Barriers and strategies for building information modelling implementation: a comparative study between New Zealand and China

References

• The 2016–2020 Development Guideline for Construction Industry Informatisation 2016. Beijing.
   Google Scholar
• Abanda FH, Tah JHM, Cheung FKT. 2017. BIM in off-site manufacturing for buildings. J Build Eng. 14:89–102.
   Google Scholar
• Agirachman FA, Putra IF, Angkawijaya A. 2018. Initial study on building information modeling adoption urgency for architecture engineering and construction industry in Indonesia. MATEC Web Conf. 147:06002.
   Google Scholar
• Ahankoob A, Manley K, Abbasnejad B. 2019. The role of contractors’ building information modelling (BIM) experience in realising the potential values of BIM. Int. J Constr Manage. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1639126.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad Z, Thaheem MJ, Maqsoom A. 2018. Building information modeling as a risk transformer: an evolutionary insight into the project uncertainty. Autom Constr. 92:103–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahuja R, Sawhney A, Jain M, Arif M, Rakshit S. 2020. Factors influencing BIM adoption in emerging markets – the case of India. Int. J Constr Manage. 20(1):65–12.
   Google Scholar
• Arsham H. 2005. Questionnaire design and surveys sampling. Baltimore, MD: University of Baltimore.
   Google Scholar
• Arunkumar S, Suveetha V, Ramesh A. 2018. A feasibility study on the implementation of building information modeling (BIM): from the architects’ & engineers' perspective. Asian J Civ Eng. 19(2):239–247.
   Google Scholar
• Azhar S. 2011. Building information modeling (BIM): trends, benefits, risks, and challenges for the AEC industry. Leadership Manage Eng. 11(3):241–252.
   Google Scholar
• Babatunde SO, Ekundayo D, Babalola O, Jimoh JA. 2018. Analysis of the drivers and benefits of BIM incorporation into quantity surveying profession: academia and students’ perspectives. JEDT. 16 (5):750–766.
   Google Scholar
• Banawi A. 2017. Barriers to implement building information modeling (BIM) in public projects in Saudi Arabia. International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics. Cham: Springer. p. 119–125.
   Google Scholar
• Benjaoran V, Bhokha S. 2010. An integrated safety management with construction management using 4D CAD model. Saf Sci. 48(3):395–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BIM Acceleration Committee. 2017. BIM in New Zealand-an industry-wide view 2017. Retrieved from https://www.eboss.co.nz/.
   Google Scholar
• Bosch-Sijtsema P, Isaksson A, Lennartsson M, Linderoth HCJ. 2017. Barriers and facilitators for BIM use among Swedish medium-sized contractors – “We wait until someone tells us to use it”. Vis Eng. 5(1):3.
   Google Scholar
• Bryde D, Broquetas M, Volm JM. 2013. The project benefits of building information modelling (BIM). Int J Project Manage. 31(7):971–980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui N. 2020. The contextual influence on building information modelling implementation: a cross-case analysis of infrastructure projects in Vietnam and Norway. In: Lecture notes in civil engineering. Vol. 54. Singapore: Springer; p. 1229–1234.
   Google Scholar
• Chen L, Wang Y, Siu MFF. 2020. Detecting semantic regions of construction site images by transfer learning and saliency computation. Autom Constr. 114:103185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chien K-F, Wu Z-H, Huang S-C. 2014. Identifying and assessing critical risk factors for BIM projects: empirical study. Autom Constr. 45:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis H, Derek T. 2015. BIM implementation in a New Zealand consulting quantity surveying practice. Int J Constr Supply Chain Manage. 5(1):1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Davies MB, Hughes N. 2014. Doing a successful research project: Using qualitative or quantitative methods. London, UK: Macmillan International Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Doan DT, GhaffarianHoseini A, Naismith N, Ghaffarianhoseini A, Zhang T, Tookey J. 2021. Examining critical perspectives on building information modelling (BIM) adoption in New Zealand. SASBE. 10(4):594–615.
