Evaluation of key performance indicators of Internet of Things and Cloud Computing for infrastructure projects in Gujarat, India through Consistent Fuzzy Preference Relations approach

References

• Al-Hogail A. 2018. Improving IoT technology adoption through improving consumer trust. Technologies. 6(3):2–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali HAEM, Al-Sulaihi IA, Al-Gahtani KS. 2013. Indicators for measuring performance of building construction companies in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. J King Saud Univ - Engin Sci. 25(2):125–134.
   Google Scholar
• Alkhater N, Wills G, Walters R. 2015. Factors affecting an organisation’s decision to adopt cloud services in Saudi Arabia. In: Awan I, Younas M, Mecella M, editors. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud; August 24–25; Rome, Italy: IEEE Computer Society. p. 553–557.
   Google Scholar
• Alkhlewi A, Walters R, Wills G. 2015. Success factors for the implementation of a private government cloud in Saudi Arabia. In: Awan I, Younas M, Mecella M, editors. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud; August 24–25; Rome. Italy: IEEE Computer Society. p. 387–390.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Mascati H, Al-Badi AH. 2016. Critical success factors affecting the adoption of cloud computing in oil and gas industry in Oman. In: Proceedings of 3rd MEC International Conference on Big Data and Smart City; March 15–16; Muscat. Oman: IEEE. p. 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Qirim N. 2011. A Roadmap for success in the clouds. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology; April 25–27; Abu Dhabi. UAE: IEEE. p. 271–275.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Sharafi MA, Arshah RA, Abu-Shanab EA. 2017. Factors affecting the continuous use of cloud computing services from expert’s perspective. In: Proceedings of TENCON 2017- IEEE Region 10 Conference; November 5–8; Penang, Malaysia: IEEE. p. 986–991.
   Google Scholar
• Amade B, Nwakanma CI. 2021. Identifying challenges of internet of things on construction projects using fuzzy approach. J Engin Project, and Production Manage. 11(3):215–227.
   Google Scholar
• Aripin I, Zawawi E, Ismail Z. 2019. Factors influencing the implementation of technologies behind industry 4.0 in the Malaysian construction industry. In: Ahnuar E, Nordin R, Yunus J, Abdul Rahman NA, editors. Proceedings of MATEC Web of Conferences; October 29–30; Johor. Malaysia: MATEC Web of Conferences. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Bajpai A, Misra SC. 2020. Identifying critical risk factors for use of digitalization in construction industry: A case study. In: Proceedings of IEEE India Council International Subsections Conference (INDISCON); October 3–4; Visakhapatnam. India: IEEE. p. 124–128.
   Google Scholar
• Baker BN, Murphy DC, Fisher D. 1983. Factors affecting project success Project management handbook. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold; p. 669–685. (Cleland DI, King WR, editors).
   Google Scholar
• Bandyopadhyay D, Sen J. 2011. Internet of things: Applications and challenges in technology and standardization. Wireless Pers Commun. 58(1):49–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee T, Sheth A. 2017. IoT quality control for data and application needs. IEEE Intell Syst. 32(2):68–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belbergui C, Elkamoun N, Hilal R. 2017. Cloud computing: Overview and risk identification based on classification by type. In: Proceedings of 3rd International Conference of Cloud Computing Technologies and Applications (CloudTech); October 24–26; Rabat, Morocco. IEEE. p. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Bello SA, Oyedele LO, Akinade OO, Bilal M, Davila Delgado JM, Akanbi LA, Ajayi AO, Owolabi HA. 2021. Cloud computing in construction industry: Use cases, benefits and challenges. Autom Constr. 122:103441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan FT, Chong AYL, Zhou L. 2012. An empirical investigation of factors affecting E-collaboration diffusion in SMEs. Int J Prod Econ. 138(2):329–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang TH, Hsu SC, Wang TC. 2013. A proposed model for measuring the aggregative risk degree of implementing an RFID digital campus system with the consistent fuzzy preference relations. Appl Math Modell. 37(5):2605–2622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang TY, Chen YT. 2009. Cooperative learning in E-learning: A peer assessment of student-centered using consistent fuzzy preference. Expert Syst Appl. 36(4):8342–8349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao RJ, Chen YH. 2007. Evaluation of e-learning material design with consistent fuzzy preference relations. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Fuzzy Systems. London, UK: IEEE. p. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Chao RJ, Chen YH. 2009. Evaluation of the criteria and effectiveness of distance e-learning with consistent fuzzy preference relations. Expert Syst Appl. 36(7):10657–10662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee S, Kar AK, Gupta MP. 2018. Success of IoT in smart cities of India: An empirical analysis. Government Inform Quarterly. 35(3):349–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F, Alonso S. 2007. Some induced ordered weighted averaging operators and their use for solving group decision-making problems based on fuzzy preference relations. Eur J Operation Res. 182(1):383–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coughlan T, Brown M, Mortier R, Houghton RJ, Goulden M, Lawson G. 2012. Exploring acceptance and consequences of the Internet of Things in the home. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom); November 20–23; Besancon, France. IEEE. p. 148–155.
