164
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Evolutionary game analysis of stakeholders in Villages-in-City reconstruction: Pazhou village as an example

, , &
Pages 31-43 | Received 24 Dec 2021, Accepted 08 Mar 2023, Published online: 02 Jun 2023

References

  • Cheng H, Lai Y, De T. 2021. Decoding the decision-making in the new wave of urban redevelopment in China: a case study of a bottom-up industrial land redevelopment in Shenzhen. Land Use Policy. 111:105774.
  • Chu XL, Shi ZJ, Yang LC, Guo SJ. 2020. Evolutionary game analysis on improving collaboration in sustainable urban regeneration: a multiple-stakeholder perspective. J Urban Plann Dev. 146(4):04020046.
  • Couch C, Sykes O, Börstinghaus W. 2011. Thirty years of urban regeneration in Britain, Germany and France: the importance of context and path dependency. Prog Plann. 75(1):1–52.
  • Couch C. 1990. Urban renewal: theory and practice. New York (NY): Macmillan.
  • González S. 2011. Bilbao and Barcelona “in motion”. How urban regeneration “models” travel and mutate in the global flows of policy tourism. Urban Stud. 48(7):1397–1418.
  • Hao P, Sliuzas R, Geertman S. 2011. The development and redevelopment of urban villages in Shenzhen. Habitat Int. 35(2):214–224.
  • Hong S, Shin E, Kim S. 2016. Effects of frequently overriding regulations on urban renewal in Seoul: a warning. J Urban Plann Dev. 142(3):04015020.
  • Huang LJ, Zheng W, Hong JK, Liu Y, Liu GW. 2020. Paths and strategies for sustainable urban renewal at the neighbourhood level: a framework for decision-making. Sustainable Cities Soc. 55:102074.
  • Jiang Y, Mohabir N, Ma R, Wu L, Chen M. 2020. Whose village? Stakeholder interests in the urban renewal of Hubei old village in Shenzhen. Land Use Policy. 91:104411.
  • Koc K, Okudan O. 2021. Assessment of life cycle risks of deconstruction in urban regeneration projects. J Constr Eng Manage. 147(10):04021137.
  • Lai SK, Ding C, Tsai PC, Lan IC, Xue M, Chiu CP, Wang LG. 2008. A game-theoretic approach to urban land development in China. Environ Plann B. 35(5):847–862.
  • Lee GKL, Chan EHW. 2008. Factors affecting urban renewal in high-density city: case study of Hong Kong. J Urban Plann Dev. 134(3):140–148.
  • Li LH, Lin J, Li X, Wu F. 2014. Redevelopment of urban village in China – A step towards an effective urban policy? A case study of Liede village in Guangzhou. Habitat Int. 43:299–308.
  • Li X, Hui ECM, Chen TT, Lang W, Guo YL. 2019. From Habitat III to the new urbanization agenda in China: seeing through the practices of the “three old renewals” in Guangzhou. Land Use Policy. 81:513–522.
  • Li X, Kleinhans R, Ham MV. 2018. Shantytown redevelopment projects: state-led redevelopment of declining neighbourhoods under market transition in Shenyang, China. Cities. 73:106–116.
  • Lin Y, Meulder BD, Wang S. 2011. Understanding the ‘village in the city’ in Guangzhou: economic integration and development issue and their implications for the urban migrant. Urban Stud. 48(16):3583–3598.
  • Lin Y, Meulder BD, Wang S. 2012. The interplay of state, market and society in the socio-spatial transformation of “villages in the city” in Guangzhou. Environ Urban. 24(1):325–343.
  • Lin YC, Lin FT. 2014. A strategic analysis of urban renewal in Taipei City using game theory. Environ Plann B Plann Des. 41(3):472–492.
  • Liu DH, Yin LJ. 2012. Equilibrium evolutionary analysis about city demolition emergency based on scenario analysis. Manage Rev. 24:156–161.
  • Liu G, Wei L, Gu J, Zhou T, Liu Y. 2020. Benefit distribution in urban renewal from the perspectives of efficiency and fairness: a game theoretical model and the government’s role in China. Cities. 96:102422.
  • Liu JK, Li GK. 2021. Comprehensive benefit evaluation on urban village micro-transformation based on extension matter-element model. Int J Constr Manage. 21(5):524–537.
  • Liu X, Huang JM, Zhu JM. 2019. Property-rights regime in transition: understanding the urban regeneration process in China – a case study of Jinhuajie, Guangzhou. Cities. 90:181–190.
  • Liu Y, Lin Y, Fu N, Geertman S, Oort FV. 2018. Towards inclusive and sustainable transformation in Shenzhen: urban redevelopment, displacement patterns of migrants and policy implications. J Clean Prod. 173:24–38.
  • Ma H, Li ST, Chan CS. 2018. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)-based assessment of the value of non-World Heritage Tulou: a case study of Pinghe County, Fujian Province. Tour Manage Perspect. 26:67–77.
  • Melo B, Cruz CO. 2017. Effect of private externalities in urban housing renewal investment: empirical assessment using a game-theory approach. J Urban Plann Dev. 143(4):04017015.
  • Meng WH, Zhu DJ, Zhou XH. 2009. Game model and empirical study of urban village reconstruction. China Anci City, 15–21.
  • Peng Y, Tian C. 2022. Removal and reconstruction: multi-period price effects on nearby housing from urban village redevelopment. Land Use Policy. 113:105877.
  • Shen TY, Yao XY, Wen FH. 2021. The Urban Regeneration Engine Model: an analytical framework and case study of the renewal of old communities. Land Use Policy. 108:105571.