   Google Scholar
• Dodge Data & Analytics. 2015. The business value of BIM in China. https://damassets.autodesk.net/content/dam/autodesk/www/solutions/building-information-modeling/bim-value/EN_Business_Value_of_BIM_In_China_SMR_(2015)FINALf.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Eadie R, Browne M, Odeyinka H, McKeown C, McNiff S. 2015. A survey of current status of and perceived changes required for BIM adoption in the UK. Built Environ Proj Asset Manage. 5(1):4–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastman C, Teicholz P, Sacks R, Liston K. 2008. BIM handbook: a guide to building information modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers and contractors. 1st ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Elmualim A, Gilder J. 2014. BIM: innovation in design management, influence and challenges of implementation. Archit Eng Des Manage. 10(3–4):183–199.
   Google Scholar
• Fiedler A, Fath B, Whittaker DH. 2021. The dominant narrative of the New Zealand–China free trade agreement: peripheral evidence, presumptive tilt and business realities. New Polit Econ. 26(3):328–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fellows R, Liu A. 2015. Research methods for construction. 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Finstad K. 2010. Response interpolation and scale sensitivity: evidence against 5-point scales. J Usability Stud. 5(3):104–110.
   Google Scholar
• Gerbov A, Singh V, Herva M. 2018. Challenges in applying design research studies to assess benefits of BIM in infrastructure projects: reflections from Finnish case studies. ECAM. 25(1):2–20.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson A. 2016. World’s biggest builder arrives in NZ for $375m in contracts. NZHERALD. Retrieved from https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/worlds-biggest-builder-arrives-in-nz-for-375m-in-contracts/J2WOQ4NPCYWAVLHVQXPUXCVWMA/.
   Google Scholar
• Hamid ABA, Taib MZM, Razak AHNA, Embi MR. 2018. Building information modelling: challenges and barriers in implement of BIM for interior design industry in Malaysia. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci. 140(1):012002.
   Google Scholar
• Hatem WA, Abd AM, Abbas NN. 2018. Barriers of adoption building information modeling (BIM) in construction projects of Iraq. EJ. 22(2):59–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong Y, Hammad A, Zhong X, Wang B, Akbarnezhad A. 2020. Comparative modeling approach to capture the differences in BIM adoption decision-making process in Australia and China. J Constr Eng Manage. 146(2):04019099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamsen J, Corley K. 2007. E-survey methodology. In Handbook of research on electronic surveys and measurements. Hershey, PA: IGI Global; p. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Jin R, Hancock CM, Tang L, Wanatowski D. 2017. BIM investment, returns, and risks in China’s AEC industries. J Constr Eng Manage. 143(12):04017089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin R, Zou PX, Li B, Piroozfar P, Painting N. 2019. Comparisons of students’ perceptions on BIM practice among Australia, China and UK. ECAM. 26 (9) :1899–1923.
   Google Scholar
• Juan YK, Shih SG, Lai WY. 2016. Building information modeling acceptance and readiness assessment in Taiwanese architectural firms. J Civ Eng Manage. 23(3):356–367.
   Google Scholar
• Kline P. 2014. An easy guide to factor analysis. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ku K, Taiebat M. 2011. BIM experiences and expectations: the constructors’ perspective. Int J Constr Educ Res. 7(3):175–197.
   Google Scholar
• Lee G, Park HK, Won J. 2012. D3 City project—economic impact of BIM-assisted design validation. Autom Constr. 22:577–586.
   Google Scholar
• Lee S, Yu J, Jeong D. 2015. BIM acceptance model in construction organizations. J Manage Eng. 31(3):04014048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Thomas Ng ST, Skitmore M, Zhang X, Jin Z. 2017. Barriers to building information modelling in the Chinese construction industry. Proc Inst Civ Eng Munic Eng. 170(2) :105–115.
   Google Scholar
• Liao L, Ai Lin Teo E. 2018. Organizational change perspective on people management in BIM implementation in building projects. J Manage Eng. 34(3):04018008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou J, Xu J, Wang K. 2017. Study on construction quality control of urban complex project based on BIM. Procedia Eng. 174:668–676.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Aires MD, López-Alonso M, Martínez-Rojas M. 2018. Building information modeling and safety management: a systematic review. Saf Sci. 101:11–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miettinen R, Paavola S. 2014. Beyond the BIM utopia: approaches to the development and implementation of building information modeling. Autom Constr. 43:84–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed AB. 2019. Applying BIM to achieve sustainability throughout a building life cycle towards a sustainable BIM model. Int J Constr Manage. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1615755.