   Google Scholar
• Da Xu L, He W, Li S. 2014. Internet of things in industries: A survey. IEEE Trans Ind Inf. 10(4):2233–2243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Distefano S, Merlino G, Puliafito A. 2013. Towards the Cloud of Things: Sensing and actuation as a service, a key enabler for a new cloud paradigm. In: Proceedings of 8th International Conference on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing; October 28–30; Compiegne, France. IEEE. p. 60–67.
   Google Scholar
• Dixit S, Stefańska A, Musiuk A, Singh P. 2021. Study of enabling factors affecting the adoption of ICT in the Indian built environment sector. Ain Shams Eng J. 12(2):2313–2319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Abidi KMA, Ofori G, Zakaria SAS, Mannan MA, Abas NF. 2019. Identifying and evaluating critical success factors for industrialized building systems implementation: Malaysia Study. Arab J Sci Eng. 44(10):8761–8777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emam AZ. 2013. Critical success factors model for business intelligent over ERP cloud. In: Proceedings of International Conference on IT Convergence and Security (ICITCS). Macau, China. p. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh A, Edwards DJ, Hosseini MR. 2020. Patterns and trends in Internet of Things (IoT) research: future applications in the construction industry. ECAM. 28(2):457–481.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Misra SC. 2016. Moderating effect of compliance, network, and security on the critical success factors in the implementation of Cloud ERP. IEEE Trans Cloud Comput. 4(4):440–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez A, Boukrami E, Lumsden R. 2015. Technological, organizational and environmental factors influencing managers’ decision to adopt cloud computing in the UK. J Enterprise Inform Manage. 28(6):788–807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakim IM, Singgih ML, Gunarta IK. 2021. Critical success factors for implementation of internet of things (IoT) in automotive companies: A literature review. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. Lisbon, Portugal. p. 5199–5207.
   Google Scholar
• Haponava T, Al-Jibouri S. 2012. Proposed system for measuring project performance using process-based key performance indicators. J Manage Eng. 28(2):140–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawash B, Mokhtar UA, Yusof ZM, Mukred M, Gaid ASA. 2021. Factors affecting Internet of Things (IoT) adoption in the Yemeni oil and gas sector. In: Proceedings of International Conference of Technology, Science and Administration (ICTSA). Taiz, Yemen. p. 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Hemanth G, Sidhartha C, Jain S, Saihanish P, Rohit V. 2017. AHP analysis for using cloud computing in supply chain management in the construction industry. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Conference for Convergence in Technology (I2CT); April 07–09; Mumbai, India. IEEE. p. 1228–1233.
   Google Scholar
• Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F, Chiclana F, Luque M. 2004. Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations. Eur J Oper Res. 154(1):98–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu CW, Yeh CC. 2017. Understanding the factors affecting the adoption of the Internet of Things. Technol Anal Strategic Manage. 29(9):1089–1102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussein Alghushami A, Zakaria NH, Mat Aji Z. 2020. Factors influencing cloud computing adoption in higher education institutions of least developed countries: Evidence from Republic of Yemen. Appl Sci. 10(22):8098.
   Google Scholar
• Jeyasheeli PG, Selva JVJ. 2017. An IoT design for smart lighting in green buildings based on environmental factors. In: Proceedings of 4th International Conference of Cloud Computing Technologies and Applications and 2017 4th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS); January 06–07; Coimbatore, India. IEEE. p. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Jiao Y, Wang Y, Yuan L, Li L. 2012. Cloud and SNS supported collaboration in AEC industry. In: Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design, Wuhan, China, CSCWD 2012. p. 842–849.
