Optimizing the portfolio of road project stakeholders with cost and risk approach

References

• Aaltonen K. 2011. Project stakeholder analysis as an environmental interpretation process. Int J Proj Manag. 29(2):165–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aaltonen K, Jaakko K, Tuomas O. 2008. Stakeholder salience in global projects. Int J Proj Manag. 26(5):509–516.
   Google Scholar
• Abdelazeem AS, Ibrahim AH. 2022. Evaluation of project cost and schedule performance using fuzzy theory-based polynomial function. Int J Constr Manag. 22(13):2564–2576.
   Google Scholar
• Al Hattab M, Hamzeh F. 2015. Using social network theory and simulation to compare traditional versus BIM–lean practice for design error management. Autom Constr. 52:59–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An M, Baker C, Zeng J. 2005. A fuzzy-logic-based approach to qualitative risk modeling in the construction process. World J Eng. 2(1):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Assudani R, Kloppenborg TJ. 2010. Managing stakeholders for project management success: an emergent model of stakeholders. J Gen Manag. 35(3):67–80.
   Google Scholar
• Bentley C. 2010. Prince2: a practical handbook. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bourne L. 2011. Advising upwards: managing the perceptions and expectations of senior management stakeholders. Manag Decis. 49(6):1001–1023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourne L, Walker DH. 2005. Visualising and mapping stakeholder influence. Manag Decis. 43(5):649–660.
   Google Scholar
• Clarkson ME. 1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Acad Manag Rev. 20(1):92–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dadpour M. 2021. Optimization of the portfolio of stakeholders of construction projects. Iran.
   Google Scholar
• Dadpour M, Shakeri E, Nazari A. 2019. Analysis of stakeholder concerns at different times of construction projects using social network analysis (SNA). Int J Civ Eng. 17(11):1715–1727.
   Google Scholar
• Davis K. 2016. A method to measure success dimensions relating to individual stakeholder groups. Int J Proj Manag. 34(3):480–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitriou HT, Ward EJ, Wright PG. 2013. Mega transport projects – beyond the ‘iron triangle’: findings from the OMEGA research programme. Prog Plan. 86:1–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dionisio CS. 2017. A project manager’s book of forms: a companion to the PMBOK guide. Canada: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Doloi HK. 2011. Understanding stakeholders’ perspective of cost estimation in project management. Int J Proj Manag. 29(5):622–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson T, Preston LE. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Acad Manag Rev. 20(1):65–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elias AA, Cavana RY, Jackson LS. 2002. Stakeholder analysis for R&D project management. R&D Manag. 32(4):301–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fageha MK, Aibinu AA. 2013. Managing project scope definition to improve stakeholders’ participation and enhance project outcome. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 74:154–164.
   Google Scholar
• Fayek AR, Oduba A. 2005. Predicting industrial construction labor productivity using fuzzy expert systems. J Constr Eng Manag. 131(8):938–941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman RE. 2010. Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. United States of America: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn J. 2002. Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. Res Pol. 31(4):477–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heravi A, Coffey V, Trigunarsyah B. 2015. Evaluating the level of stakeholder involvement during the project planning processes of building projects. Int J Proj Manag. 33(5):985–997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho MF, Drew D, Mcgeorge D, Loosemore M. 2004. Implementing corporate ethics management and its comparison with the safety management system: a case study in Hong Kong. Constr Manag Econ. 2(6):595606.
   Google Scholar
• Holifield R, Williams KC. 2019. Recruiting, integrating, and sustaining stakeholder participation in environmental management: a case study from the Great Lakes Areas of Concern. J Environ Manag. 230:422–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang CL, Kung FH. 2010. Drivers of environmental disclosure and stakeholder expectation: evidence from Taiwan. J Bus Ethics. 96(3):435–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jergeas G, Put JV 2001. Benefits of constructability on construction projects. J Constr Eng Manag. 127(4):281–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen A, Eik-Andresen P, Ekambaram A. 2014. Stakeholder benefit assessment – project success through management of stakeholders. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 119:581–590.
   Google Scholar
• Jones TM. 1995. Instrumental stakeholder theory: a synthesis of ethics and economics. Acad Manag Rev. 20(2):404–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li CZ, Hong J, Xue F, Shen GQ, Xu X, Mok MK. 2016. Schedule risks in prefabrication housing production in Hong Kong: a social network analysis. J Clean Prod. 134:482–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li TH, Ng ST, Skitmore M. 2012. Conflict or consensus: an investigation of stakeholder concerns during the participation process of major infrastructure and construction projects in Hong Kong. Habitat Int. 36(2):333–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin X, Ho CM, Shen GQ. 2017. Who should take the responsibility? Stakeholders’ power over social responsibility issues in construction projects. J Clean Prod. 154:318–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loosemore M. 1998. Social network analysis: using a quantitative tool within an interpretative context to explore the management of construction crises. Eng Constr Archit Manag. 5(4):315–326.