  • Sun H, Wu Y, Guan N. 2014. Analysis on benefit equilibrium of stakeholders in the reconstruction of the urban village. Resour Environ. 24:284–286.
  • Tan SK, Tu S. 2009. The game theory analysis on the stakeholders involved in farmland-acquisition conflicts: taking the local government and land-lost peasants as an example. China Land Sci. 23:27–37.
  • Tang WS. 2016. Creative industries, public engagement and urban redevelopment in Hong Kong: cultural regeneration as another dose of isotopia? Cities. 56:156–164.
  • Tang ZY, Yao KM. 2009. Game relationship and strategic choice in urban village reconstruction. Hubei Soc Sci. 23:32–34.
  • Tian L, Yao ZH. 2018. From state-dominant to bottom-up redevelopment: can institutional change facilitate urban and rural redevelopment in China. Cities. 76:72–83.
  • Vandenbussche L. 2018. Mapping stakeholders’ relating pathways in collaborative planning processes; a longitudinal case study of an urban regeneration partnership. Plann Theory Pract. 19(4):534–557.
  • Wang D, Liu JK, Wang XT, Chen YJ. 2019. Cost-effectiveness analysis and evaluation of a 'three-old’ reconstruction project based on smart system. Cluster Comput. 22(S4):7895–7905.
  • Wang H, Shen Q, Tang B, Lu C, Peng Y, Tang L. 2014. A framework of decision-making factors and supporting information for facilitating sustainable site planning in urban renewal projects. Cities. 40:44–55.
  • Wang JM, Liu MD, Liu BH. 2015. Construction and verifying of benefit equilibrium model in urban village reconstruction. Areal Res Dev. 34:69–75.
  • Wang S, Yung EHK, Yu Y, Tsou JY. 2022. Right to the city and community facility planning for elderly: the case of urban renewal district in Hong Kong. Land Use Policy. 114:105978.
  • Wang YS, Li JF, Zhang GL, Li YK, Asare MH. 2017. Fuzzy evaluation of comprehensive benefit in urban renewal based on the perspective of core stakeholders. Habitat Int. 66:163–170.
  • Wu ZG, Zhou SH. 2005. Solutions to the renovation of the urban-village: balancing the interests among the municipal management urban development and inhabitants: a case study of Wenchong community in Guangzhou. Urban Stud. 12(2):48–53.
  • Yan XP, Wei LH, Zhou RB. 2004. The coordination of urban-rural relations in rapidly urbanizing areas - Taking the reconstruction of "urban villages" in Guangzhou as an example. City Plan Rev. 03:30–38.
  • Yang RJ. 2014. An investigation of stakeholder analysis in urban development projects: empirical or rationalistic perspectives. Int J Project Manage. 32(5):838–849. 2014
  • Yu T, Liang X, Shen GQP, Shi Q, Wang G. 2019. An optimization model for managing stakeholder conflicts in urban redevelopment projects in China. J Clean Prod. 212:537–547.
  • Yu T, Shen GQ, Shi Q, Lai X, Li CZ, Xu K. 2017. Managing social risks at the housing demolition stage of urban redevelopment projects: a stakeholder-oriented study using social network analysis. Int J Project Manage. 35(6):925–941.
  • Yuan DH, Bao HJ, Yau Y, Skitmore M. 2020b. Case-based analysis of drivers and challenges for implementing government-led urban village redevelopment projects in China: evidence from Zhejiang Province. J Urban Plann Dev. 146(3):05020014.
  • Yuan DH, Yau Y, Bao HJ, Lin WY. 2020a. A framework for understanding the institutional arrangements of urban village redevelopment projects in China. Land Use Policy. 99:104998.
  • Zhang J, Yang X, Wang H. 2021. Age-friendly regeneration of urban settlements in China: game and incentives of stakeholders in decision-making. Land Use Policy. 111:105745.
  • Zhang YQ, Kang S, Koo JH. 2021. 2021. Perception difference and conflicts of stakeholders in the urban regeneration project: a case study of Nanluoguxiang. Sustainability. 13(5):2904.
  • Zhang ZT, Liu Y, Liu GW. 2022. Rethinking growth coalition in urban village redevelopment: An empirical study of three villages in Zhuhai, China. Habitat Int. 121:102529.
  • Zheng HW, Shen GQ, Wang H. 2014. A review of recent studies on sustainable urban renewal. Habitat Int. 41:272–279.
  • Zhou T, Zhou Y. 2015. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of urban regeneration decision-making based on entropy weight method: case study of Yuzhong Peninsula, China. J Intell Fuzzy Syst. 29(6):2661–2668.
  • Zhou YL, Lan F, Zhou T. 2021. An experience-based mining approach to supporting urban renewal mode decisions under a multi-stakeholder environment in China. Land Use Policy. 106:105428.
  • Zhou ZH. 2014. Towards collaborative approach? Investigating the regeneration of urban village in Guangzhou, China. Habitat Int. 44:297–305.
  • Zhu XX, Xia ZL, Wang JH. 2019. Income distribution model based on risk-sharing in urban village reconstruction project. J Civ Eng Manage. 36:99–106.
  • Zhuang TZ, Qian QK, Visscher HJ, Elsinga MG, Wu WD. 2019. The role of stakeholders and their participation network in decision-making of urban renewal in China: the case of Chongqing. Cities. 92:47–58.
  • Zhuang TZ, Qian QK, Visscher HJ, Elsinga MG. 2017. “Stakeholders” expectations in urban renewal projects in China: a key step towards sustainability. Sustainability. 9(9):1640.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.