   Google Scholar
• Jo J, Jo B, Kim J, Kim S, Han W. 2020. Development of an IoT-Based indoor air quality monitoring platform. J Sens. 2020:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotenko I, Saenko I, Ageev S. 2015. Countermeasure security risks management in the internet of things based on fuzzy logic inference. In: Proceedings of IEEE Trustcom/BigDataSE/ISPA. p. 654–659.
   Google Scholar
• Lee JY, Lee JW, Cheun DW, Kim SD. 2009. A quality model for evaluating software-as-a-service in cloud computing. In: Proceedings of 7th ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications. Las Vegas: IEEE. p. 261–266.
   Google Scholar
• Lu S, Lin C, Tzeng G. 2009. Using consistent fuzzy preference relations to risk factors priority of metropolitan underground project. In: Proceedings of Cutting-Edge Research Topics on Multiple Criteria Decision Making proceedings Springer 20th International Conference, MCDM 2009. Chengdu/Jiuzhaigou. China. p. 833–839.
   Google Scholar
• Luqman A, Van Belle JP. 2017. Analysis of human factors to the adoption of Internet of Things-based services in informal settlements in Cape Town. In: Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Next Generation Computing Applications. USA. p. 61–67.
   Google Scholar
• Mell P, Grance T. 2011. The NIST definition of cloud computing. NIST Special Publication (NIST SP 800-145). Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. p. 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Nair KK, Pillai MM, Lefophane S, Nair HD. 2020. Adaptation of smart cities in the South African internet of things context. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Big Data, Computing and Data Communication Systems. KwaZulu Natal. South Africa: IEEE. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Oke AE, Kineber AF, Albukhari I, Othma I, Kingsley C. 2021. Assessment of cloud computing success factors for sustainable construction industry: The case of Nigeria. Buildings. 11(2):1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palacios-Marqués D, Soto-Acosta P, Merigó JM. 2015. Analyzing the effects of technological, organizational and competition factors on web knowledge exchange in SMEs. Telematics and Informatics. 32(1):23–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel DA, Kikani KD, Jha KN. 2016. Hazard assessment using consistent fuzzy preference relations approach. J Constr Eng Manage. 142(12):1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polyviou A, Pouloudi N, Rizou S. 2014. Which factors affect software-as-a-service selection the most? A study from the customer’s and the vendor’s perspective. In: Sprague R, editor. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences; January 6–9; Waikoloa. Hawaii: IEEE. p. 5059–5068.
   Google Scholar
• Porrawatpreyakorn N, Nuchitprasitchai S, Viriyapant K, Tangprasert S, Chaipunyathat A. 2019. Understanding key enablers of cloud computing adoption and acceptance over time. In: Proceedings of Research, Invention, and Innovation Congress. Bangkok. Thailand. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Qing A. 2019. Exploring the adoption of internet of things in Malaysian construction industry. Malaysia (Jaya): UniversitiTunku Abdul Rahman.
   Google Scholar
• Ranganath N, Sarkar D, Patel P, Patel S. 2020. Application of fuzzy TOPSIS method for risk evaluation in development and implementation of solar park in India. Int J Construct Manage. 1–11. DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2020.1826027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redmond A, Hore A, Alshawi M, West R. 2012. Exploring how information exchanges can be enhanced through Cloud BIM. Automation Construct. 24:175–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar D, Singh M. 2021. Development of risk index for mass rapid transit system project in western India through application of fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP). Int J Construct Manage. 21(5):439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar D, Singh M. 2022. Risk analysis by integrated fuzzy expected value method and fuzzy failure mode and effect analysis for an elevated metro rail project of Ahmedabad, India. Int J Construct Manage. 22(10):1818–1829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah MN, Dixit S, Kumar R, Jain R, Anand K. 2021. Causes of delays in slum reconstruction projects in India. Int J Construct Manage. 21(5):452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibiya M, Aigbavboa C, Thwala W. 2015. Construction projects key performance indicators: A case of South African construction industry. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Construction and Real Estate Management. Lulea. Sweden. p. 954–960.
   Google Scholar
• Silverio-Fernández MA. 2019. Implementation of smart devices in the construction industry [dissertation]. England (Wolverhampton): University of Wolverhampton.
   Google Scholar
• Singh M, Srivastava VM. 2018. Multiple regression based cloud adoption factors for online firms. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Advances in Computing and Communication Engineering; June 22–23; Durban, South Africa: IEEE. p. 147–152.