   Google Scholar
• Mashwama X, Aigbavboa C, Thwala D. 2016. Investigation of construction stakeholders’ perception on the effects & cost of construction dispute in Swaziland. Procedia Eng. 164:196–205.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood DJ. 1997. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad Manag Rev. 22(4):853–886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mok KY, Shen GQ, Yang J. 2015. Stakeholder management studies in mega construction projects: a review and future directions. Int J Proj Manag. 33(2):446–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mok KY, Shen GQ, Yang RJ, Li CZ. 2017. Investigating key challenges in major public engineering projects by a network-theory based analysis of stakeholder concerns: a case study. Int J Proj Manag. 35(1):78–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okakpu A, Ghaffarianhoseini A, Tookey J, Haar J, Ghaffarianhoseini A, Rehman AU. 2022. Risk factors that influence adoption of Building Information Modelling (BIM) for refurbishment of complex building projects: stakeholders perceptions. Int J Constr Manag. 22(13):2446–2458.
   Google Scholar
• Oke AE, Arowoiya VA, Akomolafe OT. 2022. Influence of the Internet of Things’ application on construction project performance. Int J Constr Manag. 22(13):2517–2527.
   Google Scholar
• Olander S. 2007. Stakeholder impact analysis in construction project management. Constr Manag Econ. 25(3):277–287.
   Google Scholar
• Olander S, Landin A. 2005. Evaluation of stakeholder influence in the implementation of construction projects. Int J Proj Manag. 23(4):321–328.
   Google Scholar
• Olander S, Landin A. 2008. A comparative study of factors affecting the external stakeholder management process. Constr Manag Econ. 26(6):553–561.
   Google Scholar
• Pryke SD. 2004. Analysing construction project coalitions: exploring the application of social network analysis. Constr Manag Econ. 22(8):787–797.
   Google Scholar
• Reed MS, Graves A, Dandy N, Posthumus H, Hubacek K, Morris J, Prell C, Quinn CH, Stringer LC. 2009. Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. J Environ Manag. 90(5):1933–1949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage GT, Nix TW, Whitehead CJ, Blair JD. 1991. Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders. Acad Manag Perspect. 5(2):61–75.
   Google Scholar
• Sedita SR, Apa R. 2015. The impact of inter-organizational relationships on contractors’ success in winning public procurement projects: the case of the construction industry in the Veneto region. Int J Proj Manag. 33(7):1548–1562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharpe LM, Harwell MC, Jackson CA. 2021. Integrated stakeholder prioritization criteria for environmental management. J Environ Manag. 282:111719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith A, Yee SH, Russell M, Awkerman J, Fisher WS. 2017. Linking ecosystem service supply to stakeholder concerns on both land and sea: an example from Guánica Bay watershed, Puerto Rico. Ecol Indic. 74:371–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan N, Dhivya S. 2019. An empirical study on stakeholder management in construction projects. Mater Today Proc. 21:60–62.
   Google Scholar
• Tichy NM, Tushman ML, Fombrun C. 1979. Social network analysis for organizations. Acad Manag Rev. 4(4):507–519.
   Google Scholar
• Turner JR. 2009. Handbook of project-based management: leading strategic change in organizations. London: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Vukomanović M, Young M, Huynink S. 2016. IPMA ICB 4.0 – a global standard for project, programme and portfolio management competences. Int J Proj Manag. 34(8):1703–1705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia N, Zou PX, Griffin MA, Wang X, Zhong R. 2018. Towards integrating construction risk management and stakeholder management: a systematic literature review and future research agendas. Int J Proj Manag. 36(5):701–715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue H, Zhang S, Su Y, Wu Z, Yang RJ. 2018. Effect of stakeholder collaborative management on off-site construction cost performance. J Clean Prod. 184:490–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Shen GQ, Drew DS, Ho M. 2010. Critical success factors for stakeholder management: construction practitioners’ perspectives. J Constr Eng Manag. 136(7):778–786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Shen GQ, Ho M, Drew DS, Xue X. 2011. Stakeholder management in construction: an empirical study to address research gaps in previous studies. Int J Proj Manag. 29(7):900–910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang RJ. 2014. An investigation of stakeholder analysis in urban development projects: empirical or rationalistic perspectives. Int J Proj Manag. 32(5):838–849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang RJ, Shen GQ. 2014. Framework for stakeholder management in construction projects. J Manag Eng. 31(4):04014064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu T, Man Q, Wang Y, Shen GQ, Hong J, Zhang J, Zhong J. 2019. Evaluating different stakeholder impacts on the occurrence of quality defects in offsite construction projects: a Bayesian-network-based model. J Clean Prod. 241:118390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu T, Shen GQ, Shi Q, Lai X, Li CZ, Xu K. 2017. Managing social risks at the housing demolition stage of urban redevelopment projects: a stakeholder-oriented study using social network analysis. Int J Proj Manag. 35(6):925–941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan J, Chen K, Li W, Ji C, Wang Z, Skibniewski MJ. 2018. Social network analysis for social risks of construction projects in high-density urban areas in China. J Clean Prod. 198:940–961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng X, Le Y, Chan AP, Hu Y, Li Y. 2016. Review of the application of social network analysis (SNA) in construction project management research. Int J Proj Manag. 34(7):1214–1225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar