 2012. Application of modular construction in high-rise buildings. J Archit Eng. 18(2):148–154.
   Google Scholar
• Lee C-J, Lim S-H. 2012. Study on the application of modular technologies to Han-Ok. J Korean Hous Assoc. 23(4):49–57.
   Google Scholar
• Lee G-K, Lim S-H. 2011. A study on unit modular design method of urban-type housing. J Korean Hous Assoc. 22(5):101–110.
   Google Scholar
• Lee JS, Kim YS. 2017. Analysis of cost-increasing risk factors in modular construction in Korea using FMEA. KSCE J Civ Eng. 21(6):1999–2010.
   Google Scholar
• Lee Y-H, Lee D-H, Kim K-T. 2012. Considerations in the early stage of designing the unit modular building. Korean J Constr Eng Manage. 13(6):133–142.
   Google Scholar
• Lu N, Korman T. 2010. Implementation of building information modeling (BIM) in modular construction: benefits and challenges. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Construction Research Congress; p. 1136–1145.
   Google Scholar
• Lu N, Liska RW. 2008. Designers’ and general contractors’ perceptions of offsite construction techniques in the United State Construction Industry. Int J Constr Educ Res. 4(3):177–188.
   Google Scholar
• Manley K. 2008. Implementation of innovation by manufacturers subcontracting to construction projects. Eng Constr Archit Manage. 15(3):230–245.
   Google Scholar
• Modular Building Institute. 2016. Modular advantage for the commercial modular construction industry. PMC & RB Annual Statistics Data.
   Google Scholar
• Molavi J, Barral DL. 2016. A construction procurement method to achieve sustainability in modular construction. Proc Eng. 145:1362–1369.
   Google Scholar
• Musa MF, Mohammad MF, Mahbub R, Yusof MR. 2014. Enhancing the quality of life by adopting sustainable modular industrialised building system (IBS) in the Malaysian Construction Industry. Proc - Soc Behav Sci. 153:79–89.
   Google Scholar
• Myers D. 2016. Construction economics: a new approach. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Navaratnam S, Ngo T, Gunawardena T, Henderson D. 2019. Performance review of prefabricated building systems and future research in Australia. Buildings 9(2):1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Nulty DD. 2008. The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done? Assess Eval Higher Educ. 33(3):301–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oke A, Aigbavboa C, Ngema W. 2017. Adoption of smart structures for prevention of health hazards in buildings adoption of smart structures for prevention of health hazards in buildings. In: 4th International Conference on Advanced Materials, Mechanics and Structural Engineering; p. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Oke AE, Aghimien DO, Aigbavboa CO, Koloko N. 2018 Mar. Challenges of digital collaboration in the South African Construction Industry. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management; p. 2472–2482.
   Google Scholar
• Olearczyk J, Al-Hussein M, Bouferguène A. 2014. Evolution of the crane selection and on-site utilization process for modular construction multilifts. Autom Constr. 43:59–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallant J. 2011. SPSS survival manual. 4th ed. Crows Nest (Australia): Allen & Unwin. S0003497598001581 [pii].
   Google Scholar
• Palma O, Andrés A. 2010. Sustainability in prefabricated architecture - a comparative life cycle analysis of container architecture for residential structures. http://researcharchive.vuw.ac.nz/handle/10063/1486.
   Google Scholar
• Pan W, Dainty ARJ, Gibb AGF. 2004. Encouraging the appropriate use of off-site production (OSP): perspectives of designers. In: 2nd CIB SC International Symposium; p. 125–136.
   Google Scholar
• Pan W, Goodier C. 2012. House-building business models and off-site construction take-up. J Archit Eng. 18(2):84–93.
   Google Scholar
• Pan Y, Wong FKW, Hui ECM. 2011. Application of industrialized housing system in China: a Chongqing study. Springer; p. 161–168.
   Google Scholar
• Paul CA, Aghimien DO, Ibrahim AD, Ibrahim YM. 2021. Measures for curbing unethical practices among construction industry professionals: quantity surveyors’ perspective. Constr Econ Build. 21(2):1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Pisello AL, Cotana F, Nicolini A, Buratti C. 2014. Effect of dynamic characteristics of building envelope on thermal-energy performance in winter conditions: in field experiment. Energy Build. 80:218–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quale J, MJ, Eckelman KW, Williams G, Sloditskie and JB, Zimmerman 2012. Construction matters: comparing environmental impacts of building modular and conventional homes in the United States. J Ind Ecol. 16(2):243–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman MM. 2014. Challenges of implementing modern methods of construction. J Manage Eng. 30(1):69–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin HKyu, Ahn YHan. 2016. Modular building construction process development by benchmarking international best practices. Korean J Constr Eng Manage. 17(6):3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Sholanke AB, Opoko AP, Onakoya AO, Adigun TF. 2019. Awareness level and adoption of modular construction for affordable housing in Nigeria: architects’ perspective. Int J Innovative Technol Exploring Eng. 8(9):251–257.
   Google Scholar
• Srisangeerthanan S, Hashemi MJ, Rajeev P, Gad E, Fernando S. 2020. Review of performance requirements for inter-module connections in multi-story modular buildings. J Build Eng. 28(10):101087.
   Google Scholar
• Tan WCK. 2011. Practical research methods. Pearson Custom.
   Google Scholar
• van Bortel G. 2010. A Review of ‘Moving Homes: The Housing Corporation 1964–2008. Int J Hous Policy. 10(2):209–211.
   Google Scholar
• Velamati S. 2012. Feasibility, benefits and challenges of modular construction in high rise development in the United States: a developer’s perspective [Doctoral dissertation]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/77129.
   Google Scholar
• Volder A, Dvorak B. 2014. Event size, substrate water content and vegetation affect storm water retention efficiency of an un-irrigated extensive green roof system in Central Texas. Sustainable Cities Soc. 10:59–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Pan W. 2020. A hybrid coupled wall system with replaceable steel coupling beams for high-rise modular buildings. J Build Eng. 31:101355–55.101355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuni IY, Shen GQP, Mahmud AT. 2019. Critical risk factors in the application of modular integrated construction: a systematic review. Int J Constr Manage.:1–15. 623599.2019.1613212.
   Google Scholar
• Wuni IY, Shen GQ, Hwang B-G. 2020a. Risks of modular integrated construction: a review and future research directions. Front Eng Manage. 7(1):63–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuni IY, Shen GQ, Osei-Kyei R. 2020b. Quantitative evaluation and ranking of the critical success factors for modular integrated construction projects. Int J Constr Manag. 16:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Xu Z, Zayed T, Niu Y. 2020. Comparative analysis of modular construction practices in Mainland China, Hong Kong and Singapore. J Cleaner Prod. 245(11):118861.118861.
   Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Pan M, Pan W. 2019. Co-evolution through interaction’ of innovative building technologies: the case of modular integrated construction and robotics. Autom Constr. 107:102932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yong AG, Pearce S. 2013. A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials Quant Methods Psychol. 9(2):79–94.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon J, Shin D, Cha H, Kim K. 2015. A business model for application of the modular building in the rental market. Korean J Constr Eng Manage. 16(6):3–11.
   Google Scholar