   Google Scholar
• Siregar KL, Asvial M. 2020. Analysis of IoT implementation using the dematel method and TOES framework. In: Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Mechanical, Electronics, Computer, and Industrial Technology (MECnIT). Medan, Indonesia. p. 19–23.
   Google Scholar
• Suhanto A, Hidayanto AN, Naisuty M, Bowo WA, Ayuning Budi NF, Phusavat K. 2019. Hybrid cloud data integration critical success factors: A case study at PT Pos Indonesia. In Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Informatics and Computing; October 16-17; Semarang. Indonesia: IEEE. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Tahir HM, Kamis NH, Ramli NA, Bahari UT, Anoar NLM. 2012. Criteria weights determination in choosing mathematics programme based on consistent fuzzy preference relations - A case study. In: Proceedings of Colloquium on Humanities, Science and Engineering Research. (CHUSER); Penang, Malaysia. p. 694–698.
   Google Scholar
• Tariq MI, Tayyaba S, Rasheed H, Ashraf MW. 2017. Factors influencing the cloud computing adoption in higher education institutions of Punjab, Pakistan. In Proceedings of International Conference on Communication, Computing and Digital Systems, United States C-CODE 2017. p. 179–184.
   Google Scholar
• Teh HY, Kempa-Liehr AW, Wang KIK. 2020. Sensor data quality: a systematic review. J Big Data. 7(1):1–49.
   Google Scholar
• Terrada L, Alloubane A, Bakkoury J, Khaili ME. 2018. IoT contribution in supply chain management for enhancing performance indicators. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Electronics, Control, Optimization and Computer Science (ICECOCS). Kenitra, Morocco. p. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Tongsuksai S, Mathrani S, Taskin N. 2019. Cloud enterprise resource planning implementation: A systematic literature review of critical success factors. In: Proceedings of Asia-Pacific Conference on Computer Science and Data Engineering (CSDE); December 09–11; Melbourne, Australia. IEEE. p. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Tripathi KK, Jha KN. 2018. An empirical study on performance measurement factors for construction organizations. KSCE J Civ Eng. 22(4):1052–1066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uslu BÇ, Okay E, Dursun E. 2020. Analysis of factors affecting IoT-based smart hospital design. J Cloud Comput. 9(1):1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Wang J, Lin X, Tian S. 2020. Evaluation of nationwide enterprise-starting environment based on consistent fuzzy preference relations: A case study of Daqing City. In: Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Economics and Business Management (FEBM 2020); October 17–19; Sanya, China. Atlantis Press. p. 116–124.
   Google Scholar
• Wang T, Liang J. 2006. Applying consistent fuzzy preference relations to measure user perceived service quality of information presenting web portals. In: Proceedings of the 10th WSEAS International Conference on Applied Mathematics; November 01–03; Dallas, United States. WSEAS. p. 279–285.
   Google Scholar
• Wang TC, Chang TH. 2007a. Application of consistent fuzzy preference relations in predicting the success of knowledge management implementation. Eur J Oper Res. 182(3):1313–1329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang TC, Chang TH. 2007b. Forecasting the probability of successful knowledge management by consistent fuzzy preference relations. Expert Syst Appl. 32(3):801–813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang TC, Chen YH. 2007. Applying consistent fuzzy preference relations to partnership selection. Omega. 35(4):384–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang TC, Lin YL. 2008. Applying consistent fuzzy preference relation to select merger strategy for financial organizations. In: Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics. Kunming, China: ICMLC. p. 222–227.
   Google Scholar
• Wang TC, Lin YL. 2009. Applying the consistent fuzzy preference relations to select merger strategy for commercial banks in new financial environments. Expert Syst Appl. 36(3):7019–7026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Yeo GT. 2019. Transshipment hub port selection for shipping carriers in a dual hub-port system. Maritime Policy and Manage. 46(6):701–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitmore A, Agarwal A, Xu Li D. 2014. The Internet of Things – A survey of topics and trends. Information Syst Front. 16(1):1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Yang SJ, Liao CH. 2017. A study of critical success factors on software quality assurance of cloud networking devices. In: Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Systems and Informatics. USA. p. 762–767.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao YL, Tang J, Huang HP, Wang Z, Chen TL, Chiang CW, Chiang PC. 2020. Development of IoT technologies for air pollution prevention and improvement. Aerosol Air Qual Res. 20(12):2874–2888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhihong F. 2020. Application of IoT technology in construction engineering safety management. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Urban Engineering and Management Science (ICUEMS). p. 651–656.
   Google Scholar