   Google Scholar
• Mohamed E, Jafari P, Siu MFF, Abourizk S. 2017. Data-driven simulation-based model for planning roadway operation and maintenance projects. Proceedings - Winter Simulation Conference. New York City, NY: IEEE; p. 3323–3334.
   Google Scholar
• NBS. 2020. 10th Annual BIM Report. Retrieved from https://architecturaltechnology.com/uploads/assets/3f388415-32f9-408d-85cc2c1adf13d012/TheNBSBIMReport2020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Norusis MJ. 2008. SPSS 16.0 statistical procedures companion. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• NZ Government. 2006., New Zealand and China – building relationships for growth. Retrieved from https://www.beehive.govt.nz/speech/new-zealand-and-china-%E2%80%93-building-relationships-growth.
   Google Scholar
• Olanrewaju OI, Chileshe N, Babarinde SA, Sandanayake M. 2020. Investigating the barriers to building information modeling (BIM) implementation within the Nigerian construction industry. ECAM. 27(10):2931–2958.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen D, Taylor JM. 2017. Quantity take-off using building information modeling (BIM), and its limiting factors. Procedia Eng. 196:1098–1105.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers J, Preece C, Chong H-Y. 2015. Adoption of building information modelling technology (BIM): perspectives from Malaysian engineering consulting services firms. Eng Constr Archit Manage. 22(4):424–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell J, Cohn R. 2012. Likert Scale. Moscow, Russia: Book on Demand.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks R, Eastman C, Lee G, Teicholz P. 2018. BIM handbook: a guide to building information modeling for owners, designers, engineers, contractors, and facility managers. 3rd ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Sherif M, Kim KP, Tam VW, Rahnamayiezekavat P. 2020. Exploring the status, benefits, barriers and opportunities of using BIM for advancing prefabrication practice. Int. J Constr Manage. 20(2):146–156.
   Google Scholar
• Spector PE. 1994. Using self-report questionnaires in OB research: a comment on the use of a controversial method. J Organiz Behav. 15(5):385–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley R, Thurnell D. 2014. The benefits of, and barriers to, implementation of 5D BIM for quantity surveying in New Zealand. CEB. 14(1):105–117.
   Google Scholar
• Sutrisna M. 2009, May. Research methodology in doctoral research: understanding the meaning of conducting qualitative research. Proceedings of the Association of Researchers in Construction Management (ARCOM) Doctoral Workshop, in Liverpool John Moores University.
   Google Scholar
• Tan T, Chen K, Xue F, Lu W. 2019. Barriers to building information modeling (BIM) implementation in China's prefabricated construction: an interpretive structural modeling (ISM) approach. J Cleaner Prod. 219:949–959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The World Back. 2021. GDP-World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files. Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins MW. 2018. Exploratory factor analysis: a guide to best practice. J Black Psychol. 44(3):219–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Love PED, Kim MJ, Park C-S, Sing C-P, Hou L. 2013. A conceptual framework for integrating building information modeling with augmented reality. Autom Constr. 34:37–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright KB. 2006. Researching Internet-based populations: advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and web survey services. J Comput-Mediat Commun. 10(3):00–00.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu P, Jin R, Xu Y, Feng L, Dong Y, Pan Z. 2021. The analysis of barriers to BIM implementation for industrialised building construction: a China study. J Civ Eng Manage. 27(1):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Feng Y, Pienaar J, O’Brien D. 2017. Modelling paths of risks associated with BIM implementation in architectural, engineering and construction projects. Archit Sci Rev. 60(6):472–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Y. 2009. Managing business relationships in New Zealand and China. Manage Int Rev. 49(2):225–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu H. 2021. Chinese working holidaymakers in New Zealand: adaptation to work culture. Tour Cult Commun. 21(2):109–121.
   Google Scholar
• Zibran MF. 2007. Chi-squared test of independence. Alberta, Canada: Department of Computer Science, University of Calgary; p. 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Zou PX, Xu X, Jin R, Painting N, Li B. 2019. AEC students’ perceptions of BIM practice at Swinburne University of Technology. J Prof Issues Eng Educ Pract. 145(3):05019002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar